Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Who owns Princes Street?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 March 2008
IT is one of the world's most famous streets, attracting millions of visitors every year.
Princes Street is home to some of the country's best-known high street names, ranging from McDonald's to Jenners, Boots the chemists to Ann Summers.

Click here to open PDF map showing Princes Street property owners


Yet behind the facades, surprisingly little is known about who owns Princes Street.

Those who work with these wealthy owners are largely reluctant to speak, unwilling even to identify them publicly for fear of breaking the discreet protocol of the big money property dealers.

It is possible, though, to piece together a comprehensive picture of who owns what, with the help of land ownership records and property industry insiders.

The picture that emerges is a world dominated by multi-billion pound investment funds, but also featuring a smattering of wealthy families and individuals, including the Queen.

It offers a fascinating insight into the real life monopoly game which mega-wealthy Arab oil sheikhs are considering playing – as they weigh up plans to try to buy every building on Princes Street's north side.

Representatives of the cash-rich "sovereign funds" of some Middle East states are in talks with the city council about the possibility of such a massive investment. The funds are looking for major investment opportunities which would generate income once their oil runs out.

Property experts believe it would cost somewhere in the region of £1.5 billion to buy the whole street.

The biggest player on Princes Street – owning a series of buildings, housing seven stores and worth at least £20m – is the investment management firm PRUPIM. The global group manages more than 1000 properties across North America, Europe and Asia, worth more than £20bn. It is the only one of the current owners to have built up a portfolio of more than three Princes Street properties.

Others with significant stakes include a range of pension funds, including ones providing for the future of former miners, farmers and Nottinghamshire council workers.

The Queen – who owns the Game computer shop and Waterstone's buildings through the Crown Estate and its commissioners – is undoubtedly the best known Princes Street property owner.

The Douglas Miller family have kept a stake on the street despite selling Jenners to the House of Fraser – they still own the Mount Royal Hotel.

Business tycoon Sir Philip Green, through his Arcadia Group, is one of the few owner-occupiers on the street, with brands including Top Shop, Burton's and Dorothy Perkins, in his building at number 30-31.

The various owners, and their differing objectives, will make any attempt to buy up the entire street – or even significant stretches of it – tortuous.

Industry experts say it is easy for a wealthy investor to buy their first two properties on Princes Street, but by the time they move for a third the word is out.

Once other owners know the "new kid on the block" is trying to build a significant portfolio the asking price goes up.

Alasdair Humphery, director of capital markets at investment and property firm Jones Lang LaSalle in Edinburgh, estimates the total value of all the buildings collectively would be around £1.3bn, if they were sold individually at their current market value.

However, anyone wanting to buy a significant stretch of the street, never mind the entire parade, would have to pay significantly over that price, he warns.

"These parties have widely varying objectives. It is highly unlikely that you will get them to act in unison as every building is different, leased to a variety of traders on differing lease terms," he says.

One major problem for any potential mass buyer would be tempting some of the pensions and investment firms to sell up.

Property on Princes Street is highly desirable to them as an investment which promises a steady income and a sizeable asset on their balance sheet. The attraction of a steady rental income means some are even reluctant to develop their properties – and lose a few years of lucrative rent – even though it would ultimately add to their value.

A source close to one of the firms said: "They are an investment company, they hold on to these buildings as part of a fund, or on behalf of their clients. They wouldn't want to develop them, that's not in their interests."

Yet, despite the difficulties, there are likely to be plenty of opportunities for the Arab investors – or any other prospective buyers – to test the water.

In the last year, between ten and 15 properties are thought to have changed hands on Princes Street. It is impossible to know exactly as some deals are done privately and not made public until the official Land Registry records are updated many months later.

The T-Mobile store at number 21 sold last week for an undisclosed sum to an as yet unnamed buyer. The Orange shop at 133, which recently failed to sell at auction, is expected to be one of several to come on to the market in the coming months.

The city council has been in talks with developers, including representatives of the oil-rich funds set up by countries in the Middle East, about buying into their vision for the street.

The council wants to see Princes Street developed into a series of distinctive blocks, which collectively it describes as a "string of pearls".

Councillor Tom Buchanan, the city's economic development leader, says: "We've got to find out which owners want to work with us within the masterplan.

"I would hope that they will see the sense in developing out to get more profit in."

One of the keys to the council's argument is getting the largely unused upper levels into use, increasing the owners' rental income.

Redevco, which revamped the old C&A building, did exactly that.

Simon Smith, Redevco's managing director, believes others will follow their lead.

"The principle of bringing the top floors of buildings back into use is an excellent one," he said.

"Princes Street is such a strong location in the UK and in a global context that there will always be investors and developers wanting to do things.

"We would be very interested if we could find something we like, and that we can see a future in on a medium-long term basis."

Proof that it's possible to turn a beast into a beauty
WALTER SCOTT has shown that it is possible to buy up huge swathes of property in one prestigious Edinburgh location.

The chairman of fund managers Walter Scott & Partners started buying up and revamping properties in Charlotte Square in 1995, with the aim of re-establishing the square as the city's financial hub.

