Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 4th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

SNP funding review set to hand city major cash boost



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 March 2008
FINANCE Secretary John Swinney has announced a review of the funding formula for local authorities which could give Edinburgh a major cash boost.
His announcement came as figures revealed the Capital is set to become the council with the least funding per head of population within the next three years.

The city loses out under the current formula for sharing out funding between councils bec
ause the calculations give particular weight to poverty and deprivation, which benefits Glasgow.

Mr Swinney said the review was to ensure the formula was "fair and robust".

Figures released in a written parliamentary answer, detailing projected grants for local authorities, show that by 2010, the Capital will be receiving £1935 per head – a massive £815 less for every person than top-of-the-table Glasgow and taking Edinburgh below Aberdeen, currently the council receiving least.

But the figures do not take into account the new Capital City Supplement, which Mr Swinney has promised to introduce next year in recognition of the special pressures on Edinburgh's coffers.

He told the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities conference in St Andrews yesterday that co-operation between the Government and councils was working well.

And he said: "We have also agreed jointly to review the distribution methodology for the local government funding settlement."

City finance convener Gordon Mackenzie welcomed the announcement. He said: "We will be in there arguing the case for Edinburgh. If we are about to come bottom of the heap, the only way is up."

He said the figures on funding per head highlighted the need for Edinburgh to retain more of the income it generated.

"There is the Capital City Supplement which the Government is going to bring in next year which will help to address the distinct differences between Edinburgh and elsewhere," he added.

"But there does need to be a look at the funding formula. Edinburgh needs additional investment to cope with the additional pressures success brings."

No figure has yet been attached to the Capital City Supplement, which was conceded by the SNP after pressure from Independent Lothians MSP Margo MacDonald during the Scottish Government's budget process.

But discussions have started between council and government officials on the details of the supplement.

And Cllr Mackenzie said he hoped the talks would reach a conclusion in the summer ahead of planning for the following year's budget.

A Scottish Government spokesman said Edinburgh City Council's increase in core revenue funding for next year was the fourth highest in Scotland – 7.8 per cent, compared to the Scottish average of 4.6 per cent.

He added: "We understand extra demands are placed on the capital city and we believe it is time for a Capital City Supplement. We will make provision for that in the 2009-2010 budget.

"Local government funding takes account of a range of factors and we have agreed with Cosla to review the way we calculate and distribute local government funding."





The full article contains 499 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 March 2008 1:35 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

Hector Goodrich (Dr),

Gillin pronounced 'Gullane'. 08/03/2008 18:12:31
I have never been a fan of Swinney or the SNP but am magnanimous enough to concede that decisions such as described above have my full support.
The gross funding imbalance in favour of one city in particular and over a very long period has been a festering sore for those who have been aware of the position.
Well done, Mr Swinney!
2

Resolutions,

08/03/2008 18:58:34
Wonder if it might also help Aberdeen?

Mind you they need to do a bit of prioritising their Spending to essentials and 'frills we would like'
3

Joe,

Glover Street 08/03/2008 19:12:06
I have often heard so-called pundits claiming Glasgow got more because they
put more in the pot due a slightly larger population than Edinburgh. It it's true that 40% of Glasgow's poulation are in receipt of benefits, the sums don't add up?
Anyway why should one city receive more per head than another?
4

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

EH1 09/03/2008 18:32:17
>3 The SE records (avaiable online) show that Glasgow receives far more public cash than the Scottish average whilst Edinburgh (and other aeas) receive less. This has been the position for many years. If Swinney is not engaging in political platitudes, we should see a general move towards a more equitable distribution of taxpayers cash.
Numbers of 'economically inactive' residents within specific council aeas can be seen at SCROL (the Scottish Census web site).
5

Why can't I use my usual name?,

Glasgow 10/03/2008 11:55:52
#3, because they have different needs. I would have thought that was fairly obvious. Apart from the greater levels of poverty found in the West, Glasgow also provides services to a huge surrounding area - whether it be jobs, roads, education, cultural facilities which is outwith the (ridiculous) city boundary.

It is very difficult to compare Glasgow and Edinburgh on the basis used here: Glasgow's municipal boundary does not represent the city (unlike Edinburgh's). if the wealthy suburbs in East Dunbartonshire and East Renfrewshire (which are utterly dependent on the city) were roped in, the differences would be much less.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.