Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 19th July 2008 Change Date

Life & Style - inside your Evening News every Thursday

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

City charities face £870k cash grab



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 February 2008
DOZENS of city charities and voluntary groups are facing swingeing grant cuts as part of the latest council efficiency drive.
Reports leaked to the News have revealed city leaders are considering making £874,297 worth of savings in the grants they give out – with everything from small sports clubs to the Royal Zoological Society in the firing line.

Some organisations today said they will close if they lose all their funding as proposed, while others from the 31 groups affected have said they would face an uphill struggle to continue.

Among the big losers could be Gorgie City Farm, which would see 75 per cent of its annual £95,600 grant from council chiefs disappear under the plans.

Edinburgh Leisure also stands to lose £300,000 from its annual £8 million grant under the proposals, though this is not thought to put any of its frontline services in jeopardy.

The leaked papers also revealed a planned 42 per cent cut in the £121,291 available for the city's playgroups to make grant applications for items such as new equipment or transport costs.

The proposed cuts come just two months after city leaders revealed plans to spend £3m less on learning and care services from the voluntary sector. The savings are part of a wider bid to save £11m from the way the council purchases services it doesn't directly provide.

Council chiefs today insisted the leaked plans were just a work in progress with nothing being finalised before the council's budget is settled on February 21.

But volunteer groups and politicians hit-out at the "shortsightedness" of the proposals.

Ewan Aitken, leader of the city's Labour group, said: "This is an absolute scandal. In their panic to deal with issues which we dealt with on a regular basis, they are attacking the poorest and most vulnerable. Their incompetence means years of suffering.

"The social fabric of the city is so dependent on the work and commitment of the voluntary sector, and this is just cutting a swathe through it. The knock-on consequences will be far greater than the money saved.

"It's also about trust. We built up trust with the voluntary sector over many years, which they have destroyed in just eight months."

Research published last year showed that for every £1 the council invests in the voluntary sector, it actually "raises" £9.78 in the city. A spokesman for the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations said: "Cutting funding to voluntary organisations would be an incredibly shortsighted move on the part of the council.

"The sector offers a proven and efficient way of providing public services, and the council knows that it is underpaying for the services they get from these organisations in terms of the value they generate for the city."

Green councillor Maggie Chapman, said the proposals would cause "huge damage" for "a relatively small saving".

"These proposals are remarkably shortsighted. Some of these services reach the most vulnerable people in Edinburgh and their true worth would only be realised when they are gone," she said.

City leader Jenny Dawe, said: "These are simply background papers which contain a range of financial options, recommended by officers, which have been prepared for members as part of the council's normal budget setting process.

"All political groups on the council will have access to budget information, as in the past, and it is up to each group to set their own budget priorities which will then be submitted to the council for a decision.

"The papers are a work in progress and at present it is unhelpful to make them public as they are not the finalised documents."


'Our funding has not gone up in 10 years'

THE GORGIE AND DALRY PARTNERSHIP – PROPOSED FUNDING CUT, £14,000
THE Gorgie and Dalry Partnership faces certain closure if it loses all its funding as proposed.

The organisation, which was launched in 1987 to run community groups and organise events, has an annual budget of just over £20,000 – almost three quarters of which comes from the city council.

It is based in Dalry Road and the offices it rents are also used by other voluntary groups who would find themselves homeless if the partnership closed.

Elaine Brand, project manager, said: "Our funding has not gone up at all in the last ten years.

"We asked for extra money so we could employ a new member of staff.

"However, this would result in the closure of the partnership and would be a disaster for the area.

"It is not just the services we provide directly, but also the groups we assist who use our resources here.

"I had not heard anything from the department saying our funding was likely to be cut. To be treated like this is a real kick in the teeth."


'These sorts of cuts seem really shortsighted to me'

NORTH MERCHISTON CLUB – PROPOSED FUNDING CUT, £12,829
DATING back to 1921, the North Merchiston Club has helped thousands of city youngsters take up and excel at a variety of sports ranging from canoeing to martial arts.

But the club will face real hardship under the proposed funding cuts.

Club leader John Summers today said the proposed cuts – which would see the club's grant of £17,105 cut by 75 per cent – would have a big impact on its ability to continue.

