Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 4th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Can Alexander do her job in the face of scandal?'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

WENDY Alexander has insisted she will not quit as Scottish Labour leader over the illegal donation to her campaign fund. She seems determined not to be forced out by media revelations and opposition attacks.
But the question is whether, in the circumstances that now exist, she can really do the job any more.

Not only are the unanswered questions over the donation going to dog her wherever she goes, her credibility in criticising the decisions or acti
ons of the government is fatally undermined by the scandal.

However the £950 donation from Jersey-based businessman Paul Green came about, whatever the misunderstandings and whoever knew what and when - the fact remains Ms Alexander was legally responsible for making sure contributions to her leadership campaign complied with the rules, and it turns out this one did not.

The Electoral Commission and the police are both to investigate the illegal donation and with the comments of Sir Alistair Graham yesterday, the controversy shows no signs of going away. With all this swirling round her, how can Ms Alexander take the moral high ground on any issue?

When she gets up in the Scottish Parliament on Thursday to take on Alex Salmond at First Minister's Questions, the cash row will inevitably haunt her, even though Alex Salmond will be in no hurry to see her go.

The situation has echoes of the "Taxigate" affair two years ago, which saw David McLetchie quit as Scottish Tory leader. Mr McLetchie went in the end because the wrangling over his taxi expenses destroyed his credibility and meant he could no longer operate effectively as leader.

Ms Alexander has not been a resounding success since she took over the leadership. She has failed to land any serious punches on Mr Salmond - and there are still enemies around from her past career as a minister in previous Scottish Executives.

Many believe the main reason Ms Alexander refuses to resign is that to do so would make life even worse for colleagues in London who are embroiled in a similar donations scandal involving much larger sums.

But the longer she stays on, the more she will be seen as a lame duck who is only there because London wants her to be there. If she were to go, then at least this time there might be a contest to succeed her - though the job is now hardly attractive. Iain Gray, Andy Kerr, Margaret Curran and Cathy Jamieson have all been mentioned as possible contenders. Labour faces a long climb back from the election defeat and now this messy donations scandal. But a change of leader might be the necessary first step.



The full article contains 452 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 December 2007 10:31 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish Labour Party
 
1

Tynie,

Edinburgh 04/12/2007 12:30:20

This story is just the tip of the iceberg for Scottish Labour. For decades they have been the Glasgow Mafia.

Was Charlie Gordon receiving donations from a businessman putting in planning applications during his time as leader of Glasgow Council?

Why did the same Council leader support Paul Green's nomination for an honour

This is just one story - the press will be paying big bucks to anyone who can come up with more news on bribery and corruption in the Scottish Labour party.

There is plenty to find believe me

2

Linda,

04/12/2007 12:34:39

Wendy has broken the law, if I am unintentionally overstay my time in a parking bay, I will get fined whether it is a couple of minutes or an hour.

2. The Electoral Commission has a record of coming down hard on small parties such as SSP with heavy fines but merely raps the knuckles of Labour in the past.

3. Labour have history of ignoring rules on expenses / donations. Remember Nigel Griffiths
who was found guilty on 4 counts by Standards Commissioner then "exonerated" by a Commons Committee by its Labour majority.

4. Wendy's scandal would not have occurred if only Scottish voters can donate money for Scottish Elections. I suggest everyone contact The Electoral Commission on this.

3

Gtj,

Dundee 04/12/2007 13:27:03

My compliments to the author of this article.

4

An Gearanach,

End the corruption now! 04/12/2007 13:37:08

#1 Tynie, yeah. I agree with yuo 100%.
The only way Wendy can stay in the job is if she has a massive cull and completely turns her back on their corrupt ways. I feel the labour party in Scotland is dead in the water as it was struggling even before this scandal.
Anyway, this is not about £950. This is about blatant corruption.
Q: Who controls Glasgow City Council?
A: Labour
Q: Why would a jersey based mutli millionaire donate to the labour party in Scotland?
A: His main interest in Scotland is building huge shopping malls in Glasgow and the surrounding areas.
Q: Why would this man donate £950 several times over?
A: He and the labour party knew it was illegal and if he donated £1000 or more, it' have to be publicly declared.
Q: Has this man handed over brown envelopes to any past or present Glasgpow City councillor?
A: Only he and labour know... let me change the question, do bears keech in the woods?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.