Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

One a week prosecuted for cheating on benefits

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 May 2008
AT least one benefits cheat is prosecuted in the Lothians every week after being tracked down by fraud investigators.
A total of 56 people were taken to court in a single year for falsely claiming unemployment and other benefits.

The new figures also show that investigators catch up with more than one fraudster every day.

Between April 2006 and March last year, the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) tracked down 424 offenders in Lothian and Borders.

Although most avoided prosecution, each one faced having to pay back the illegally-claimed cash while many had to pay a penalty set at around 30 per cent of what they stole.

Investigators from the DWP often mount undercover surveillance on suspects to try and catch them working while claiming unemployment or disability pay.

Teams also make visits to building sites and other workplaces, as well as carrying out spot checks on workers at private homes, such as window cleaners or gardeners.

On Wednesday, the News revealed that the DWP was investigating a one-legged man caught working as a roofer in North Berwick, East Lothian.

The DWP even has powers to check bank accounts to uncover when extra cash is being earned, although it still relies heavily on tip-offs from the public.

James Plaskitt, DWP anti-fraud minister, said: "Our investigators have more powers than ever before.

"We can check the bank accounts and household bills of those we suspect of fraud, as well as working with other government departments to ensure benefit claims are valid.

"Matching data this way has helped uncover millions of pounds in overpayments every year. Benefits thieves have to understand they will not get away with it.

"Working together with local authorities and the police, we have a strong range of powers to investigate and with the support of the public we bring benefits thieves to justice."

The most popular frauds are working while claiming unemployment, working while taking incapacity benefits, overstating disabilities to increase payments, and falsely taking single person discounts on council tax.

Single parents have also been caught claiming benefits for living alone, but failing to declare a live-in partner.

Council officials believe up to 38,000 Edinburgh households could be fraudulently claiming the single-person household discount of 25 per cent.

In March, around 70,000 homes in the Capital were targeted as part of a mail drop aimed at tackling benefit fraud.

Councillor Gordon Mackenzie, Edinburgh's finance leader, said: "We are making good progress on tackling benefit fraud, but we want to improve in this area even more. The vast majority who receive benefits are genuinely entitled to them.

However, there is a minority who are intent on stealing money from those who need it most."

The estimated annual cost of fraud in the UK is £900 million, or £36 from each family.

The DWP is targeting the Capital as part of its "No ifs, no buts" drive to encourage more people to report benefit fraud.


You can't beat the system

BENEFITS cheats have stolen tens of thousands before being caught and landing themselves in court.

Last month, mum-of-four Annette Slater, 42, who cheated a benefits agency out of almost £23,000, was spared jail to look after her children. Sheriff Kenneth Maciver said sending her to jail would only cost the public more by having to provide care for the children.

Last July, Donald Henderson, of Balderston Gardens, received 120 hours' community service for not declaring an occupational pension when claiming benefit. He defrauded a total of £5169.

The same month, Heather Hainey, of Northfield Drive, was given 150 hours' community service for falsely claiming £11,306.32.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 May 2008 11:25 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

09/05/2008 12:23:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 09/05/2008 12:33:03
For evary one cheat they catch, there will be dozens they don't.
Get rid of the benefits system.
Don't want to work ? Fine but you get no money from the taxpayer.
3

True Jambo,

09/05/2008 12:33:10
hate those unts
4

,

09/05/2008 12:36:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

gorgeousgorgieboy,

Edinburgh 09/05/2008 12:41:34
My god she is rough. If I had a face like that I'd shave me @rse and walk backwards.
6

Gorgieslums,

09/05/2008 12:45:27
Gibbo's been passing himself off as a journalist for decades so in my narrow hate-filled eyes he's just as much a cheat as Mrs Pov above.

