Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Hundreds of condoms given out to teens in safe sex drive

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
16 January 2007
MORE than 1000 condoms a week are being handed out free to children under 16 as part of a controversial safe sex programme in the Lothians.
The confidential C:card service hands out contraception to children as young as 13 at youth clubs and other venues on condition youngsters talk to an adviser about safe sex.

The service was today praised as a crucial way of protecting youngsters from unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, amid rising rates of teenage pregnancy and chlamydia in the region.

But the Catholic Church in Scotland condemned the service for making sex as easy as "having a pizza" for schoolchildren.

A total of 53,638 free condoms were issued to 13 to 15-year-olds in Edinburgh and the Lothians as part of NHS Lothian's C:card service in 2005, according to new figures released to the Evening News under the Freedom of Information Act. Youth workers at the Canongate Youth Project, one of 69 C:card outlets in the Lothians, said growing numbers of teenagers were using its service.

Canongate project worker Laurene Edgar said: "Yes, the legal age of consent is 16, but we all know that some people under that age have sex whether we give them free condoms or not.

"It's about taking a harm reduction approach in that we recognise that those under 16 engage in sexual relationships and we want to make sure they are doing that in a way that is as safe as possible."

The C:card service costs NHS Lothian £134,000 a year to run. Take-up last year dropped from the previous year, but health chiefs believe there is no significant trend, and the service is still proving popular with youngsters.

Children who want to claim free condoms, receive a membership card after handing over their date of birth and the first part of their postcode. Before contraceptives are issued, the child is shown how to put on the condom and must talk to a worker about their sexual relationship.

NHS Lothian's public health director Dr Alison McCallum said: "The C:card system is an important service for young people. As well as providing free condoms, it allows young people to access free and confidential advice and information, from experienced and skilled staff, regarding the practice of safer sex, related infections and relationships.

"The number of organisations which operate the C:card system has risen in the last six months from 65 to 69."

Unsafe sex has been blamed for the rising cases of chlamydia and growing numbers of teenage pregnancies in the Lothians.

Cases of chlamydia, which can cause infertility, have doubled in both women and men over the past five years. There were 781 cases among men and 615 among women in 2005.

The latest NHS Lothian figures also show around 120 pregnancies a year among 13 to 15-year-olds - a 31 per cent rise in ten years.

Simon Dames, a spokesman for the Catholic Church in Scotland, condemned the service.

He said: "Sex isn't like having a pizza, which is why I think we are lying to our youth by having these so-called sexual health services.

"We are raising the age of smoking cigarettes to 18 and it would be crazy encouraging youngsters to try cigarettes by calling it safe smoking. We have now got a zero tolerance approach to smoking but, for some reason, with sexual integrity and dignity we are going the other way and destroying our youths' modesty."

Judith Gillespie of the Scottish Parent Teacher Council said although parents do worry about their child having sex at such a young age, they should feel reassured that they are being encouraged to do so safely. She said: "If you have a child of this age, you might not like them to participate in sex but it's worse if the child ends up pregnant or with some disease that is difficult to treat."

"If you have got a teenage girl, the one thing you don't want to happen is that youngster getting pregnant. The ideal situation might be no sex but the realistic solution is to try to stop young girls from getting pregnant."

The full article contains 708 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 January 2007 1:34 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Sex education
 
1

Spondoolicks,

16/01/2007 12:23:31

I suppose handing out condoms it quicker than having to actually talk to children about how shagging around at 13 is too young...

2

bikerider1,

16/01/2007 12:33:06

lets hope that they perhaps promote the idea of abstaining from sex until their a bit older, as well as safe sex to them. But the truth of the matter is that some youngsters are going to be having sex regardless, so doing something to keep them safe is no bad thing

3

Paul Voltaire,

www.paulvoltaire.spaces.live.com 16/01/2007 13:06:41

Like paddling in the sea with wellies on.

4

petrol head,

Edinburgh 16/01/2007 13:06:51

#1 has a ggod point.

This government is full of hypocracy. Something's illegal and the law is regularly being broken so instead of looking at the issue and doing something positive about it they aid and abet the law breaking.

It seems that if you are a drug addict, workshy, or an irresponsible teenager then the system will bend over backwards to help you. If on the other hand, you hold down a proper job, are responsible and are trying to better yourself, the system puts every obstacle possible in your way. It's known as "socialism" and the sooner we get rid of it the better.

