Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008 Change Date

Life & Style - inside your Evening News every Thursday

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Pubs fear extra round of costs will push them over the limit



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 May 2008
A SCHEME that would see businesses pay additional rates to fund better public services will be too much of a burden on hard-pressed bars and restaurants, according to pub leaders.
All businesses between Princes Street and George Street are currently voting on whether they want a business improvement district scheme (BID), which would see them pay an additional one per cent levy to create a £1 million spending pot.

But the Scottish Beer and Pub Association (SBPA) said its pubs have already been hit by a series of additional charges and cannot afford to pay more.

Patrick Browne, the SBPA's chief executive, said: "We are happy to support the BID generally when there are tangible benefits to our members.

"But in Scotland, and in Edinburgh in particular, there are so many other things happening. Licence fees have increased quite steeply, at the same time as the BID proposal. We are also waiting for the Scottish Government's 'polluter pays' legislation in June that could be costly for our members.

"Lots of licensed traders are just scratching their heads asking how they'll afford it. The BID could be just another expense for them."

Under the recent licensing regulations, a firm with a rateable value of between £70,000 and £140,000 would pay £1700 for an initial licence application and up to £700 for its annual fee.

Under the BID, they would pay an additional annual levy of between £700 and £1400.

The proposals would see the money, which amounts to just under £1m a year, being spent on a range of areas including "welcoming wardens" to help visitors to the city centre, advertising and marketing of the area, teams to tackle cleanliness issues, parking promotions and events.

A total of 570 businesses will be eligible to vote in the BID ballot, which will run until May 23. The amount of people that have voted has already passed the compulsory 25 per cent mark that means it will be statutory. But it is estimated that as many as two thirds of firms have yet to vote.

Edinburgh City Centre Management Company, the firm charged with setting up the BID, to be called Essential Edinburgh, said that three of its main supporters are among the biggest figures in the licensed trade.

David Withers of Montpelier Group and Saltire Taverns managing director Tony McGrath have both come out in support.

Abbotsford and Guildford bar owner David Stewart is also an adviser for Essential Edinburgh.

A spokesman for Essential Edinburgh said: "The BID is there to encourage people to come into the city centre and help it regenerate as a place that people want to spend money, to the benefit of all businesses."


The full article contains 461 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 May 2008 11:58 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

10/05/2008 12:29:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Hmm ...,

10/05/2008 12:48:41
... sorry Genuine - this is symptomatic of a local authority with more ambitions than cash. Having killed off the centre of edinburgh, the former Labour administration created this opportunity "to be seen to be doing something" - and we now have people whose career depends on obtaining cash to keep them in a job.

No public money is available so let's just "tax" business with this levy. "Win/win" say our elected representatives!
3

Jock MacSprog,

10/05/2008 14:25:13
if you cant make money selling alcohol in the UK, then you are inept as a businessman and should try some other way of making a living.
4

KTCB41,

10/05/2008 15:42:39
3# I think the point is about making money not becoming an unpaid collector of of even more revenue for the Council.

The point about this plan is that business have given up on getting anything back on their business rates so they have given in to the demand for some ring-fenced money that will be spent in their area.
5

Allis Chalmers,

Crieff 10/05/2008 16:20:19
#1 and #3, trite drivel.

When did either of you last own and run a profitable city centre pub?
6

blackley,

Edinburgh 10/05/2008 17:05:28
There's too mnay pubs and the price of booze is too low.
7

Fifi la Bonbon,

10/05/2008 17:07:46
The pub owners' chief executive meant, but didn't say: we are happy to support the BID generally when there are no costs to our members.
8

jdships,

10/05/2008 18:21:43
5 Allis Chalmers,

"When did either of you last own and run a profitable city centre pub?"

Serious question,
Are you saying all city centre pubs are losing money ?
If so how do that many remain open ?
9

THE BPRENTICE,

11/05/2008 10:46:10
1 The Geniune Mario Antionette, "These pub whingers at it again."...err no!! I know of pubs in Leith Walk that haven't been able to pay their last 3 or 4 vat bills. Lets see you put your all into a business only to be hammered from pillar to post with Coucil charges - and lets see if any noises come out of you?!
10

Ezekiel Gazooks,

12/05/2008 11:25:29
Taxing a business out of existance does not profit anyone.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.