Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 9th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Banking drama: HBoS and RBS shares bounce back after day of turmoil



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 October 2008
SHARES in Royal Bank of Scotland and HBoS bounced back today as confidence grew among UK investors.
Shortly after 9am, RBS was up by more than eight per cent at 71.2p, while HBoS was up by more than four per cent at 93.8p.

In the aftermath of the Government's announcement that it will inject up to £37 billion in RBS, HBoS and Lloyds TSB, shares in the banks slumped amid fears among shareholders of their stock being diluted and no dividends being paid under part-nationalisation.

But analysts had said that once the initial fears are passed, they expect investors to take a longer-term view of the potential future value of their holding.

Aside from banking stocks, shares performed well yestercay with the FTSE 100 Index enjoying its second-biggest rise, surging 8.3 per cent. The momentum continued today, with the first hour of trade seeing the index rise by another five per cent to 4467.84 points.

Yesterday's losses for Scotland's two biggest banks came on one of the most dramatic days in UK banking history.

Sir Fred Goodwin and Sir Tom McKillop both said they would leave Royal Bank of Scotland, while Andy Hornby and Dennis Stevenson will leave their roles at HBoS once the takeover by Lloyds TSB goes through.

RBS confirmed that chief executive Sir Fred, dubbed 'Fred The Shred' for his ruthless approach to banking, will leave his role, to be replaced by British Land boss Stephen Hester, while chairman Sir Tom and RBS Global Markets boss Johnny Cameron will also go.

The Government has said it is to invest a combined £37 billion in RBS, Lloyds TSB and HBoS – meaning the taxpayer will become a major shareholder in some of the UK's biggest institutions.

And Lloyds confirmed that it has renegotiated its takeover of HBoS.

RBS is to raise £20bn of new capital through a Government-guaranteed £15 billion share issue and a £5bn Government cash injection.

HBoS is to raise £11.5bn in new additional capital, including £3bn through preference shares with the Government, while Lloyds wants £5.5bn of new capital.

Barclays said it is not turning to the Government for emergency funding, unveiling instead plans to raise more than £6.5 billion from investors to help shore up its balance sheet.

But the capital injection was being seen as bad news by shareholders fearful of their own investments being diluted by the new Government shares.

As part of the plans, the Government has pledged to review the remuneration of senior executives – both for 2008, when it expects no cash bonuses to be paid to board members, and for long-term incentive schemes.

The Government will also have a say on the appointment of new independent non-executive directors and on dividend policy.

Banks have also been told to commit to offer competitively-priced lending to homeowners and to small businesses.

RBS chairman Sir Tom, who is to retire in April, said: "The steps we have announced today, taken in conjunction with the Government, will secure a stronger future for the RBS Group.

"We regret having to raise new capital but believe that decisive action is necessary in this unprecedented market environment.

"Following the recapitalisation, RBS will be one of the best-capitalised banks in the world, enabling us to support our customers while pursuing our refocused strategic goals."

Both Sir Fred and Sir Tom had come under pressure after agreeing to head the consortium that acquired Dutch lender ABN Amro for £49bn last year at a time when the banking sector was beginning to decline across the globe.

They both faced confrontation from angry shareholders at the bank's AGM in April after it was announced that the bank was to seek an additional £12bn from shareholders in a bid to shore up its finances.

Today's drama, which will see three Government directors appointed to the RBS board, will see 60 per cent of the company owned by the Government.

The combined HBoS and Lloyds TSB entity is expected to be around 40 per cent Government-owned once the merger is complete, and will have two Government directors.

Chancellor Alistair Darling said that the Government was injecting "very substantial sums" into banks in order to stabilise the system.

"It is necessary because we are going through quite extraordinary circumstances the world over," he said.

"I believe that what we are doing will help, it will go a long, long way to reassuring people.

"There is a lot of turbulence to go through yet, there are a lot of bumps along the way, but I believe that this first step will help in two respects.

"First, it makes our banks strong. Secondly, of course, it is beginning the process of making lending easier."

He added: "There will be restrictions on what happens on boardroom pay and we are also getting guarantees in relation to increased lending to businesses, as well as to mortgages too."

The restructuring of the Lloyds/HBoS comes after concerns that shareholders would not approve the deal on its existing terms because of the plummeting HBoS share price.

In a statement today, HBoS said: "HBoS reaffirms its confidence in the substantial benefits for shareholders that will arise from its proposed acquisition by Lloyds TSB. Revised terms are to be recommended to shareholders reflecting today's announcement in respect of capital raising by both companies and the impact of significant disruption in financial markets.

"The resulting capital and funding position for the proposed combination establishes a strong platform from which the enlarged group can create value in the long term."

The re-adjusted HBoS/Lloyds deal means that every HBoS shareholder will now receive 0.605 Lloyds shares for each share they own, down from 0.833 previously.

A spokesman for HBoS insisted that the deal will go through. He said: "The deal is done and the ink is dry".

Sir Victor Blank, chairman of Lloyds TSB, said: "Today's news is good for investors and customers alike. Lloyds TSB's already robust financial position is further enhanced by today's capital raising which in turn allows us to drive forward with our plans to acquire HBoS.

"Our trading update underlines that our core business is strong and growing. Our customers can feel confident that their money is secure. Lloyds TSB is, and remains a great place to bank."


The full article contains 1070 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Coach,

Lasswade 13/10/2008 10:48:58
First to quit. RBS but dowe have the payout they will receive. Better journalism please! Any how might as well guess the gold watch amount.
Fred £10m package however it is made up.
Sir Tom £5m package and keep his knighthood (poor show)
Johnny £3m package and a directorship at a Uni.
WHAT A SCAM
My business went down the swanny and I get diddly squat.
2

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 13/10/2008 11:45:06

Letter form Jenny Dawe in The Scotsman today. It isn't very clearly worded so I'm not sre what she's on about - "actions must be based on fact" ?? - anyway, I think what she means is that Fred must stay.

