Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The world's paying a heavy price for the biofuel gold rush



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

The cost of food is up and the environment is suffering, says Alex Orr
ALL the diesel and petrol bought from forecourts in the UK must now contain 2.5 per cent biofuels – made in part from crops like corn or sugar – with a European Union target of ten per cent by 2020. It is, however, a policy that, unbeknown to the va
st majority of drivers, is putting millions of vulnerable people and the environment at risk, exacerbating climate change, and contributing to soaring food prices.

When first formulated, the EU biofuel target appeared sensible. Europe, after all, had a thriving biofuel industry that offered significant potential for reducing greenhouse gases from oil-powered transport. Beyond this, biofuels could be imported and the demand would stimulate similar industries around the world. However, the law of unintended consequences has kicked into effect. In the rush to make our exhaust emissions greener, worldwide biofuel production has been over-stimulated, with dire consequences.

Industrial conglomerates all over the world have not been slow to recognise there was money to be made from turning foodstuffs into alcohol, in growing oil crops rather than cereals and in ploughing up the world's forests and peat bogs for biofuel plantations. As a result, cheap biofuel is flooding into Europe, depressing indigenous European production and reducing agricultural output for human consumption.

While the sustainability plan envisaged biofuel produced from the surpluses and waste that inevitably accompanies food production, the reality has been that conglomerates have found it more profitable to grow fuel than food. The financial attraction of biofuel production has accelerated pressures on virgin forest. It has been estimated that for an emissions saving of ten per cent come 2020, the developed world will have been indirectly responsible for the destruction of another tenth of the world's forests.

People in poor countries are also being driven off their land to make way for new biofuel plantations, working in punishing conditions for a pittance. Combined with the large-scale drive in the US to produce bioethanol from maize, this is contributing to soaring food prices, depriving the world of vital land to grow crops just at the time when climate change is inducing drought in large areas of Africa and Asia. As a result, world food prices have soared by 45 per cent in the last nine months, according to the UN.

It is time for the UK Government to put a stop this misguided policy and to urge the EU to do likewise until a thorough investigation into the impact of biofuels has been completed and credible and enforceable standards are in place, guaranteeing that biofuels make neither climate change nor poverty worse. Unless they do, the lives and livelihoods of poor people around the world will be put at increased risk.

Alex Orr is a board member of the European Movement





The full article contains 486 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 April 2008 10:08 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Environment
 
1

me150,

25/04/2008 12:12:11
Took your time to report on that one EN.

I have known this for a very long time. Biofuels are not sustainable.

Also since Carbon footprints and global warming are non entities, lets get back to the way it was and get our prices lowered.

We waste billions every year dealing with global warming and it doesn't exist. Carbon footprints and how to reduce them....well yes it is good to cut back carbon emmisions but not for global warming reasons.

There is a huge amount of scientific evidence to demonstrate that Government, scientists and media have jumped on a bandwagon and are so far up the road that there is no turn back.

Global warming is a myth and the sooner everyone realises it the better.
2

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 25/04/2008 12:42:32
I blame the bunnyhuggers. We should melt them down for fuel.
3

dodderer,

Edinburgh 25/04/2008 21:25:45
It makes perfect sense, don't grow food, get paid to grow crops to burn. You want less CO2, burn more carbon.
4

Gordon lying traitor scum,

25/04/2008 22:13:02
BBC Anchor Who Reported on WTC7 Collapse Early Agrees There May Be a 'Conspiracy'

YouTube
5

truthsleuth,

26/04/2008 01:48:08
Bio Fuels for bio fools.

Cheap Food or Cheap fuel
Sorry, Cheap food or Expensive Food AND Expensive fuel
No doubt the Deniers will tellus we could build massive underground caverns and use hydroponic methods to grow bio fuels and thus not require any surface land take.


6

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 26/04/2008 15:02:41
#5

Oh no. You've discovered our cunning plan. But wait a minute - for a long time the EU were subsidising unused land. If our food requirements aren't all that different and this land is now being used albeit for bio-fuels, what's the problem? Maybe the EU could provide for some ring-fencing of food production to avoid farmers doing the obvious and selling it all for biofuels. But then there's that hydroponic thing - tat'll sort it. Right - off to panic buy some diesel.
7

PJ,

Edinburgh 29/04/2008 15:58:31
It was also mentioned on Sky news a couple of weeks ago, in a study it mentioned that any benefits from the use of Bio-fuels won’t be felt for over 800 years. It was also mentioned buying bio-fuel for your car could be more devastating to the planet than traditional fossil fuels, filling up with bio diesel containing palm oil is helping to destroy the Borneo's rainforests - one of the greenest places on Earth.

The UN says the entire rainforest will be gone in 15 years, and the native wild orang-utan extinct in just 10 years so all this saving the planet tree-hugging is doing more harm than good.

But these treehuggers don't really care about starving people and food riots in third world countries they have their nuts and lentils, to keep them well fed.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.