Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 3rd July 2009 Change Date

Which is the greatest game your team has ever played?

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Robert's on run to get drink-drive message across



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 January 2008
IT will be the hardest run Robert Henderson has ever attempted. The 400-mile journey from Edinburgh to Stevenage will take three weeks, with the 46-year-old covering 20 miles a day.
But it is not the physical exertion that will take the greatest toll on Robert as he pounds the streets. It is the time he spends thinking about his brother Shaun and how he was killed by a drink-driver that will make the challenge so hard.

Social worker Robert decided to undertake the run to raise awareness of the damage caused by drink-driving.

Shaun was killed a year ago in Stevenage when a van driver, who had been drinking ran into him, knocking him off his scooter. The father-of-four died from his injuries on January 3 last year.

Shaun, 43, was born and raised in Edinburgh before moving to England 12 years ago. A devoted father and lifelong Hibs fan, he was working as a chef at the time of his death.

His partner Angie Archer has been left to bring up their two children, aged one and two, on her own. The couple hoped to marry last year, and were discussing moving back to Edinburgh. Shaun also had two children from previous relationships.

The driver of the van, Daniel Ellis, 28, was found to have a blood alcohol level twice the legal limit. He was sentenced to two years in prison last September and banned from driving for four years.

Robert, who works at Castlebrae Community High School, said it would be a very emotional journey. He said: "I wanted to do something positive to remember Shaun. It's desperately hard for all the family at the moment.

"It's especially difficult for Angie. She's trying to cope but it's been a horrible year. She's really struggling emotionally and physically. It's all so tragic.

"The grief has been tinged with anger. Every time I see his children I think they've been robbed of their dad. We were shocked when we were told the driver could be out of prison in a year. Nothing can bring my brother back, but something doesn't seem right."

Robert will wear T-shirts publicising his message. The family have written to MSPs calling for the drink-drive limit to be lowered, and say there should be "zero tolerance" of drink-drivers.

Robert, from Piershill, has already run 13 marathons and takes part in the Seven Hills of Edinburgh Race most years. He's looking for sponsorship to cover accommodation and other costs, and will raise money for charity.

He is currently planning his route, which he hopes to complete in the school summer holidays.

He said: "I'm confident I'll be able to cover 20 miles a day, running five or six hours daily.

"If you've got a mission, you gain what you need to finish it. It'll be the most difficult thing I've ever done, but I'm determined to do it. It'll get quite emotional when I get to the place where he died."

Robert hopes friends, family and other campaigners will join him on parts of his journey. He said: "There are thousands of families who have been affected by drink-related road accidents, and it would be great if some of them wanted to take part.

"I think Shaun would be saying: 'You're mental Robert – but I love you for it.'"

The full article contains 573 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 13:33:34
I admire him for what he is doing, however I vehemently disagree with his proposals for a zero limit.

His brother was killed by someone who was completely drunk and as a result was incapable of driving properly. Patently avoidable as this was, it is certainly not justification for a zero limit, or even for a reduction in the limit as it stands.

If this driver had been within the existing limit, the chances are that Robert's brother would still be alive today because the incident would not have occured. What happened was that this irresponsible idiot got hammered and drove in complete disregard of the law. this would have happened regardless of the limit.

It's very easy to get emotional about this kind of thing and is in many ways understandable. However, the lowering of the drink limit would serve no other purpose than to criminalise millions of perfectly safe drivers---and that is simply not right.
2

hermione g,

11/01/2008 14:29:30
There are several good reasons for a lower, or zero limit.

Any amount of alcohol impairs your reaction time. Even if you're under the limit, it increases the chances of an accident, particularly in difficult conditions.

Most people find it hard to judge how much they can safely drink and drive, as everybody's body takes different amounts of time to break down alcohol. Avoiding alcohol completely when you are going to drive is the only safe advice.

Surely it is worth it if it prevents more tragedies like this one?
3

,

11/01/2008 14:57:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 16:39:05
Hermione:

No, it's not worth it under any circumstances. Nothing is ever worth blanket, knee-jerk reactions. If that seems a bit harsh, let me explain.

For a start, driving is not about reaction times. If you were to set off down the road in your car, driving just on your reactions, you would crash before you recahed the end of the road. Driving is about all kinds of factors but mainly about anticipation. This is not affected very much by moderate amounts of drink.