5

Messalina,

16/01/2007 13:41:07

My youngest says they make "great water balloons"!!

6

Everything you do is a balloon,

16/01/2007 14:10:13

Thats what the wil get used for Messalina. That or a "posh".

7

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 16/01/2007 14:10:48

I don't know wether to be appalled or to be happy.

I think I'll err on the side of caution and be happy and as long as they hand out condoms, they dish out education with them. At least that way the whinging wee sh*ts cannot say we don't do enough to protect them from themselves.

8

Evie,

16/01/2007 14:20:22

So the Catholic Church says that gving out condoms is as easy as having a Pizza? I wonder what church encourages unmarried girls to have children by bribing them with cash gifts? Do I get a prize for guessing?

9

heather,

16/01/2007 14:33:34

the catholic church could help in some way to cut under-age sex ,unwanted kids & the spread of HIV etc by backing the use of condoms & other family planning.
would rather my 15 year old daughter (if i had one]
be handed a condom than have a baby to look after for the next 18+ years.

10

.,

16/01/2007 14:40:59

We really should get the commentators of the Scotsman/Evening News site to run the country, after all they are the most qualified and knowledgable people in the land!
They seem to know what's best in any given situation.

I mean, honestly, what would doctors know about public health?!

11

Janet,

16/01/2007 14:43:44

i am 38 and still haven't had my end away.

when i read about kids of this age doing the business i feel ashamed and depressed. What have they got that i don't?

well done the Evening News.

12

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 16/01/2007 14:47:14

What have they got that i don't? - Janet

Bottles of Buckie!

13

Ali M,

Edinburgh 16/01/2007 14:48:24

Am I missing something here. Why are we handing these out to under age people, surely this is encouraging them to break the law in terms of the age of consent.

Lets get the message out there that sex was designed to be enjoyed by a man and a women who are married. This would have so many benefits to society.

NHS Lothian - please do not waste my money on these

14

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 16/01/2007 14:49:13

#10

You have a point but remember, some of us commentators are parents of said children and we too are also responsible for thier health and there is also a question of moral health, not just physical health.

15

Jakey Rowling,

16/01/2007 14:55:25

#11
I've phoned my Chinese sex therapist and according to him you've got Ed Zachery disease.
Apparently its caused when your face looks Ed Zachery like your ....
:)

16

Everything you do is a balloon,

16/01/2007 14:56:44

Janet , you havent got an "end" to get away.

Thats probably what you are missing.

17

Janet,

16/01/2007 14:57:25

#15

HA HA HA = that is a good joke!!!!


fancy a hump?

18

Jakey Rowling,

16/01/2007 15:03:36

#17
Sorry, no can do.
Faye has already taken the hump with me on another topic.

19

Soosie,

16/01/2007 15:05:32

If people would care to research the C Card service and look into what it is actually about, they will find that it is not simply a condom distribution point. The young people (of all ages) are engaged in discussion with a qualified worker about all aspects of their relationship. The service is a valuable health promotion exercise, which provides a method of monitoring the reasons why the young people are engaging in sexual activity and discussing issues of self esteem, saying "no", and how to conduct themselves in the safest manner if they are saying "yes". To suggest that it is encouraging underage sexual activity is far from the truth.

If the Catholic church woke up to the real world, they would recognise that by not talking about things, you do not make it go away, but instead drive it underground, hence the lack of knowledge of young people in Catholic schools, who are just as likely to be victim to teenage single parenthood or sexually transmitted infections. The Catholic method (and I speak as one who attended Catholic school) is damaging in the extreme. We need look no further than the African nations, where Catholic missionaries refuse to promote the idea of contraception or use of condoms. These poor people are left to pick up the pieces of unwanted children they cannot feed, and the horror of HIV. Good old Catholic sex education, eh?

20

Proximo,

16/01/2007 15:08:01

Is the person in the photograph saying 'pick a card, any card'? Or maybe playing two hands of poker simultaneously?

21

Everything you do is a balloon,

16/01/2007 15:09:22

Enough about the catholic church...

What age is Laurene Edgar ? She looks about 14.

Still if she is old enough to lead , then she is old enough to take responsibility for her peers.

