Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Schools need to tackle drink and sex together

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 January 2008
COULD there be a more appropriate time in the year to launch two new strategies on sex and drinking than at Hogmanay?
Certainly the Scottish wing of the British Medical Association doesn't think so, getting its new year off to a flying start this week with resolutions on teenage pregnancy and the nation's other national sport, consuming as much alcohol as possible b
efore ending up in the gutter or A&E.

Controversially, two of its committees have proposed introducing sex and alcohol education into the classroom for five-year-olds.

The BMA has a point. Learning about how babies are made in a matter-of-fact way can be no bad thing for young children – that's if they don't know already should they have siblings; there are few parents who haven't had to deal with the "where do babies come from?" query.

Similarly, learning about the potentially dangerous effects of too much alcohol consumption on the body is again a reasonable suggestion – as long as they're not given a packed-in liver to dissect.

But the doctors have also missed a great opportunity – to finally link the two issues. Sex and drinking need to be tackled together with an admittance that soaring levels of teenage pregnancy and sexual disease are in bed with binge drinking. Indeed, teenage drunken fumbles and unwanted babies go together like, well, love and marriage, don't they?

Perhaps not. But if the Scottish Government and BMA are committed to tackling both issues, it is surely better to look at them in tandem when it comes to health education in schools.

Twenty or so years ago, sex education consisted of looking at magnified images of pubic lice – blown up to show off every millimetre of their itchy glory – and genital warts.

No doubt some of the 13 and 14-year-olds I sat with in the science lecture theatre being bombarded with such images were already better acquainted with each other's bodies than they legally had the right to be.

Sex education for them had a more practical, do-it-yourself approach.

At school though the emphasis was on not doing "it" because of what you might catch – anything from nasty itches to newborn babies. There was talk of condoms but, more importantly, we were given the address and phone number of the family planning clinic, the Brook, in Gilmore Place. It was a favourite haunt of Gillespie and Boroughmuir girls looking for the Pill.

Those classes could have put us all off sex for life, but by the end of fourth year there were girls leaving school to have babies.

SE classes couldn't be blamed for that. But SE also stood for "social education" and yet I can't remember a single period devoted to alcohol and the idea of drinking it responsibly.

And there can be no doubt that those who ended their education to become teenage mums did so in part thanks to the cider and vodka-fuelled house parties that were all the rage. No alcopops back then – just the hard stuff.

Teenage sex and binge drinking at weekends have always been with us, and yet these two major health and social issues are seemingly irresolvable – resulting in massive cost to the NHS.

I can understand the idea of sex education at five will likely be baulked at by parents who want to keep their youngsters as "innocent" for as long as possible. But why should knowing about how babies are made ruin a youngster's innocence? Finding out how tough school life can be in the playground will do that much more quickly.

And again while it may be troubling to think that their bright eyes might be opened to the perils of drink – that's all those children who live at home with abstainers – surely a little factual information about hangovers can do as much harm as telling them that two and two equals four.

Perhaps when they're slightly older it can be refined into simple equations such as, if x > bacardi and y > a boy/girl you like, what is xy? That's right, your new baby boy.

And honestly, which home with children has not had some discussion of the drinking culture which surrounds Hogmanay this week?

So let's take away the mystique of sex and alcohol and make them matter-of-fact subjects to be discussed openly at school – and more importantly at home – and try to remove some of their illicit appeal. Of course that won't stop young people experimenting, but forewarned is forearmed.

We are now into the eighth year of a new millennium and it's time to shake off the shackles of the previous one. It is not shameful to have sex. It is not shameful to enjoy a drink. What is shameful is bringing a baby into the world when it is not wanted because of ignorance and drunkenness.

It's time to give children the tools to grow into decent, responsible adults. We need to get them to them early.


In sickness and in health, I dook

NOT for the first time I spent New Year with some loonies – this time though it was down at South Queensferry and they all seemed to be peculiarly sober.

By 11.45am on New Year's Day the truly lunatic were wading into the freezing waters of the Forth, some wearing very little (Playboy Bunny bikinis or leopard skin thongs) and leaving even less to the imagination as the temperature ensured their whole bodies would take a salute to the first day of 2008.

Apparently most taking part in the Loony Dook were doing so for charity, but for one couple it was the icing on the cake for their own celebrations.

Apparently they had got hitched at the Orocco Pier the day before and there they were up to their oxters in bitterly cold water still wearing their wedding clobber (although the bride's gown had allegedly been replaced by a charity shop version after the thought of the dry cleaning bill).

But if their marriage can survive that it can survive anything. A Happy New Year to them and to you all.



Page 1 of 1

 
1

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 03/01/2008 12:23:28
Surely it is rather crass of reporter Gina Davidson to label Scotland's other "national sport" as binge drinking. Is she trying to get a cheap headline at the expense of the true facts?

Drinking too much may be epidemic in certain parts of Scotland but to label it as a "national sport" show a lack of journalistic integrity at the expense of aiming for cheap shots at Scotland and its majority of sober subjects.
2

revsween,

03/01/2008 14:12:00
Whoa don't be so quick to disreguard Binge drinking as our other national sport ,I think we've got a chance of finishing in the medals in this one
3

tomias,

Edinburgh 03/01/2008 14:21:46
As an oldie- in my 6 years at senior secondary,one case of pregnancy.
cannot recall drunkeness; and this was within a stones throw of Gillespie's.
191947/circa 1953.
Sex could be seen on Corstorphine hill and elsewhere re the GIs.
So what were the social changes to bring about such a radical change?
PhDs have been awarded for such.Not by me however.
Flippantly it might have been sliced bread- or indeed other such disticive innovations.
For younger readeers the Brook no longer exists under that name in Scotland-try the Lothian Road end of Castle Terrace for Caledonian Youth.
4

alex patersons English teacher,

03/01/2008 14:47:40
2
far be it from me to put you down,but id keep watch of my spelling if i were you.
5

Paul Voltaire,

03/01/2008 16:42:53
Sex and drinking have never mixed well in my life.
6

Calum Crubag,

03/01/2008 16:44:37
Why are Presbyterians against sex standing up?
7

Calum Crubag,

03/01/2008 16:45:20
It may lead to dancing.

Stop worrying everyone, let the Wee Frees sort it out. Or else Pope Gord of Bannockburn.
8

brainyfurball,

Scotland 04/01/2008 11:47:38
"Schools need to tackle drink and sex together" - The kids do this all the time, or, do we have to take it that this activity should now be encouraged at an inter school level?
9

,

04/01/2008 22:59:30
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

,

04/01/2008 23:12:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

,

04/01/2008 23:17:07
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

04/01/2008 23:27:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

GalacticCannibal,

Murrieta 07/01/2008 04:25:34
9,10,11,12
Digory,
Narnia


WOW Dude ,
Do u live in the house of Shrooms ???

GC
14

,

09/01/2008 09:16:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

09/01/2008 09:21:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

09/01/2008 09:22:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

Symposiast,

BE 12/01/2008 15:05:51
GINA DAVIDSON,ESQ.
Let's go back to the basics. Your story ended in empty suggestions. It seems it doesn't have a qualification enough to discuss pedagogy. In general, it is necessary to pursu pedagogy at the university to develop the education that can receive the support from the citizens in this country. It's time when it should learn by you. Please go back to the basics. It will be the best environment.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.