Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Charity snubs stricken snooker champion

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
04 January 2007
FORMER snooker star Chris Small has been refused the help of the sport's ruling elite as he battles a debilitating spine condition.
The 33-year-old Edinburgh sportsman has been turned down for a grant by snooker's main charitable trust for players who have fallen on hard times.

The benevolent fund of the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association - which organises the World Championships at Sheffield's Crucible Theatre - is believed to have paid out funds of up to £35,000 to former players in the past, including stars such as Alex "Hurricane" Higgins.

The decision to refuse Small has sparked anger inside the sport, with former BBC commentator Clive Everton condemning the move.

Small, who once ranked among the world's top 16 players, retired in 2005 because of the intense pain he suffered every time he bent over a snooker table to play a shot.

He had made repeated appearances in the world championship quarter and semi-finals for many years and won his first major prize when he claimed the LG Cup, in 2002, beating Scots John Higgins and Alan McManus en route.

But in 2000 he was diagnosed with the rare spinal condition ankylosing spondylitis, from which sufferers can end up wheelchair-bound.

Stars including Stephen Hendry, John Higgins and Dennis Taylor turned out for a testimonial dinner for him at the city's Hilton Grosvenor hotel last year.

The father-of-three said he had been given no reason for his application being refused.

"Yes, I was knocked back," he said. "It's annoying as I was a top player for ten years. It's not often a snooker player has to retire through ill health.

"I knew I wasn't going to get anything as my face doesn't fit with World Snooker."

Small's illness means he, his wife Clare, and their three young children now depend on her work as a part-time child minder for their only income.

The couple had planned to use any cash they received to set up a childminding business, which Clare would have run, had they been successful.

He said: "I was used to earning £30,000 or £40,000 a year, now I'm on absolutely nothing. It's hard and we still have a mortgage to pay."

Mr Everton, who now edits the magazine Snooker Scene, said Chris Small was one of the most clear-cut cases for aid he had ever come across. He said: "Here we have a highly deserving case who is not getting a grant.

"He has his whole life to face and has no means of earning a living. If Chris Small isn't worthy of a grant, who is?"

The WPBSA Benevolent Fund was set up as a charitable trust in 1983 and is managed by a board of three trustees.

It stated aim is, "to provide charitable assistance to professional players of billiards and snooker and their dependents requiring such assistance by reason of disablement, superannuation, death or otherwise."

Small's former manager Gordon McKay, of Leith State Snooker Club, is listed as a trustee of the fund on the Charity Commission's website. But today Mr McKay said: "I'm no longer a trustee. I resigned a few months ago. I can't comment on the case as it's confidential, but I wasn't on the board when they made the decision."

The benevolent fund has been at the centre of controversy before. An internal report into the affairs of the WPBSA produced more than a decade ago found that the benevolent fund had been misused.

In one case, the Blake report alleged loans of more than £35,000 had been used to pay off player Neal Foulds' debts and tax bills at a time when his father Geoff was the Association's chairman. It is understood that the charitable trust paid accommodation bills for Alex Higgins during a period when he was ill in recent years.

Elaine Goldsmith, the WPBSA's company secretary, said nobody at the association could discuss Mr Small's application.

She referred all the Evening News's inquiries to the Charity Commision's website.

She said: "We don't discuss any matters relating to the fund, which is a private charitable trust. We are a private members company. We can't disclose any details."

The full article contains 705 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 January 2007 1:43 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Paul Voltaire,

www.paulvoltaire.spaces.live.com 04/01/2007 12:17:00

This is very unfortunate for Chris especially when you consider Alex Higgins' misfortunes were largely of his own making and he has been 'looked after'.

2

Billy_o,

04/01/2007 12:19:54

Why was he refused?

3

Jakey Rowling,

04/01/2007 12:33:51

For once, being small minded would have been a good thing.

4

victor ian,

04/01/2007 12:58:21

obviously not a member of the snooker 'in crowd'.