String 'em up!
7

,

09/05/2008 12:45:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

familymanwith2jobsandawifeworkingfulltime,

Edinburgh 09/05/2008 12:48:18
You have to blame the Labour government. If they werent so prepared to give away £millions of our hard earned cash to those who will do nothing to help themselves, then the problem wouldn't exist.
9

Leither1875,

09/05/2008 12:54:34
Ive said it once and Ill say it again 6-12 months is more than ample time to get a job unless for some reason you are unable too. Anyone who has been on benefits for up to 12 months or more should be struck off. People who have been paying taxes and keeping these feckers should be given more in pensions or dole money if redundancies happen out of the blue
10

,

09/05/2008 12:55:23
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

09/05/2008 13:00:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

sue27,

edinburgh 09/05/2008 13:07:01
#3 i totally agree with you!!
i cant stand people that sponge off the government!!! ive worked all my life and never claimed a benefit and i bet if i ever needed a bit of help i wouldnt get any.

theres no excuse cos there is plenty of jobs around, so spongers get of ur b*ms and get a job!!
13

tomias,

Edinburgh 09/05/2008 13:13:25
Spongers? Ever tried getting the PF to write up the documents for anything concerning them!
14

FrankGallagher,

09/05/2008 13:16:13
No. 14

I much prefer yours!
15

FrankGallagher,

09/05/2008 13:20:19
I would of thought for £23k Sharon PIssbucket could of got appropriate attire for court. No respect.
16

portboy,

Edinburgh 09/05/2008 13:24:07
This article sums it up.
Labour - aka - help the scheemie!
SNP - oh dear
why oh why are Scottish people so anti-tory. We don't live in 1980 any more! Get over it. If they were in charge you wouldnt get all these smelly people getting more money than us working folk. Seeing them on there foreign holidays, WII consoles etc, when us lot need to scrape the money to pay all the bills, dress kids etc. no doubt they get clothing allowance for their kids as well.
Labour - help the scheemie!
17

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 09/05/2008 13:46:48
Stealing from the poorest. These people are scum.

The problem is, as so often, with the sentencing. They steal 24 grand and then get 20 hours community service. That means they're effectively getting 1200 quid an hour for picking up litter. Any of us would consider that a dream job rather than a punishment.

What's needed is constraints on the halfwit judges to add the total stolen to all of the court and police costs, then divide that by the minimum wage and award that number of hours as a sentence. If they can't do that in their lifetime, then take their organs and sell them on the free market.

If they ever elect judges, as they do in the US, I'll expect your votes...
18

James2122,

09/05/2008 13:49:21
She looks horrible! yuk!!
#7 I think she has already done that but forgt to wipe her @rse
19

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 09/05/2008 13:53:16
Rabbitsfoot thinks we should let these scum off because "we're wasting money in Iraq and on a bunch of bankers".

It's hard to know where to start with someone this hard-of-thinking. How about when you were age five and your parents told you that two wrongs don't make a right?

I certainly concur that the useless bankers shouldn't see a penny of our hard-earned cash. I'm not sure that our money is quite so entirely wasted in Iraq. After all, we did hang Saddam and kill his psychopathic kids.
There only remains the question of how much value we're getting out of making the rubble bounce a bit more.

Still, just because we've poured money down those two drains, it doesn't mean we ought to let these retards act like Robin Hood in reverse and steal from the poor.
We need to get all Sherriff of Nottingham on them, not least pour encourager les autres.
20

Busy as usual,

Bonnyrigg 09/05/2008 13:53:41
re 23

I wouldnae ride that intae battle.....
21

tam562,

penicuik 09/05/2008 14:20:38
oh come on she had to look her worst so the sheriff would feel sorry for her oh thats her best sorry
22

It's me!,

09/05/2008 14:25:49
#25. Ah wouldnae ride that on an 'everyman for himself' retreat!
23

,

09/05/2008 14:27:27
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

,

09/05/2008 14:28:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

,

09/05/2008 14:28:13
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

,

09/05/2008 14:46:47
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
27

SDRAWKCAB,

Edinburgh 09/05/2008 15:27:11
#3 - If they stopped giving people benefits, the crime rate would get out of control.
Benefit fraud is an easy way for these people to make money as the punishment for it is laughable. Community service that they'll never show up for and fines that will never be paid.
28

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 09/05/2008 15:35:04
Rabbitsfoot still doesn''t get it: "are you seriously suggesting prosecuting a sad wee wifey over sweety money will make a dent in the treasury debt?"