Hymen to that.

22

Jockyw,

16/01/2007 15:16:10

What about free handouts for the over 30's & singles?

23

Jockyw,

16/01/2007 15:18:11

If children U13 are having sex then good luck to them. Hopefully the parents will be grandparents by their 30th Birthday, total class (idiots).
Education from parents & schools are much to blame for.

24

steve 1511,

16/01/2007 15:24:29

so this is how so many water bombs are being thrown

25

Janet,

16/01/2007 15:24:52

in my day..... blah blah blah ... the kids used a crisp packet and an elastic band.


kids today have it easy.
next they'll be getting handed out double ended black mambos and Super Rabbits.

26

Dave From Barra,

Western Isles 16/01/2007 15:30:08

next they'll be getting handed out double ended black mambos and Super Rabbits.

WTF???????

27

Agent 99,

16/01/2007 15:39:06

[19] Soosie: Well said.

Young adults will always experiment. The more the adult world says its forbidden the better it looks. That was certainly the case when I was 15 and bombardment from the internet today has heightened this rather than demystified it.

The catholic church along with all their holier than thou types should realise that they are only deluding themselves and can better expend the energy on positive solutions rather than unending denial.

They [the church] recognise that sin exists. They term early sexual experience a sin. Why should someone that indulges in the same be punished, possibly for a short and painful time if they get HIV, rather than be helped. To "sin" is human, to arbitrarily punish like the church does is not; it is unforgivable.

Janet: Botanic gardens 6pm?

28

Everything you do is a balloon,

16/01/2007 15:39:37

And performing The Lucky Pierre manouvre.

29

Agent 99,

16/01/2007 15:41:32

[26] Dave; dose tings havnt arrived in barra yet.

BTW: How can you have a double-ended....

Janet, explain please.

30

Robb,

16/01/2007 15:43:48

There is much misunderstanding about Harm Reduction philosophy such as this. People should educate themselves instead of slagging everything off while knowing little about it. The C card scheme lets health professionals engage with young people who otherwise might just not bother with condoms. Do we really want to have even more problems with sexual diseases and abortions etc than we do now. Any attempt to educate the young is a good thing.

As has already been said, just look at how the Catholic philosophy of no condoms under any circumstances works in Africa, swamped with over population and disease. It's a scandal that such a blinkered view is allowed in this day and age, far less encouraged!

Everybody knows that the old "keep your legs shut" message doesn't get through. Whether that's the way it should be, I'm not debating, but when youngsters are having sex, it's better that adults are talking to them about it than ignoring it and leaving the whole of society to face the consequences of that.

Jocky #22 - I think you can get them free at any G.U.M Clinic

31

Jakey Rowling,

16/01/2007 15:45:39

#19
I agree with your criticism of the African missionaries.
I don't support their position on this at all.

32

Janet,

16/01/2007 15:50:22

FAO BOSWELL

can't make it tonight i am afraid, you see, i am horse riding tonight and i will be busy feeding my pony.

33

Jockyw,

16/01/2007 16:05:57

#30 Robb, cheers for the info, much appreciated.

34

Everything you do is a balloon,

16/01/2007 16:07:12

This website is becoming dirty. Dirty minds and dirty talk .

I shall not be back.

35

yolanda,

16/01/2007 16:08:48

#13, Ali... Yes, indeed you ARE missing something here. There is a great deal of research to show that that harm reduction measures do NOT increase such behaviours as drug use, sexual practice etc. There is NO evidence to back up your theory that it is encouraging illegal activity. Do you honestly believe that people would not have sex if they were not given condoms? A naive view in the extreme! No, the outcome would be more likely to be that there would be even HIGHER levels of unmarried teenagers and people with sexually transmitted infections.

You say we should tell young people that "Sex was designed to be enjoyed by a man and a woman who are married" Interesting... WHO exactly designed it, and do you seriously think people did not have sex before the concept of marriage was invented? I understand your desire to stop underage sex. In an ideal world, of course young people wouldn't do it, but please wake up! Do you honestly believe that lying about it and ignoring it is the way to go? Please tell me who exactly would benefit from your way of dealing with this?

