Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 11th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

City given a bumpy ride for tunnel delay



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 May 2008
CYCLING groups today hit out at the delay on work to create a new cyclepath and walkway in an abandoned railway tunnel near the city centre.
The Rodney Street tunnel in Canonmills is being re-opened after 40 years to let cyclists and walkers avoid a busy road on their way between the city centre and the city's foreshore.

But no progress has been made on the £350,000 scheme for almost
a year after work stopped amid a funding shortfall.

Transport charity Sustrans has finished reinforcement work on the tunnel – which lies between the King George V playing field and Tesco on Broughton Road – but work to create a path and light the tunnel has yet to begin.

Council chiefs today insisted the remaining money for the project has to come from the Scottish Government, something which it is working with Sustrans to achieve.

Ian Maxwell, a member of cycling pressure group Spokes, said: "This is a key link in the network of cycle paths in Edinburgh and it would be splendid to get cyclists away from what is a very busy junction.

"It is a real shame that this project appears to be falling down when much of the work has already been done. We will keep up the pressure on the council to try and get a resolution to this."

Originally built in the 19th century, it was designed to take trains from Canal Street station – on the site of Waverley Station – to the Granton ferry, before the Forth Bridge was built.

Councillor Lesley Hinds, said: "I recently visited King George V Park and was very concerned to notice that work still hasn't been started on the Rodney Street Tunnel.

"Money has already been spent on upgrading the tunnel, and all it needs is lighting, a path and some speed-calming measure at the entrance. It would be a great route if completed, and I am writing to the council's director of city development to ask why the work still hasn't started."

The tunnel's cast iron arch had deteriorated and the northern end was no longer strong enough to support the road above. The first part of work, which got under way in early 2007, was to construct a reinforced concrete arch to overcome this problem.

The path will fill a missing link in National Cycle Network route 75, which runs all the way from Glasgow to Edinburgh.

A council spokeswoman said: "It's unfortunate that no funding seems to be available to see this project through to fruition at this time. We're committed to improving access for cycling and will work with Sustrans to push this forward."

Nobody from Sustrans was available for comment.





The full article contains 455 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

PaulB,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 12:31:16
How ridiculous - why start on something you do not have the money to finish? This is typical of this council.
2

Scotish Exile,

22/05/2008 12:31:21
let the cyclists pay for it themsleves, about time they paid for something
3

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 22/05/2008 12:40:43
Cyclist pay tax #2
4

Richard Mcl,

22/05/2008 12:53:05
Do Cyclists pay road tax?- o no they dont... quick get them off the road
5

Duncan in Edinburgh,

22/05/2008 13:04:05
#4 Nobody pays road tax. Vehicle excise duty is levied on all motorised vehicles and goes into the general tax funds. The ring-fenced road fund tax was abolished in 1936, so your argument is approximately 70 years out of date.
6

Dunaskin,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 13:06:12
#4 - Not quite sure what you're trying to say, Richard. If this tunnel were open then it would get some cyclists off the road. I pay income tax, VAT, NI, excise on petrol and drink. I pay VED for my car, I pay the Council Charge (or whatever rates are called these days), and I ride a bike too. The £350k initial funding wasn't so much to open the tunnel to cyclists as to stop Broughton Road collapsing into it.
7

alex paterson,

unknown 22/05/2008 13:14:33
Stuff the cyclists,let them use their normal routes,on the pavements,BELL.
8

Cappo Del Monte,

22/05/2008 13:14:55
#4
Most are off the road anyway, causing mayhem on the pavements.Its about time the cops started charging over 16's if they get caught on the pavements, as its against the law, there again, they try their best not uphold the law
9

Cappo Del Monte,

22/05/2008 13:15:24
beaten by #7 lol
10

Incandescent,

22/05/2008 13:32:03
#5 Duncan

Hansard excerpt:

Road Fund Licence
Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many applications for road fund licences were received (a) in total and (b) by means of the internet on each working day in the two months before and including 22 March in (i) 2006, (ii) 2005 and (iii) 2004. [72592]

Dr. Ladyman: The information requested is as follows.

