Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Art critics seen off by the lion of Holyrood



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 31 March 2008
TWO leading figures in Scotland's art world have quit as advisers to the Scottish Parliament over the decision to keep the iconic Lion of Scotland sculpture at Holyrood.
Award-winning artist Alison Watt and ex-director of the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art Richard Calvocoressi resigned from the parliament's art advisory group with immediate effect.

Earlier this month, the parliament bowed to public pres
sure and agreed the 20-tonne granite carving by Edinburgh sculptor Ronald Rae should stay for three years. It has been a big hit with locals and visitors alike since going on show as part of an exhibition nearly two years ago. More than 2000 people had signed a petition calling for it to stay.

But the Evening News revealed last month that Mr Calvocoressi had privately urged MSPs to resist calls for the lion to be given a permanent home in the parliament's grounds.

In an e-mail to fellow members of Holyrood's art advisory group, he branded the lion "lifeless" and "boring" and warned: "There is always a danger popular sentiment will obscure artistic judgement. I can't think of a better home for the sculpture than a Yorkshire business park."

Despite this advice, the cross-party Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body accepted a recommendation from the advisory group that they should enter discussions with Mr Rae on his offer of a free long-term loan.

But in what was seen as a concession to the art professionals, the lion would not become part of the parliament's official art collection and it would not be moved to parliament land.

Instead, the parliament would accept responsibility for it if Historic Scotland, which runs Holyrood Park, was happy for the sculpture to remain where it is.

But a parliament source said: "Their noses were so out of joint that their advice was not taken, they have decided to go."

Lothians Green MSP Robin Harper, chairman of the advisory group, confirmed Mr Calvocoressi and Ms Watt had quit.

He added: "Whilst they are supportive of what the Scottish Parliament wishes to achieve with its art collection and fully endorse the decision not to acquire the sculpture for the permanent art collection, they do not agree with the SPCB decision to look at working with the artist and Historic Scotland to extend the sculpture's residency in Holyrood Park."

Mr Calvocoressi left the SNGMA last year after two decades to head the Henry Moore Foundation. Ms Watt, who has just ended two years as artist-in-residence at London's National Gallery, is famed for her paintings of draped fabrics – one of which hangs in the Scottish Parliament.





The full article contains 445 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 March 2008 10:18 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The Scottish Parliament
 
1

Jwil,

31/03/2008 12:22:24
They have to watch their "reputations" you know.

I am sure there will be plenty of others willing to fill their shoes.
2

Brian M,

edinburgh 31/03/2008 12:39:07
I hope we don't pay any of these 'advisers' for their opinion
3

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 31/03/2008 12:41:19
No doubt Watt and Calvocoressi belong to the same smug, self congratulating 'Art Establishment' that insist a pickled half-cow, a pile of bricks or a filthy, unmade bed are 'Art'. Emperor's New Clothes? - at least the lion actually looks like something and is historically significant at Holyrood.
4

senza nome,

31/03/2008 13:06:27
They resigned because they actually know something about art and realise that the lion is a very poor piece of sculpture.As Calvocorresi says it's lifeless and boring.
You can't tie in Alison Watt with Tracy Emin & co. She paints in a traditional way. You can see her work in Old St.Paul's Episcopal Church,Jeffrey Street.
5

Brian M,

Edinburgh 31/03/2008 13:13:00
Lifeless and boring to a couple of petted lips, the poor wee souls.

6

Boy Wonder,

31/03/2008 13:17:30
Alison Watt and Richard Calvocoressi are typical of those who think that the public have not an artistic bone in their collective body.

Personally ... I want p*ss artists like them OUT of the picture anyway!
7

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 31/03/2008 13:21:12
It's horrible and malformed. A real joke lion and a disgrace to be associated with Scotland. It's taking the mick. Ghastly. It looks like it might sell as a paperweight in poundstretcher. I'm aff to get with my hammer.
8

Finbarr Saunders,

31/03/2008 13:23:28
Good riddance to pretentious rubbish!
9

Brian S,

London 31/03/2008 13:23:58
I recently took a group of overseas vistors to Edinburgh and each and everyone of them commented on how they liked the loin.

Too many folk involved in the arts get this opinion that what they think matters most and not the general public.

I for one like the loin.
10

Foresight,

By the Water of Leith 31/03/2008 13:29:08


The government of Scotland is now the responsibility of a political party that believes in independence yet it appartently does not understand that this piece of sculpture does not represent or depict the LION OF SCOTLAND. Shame on the SNP supporting its continued presence at Holyrood.
11

Brian M,

Edinburgh 31/03/2008 13:29:33
arise Sir Loin
12

Brian M,

Edinburgh 31/03/2008 13:31:20
#10

"the cross-party Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body" supported its presence
13

Foresight,

By the Water of Leith 31/03/2008 13:45:52

#12 Yes, but provide me with evidence of SNP opposition to the decision. The shame is on them.
14

Brian M,

Edinburgh 31/03/2008 14:00:22
#13

am not interested in nor do I know who did or did not support it - anyway it was not a political issue.

Best that you try to find out for yourself
15

cheuchtar,

31/03/2008 14:05:05
Art is supposed to cause argument and discussion.
The Lion seems to have succeeded!
16

hassan i sabbah,

edinburgh 31/03/2008 14:29:47
#s3&6 I think you would be hard pushed to find a more Traditional artist than Alison Watt.Still dont let yer ignorance stop ye making complete erses o' yerselves!
17

Rusty Nut,

On a plinth 31/03/2008 16:05:59
Who says a public park should be a place for challenging rather than populist art? Surely Edinburgh has enough publicly funded galleries where people can indulge their own tastes.
Better a stone lion than a papier mache bloke with an extreme sun tan standing on a plinth as evident outside the new Cooncil HQ. That is frankly awful.
18

Jwil,

31/03/2008 17:36:13
This stylised lion would have made Picasso proud.
19

Finbarr Saunders,

31/03/2008 17:57:46
"Alison Watt ... famed for her paintings of draped fabrics"

Aye, you read it right - Little miss huffy paints lots of pictures of folded cloth and thinks she can dictate what is and what isn't worthy of being displayed in a public park.

http://www.nationalgalleries.org/media_collection/6/GMA%204353.jpg

20

Major General Puffin-Stuff,

31/03/2008 18:39:29
As one who signed the petition - power to the people and up yours, art snobs!
21

tomias,

Edinburgh 31/03/2008 20:55:54
I have met Mr Rae- I'd back him all the way.
I too have handled chisels etc; not easy at all.
Well done lion heart.
22

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 01/04/2008 09:41:12
Thing is you're allowed to be avant-garde, but only if it's by one of the in-crowd. It's so pathetically snobbish that and then if some "outsider" dares to create something which most people actually like it's toys oot the pram.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.