In any case, rather than theorising, let's look at the facts (excuse me for not quoting exact figures, but I don't have them to hand). Out of the number of crashes over a given period, only a small percentage of them involved a driver who had been drinking. Out of that small percentage, a small percentage involved drivers who were over the limit. Out of that percentage, a small percenage of incidents were directly attributable to the fact that the driver had been drinking. In these cases, the driver was usually well above the limit.

Therefore, only a tiny percentage of incidents were actually caused by a driver being drunk. More incidents are actually caused by drunkk pedestrians but that is another subject.

What a zero limit would do is to criminalise millions of drivers who are currently perfectly safe whilst having absolutely no effect on the status quo. Where is the justificatio nin that? There isn't any at all.

You should never drive if unfit to do so for any reason. A better way of measuring fitness to drive is by means of a driving simulator test coupled with tiered licences.
5

hendo16,

edinburgh 11/01/2008 17:07:32
After reading the comments made from 'Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head' I can assume that he/she has NEVER lost anyone close to them in this way. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but as a member of Shaun's family I am deeply sadened to see that this person thinks it is ok to have any amount of alcohol in their system whilst driving. Daniel Ellis was not 'completely drunk' but over the limit all the same. Why can't there be a zero limit? My family are devastated by Shaun's death and it is only until you become emotionally involved that you realise how shocking people's attitude is towards drinking in general. I am unable to explain how much pain my family are experiencing at this time and I really feel that by having a zero limit it protects more people from the distressing and shattering effects that drink driving has. For more information on drink driving facts and figures I suggest that you visit CADD (Campaign Against Drink Driving)website.
6

hendo16,

11/01/2008 17:18:41
Here are some of the statistics that you didn't have to hand 'Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head';
On average 3,000 people are killed or seriously injured each year in drink drive collisions.
Nearly one in six of all deaths on the road involve drivers who are over the legal alcohol limit.
On average 100,000 drivers are convicted every year for drink driving.
Drinking and driving occurs across a wide range of age groups but particularly among young men aged 17-29. There is no failsafe guide as to how to stay under the legal alcohol limit or how much you can drink and still drive safely.

Alcohol can slow down reactions by 10% to 30%

'steer clear'


7

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 11/01/2008 17:58:20
Hendo,

I'm not going to get into an argument about statistics because I don't have my sources to hand at present but I can assure you that they are true facts.

Whilst I can sympathise entirely with your loss and completely agree that the driver should not have been on the road, I still do not see that this is in any way a justification to clamp down on everyone. I can also understand that you are emotionally involved here and I am not but sometimes you need to be emotionally detached to see things objectively.

Millions of motorists drive millions of miles every day in this country in perfect safety, having had a drink but still within the legal limit. Their driving is not affected adversely. The point at which driving starts to be adversly affected is generally around the legal limit as it stands.

You will probably disagree with me when I say that the drink-drive laws in this country work. The bottom line is the fact that the driver was breaking the law. The law is in place. He broke it. The consequences were tragic. I hope he is never allowed to drive again.

No matter how strongly you feel about something like this, it simply doesn't make sense to move the goal posts and dramatically affect millions of people just because one person broke the law and it ended in tragedy. If he had not broken the law, we would probably not be having this conversation.
8

islandboy,

edinburgh 11/01/2008 18:03:19
Good on you hendo16. Alternative Fuel head seems to lack any tact or sense. I'm glad you put him in his place. Zero tolerance is the way to go, drinkers would then know exactly where they stood, have a drink by all means, but do not drive after!
9

hendo16,

11/01/2008 19:06:06
thank you island boy and WeeG!

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head I am not arguing with you. I just feel strongly on this matter! I feel that being emotionally involved has allowed me to see what a problem we have with Drink Driving in the UK. I find it interesting to see other people's views on this situation so cheers!

10

roberto,

11/01/2008 20:58:51
good luck robert
11

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 12/01/2008 00:02:04
its.tough.over.here.you.do.the.cime.you.do.the.time
12

Haggis MacBagpipes,

Central Canada ex-Perth & Glesca' 15/01/2008 18:02:14
#1 and #7
You are wrong, very very wrong!

By your definition even the Police are wrong?
I don't think so...

"IF YOU INTEND TO DRINK, DON'T DRIVE!"
-----------
Haggis MacBagpipes™©

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.