Vehicle relicensing Total Electronic
January, February and March 2004
10,543,187
453

January, February and March 2005
10,216,572
112,029

January, February and March 2006
10,691,531
626,817

So-called Vehicle "Excise Duty" is a cynical and, frankly, insulting renaming exercise to get around the ring-fencing implicit in the previous name of the TAX. HMRC's definition of Excise Duty is a one-off tax paid on the manufacture or import of goods. As I've said before here, if you buy a bottle of spirits and pay Excise Duty on it, you don't expect to have to pay duty every subsequent year you keep it.
11

Jenny MacArthur,

22/05/2008 13:35:55
Listening to the selfish car polluters whine is always a laugh. You don't pay a fraction of the costs you impose on the rest of us, through pollution, use of public land, deaths, injuries, and pollution-related health damage paid for invisibly by health service budgets, and so on. You're just too thick to enjoy the vast subsidies and keep quiet. Morons.
12

Dunaskin,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 13:42:27
#10 Incandescent - what is the point of the stats in your post? All it says is that more and more folk are renewing VED on-line. Wow. Big deal. What does this have to do with the half-assed approach to providing alternatives to the car, which is what the article is (mostly) about.
13

Yonthing!,

22/05/2008 14:01:34
#1 - "How ridiculous - why start on something you do not have the money to finish? This is typical of this council."

Now you know why the Trams was a bad idea - if they can't budget a simple cycle path, what chance have they got with a £545Million tram system.

Sorry, it's not a tram system, it's a tram route.
14

Duncan in Edinburgh,

22/05/2008 14:06:11
#10 The road fund licence is issued free of charge once the VED has been paid. The naming of it has no relevance to the point, which is that ring-fenced funding of roads by vehicle taxation was abolished in 1936. The "we pay road tax so they're our roads" argument has been dead for 70 years, and it is more than sad to see people like you desperately trying to resurrect it. Stop.
15

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 22/05/2008 15:19:37
If motorists were to pay the REAL cost of the burden that their chosen mode place on the country, it would be more like £4,000 "road tax" per vehicle per year.

Oh, and cyclists would actually be PAID for using their bikes LOL !
16

Incandescent,

22/05/2008 15:25:12
#12 The point is that it's a cynical exercise in renaming

#11 The facts are otherwise and this is well known within Government.

#14 Oh dear, Duncan. Let's see: " the road fund licence is issued free of charge once the VED has been paid."? Possibly your most pompous assertion to date. See the following excerpt from the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994:

1 Duty and licences

(1) A duty of excise (“vehicle excise duty”) shall be charged in respect of every mechanically propelled vehicle which is used, or kept, on a public road in the United Kingdom and shall be paid on a licence to be taken out by the person keeping the vehicle.

(2) A licence taken out for a vehicle is in this Act referred to as a “vehicle licence”.

It's clear to you precisely what "shall be paid on a licence" means, right?
17

Incandescent,

22/05/2008 15:27:58
#15 Road Raga

By the very fact that road tax is nor ring-fenced, motorists actually subsidise non-motorists. One of the big three HM Treausry dirty secrets, the other two being fags'n'booze. This is fact, not opinion or speculation.
18

Incandescent,

22/05/2008 15:29:45
...or perhaps even "HM Treasury's dirty secrets".
19

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 22/05/2008 16:02:13
#17 that is a well known myth peddled by the roads lobby to claim that the 'poor motorist' is being ripped off.
FACT - most of the roads in the UK are built and maintained by Local Roads Authorities (Councils) - paid for out of Council tax, NOT "Road tax".
Thus EVERYONE pays for roads, cyclist, driver and pedestrian.
20

Scotish Exile,

22/05/2008 16:25:39
#11

on day release from the asylum?
21

,

22/05/2008 17:00:26
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

Artemis,

22/05/2008 17:01:47
Oh, what a bunch of whingers. You don't want cyclists on the road, you don't want off-road paths for them. Make your tiny minds up, please.
23