5

mathilde,

aultbea ross-shire 04/01/2007 13:13:09

Descusting can't say anything else.

6

dawkins' goat,

cork 04/01/2007 13:25:30

#5

Can't spell it either...

7

King o' the Castle,

Penicuik 04/01/2007 13:43:46

This benevolent fund crew must have thought he got too much money from his benefit dinner last August. As No.1 said Higgins brought on his own demise. Good luck Chris.

8

Master Bates,

Leith 04/01/2007 13:54:57

Probably correct No.1 & No.7

9

Douglas,

Bathgate 04/01/2007 14:00:42

Ochone Dawkins Goat, it might have been phonetic. Away wi' ye now!

10

Faye,

Scotland 04/01/2007 15:03:13

He said: "I was used to earning £30,000 or £40,000 a year, now I'm on absolutely nothing. It's hard and we still have a mortgage to pay."

Why didn't he take out insurance to protect his lifestyle? At the very least he could have protected his mortgage payments. Insured the car but failed to insure himself against illness. Doh!

Hope his wife doesn't fall ill, without cover or they will be snookered.

Benevolent charities usually have a strict criteria. Probably his wife's income exceeded the limits.

Sorry to hear of his misfortune in what must now be difficult financial circumstances coupled with poor health.

11

Messalina,

04/01/2007 15:19:51

Other professions take care of their own when hit by hard times. Why should Smallie be an exception? Come on WPBSA .. time to show goodwill.

12

Alberto.,

04/01/2007 15:20:27

From comments made and comparisons mentioned, perhaps this may be a good time to call in the Auditors and check the books of the Charity involved!

It may well be that Mr Small has made much money from his snooker endeavours - who knows, but not made sufficient 'future insurance arrangements' - as one would expect!

Most top Players are paid, quite deservedly, high rewards for their ‘skill and entertainment’ value, buy lavish luxury houses and cars etc. as befits their idea of a lifestyle they can afford – nothing wrong with that, but if they (or their management!) don’t consider future possibilities and difficulties, well, I suppose in this day and age, for many reasons, the answer may have to be ‘Tough!’

It is, however, very surprising, in view of what will obviously be Public interest and concern, that the Charity seem not to have clarified their reason for this refusal - could it be that, from their point of view - it is simply 'none of our business!'

Possibly, from the various unusual positions we read of, quite frequently, about Charitable funds 'going missing' etc. and considering the request appears to be for such important reasons, and would be accepted as a good enough reason for them to be approached, an account check should clear one aspect at least, particularly for those who have donated!

What about any concern from those ‘Top’ players?

While they are under no obligation to help out financially, surely they must have some moral concern for colleague’s circumstances when brought on due to illness – is ‘no comment’ the order of the day?

13

Shaelyn,

04/01/2007 16:45:28

Good question, Victor (12)...why haven't we heard from the "Top" players and those who support this "charity"? They would do well to consider how they would be treated, should they need help. If the Board is not acting in a manner that represents the will of the membership, perhaps it's time for a new Board. If it is, perhaps it is time to reconsider our support and admiration of those members who are unwilling to demand the Trustees do what is right.

14

Georgieboy,

04/01/2007 17:23:00

If his ex manager had still been a trustee and the grant had been given, there's every chance that this would have made headlines as a decision only granted because of the managers position on the board of trustees!! or am I just being cynical?

Regardless of occupation, the opportunity to insure against loss of income due to illness is there for everyone, I do not see why it should be any different for our "sports stars"

15

plok,

04/01/2007 17:51:47

#3 Jakey Rowling - terrible pun, you should be ashamed of yourself to mock a disabled person in this way

16

Oliver F,

UK 04/01/2007 18:29:54

Those saying he should have taken out insurance forget one thing: You cannot get insurance for pre-existing conditions. It may be that he has been suffering from ankylosing spondylitis since his teens and would not be able to get such insurance.

