Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Late First Minister would be 'horrified' at Scottish Parliament bill, says aide

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 May 2009
DONALD Dewar would never have embarked on the controversial Holyrood parliament building if he had known it would cost so much, his chief press aide has claimed.
David Whitton, now a Labour MSP, says the late First Minister would have been "horrified" at the final £414 million bill for the building.

In a radio documentary to be broadcast this weekend, he says there was "no way" Mr Dewar would have agreed t
o spend so much money on the new home for the parliament.

Mr Dewar, who served as Scottish Secretary in the run-up to devolution, was the driving force behind the Holyrood project, choosing both the site and the architect.

When he died in October 2000, after just 17 months as First Minister, the cost of the building had already rocketed from initial estimates of £10m-£40m to £195m, and was expected to rise further.

Mr Dewar had opted for the Holyrood site at the last minute after a fierce public debate on the merits of two other options, Leith and Calton Hill. He believed it was symbolically important for the new parliament to have a new building.

He also chose Catalan architect Enric Miralles and his "upturned boats" plan from a shortlist of possible designers for the historic construction.

However, costs quickly began to escalate from the £10m-£40m figure Mr Dewar included in the devolution white paper.

The Scottish Office formally handed over responsibility for the project to the parliament itself in June 1999, but many problems were traced back to earlier decisions, including the "fast track" procurement contract adopted which meant construction began before the design was completed. This was intended to speed up building work, but was widely blamed for causing delays and incurring extra costs.

Mr Dewar was also instrumental in blocking a move in April 2000 to call a temporary halt to the project, because of cost concerns, so other options could be considered.

In the documentary, however, Mr Whitton rejects the idea the building could eventually have proved Mr Dewar's downfall.

He says: "He certainly didn't believe it should cost as much as it did. If somebody had said to him on day one, 'You want a new building, it will cost £400m', he would have said, 'Forget it'.

"There is no way he would have spent that kind of money on it.

In his independent report on the Holyrood project, published in September 2004, Lord Fraser said Mr Dewar could have adopted a "more leisurely" timetable for the building without endangering the devolution scheme.

He also raised the issue of whether Mr Dewar should have asked more searching questions on costs at the time of the handover in 1999.

The Decade of Devolution is broadcast on Forth 2 at 10am on Sunday.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2009 10:07 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The Scottish Parliament
 
1

Brianwci,

01/05/2009 11:41:07
£414million for an entire Parliament is excellent compared to Westminster's new office block, Portcullis house.

This is a quote from the BBC webpage:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1023847.stm

"It has had to cope with a leaking roof, malfunctioning lifts, and disabled toilets that some disabled people say they cannot access.

The fig trees - which are leased from Belgium for five years - have cost £150,000, and bronze cladding in the building cost £30 million.

This was truly an exercise in which no expense was spared - even the lifts are padded."

So let's not get too hung up over a relatively Spartan Parliament building in Edinburgh costing £400million+.
2

alanh,

ek 01/05/2009 11:55:50
who is Whitton trying to kid?

the site of the building was chosen by nu liebore, north brittian dept, under Mr Dewar.
The planner was chosen by nu liebore, north brittian dept, under Mr Dewar.

And all the major decisions and changes were decided by nu liebore, north brittian dept, under Mr Dewar.

So how can he try and spin that to mean that the person who was RESPONSIBLE for the decision would not have made them?

Is this another case of nu liebore trying to rewrite history?
3

Unimpressed one,

01/05/2009 12:08:47
#1, But it still looks like a trendy penal colony from the outside. Goes to show that money can't buy taste.
4

I love to eat Sellotape,

01/05/2009 12:16:09
Donald Dewar died in 2000.

He is still dead.

Why should we care what he might or might not think of the building? Robert the Bruce might be really excited by it.

5

Number 6,

Germany 01/05/2009 12:23:13
Who is Whitton trying to kid?. It was Dewar who blocked a temporary halt, called for because of cost concerns.

There's no way his ego was going to allow that. If it was projected to cost twice as much he would still have gone ahead with it.
6

steve 1511,

aberdeen 01/05/2009 12:30:58
members of the lybour sleaze and corruption stasi party led by the gibbering eejit comrade broon with the big banana smile,have never shown any remorse about squandering taxpayers money before,as we get nearer and nearer to an election even if they get down on their knees and apoligies for their greed it will make no difference they are doomed to oblivion.

LYBOUR ARE DOOMED WITH BROON,THERE WILL BE NO BOOM UNDER BROON
7

reincarnated,

Edinburgh 01/05/2009 12:38:01
Most of you lot voted for it, so dont moan about it.

the only good thing about it is that we get to see the delicious Sturgeon on the telly.
8

Charles MN,

01/05/2009 12:50:58
#1
Portcullis House 18% over budget and 6 weeks late according to the National Audit Office report ( see below).