36

bikerider1,

16/01/2007 16:13:46

#17 janet if you've got a hump no wonder you cant get laid

37

thebhoycolin,

Edinburgh 16/01/2007 16:18:05

I had a C card as a youing teenager and it never made me have sex. I think the condoms may have even went out of date(not for the want of trying). Condoms dont make kids have sex but hopefully they can provide safety if they are having it

38

Everything you do is a balloon,

16/01/2007 16:19:28

Try and grow another Hump and , depending on the size and position of the humps, I will quite happily take you up the market.

39

John B Dick,

Rothesay 16/01/2007 16:25:49

The only effective means in any society in history which has prevented young people having sex is malutrition.

Earlier maturity is a consequence of beter nutrition and health care.

40

Proximo,

16/01/2007 16:29:26

I'm sure you can get black mambos and super rabbits at our corner shop, the kids love 'em. 1p each still, bad for the fillings though...

41

Everything you do is a balloon,

16/01/2007 16:33:33

Are you saying we should give our children Malnutrition John ?

42

Andrew,

16/01/2007 16:34:13

Learn to spell in your poll on this issue!
"Thirteen is TO young!!!! ie TOO!!!

43

Stickman,

16/01/2007 16:34:16

Underage sex isn't something that society necessarily likes or approves of. It does, however, have to DEAL with it. Those who advocate ignoring it or telling lies about it really need to get a reality check. It solves NOTHING. It doesn't stop any of it happening. It just normally makes it happen even more. We all know that, but some people won't see sense, eg. #13.

Personally I'd rather a fourteen year old had protected sex than unprotected sex. Ideally, no sex at all actually, but I have no control over that, so let's be realistic and get our heads out of the sand.

44

Soosie,

16/01/2007 16:50:37

#44, Chairman Gordon - Wrong on both counts actually. I am actually someone who takes an interest in social issues and prefers to learn about things before I comment on them, unlike some. Instead of accusing me of propaganda, I suggest you do a little bit of research yourself so that you may have facts instead of merely unsubstantiated opinions. Which part of what I said do you think is incorrect?
Sneering at suggestions? No, I am merely stating what, if people such as yourself would actually pay attention to FACT, is well evidenced. Which part about the African situation I mentioned is wrong? The overpopulation, the malnutrition, or the condemnation of condoms by the Catholic church? Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not true!

45

thebhoycolin,

Edinburgh 16/01/2007 16:57:39

Giving out condoms is just plain sensible thats all. The other problem is teaching teenagers the skills to either say no to sex or to insist on the use of a condom. As for accusations of liberalism then surely liberalism takes good points and bad points then weighs up the pro's and con's. This scheme is to be commended

46

Robb,

16/01/2007 17:02:31

Spot on #19, #43, #47. The main thing is that the condoms aren't just given out in isolation. It's part of an education and health service.

47

Angus Mor,

God's Own Island 16/01/2007 17:04:59

How about teaching the kids this mantra - "No glove, No love!"

48

Arthur,

16/01/2007 17:41:18

42) Isn't to,too young two?

49

livislosin,

somewhere 16/01/2007 17:45:00

jANET, GIVE ME A CALL, I`LL BRING A PIZZA.

50

Arthur,

16/01/2007 17:45:00

11) it does not surprise me that you have not had your end away, Still I'm a charitable sort so hw would you like it safe or unsafe?

51

Arthur,

16/01/2007 17:48:29

£) this tells us quite a lot we did not want to know about your sex parners, if you have time for them.
In your case it's more like throwing a banana up an aley.
A better comparison than your's however is, it's like having a bath with your socks on.

52

Arthur,

16/01/2007 17:51:23

5) Point of information for your son, those brands which
bear the BSI kitemark can hold 5 imperial gallons of water, thats some size of water bomb, about 3 ft in diameter, dropped from about 15 feet it can give a robin reliant a good wash in one go.

53

,

16/01/2007 17:56:05
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 291283, Article id was mapped to record!
54

Scaramouche,

16/01/2007 18:13:58

After the spectacle of having an 11 year old give birth to a baby last year, why is anyone even questioning handing out condoms??

I know that kids of 12 and 13 are experimenting. I also know it was happening when I was that age. Every guy in my class in first year were so envious that one guy had had his end away. By the time I was in 3rd year, every guy DID end his virginity - except for a guy called Paul but we were all wary of him in the showers anyway!