17

,

04/01/2007 21:17:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 262144, Article id was mapped to record!
18

Sylvia in Regina,

Canada 04/01/2007 21:35:13

Chris said: "I was used to earning £30,000 or £40,000 a year," - my good Lord, couldn't he have put some aside and paid a healthy sum on his mortgage? I wish him well, as it seems nobody will be helping him out.

19

AJ,

Fife 04/01/2007 21:58:44

This is a deep screw up by the authorities. They should be made to follow through with a settlement to help cushion the blow!

20

Kitti Kat,

04/01/2007 23:03:55

how sad that his own sport left him high and dry. one can only hope that the people who refused him help are someday in that same boat.

21

St Andrew,

Edinburgh 05/01/2007 08:31:21

Why don't some "stars" arrange a few benefit events to raise money. It seems harsh that a member who is suffering through no fault of his own cannot be helped.

22

TalkSnooker,

Fife 05/01/2007 09:16:35

The benevolent fund of the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association must reconsider thier decision not to come to the aid of former Snooker champion, Chris Turner.

Chris has been forced to quit Snooker due to a spine condition, yet the fund refuse to help him and his family, despite the former champion relying on his wife's part-time income.

The fund was setup to help players who have fallen on hard times and has helped former stars such as Alex Higgins.

In Small's case, the condition he is suffering could be linked with the participation of the sport, unlike some others who, although suffer a horrible disease, could be construed as inflicting it on themselves through habits chosen by themselves.

Give Chris and his family the help they deserve!

ONLINE PETITION - http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/christurner/index.html

23

Billy,

Germany 05/01/2007 09:20:42

If he is disabled does that not entitle him to a raft of benefits? His days of high earnings are over, he needs to make realistic adjustments to his standard
of living.

24

big white,

edinburgh 05/01/2007 09:54:54

snooker a sport,,,hah dont make me laugh,,if i was earning 30,,40 thousand a year,im sure i could afford to put something away,,,,,i bet you any money that he will have dole money ,,dissability,,a car,,,im a painter and decorator and i suffer from cervical spondolitis,,,,so should i go cup in hand to all the other painters and ask for a free handouts,,,no i live on £137.42 per fortnight,,

nobody had a sponsered night out for me....work it out,,just say £35.000 a year for ten years,,it works out at £350.000,,,no bad eh,,,and how can anybody call snooker a sport,,,get up from chair pot a few balls go back to chair ,,,,,sport nah,,,daly thompson,now he was a sportsman,,,i rest my case,,anyway he should have invested some of his really hard earned cash,,,and what about all the exhibition matches he done im sure he declared all of it ,,,,,,sorry pal but theres a lot of other people worse of than cue.............

25

Bicknoller,

05/01/2007 11:12:10

Chris Small said "I was used to earning £30,000 or £40,000 a year, now I'm on absolutely nothing. It's hard and we still have a mortgage to pay."

Is that true? Are there no state benefits for people who cannot work?

If Chris Small is getting no benefits, then the charity should help him.

If he is getting benefits and is claiming otherwise, then my support goes to Caster the painter.

26

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 05/01/2007 14:27:56

More idiotic and incomprehensible blather from Paul Voltaire. Does he post just so he can see his name and stupid postings in print?

It is disgraceful that the Association is denying the man the compensation that they gave others and not giving any reasons for this denial.

This is arrogance at it most blatant and they should be called to account and explain EXACTLY why they are denying him compensation. These "fat cats" have to much power and need to be accountable to those that pay their salaries.

27

Oliver F,

UK 05/01/2007 14:42:49

Talksnooker #22

"In Small's case, the condition he is suffering could be linked with the participation of the sport"

Ankylosing Spondylitis would not be caused by playing snooker. Its an incredibly complex disease which I have been fighting for 20 years. That said, once the disease progresses, like in smalls case, bending over a snooker table to try and play would be agonising and would quite conceivably aggravate the condition.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.