The Scottish Parliament 1000% over budget and 3 years late. Not much of a difference.


www.nao.org.uk/idoc.ashx?docId=8116fd2b-91c6-4835-9874-25acf70ba7b8&version=-1 ·
9

I love to eat Sellotape,

01/05/2009 13:01:33
Donald Dewar is still dead, by the way.
10

Sumpplareasswholes,

Edinburgh 01/05/2009 13:12:10
#4 I agree whom cares what a deceased politician would have thought as there are plenty of live ones that are culpable(Sir David Steel)and have goten away with it!
I would also add that why dont they broadcast the 1000's of comments from the Scottish and Edinburgh taxpayers whom have an opinion on the cost and look of the carbuncle of a building!
The Forth road crossing is going to be the 3rd Disaster to hit our pockets when it arrives!
11

Marian,

01/05/2009 13:22:42
Once again we have the New Labour party trying to distance itself from another of its monumental financial blunders. This hideous 60's style concrete shopping centre come multi-storey car park is a temporary monument to Dewar who single-handedly forced it through despite the fact that other far less costly options were available at the time. It probably won't last more than 25 years before it has to be pulled down. A lesson should have been learned from the fact that we have in Edinburgh beautiful stone buildings that were built by the Victorians that are still standing and have an ageless quality about them - but no such luck as Dewar wanted an architectural folly instead.
12

hoblar,

01/05/2009 13:24:48
"Portcullis House 18% over budget and 6 weeks late according to the National Audit Office report ( see below).

The Scottish Parliament 1000% over budget and 3 years late. Not much of a difference."

Portcullis house cost a fortune and they knew it from the start so it came in costing a fortune, whereas the Scottish parliament was built on a site decided by Donald dewar, and believe it or not Mr dewar HID the escalating costs before he popped off to another place!

Yep!

New labour and good choices aren't exactly used in the same sentence, let's be honest, and the Scottish parliament followed the same fiasco style.

Dewar knew. It came out in the report, and having the daft blind quote above where some dreamer believes that the choice, cost and architect was a Scottish choice rather than the Westminster choice that it definitely was is just hilarious.

The old Royal High school, the place most Scots who had an opinion hoped would be re-modelled and adapted (at a fraction of any new-build cost), but of course it was in a prominent position, looked really cool and classical and would have looked great.

However, Holyrood looks cool from the inside, some of the other bamboo shoot parts look naff on the exterior, but we could always modify and adapt that in the future.



13

,

01/05/2009 13:49:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Mikey,

01/05/2009 13:59:50
Because labour are liars and their supporters are brain dead, that's why!
15

Liz,

Edinburgh 01/05/2009 14:00:06
#13
It is not the cost that bothers me, but more the fact that it looks s*ite (well at least it does from the outside) and most of it looks like it might fall off in the next few years.

I blame the architect and whoever approved the plans it just looks like a complete mess.

16

Eve,

Scoltand 01/05/2009 15:11:51
Why are we hearing about this 8 & 1/2 years after his death?

Is it because their was ten year top secret marked on files that contain the late First Minster views from back in 1999!
17

Voice of reason,

EDINBURGH 01/05/2009 15:44:44
I think Blair was the one who invented the initial cost . The whole ethos of the last 12 years is that voters are gullible idiots .
18

Brianwci,

01/05/2009 17:25:49
The point about Portcullis House is that it is effectively an office block with cloakrooms and it cost a fortune with 'no expense spared'.

We got a whole Parliament with offices. Personally I would have much preferred a revamped Carlton Hill which as #12 hoblar says was 'in a prominent position....looked Classical' and would indeed 'have looked great.'

Like hoblar I don't like the bamboo either and like him I hope they are removed in time.

Bottom line, Portcullis House "was truly an exercise in which no expense was spared - even the lifts are padded." So let's not get too excited if a Scottish project gets a bit costly, there are so few of them after all.
19

Douglas,

Bathgate 01/05/2009 18:06:01
#9: Dewar and Marc Bolan were seen perusing the fresh fruit and veg in Aldi, Bathgate last Tuesday.
The article states he's only late.
Please check your facts.
20

donald,

glasgow 02/05/2009 06:20:45
The triple millionaire, lawyer and career politician, whose three big hooses, were not in Drumchapel constituency, refused a ready made site on Caltonhill to hide it in a gully, where no one could see it featured on the Edinburgh skyline.
21

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 02/05/2009 10:58:43
And well he might be horrified. Mortified too, since he was the driving force behind it!
22

redcliffe62,

02/05/2009 12:16:44
would he be horrified about all those iraqis dead and billions on nuclear toys for the london boys? that horrifies me more.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.