Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

London from only £11.50 with National Express

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Residents facing 10-year wait for new bridge compensation



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 October 2008
FAMILIES living close to the new Forth Road Bridge may have to wait ten years before they can claim compensation for the noise and pollution caused by the £4 billion project.
People living close to where the new crossing will be built in South Queensferry said the value of their properties has already been hit by the bridge proposals.

And they face five and a half years of disruption once construction work starts in 20
11.

Transport bosses said they will only publish information on compensation after the final road alignment is confirmed later this year.

But general compensation guidelines say people whose homes are affected by new roads projects cannot make any claim until a year after the project is completed – which means around 2018.

Alan Doig, 40, whose home in Clufflat, South Queensferry, is just 30 metres from the proposed route of the approach roads. He is furious at the prospect of such a long delay and fears it could be even longer.

He said: "What are the chances of the project being finished on time anyway?

"It's just making a bad situation worse. We should not have to wait all that time. There should be some kind of interim payment to at least compensate us for what is happening.

"We are going to have to endure at least five years of construction, noise and pollution before the new bridge opens.

"They just gloss over the whole issue of compensation. If you ask about it, they just say there is legislation in place, but you can't claim until well after the completion of the project."

Mr Doig said he was not wanting to sell his house, but one neighbour had had her house on the market when the bridge announcement was made.

"She was told before the announcement she could probably get £280,000 or £290,000 for it, but once the announcement was made she was told she'd be lucky to get £260,000 – and that's if she could sell it at all.

"She had already bought somewhere else, so she has moved out, but the house is still on the market."

Edinburgh West Liberal Democrat MSP Margaret Smith also condemned the way the compensation issue was being handled.

She said: "People are starting to get quite concerned about this.

"The basic idea of what people are going to be entitled to should be available now. That is not something that has to wait for the alignment. Individuals and families need some reassurance.

"Then, when the details of the alignment are clear, people should be able to phone and find out what their entitlement is.

"This is such a massive issue for people. There is no room for confusion."

A spokeswoman for Transport Scotland, which is in charge of the bridge project, said: "At present, we can only advise on the basis of how compensation is currently dealt with in relation to all our road schemes. Once the final alignment for this scheme is announced, we can then give specific information for this project.

"If property is affected by certain physical factors, such as noise arising from the use of the new road once in use, then a claim can be made on the first anniversary of the opening."

She said the year's delay was so the road and its use had time to settle down and could be measured effectively.





The full article contains 572 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2008 10:40 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

lulach mac gille coemgain,

13/10/2008 12:49:10
Ha ha ! Are these folk expecting fair treatment from ANY government - no chance !

When it comes to this kind of civil engineering project - Governments can do as they please - and damn the few who are blighted- it’s for the economic(?) good of the country ! At least that’s the BULL ! They’ll feed - and we can see how good the world economy is - WE NOW OWN ALL OUR BANKS THAT WE ARE REPAYING OUR DEBT TO !

If it weren’t such a comedy ye’d cry !

2

Finbarr Saunders,

13/10/2008 12:56:44
"She was told before the announcement she could probably get £280,000 or £290,000 for it, but once the announcement was made she was told she'd be lucky to get £260,000 – and that's if she could sell it at all."

Nowt to do with the new bridge. The so-called Credit Crunch is to blame!
3

Forrest,

Livingston 13/10/2008 12:59:42
They shouldn't be building a bridge anyway - a tunnel was the way forward.
4

Heretic_,

13/10/2008 13:30:45
#3

Aye right - have you not noticed that the Channel tunnel is cirrently closed indefinitely following last month's tunnel fire - and this is the second time in the last decade it has been closed for months following a fire?

That's quite apart from the fact that the tunnel option woudl have cost way more than the already expensive bridge.

Not to mention the fact that the Forth is too deep at Queensferry for a tunnel, so it would have to have been built four miles upstream, requiring miles of new roads to be built to connect it.

I can understand why residents of South Queensferry are unhappy, but fortunately Transport Scotland were able to see the bigger picture.
5

Smasher,

13/10/2008 14:01:50
Can't build a bridge without the locals moaning. Can't build a tram system without another bunch moaning. It amazes me how we ever built anything in this country.

What a bunch of moaning faced whingers we have turned into. It's no wonder the economies in the Far East are miles ahead of us. They need something built they get on and do it. What do we do.....moan and demand compensation.
6

likkitysplit,

Bridge smidge 13/10/2008 14:03:32
What we need are submarine trams like they have in atlantis. Just need to lay tracks on the sea bed and away you go!
Hey they could even link up direct to sea world or whatever its called in north queensferry to save a bit of money!
7

Desperately Seeking.......a solution,

13/10/2008 14:13:24
#2 The property was actually put up for sale several months before the current financial "credit crunch" kicked in.

#4 So much opposition from those who registered their views indicating that a tunnel should be built, not a bridge. There;s democracy for you.