Unless you want to see more under 14s become parents - sex education is necessary and free condoms too. BUT, the idea of parental responsibility MUST be included in those lessons.

Otherwise the cycle continues!

55

Jakey Rowling,

16/01/2007 18:30:02

#56
If you knew Soosie like I know Soosie, you'd be in favour of the scheme.

56

John Knox for First Meenister,

High St, Embra 16/01/2007 19:04:51

"the Catholic Church in Scotland condemned the service for making sex as easy as "having a pizza" for schoolchildren."
It's a disgrace quoting the Catholic Church. And away with their idolatrous pizza! Is it goat's cheese?

57

Arthur,

16/01/2007 19:04:53

55) "Are you the same Arthur who works at York University"

Yes, what of it?

"with a rare blood group"

Yes, what of it?

"and couldn’t get any “tail in the White Cockade”

Yes, what of it?

"and had to use the services of a brothel in Rose Street Lane with “no fat slappers” sorry now the New Executive Sauna, still visit eh!"

No that is a deliberate misquote on your part
And no I don't it's rather difficult from York.

Now what is your point?
Is it on topic?
Have you got anything useful to add to this debate?
What kind of sad git collates out of context quotes from other articles?
To what purpose does he do this?
Are you capable of differentiating between when a
respondent is serious and when they are being humourous?

58

Arthur,

16/01/2007 19:10:10

58) Spare the rod and spoil the child eh?
Yep that always works without fail !
Liberal thinking, is fact it's part of the liberal nature to think.
Perhaps if reactionary, kneejerk right wing moralists
thought the world be be less of a mess than it is, don't you think, oh sorry, I forgot, course you don't!

59

Arthur,

16/01/2007 19:13:07

56) The African example is very relevent, because it is indicitive of the damage moralistic control can do.

60

Arthur,

16/01/2007 19:34:48

64) What then does discipline at home mean.
Liberal thinking means thinking before acting, not reacting, It is to be hoped that this is practised everywhere by everyone, but that does not seem to be the case, sadly.
The African experience is relevent by comparison, it is evidence on which to think hopefully liberally about solutions. You obviously will not regard it as relevent
because your thinking is not evidence based.

61

Stickman,

16/01/2007 19:39:31

The Catholic church has entered themselves into the debate of C card services by voicing their condemnation of the education of young people on sexual health and distributing condoms to people who use the service, therefore I think it is reasonable and relevant that people refer to their condemnation of condoms in general to highlight the fact that it is not only C card services and underage sex that they are condemning.

The African issue is a very clear example of where the Catholic church teaches that it is better to have an underdeveloped county live in poverty, disease and starvation, as it is unable to sustain its population than to educate the people on using contraception and make it available. This fact, I believe makes it relevant in this debate. An opinion that is obviously shared among other commentators on this subject. We are all entitled to our opinion. I do not see that providing services to address issues necessarily corresponds with condoning the behaviour of the people who attend them. It is a public health and social issue.

Surely though, even the most blinkered commentators must agree that if young people are indulging in sexual intercourse,it is better to provide healthand education services to try to ensure that they are doing this in as safe a manner as possible,than to sweep it under the carpet and leave it unaddressed?

62

yolanda,

16/01/2007 19:59:38

The C card service will not, of course, stop all teenage pregnancy or all sexually transmitted diseases, but if it stops even a few children being brought in to the world unloved and left to be raised by an unprepared and immature teenager, or people being made ill by preventable diseases, that's £134K well spent as far as I'm concerned.

I don't believe underage sex is a good thing. My goodness, I wish it didn't happen, but it does, so we can't just pretend it doesn't. I think it's better to talk to young people about what they're doing and why they're doing it,and to try to persuade them that they may not be mature enough to have that kind of relationship.Then, if that doesn't work, give them the protection they need. it's not just about chucking condoms at them. Of course that would be a bad thing to do,and I doubt if anyone would dispute that. We have to live in the real world and not an ideal fantasy world where everyone waits till they're married. Life in the 21st century isn't like that.

63

AngusMor,

God's Own Island 16/01/2007 20:07:15

Why isn't life in the 21st century like that Yolanda? Poor moral teaching perhaps? What is so special about this century as apposed to the 20th?

