Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Seafield upgrade offers stench victims powerful whiff of hope



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 April 2008
NINE out of ten homes affected by the infamous "Seafield stench" would be rid of the smell under new improvements backed by council officials.
Plans put forward by Scottish Water, which owns Seafield Sewage Works, would see most of the odour problem removed in a series of upgrades worth around £20 million. However, the measures do not include covering the sewage tanks, which is something th
at long-suffering local residents have campaigned for.

Local MSP and Justice Minister Kenny MacAskill is also likely to be disappointed, after last year saying that covering the tanks "appears to be the only real solution to the odour problem".

Among the proposed measures is for an "odour abatement plant" to be fitted above the sewage tanks to filter out the noxious smells.

New screening and treatment equipment will be fitted at the sewer entrance to the plant, and all of the open channels between the different areas will be covered.

Covering the tanks is the most expensive option, thought to cost around £40m, although it has not been ruled out if the other measures do not work. City officials, who sent Scottish Water back to the drawing board with their last odour plan, today said they were confident the measures would solve the decades-old problem.

If it is agreed by councillors next week, and wins all of its planning permissions, then the council would drop its court action against Scottish Water and plant operator Stirling Water, requiring them to tackle the odour nuisance.

Gordon Greenhill, head of community safety, said the package would mean 94 per cent of affected homes would no longer have an odour problem. He said: "These measures will make such huge inroads into the problem that I would be very surprised to see any future nuisance problems from the plant.

"There will always be smells on occasions, during periods of agreed maintenance or upgrades for example, but there is no solution that will get rid of the problem completely. If, at the end of a year of monitoring these improvements, there are still problems, then we look again at other ways to improve the situation."

Scottish Water submitted its last odour plan to the council in April last year, just two weeks before a major breakdown saw 100 million litres of sewage released into the Forth.

This spill triggered an independent review of the plant by the Water Research Council, the results of which Scottish Water has so far refused to release.

The new measures are separate from the enforcement notice served by the Scottish Environment Protection Agency on Thursday, which relates to short-term mechanical failings.

Councillor Robert Aldridge, the city's environment leader, said: "We have received a revised odour abatement plan from Scottish Water. We will take the plan into serious consideration and discuss it at the committee so as to reach the best solution to this problem."

www.edinburgh.gov.uk



The full article contains 495 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 April 2008 2:03 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish Water
 
1

upthehill,

Leith 28/04/2008 12:40:31
Gavin Strang, Mark Lazarovic, Malcolm Chisolm, just what have you done about this over the years? Nothing. Despite repeated complaints. That's Labour representation for you.
2

Paul Voltaire,

28/04/2008 13:47:55
£40 million quid is a lot for a cover.
This stinks.
3

Epicuras,

28/04/2008 15:36:11
they'll have spent more than £40 million (and I assume this includes the usual consultants fees and back-handers) once the latest cut-price attempt doesn't work - 9 out 10 is simply not good enough and probabaly a lie anyway - cover the tanks for once and for all and the issue is finally resolved - it's not as if the water companies haven't been lining their pockets with tax-payers money for years anyway
4

mamagran,

Edinburgh 28/04/2008 16:33:46
There has and always will be odour problems with huge facilities like seafield. Until we start installing, at source, systems like the Tribune Bay, Reed bed system currently used in Canada,New Zealand and America, we will have to put up with nasty odours and even worse leaks. If sewage is treated before it hits the main sewer then it should costs less to run huge plants like seafield.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.