Great timing Jenny.
3

Scotish Exile,

13/10/2008 12:12:08
They should be sacked, have their knighthoods removed and they should not get a penny in a "golden good bye", but that won't happen, will it....
4

Nettie,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 12:20:26
Perhaps rather than taking government money they should be asking for a refund of the millions they spent sponsoring the Ryder Cup and other golf tournaments in the US????
5

Daft Old Git,

13/10/2008 12:50:22
There weren't many complaining about Sir Fred when he changed a mickey mouse bank into the world's 5th largest employing an additional 18000 people and representing Scotland globally. Yes things have gone wrong but it's certainly not all his fault.. Everyone else knows better with hindsight. Better one who has tried and failed than one who has done nought. I suppose if Virgin fall on hard times Richard Branson will also be deemed a muppet by those who all knew better all along
6

Edward,

13/10/2008 12:59:35
Some salient facts are needed as clearly the EEN are towing the Labour line.
The government are NOT taking a majority shareholding as has been reported. It is injecting capital to the amount of £ 5 billion (not £ 20 billion which is being reported)in prefernce shares. The RBS group will ask shareholders to subscribe for additional shares to bring in an additional £ 15 billion, with the government backing (not financing) by guarantee at 65.5p per share purchased.
Quote 'RBS announces an offer of ordinary shares to raise £15 billion of core tier 1 capital. The offer will be underwritten by HM Treasury at a fixed price of 65.5 pence per share..Existing RBS shareholders will be invited to subscribe for all or part of their pro rata entitlements. New institutional shareholders may also be permitted to subscribe for new shares under the offer'
So why are papers and the media, specifically Robert Peston stating that RBS will be wholly owned or majority owned by the government - simple its Labour breifing in the background in order for RBS to look bad and to kick in the confidence in Scotland

The information regarding RBS share issue is freely available on the RBS group website
7

Marty Cohen,

13/10/2008 13:06:17
According to Darling, Fred and Tom have waived their "contractual entitlements". We will never know the full story because the parties will shelter behind their Compromise Agreements.

8

FrankGallagher,

13/10/2008 13:08:45
8

Thanks Edward, if i run out of paper clips to tie together or elastic bands to ping, i'll be sure to look it up.
9

Anecdotal,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 13:21:26
The media have been parked outside his house since before 7 am this morning understandably. Their vehicles have been parked illegally since 8.30 am and are still there with no action having been taken by the wardens! Have the media paid-off the wardens?
10

LarryKingston,

13/10/2008 13:31:37
"as the Footsie opened..."

"Footsie"?! Really strong financial journalism
11

JT,

13/10/2008 13:35:49
Dont trust anything that Darling the Badger says about waiving contractual entitlements, they are not going empty handed.Im sure that their severance pay will be a little more generous than those who lost their jobs recently and will be losing their jobs if and when the lloyds take over is signed off!
12

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 13/10/2008 13:40:16
#8 Edward, do you reckon that anyone but the govt will be buying the £15 billion of ordinary shares? It's a fair bet that the govt will get the lot.
13

Yeti,

13/10/2008 13:50:45
So Labour now have what they want. When they come to sell this shareholding, I bet they sell them to some giant overseas bank, leaving Scotland without a single bank headquartered here.

As an aside, I had a small debt with RBS that they phoned me about. They will now accept haggling and I cut it in half and settled it with a "discounted discharge." Don't accept their first offer - they will ask you what you can afford. Then do a deal :) Now debt free :D
14

Ronaldo Stuffed Everyone,

13/10/2008 13:55:30
Amazing, HBOS and RBS all but bust without government cash yet SNP crackpots still believe in complete independence.
15

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

13/10/2008 14:05:37
#8: I'd be happy to personally take some preference shares. 9% and a 5-year warrant to buy shares at the rights-issue price would make me happy.

Why is it I can't personally buy these and yet am forced to buy them through the government?
16

Linda,

Edinburgh 13/10/2008 15:00:26
Bail out would not have been necessary if Brown and Darling had been doing their jobs and properly regulating the Banks and Building Societies.
17

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 13/10/2008 16:15:15

#8

EEN "towing" the labour Party line, eh?

Looks like the FT are too. And ITN, CNN, the BBC, the New York Times, Real Radio, and every mainstream media outlet, bar Shaver's Weekly.


18

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 13/10/2008 16:19:10

Power, Corruption & Lies
19

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 13/10/2008 16:34:36

#20

ie - there is no Labour Party media conspiracy. Alistair Campbell might know a bit about journalism, but I don't think he's got the power to influence financial editors of newpapers and televion news across three continents.

20

Arrow,

edinburgh 13/10/2008 17:53:23
no dividends? so why would anyone, their pension fnds and anyone INVESTING but into this situation. investors do so to make a return on their money. that is what the local government pension fund (like all otehr pension funds)does. then the local government pension fund like the public service funds does not have to worry too much because the rest of the tax payers will be baling them out as well as the banks.
sorry to sound bitter but my pension fund that i have saved up for for the past 30 years has just lost 30% of its value since September (just when the USA RBS Director sold his 140000 shares for £350000 and now they would be worth about £91000)and i was going to retire at 66 this year. i keep working it seems!
21

Joe Smith.,

Moscow 13/10/2008 18:22:13

I see Fopp are selling the DVD of "Bubba Ho-Tep" for £3. It's probably the best U.S. film since Scorcese's creative peak on the mid-70s.
22

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

13/10/2008 20:06:11
#6 - bad points
23

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

13/10/2008 20:06:54
Anton, where are you ? I could do with a hand.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.