64

Miss Sinclair,

16/01/2007 20:09:08

It seems absurd to me that in this day and age parents will still not accept that there teenage daughters/sons are experimenting with sex. I'm in my 30"s and when we were in school, we were all experimenting. I do believe the the sex education we got at school was fairly good and I'm sure its even better now, but come on parents, take your blinkers off. I know its hard to come to terms with but its about time we got to grips with it, more education at a young age, might stop our children coming home with a sexually transmitted disease or an unwanted pregnancy.

65

AngusMor,

God's Own Island 16/01/2007 20:12:43

I think parents accept that thier kids are experimenting but that's the problem, sex isn't for experimenting and the kids don't accept advice from people who have already made the mistakes or gone through the teenage years i.e the parents.

I speak as a father of 3 kids in late teens early 20's.

66

yolanda,

16/01/2007 20:30:47

#68, Yes, perhaps poor moral teaching is the reason that things are not the same as they used to be, along with many other factors. I don't profess to know the detail of WHY teenagers nowadays are more experimental and exposed to things in a way they weren't in, say, my parents day.

The fact is though,that things AREN'T the same, and young people are indulging in risky behaviour, perhaps more nowadays than ever before, so society and health services have to deal with the way things ARE. I'm not saying it's morally right, just that it's obvious that it's the way society IS.

Of course addressing morals has an important part to play, and parents, teachers,health professionals and adults in general all have a duty of care to young people and should try to steer them in the right direction. My point is that as a part of trying to address the issue, services providing factual sexual health education,and where necessary, appropriate contraception is important.

67

,

16/01/2007 21:38:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 291608, Article id was mapped to record!
68

Arthur,

16/01/2007 22:42:19

72) Wonderful, simply wonderful. Out of the mouths of babes....

69

Young Gordon,

The Shore 16/01/2007 23:13:30

Sorry Janet #11 you'll no be ridin ma pony -I'm already taken luv.

70

Taras Schevchenko,

17/01/2007 01:04:16

19. Soosie, really well said.

I'm not gay but I sometimes go to a gay bar with a pal after tennis and when I see the large bowl of condoms full of free condoms, I wonder why its not done in all sorts of other places.

Condoms are expensive but kids are super expensive.

71

alvin,

philippines 17/01/2007 08:56:35

nowadays,teenagers are critical minded in terms of social affairs,i think the word condom will just confuse the mind of teenagers and they are too young to be aware of it because they are not in the proper age yet to have a deep awareness about condoms,teenagers should engage a proper guidance from their parents, so that they will keep from any undesirable things about this.

72

Trix,

Edinburgh 17/01/2007 09:29:01

OK, Kids at 13 should not be having sex, but peer pressure is strong. I would rather kids had ALL the facts and could make an informed choice. My son knows all about the C-Card, and I know that to tell him not to have sex has got a good chance of falling on deaf ears. But I do know that he will be responsible, and I don't want to be a grandparent at this time.

This is a serious subject, but a lot of the comments think that it's a joke. I wish that some people would grow up. At least the kids have some sense.

73

,

17/01/2007 15:28:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
74

,

17/01/2007 15:38:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
75

TonyC,

Glasgow 17/01/2007 15:44:34

I'm Catholic.

It's very good that we're having this debate as it shows that we all care about the well-being of our society.

SEX IS A GOOD THING ! That's what Jesus teaches us !!! Awesome, in fact ! And we should definitely go for it !!!!! - but only under the proper conditions ! - a man married to a woman - all else brings sorrow, selfishness, sickness, death (AIDS etc) ...hence the phrase..."the Culture of Death".

CONDOMS are NOT the way forward and only encourage PROMISCUITY !! And hence more disease, broken families etc etc etc.

Personally, I think the money in all of this could be used more wisely. We need to reach out to our young people and listen to what they have to say while at the same time BE VERY GOOD PEOPLE...which is not at all easy. But well worth the effort.

76

Old Pastor,

USA 17/01/2007 16:51:30

This practice is the lesser of two evils. If parents would teach their offspring that "sex is worth waiting for" this condition would not exist.But--from a practical viewpoint--condoms are preferable to "babies being born to children".

77

Old Pastor,

USA 17/01/2007 17:05:42

Comment already stated above.

78

,

17/01/2007 18:50:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.