The square had slipped into a decline in the early 1990s when many of Scotland's leading professional services firms, including Shepherd & Wedderburn, Baillie Gifford, and Dundas & Wilson, began to move out.

Mr Scott thought it was disgraceful that many of the properties in the area had been allowed to fall into a dilapidated condition and claimed it was possible to turn them into top class offices.

His dream was to restore the square to how Robert Adam designed it and make it the best Georgian square in Europe.

He eventually bought and restored numbers 1-4, 9, 15-17, and 44-46 in the Square at a cost of more than £35m, establishing his own office in one of the renovated properties.






The full article contains 1244 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

eric,

06/03/2008 12:12:41
That bombs out most folk in Edinburgh then.
2

john 1,

06/03/2008 12:16:19
The owners or the occupants????
3

eric-shaun,

06/03/2008 12:24:34
Well blow me.

(no lothian this time cause I was in a hurry)
4

Sarcasm,

06/03/2008 12:44:49
2.
but they have a ned as commercial director.
5

,

06/03/2008 13:05:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

A Weegie,

The burgh 06/03/2008 13:08:38
"IT is one of the world's most famous streets"

Oh come on EEN, do you really think Princes Street is up there with Oxford or Regent Street, The Champs D'Elysee or 5th Avenue in terms of fame?
7

Edin,

06/03/2008 13:24:03
of course it is 8.. Stop being a bitter weegie !
8

Bill MacD,

06/03/2008 13:35:43
Wow, so the Evening News does employ journalists after all. Nice to see an item of real local interest with a bit of research going into it.
9

mrmoneypenny,

06/03/2008 13:56:43
The royals have there scummy hands in everything.
10

tomias,

Edinburgh 06/03/2008 14:43:08
Nationaise the lote especially our southern rock.11 quid ? Try getting in for nothing to visit the war memorial-just try.
11

blackley,

Edinburgh 06/03/2008 15:04:22
Congratulations EEN on a real bit of journalism! Watch out it doesn't catch on!
12

Scotish Exile,

06/03/2008 15:23:23
Who cares??
Princess Street is just like any other street in any other big city, it is the big institutions that own the property....big deal.....hardly worth getting worked up about!
13

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 06/03/2008 15:58:54
"IT is one of the world's most famous streets"

Correction, it WAS one of the world's most famous streets, but in the sense of being a shopping attraction is now most certainly very poor and tacky.

Visitors will still come for the views of the Castle and Princes' Street Gardens, but you can forget about the shops/shopping, they are just garbage.
14

Teofilio Cubillas,

06/03/2008 16:14:41
It's not just the shops, although they are appallingly bad. It's the whole ambience, eastern-european beggars and home grown fag-smoking, foul-mouthed, Greggs-eating, unemployed, mouth-breathing dross. I'd rather shop online.
15

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 06/03/2008 16:24:45
#17 Teofilio Cubillas

Yes 17, you're absolutely correct, I had overlooked that aspect of Princes' street and other renound areas of the Town.

By the way, you omitted pavement cyclists, they are bound to exterminate a few of our visitors and tourists. That will go down well as a tourist attraction (beats bullfighting any day).

16

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 06/03/2008 16:50:29
Sorry, I have posted a mis-spelling in #18 should read 'renowned areas' not 'renound' Meant sarcastically of course.
17

,

06/03/2008 17:02:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

Londonroadguy,

nearby 06/03/2008 17:15:14
Why don't we just forget this street as a shopping thoroughfare once and for all.In yesterdays comment someone mentioned coffee shops all the way along.I'd go even further and suggest having restaurants and using all the unused upper floors for the much needed 5*luxury hotel space.
19

lavvyhead,

Edinburgh 06/03/2008 18:07:30
Why only one s is it named after two princes or one princess by someone illeterate
20

Words of Wisdom,

On the Citylink to Glasgow 06/03/2008 19:00:33
WHO ACTUALLY CARES?????
21

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 06/03/2008 23:27:21
yea the windsors have got there little finger in the pie tell them arabs to go buy israel see where they get
22

Mr Fuzzy,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 03:40:31
#21
Because the upper floors of these buildings have narrow corridors and awkward steps between different rooms. Not suitable for disabled people. It's the same with most Victorian properties all across the country, especially hotels.

It's interesting to see that the city council was proposing would raid the pension schemes of other councils and hand the money over to arab investors through the use of compulsory purchase orders.

Very informative article.
23

John N,

Edinburgh 07/03/2008 17:51:02
C'mon. It's not that exciting. Who owns Princes Street is publicly available information. So its a mixture of investment funds, the Crown Estates, and a retail owner-occupier. Is that really so surprising? It's probably similar to any major city shopping street.
24

puskas,

East kilbride 07/03/2008 22:01:03
No23..

Not me
25

11+failed,

the pans 28/04/2008 15:20:17
All talk about Arabs and anonymous investment funds. Biggest owner with three properties PRUPIM. I don't supppose that is the man from our very own PRU? ie Prudential Property Investment Management

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.