That's not the point. She *stole* from the very poor folks you're lamenting. That deserves punishment.

"A lot of you blinkered people out there, what would you do if you couldnt get a plumber or joiner who asks for cash in hand?"

Asking for cash-in-hand is freedom fighting against the tax-raising politicians who oppress us. It's just as important not to pay taxes as it is to make sure that those we do pay aren't wasted on thieving scum.

29

an interested party,

09/05/2008 15:50:12
the article details some 50K plus stolen money

pales in significance compared to 50 billion given
away to the banks

how much is that per head

and not for getting the national audit offices report on benefits 50% of the 4 billion was fraud and the other 50% mis management
30

FrankGallagher,

09/05/2008 16:03:30
It's not how much it is per head, it's how much is being spent on Fray Bentos and Lambert and Butler
31

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

09/05/2008 17:17:00
LOL at some of the misogynistic comments, based on the article's accompanying photograph, masquerading as "humour" (you know who you are) from those who are obviously devastatingly irresistible stud muffins......testosterone-fuelled sex machines who have any female moaning for more........stunning Adonises who represent the epitome of masculine pulchritude.......in your dreams.

What makes you think your massive egos, typically matched with tiny d*cks, are going to sweep any member of the opposite sex off her feet?
32

Bravetart,

09/05/2008 17:22:51
"Sweetie money"? £23k, what kind of sweeties do you buy?

We are all living off benefits, if it weren't for Working Family Tax Credits most of the people I know would be screwed. Personally I would rather pay less tax instead of having to go cap in hand for some of it back so I can pay the bills. Still, that would be too easy and would not create a country of dependancy.

I've had to go on benefits before, short term helping hand is what it is, not a way of life. And Sue, you are right, if you have worked all your life and been a good taxpayer but suddenly need help you have to jump through hoops while the professional scroungers get money thrown at them. Near enough literally.
33

Proximo,

09/05/2008 17:28:59
sue27 #16 said;
"i cant stand people that sponge off the government!!! ive worked all my life and never claimed a benefit and i bet if i ever needed a bit of help i wouldnt get any."

Maybe so, maybe not. But if you ever did need any help, and got some, the worse thing would be that all the rest of the people that feel the way you do... would hate you!

Chill
34

valleyjim,

09/05/2008 18:30:12
Sharon Pissbucket is a fat cow (no offence to our bovine friends). She is the ugliest person that I have set eyes on since Wendy Alexander.
35

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 09/05/2008 19:07:56
46 you are so wrong.
The benefits system is one of the most abused money grabbing schemes ever invented.
The VAST majority who claim are work shy layabouts, who CHOOSE not to work, and get paid for the privilage.
That I am afraid is a fact.
36

Bravetart,

09/05/2008 20:50:58
#48 is right I'm afraid.

Normal people who go on benefits are so ashamed and humiliated at having to ask for money they do what they can to get off as soon as possible.

However there is a percentage who see it as their right to never have to work and to live off the state rather than know what it is like to pay for their own things. I don't know if it is the majority but it does feel like that.

When I had to claim I was so upset yet at the "job" centre people were asking for this kind of money and that kind of money. People who looked like they were not in desperate need of anything (I sold what belonging I could before going cap in hand, I saw one man, dressed in bling ask for a form to get a loan of some kind. It was an eye-opener and not in a good way.) To then think that I was in the position where me and my sons were going to be associated with these kind of spongers was motivation enough to get things sorted asap.
37

Proximo,

09/05/2008 22:36:44
Think you've missed my point totally roadragga.