,

22/05/2008 17:02:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

Incandescent,

22/05/2008 17:08:59
#19 Raga

Far from it; is in fact your misleading over-simplication of the funding situation that is a myth. Scottish Block funding includes consequential elements of transport funding. The Scottish Government may choose to apply some of these according to its own priorities, but large parts of it are given to local authorities within Revenue Support Grant for them to build and maintain local roads (as a statutory duty) on behalf of the SG. Unfortunately, notwithstanding their statutory duty and the COSLA agreed breakdown of RSG, local authorities may choose to apply it at their discretion (note the fiasco with Edinburgh's roads). If Council Tax is being used by LAs to build and maintain roads, it is because they have previously chosen to apply transport funds accroding to their own (usually political) priorities.
25

Incandescent,

22/05/2008 17:10:52
"according", even...
26

,

22/05/2008 17:43:17
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

Parsley Flowers,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 19:28:08
Darn cyclists polluting the atmosphere with their horrid smelling sweat and abbhorent lycra wear!
28

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 22/05/2008 19:49:07
I'm not surprised they can't finish it, they probably can't find it. Where is the King George V playing field?

I've never heard of it and it doesn't show on Multimap. Can some kind poster throw light on this playing fields' whereabouts?

29

Duncan in Edinburgh,

22/05/2008 22:13:16
#16, #29 you fail to acknowledge the central point, which is unassailable, that there has been no ring-fenced taxation system for the upkeep of road since 1936! I don't care what you call the VED, it is not ring-fenced! Therefore the assertion that motor vehicle owners pay for the upkeep of roads is simply untrue. Deal with it.
30

Friar Tuck,

22/05/2008 22:15:04
#11 & #15

In actual fact, only about 2% of the money collected from motorists is used to build roads! Also remember, if there were no roads, you would not be able to buy anything as it would not be delivered to your local shop!
31

Andrew,

22/05/2008 22:25:39
THE MOST DIRECT ROUTE FROM WAVERLEY TO LEITH/GRANTON!
Reinstate it as a TRAM LINE!!!!!
32

,

22/05/2008 23:57:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
33

Dunaskin,

Edinburgh 23/05/2008 09:41:50
#28 - Peter - the park comprises two areas. The Western is the King George V park, and borders onto Eyre Place. The Eastern part is Scotland Yard park, and is the old railway yard bounded by Royal Crescent and Summerbank - the tunnel in question exits to the NE from here. The two are managed as one by the Council, but the KGV part has additional status/protection as one of a number of such parks defined as KGV parks between the wars.
34

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 23/05/2008 12:10:03
#34 Dunaskin

Thank you for that, I was mystified as to where it was, but I think now I remember as my grandmother lived in Eyre Place when I was a child (I think I probably even played in it on occasion, but was never aware of its name).

I take it the tunnel concerned is quite lengthy. I've got to say I am not against it being used as part of a cycle path and pedestrian walkway as long as there is a suitable division to prevent accidents between walkers and cyclists.

Regards,

Peter
35

,

23/05/2008 19:34:54
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
36

jimb4abobor2,

edinburgh 24/05/2008 00:01:07
to all out there cycling is healthy,enjoyable,rewarding,social,historical and also takes in wildlife of many forms things you dont see while driving and the joy of meeting other people on your travels. I think that cycling should be premoted in edinburgh and all over scotland and U K to have paths all over city without ever touching a road = safer,cleaner,friendlier,relaxing and ozone friendly does this not propose cycling??? and yes i know what u r thinking another cycle freek well ure wrong i have a car and used it everwhere i went until last year i broke my hip and took to the bike for exercise and found it very healthy for me and i will keep it up for as long as i need to. what with todays costs and rising fuel u can now axis most shopping centres and streets by bike all u need is a back pack and ure set.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should wardens be given the power to fine drivers who double park?
Yes, there has to be some kind of deterrent.
Yes, but only if they are causing a serious obstruction.
No, it would be just another money-making exercise.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.