He said: "This would be a disaster, our grant application for this year is based on the very real costs we face such as gas and electric bills.

"The council grant isn't the only money we get but it does allow us to keep the prices down for the kids.

"It seems the more successful you are, the more chance you have of having your funding cut.

"These sorts of cuts seem really shortsighted to me when you think of the good that the club is doing locally."

Mr Summers said the funding cut would put the club's long-running campaign to build a new clubhouse on hold.


'The loss of this would be devastating'

CA(I)RE – PROPOSED FUNDING CUT, £27,064
CA(I)RE is planning crisis talks after learning that its funding faces being slashed by two-thirds.

At best the organisation, which offers support, training and educational courses for carers, will run a dramatically reduced service, but there is also a very real risk it will close.

The organisation, which regularly helps 170 people, and has more than 600 on its books, is a lifeline for carers who often struggle without support to look after an ill or disabled loved one, while trying to maintain some kind of life of their own.

Council officials have recommended slashing more than £27,000 from its grant for 2007/2008.

Bob Rendall, convener of Ca(i)re and chief executive of the Eric Liddel Centre, in Morningside Road, where it is based, said: "The loss of this key grant from our principal partner on what was set up as a joint initiative, would be a devastating blow to the project."

Swingeing cuts across the board - click here to see list of charities affected



The full article contains 1192 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 06 February 2008 12:38 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

alex paterson,

embra 06/02/2008 12:06:04
Gorgie City Farm may be a big loser up to 75%,disgusting.
2

Names? - we're all just numbers really!,

Edinburgh 06/02/2008 12:25:11
Is the Zoo only mentioned to show that the cuts are being made from A-Z?

Why not publish the whole list so that we can see exactly what was "leaked", then we will be able to see which councillor's favourite charities get a reprieve and are saved when some last minute funding is miraculously found?
3

mrmoneypenny,

06/02/2008 12:28:43
Good old Rasputen, last year wrecked the city..

http://www.edinburghsucks.com/2008/02/05/the-story-of-the-mole-has-a-hole/
4

bobbity bob,

work 06/02/2008 12:33:20
So the council spends millions pump out glossy propaganda sheets like 'Edinburgh Outlook' and then will cut money from charities across the city. A couple of thousand from a small community organisation is PEANUTS for the council, but DEVASTATING to the local community... this will come back to haunt the council!
5

Moscow Central 42,

06/02/2008 12:52:13
3 mrmoneypenny

Well I am glad at least that you were not in charge of the City last year. You cannot even spell Rasputin correctly.
6

Alexander,

Edinburgh 06/02/2008 13:24:14
""This is an absolute scandal. In their panic to deal with issues which we dealt with on a regular basis"
Great joke from pathetic comedian Ewan Aitken! Most of the financial problems stem from the failures of his administration to deal with issues and from the failed election bribe of using reserves to limit the council tax rise.
7

Moscow Central 42,

06/02/2008 13:53:59
6
You have obviously not yet worked out that this city is now in the hands of prize incompetents, and that the really bad joke occupies the Leader's office.
8

Very Concerned Resident,

06/02/2008 13:57:38
#6 You're talking tripe - the reserves were used up to settle the Equal Pay bill, a move that ALL political parties on the Council supported.

But hey, why let the truth get in the way of some good, old political mud-slinging.
9

Elvis G,

Edinburgh 06/02/2008 14:13:00
Once again an example of the bureacracy largely preserving the jobs of highly paid officials at the expense of the community.

Ewan Aitken as Education Convener let the department get away with the most expensive restructuring of the Children and Families department where jobs were handed out to jobsworths without competitive interview and often with massive slary increases. While a couple of posts are to go in the children and Families Dept it would still be possible to slim that department down without any real negative effect.

That said it is a disgrace to cut Gorgie City Farm by 75%. They do a great job, provide a great resource, and bring some much needed "countryside" into the city.