Where exactly am I so wrong? Read my post again first.

If sue in #16 'cant stand people who sponge off the government' that's fair enough. There's probably millions (of us) who feel the same.

My point is that if she ever has need to be in receipt of benefit, then you, me, and millions of others will (logically) dislike her if we 'cant stand people sponging etc etc'

We won't know her personal circumstances anymore than we know anyone elses. We presumeably just wont like her, full stop.



38

Proximo,

09/05/2008 22:42:00
Thank you Braveheart, you make my point exactly.

When you (and others like you) had the misfortune to have to sign on, as a last resort I'm sure, Sue27 "couldn't stand people like you"

It doesn't get much more prejudicial and judgemental I'm afraid.
39

Woody47,

09/05/2008 23:28:51
Rabbitsfoot. What a narrow minded to££er you are. Why shouldn't we take some thief to court? That is what someone who steals is called or are you so shallow minded that you cannot see this. I really don't care what the amount is. Theft is theft.
As to your comments regarding the war against Iran - FFS grow up. This story has FA to do with anything other than some thieving woman.
You sort of people who live in their own little world where everything is perfect want to get out into the REAL world. It is not all rosy.
40

Alberto.,

10/05/2008 07:57:10
Recently, from what has been reported in the Press, it would seem that the enormous Den / Lair/ Nest / well organised gathering - call it what you will, of 'Benefit Cheats' are holed up in Westminster, in the 'House of Corruption', where a gang is at large, blatantly displaying their ability to rob the taxpayer legally - as they seem to see it, through their 'Expenses Claims' facilities procedures, and apparently, without fear of being caught!

Such a ‘scheme’ which seems very expertly ‘tailored’ to suit - for their personal financial gain, and which, by the seemingly non-action by the authorities, and the possibility of much, and many in ‘collusion’ to the situation, yet seemingly is to be allowed to continue 'unfettered' and protect them from ‘legal harm’ on the basis of, as it has been implied - it is ‘Within the rules!’

This procedural operation seems to be a very positive arrangement that must have many 'Members' - and others 'in collusion’ for such financial success to be achieved! Seemingly also, with many of the authorities, who should be endeavouring to stop such activity, well and truly within the Politicians pockets and re-acting accordingly - as expected and probably directed!!

All sounds very nice and ‘Lubbly - Jubbly!’

With regard to the ‘authorities’, who should be very concerned about such apparently very obvious, and possibly fraudulent activity, it would seem, from their lax approach, to paint the old picture of ‘There are none so blind, as those who do not wish to see’ - and, as seems to suit this ‘special’ occasion, especially if they cannot be bothered to look!

I sincerely hope that the Trust, Loyalty, Honour and standard of Principle, that the Public have ‘mistakenly’ placed on the shoulders of our elected representatives over the years - is not confusing the authorities, in any intent they may still have to do their job - as I believe is their duty, to protect the taxpayers funds!

Any thoughts of a ‘Whitewash’ finish to this j
41

Alberto.,

10/05/2008 08:00:35
#53 Cont'd.....

Any thoughts of a ‘Whitewash’ finish to this job should be put completely ‘out of mind’ - ‘We cannot afford otherwise!’ Nowadays even the vast cost of ‘Whitewash’applied so far - in similar cases, must be getting beyond our financial reach!

In the circumstances, is it little wonder the Politicians are, at enormous cost to the taxpayer, fighting 'tooth and nail' to avoid disclosure of how 'they' spend our (easy to get) money on their 'personal' expenses!

Or have I got it all wrong?
42

who is sharon pissbucket,

penicuik 10/05/2008 18:02:50
i am the person in pic above and i think you will find i got 200 hours comunity service and 2 yrs probation.i am also paying back the money. but id like to all the papers for the publicty as i have had various offers to apear on various tv shows.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.