#5 Mmmm, so you'd be happy living next to a building site for for 6 years..........not ! Get real.

These people have a legitimate claim to make and should not be put in the position that they have to suffer 6 years of noise and air pollution and a further year "so the road and its use had time to settle down and could be measured effectively". Absolutely crazy. It's these folk who are having to suffer for the supposed "greater good", so lets see the Ministers cough up for them. You will never understand the plight of people until you try and imagine being in their shoes.
8

Local Lass,

South Queensferry 13/10/2008 14:22:37
#7 Couldn't agree more.

The people of South Queensferry have suffered long enough at the inept decisions taken by this and previous governments, without taken into account the express views of the local community. It's a disgrace.
9

FreddieIII,

13/10/2008 14:35:57
I totally disagree. If it was new housing put up around them they would not ask for compensation, but because it is the public sector they think they can milk the system. In ref to #7 - I agree with #2 - the market slowed down in early 2007, so you cannot directly contribute the house not selling to a new bridge. If the properties increase in value between now and the bridge opening will they give the change back to the bridge development?
10

sazm,

edinburgh 13/10/2008 15:30:04
guess these people who are wanting compo wont be using the new bridge, na didnt think so
11

Local Lass,

South Queensferry 13/10/2008 15:42:32
#9 Where do you idiots come from.....???? I think tere is a bit of a difference between building a few houses as against a 6-year-long major piece of cnstruction. Idiot.

#10 Yet another numptie. I wouldn't know, but even if they weren't, more the point of providing compensation - your real name must be Homer....doh !
12

celtic4,

USA 13/10/2008 16:14:43
The old bridge will still handle the traffic while the new one's built will it not?
13

FreddieIII,

13/10/2008 16:19:58
#11 - You are a NIBY, the sort of person that holds this country back. Take pride in the fact that Scotland is investing in the future and take pride that you will be living close to a major new piece of engineering.
14

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

13/10/2008 20:32:13
Ridiculous
15

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

13/10/2008 20:33:46
Its a bridge too far
16

woofer,

South Queensferry 13/10/2008 20:48:54
The houses in question are fairly close to the existing bridge. No house anywhere including queensferry is selling fast and its not to do with a new bridge, it is the credit crunch. I would see the point in compensating people who don't want to live so close to the new bridge, but not people who are happy to live there after its built, coz obviously its not going to bother them too much.
17

Resolutions,

13/10/2008 23:44:02
When new housing is being built, quite a few take several years and we had several years of disruption and lost a lot of amenity - compensation? Dinna be daft! (House lost value well before 'credit crunch entered the vocab)
#3 there is also the fact that the tunnel option was considered and the rocks are too fractured to be able to do it safely - this from countries well used to tunnelling where appropriate. Unfortunately, that was an option which had to go.
18

Kerry,

EDINBURGH 14/10/2008 13:45:15
#7 Exactly ! Not to mention the fact that I am terrified that the work will continue throughout the night as it does at present. Nothing like the sound of a couple of lorries reversing all night to give you a nice relaxing sleep.

I don't want compensation. I want the to build it elsewhere we have been put through enough chaos. To everyone who thinks we are money hungry leaches think how you would feel if you were forced out of your home and out of pocket. Perhaps it's not the residents of South Queensfery that need to look at the bigger picture. I find it hard to believe that no other location was possible. At the very least they could have surely replaced the existing bridge ! I'm sure commuters wouldn't mind the disruption for 6 years for the greater good of the country. Yes I use the bridge but not everyday I wouldn't mind if it wasn't there I think you'll find the majority commute to Edinburgh to work. I'm also very suspicious about us not ending up with two bridges seeing as it's going to cost so much to 'fix' the current structure!
19

Local Lass,

South Queensferry 14/10/2008 14:11:00
#17 Several years to build a house ? What kinda house is that ? Sounds like cowboy builders to me, or are you just exagerating to get your (usless) point over ??

Anyway, everone knows the bridge is being built just to appease Fifers - they seem to be the only ones who want it built so that they can drive 1 to a car into Edinburgh for their work. Numpties. Don't see any point travelling north of the Forth anyway, there's nothing to see and all the people are jakies.....
20

sazm,

edinburgh 14/10/2008 17:46:38
#11 Take it that's only comment you can think of?(and u call others a numptie!) If everybody could claim compo for building work affecting them or road works causing difficulty it'd be never ending.
21

Kerry,

EDINBURGH 15/10/2008 13:05:16
#20 I think anyone affected by 6 Years of road works AND building works should be though eh !
22

D Williams,

15/10/2008 13:25:48
#20 She could have called you idiot, waster, jakey, t*at, stupid, di*khead, fartface - the list is never ending. I think Local Lass is actually being quite generous in calling you a numptie.....you numptie !!!
23

sazm,

edinburgh 15/10/2008 15:14:06
#22 Quite sad that you only comment on here to be a fan*y instead of actually talking sense.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.