Hopefully there will be a great campaign to save the Farm-and other charities as well. Time for a rethink!
10

Mik Wilso,

Ed. 06/02/2008 14:21:01
This is added to the £850,000 that Rosendale and his cronies want to take out of front line community centre work.
11

Mik Wilso,

Ed. 06/02/2008 14:24:08
Every cut in the Community Centres comes from front line services. All the boys sitting on over 60K are totally safe. This was another Edinburghsucks story last week.

Understandable that they were left in the sh1t by Labour but start weeding out the high paid deadwood that got jobs from their labour cronies with salaries in excess of 60k - Rosendale and his wife together are on about 180k - do an foi request and find out yourself.
12

Labour Sleeze Reporter,

Uninspiring Capital 06/02/2008 14:34:23
#10 & #12 are totally correct. The current administration are TOTALLY SCARED of taking any decisions other than what the labour installed officials tell them.

BTW the leaker was Councillor Ewan Aitken. His office staff spent all of yesterday phoning round the projects on the hitlist to get their support. They never of course mentioned that it was their placed officials who wrote up the papers for the cuts.

The figure #12 gives is around £20,000 for the joint income. It is public knowledge - Rosendale Head of Service £110,000 and wife Neighbourhood Manager £88,000 = £198,000 - Just think how many of the mentioned projects wouldn't be affected if they just got rid of those two who have ripped apart the community and voluntary sector in the city. More to come.
13

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 06/02/2008 14:36:47
#5 - #7 - Donald A? Trevor D? is that you? Nice to see you're back! Just as it was nice to see your backs after the May election when your Edinburgh Labour Administration got found out for the ragbag of trough-swillers they were!
14

Top Floor,

on the side lines 06/02/2008 14:50:03

We all know they have budget problems but surely it is immoral to penalise external organisations i.e. the voluntary sector for internal failings.

I find it hard to believe that within an organisation the size of the Council with approx £800m annual revenue budget that they can't find other ways of saving 850k.

Local charities do a pretty good job, usually on a shoestring budget why do they have to be the victims ?

The SNP / Lib Dem Council must have more imagination and gumption than that ????
15

Moscow Central 42,

06/02/2008 15:23:42
8 very concerned resident

8 very concerned resident
You are the one talking absolute tripe. The Contingency Fund was only around £7 million and this money was used by Labour to reduce the Council Tax increase in 2007. The other political parties did not realise this had happened until the Budget was announced. The equal pay settlement is another matter altogether.It will probably cost between £30 and £40 million and I doubt very much if the whole sum can be paid in full all at once.
16

Very Concerned Resident,

06/02/2008 15:30:27
#16 Sorry - have a look at this graphic:

http://multimedia.scotsman.com/documents/pdf/eveningnews/en09fund.pdf

- I think you'll see that £22million was taken for the Equal Pay bill. This was not contested and is, by far, the main reason why the reserves are so low.
17

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 06/02/2008 15:40:10
#7 It's not only the city that's in the hands of prize incompetents. I think it's all of Europe.
18

Terr2,

The Greater place 06/02/2008 16:13:57
#14 You are just worried that your spacehopper budget will get cut ;-)
19

SPG,

edinburgh 06/02/2008 16:18:29
Listen you lot, personal expense increases don't just fund themselves.....
20

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 06/02/2008 17:51:52
cuts have to be made and we have to make personal cuts in our business.

The question is cuts in the right places. Community newspaper grants could be cut and one good all round newspaper produced. Less overheads and be more professional.

21

Moscow Central 42,

06/02/2008 18:08:35

17 very concerned resident
You are confusing the issue here. The money for the equal pay settlement whether £22,£30 or £40 million did not come from the Contingency Fund, the City's official reserve. All the Parties have accepted that the Council has a legal obligation to meet the settlement and funds have been allocated from other sources such as the sale of development assets belonging to EDI. This would probably have happened, whichever Party was in power.
22

,

07/02/2008 01:05:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Alanmar,

14/02/2008 12:44:17
Why attack Charities? Charities extensively use caring volunteers, therefore offer value for money.

What the council is doing in adjusting its seatbelt is both obscene and insane. Maybe it could build itself a spaceship (with some other planet's money) and hurl itself into a distant corner of the universe? And take all those Outlook booklets with you too, please. How come no one mentioned Trams?

To attack Education, at any level, is to me a crime.



 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.