Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

London from only £11.50 with National Express

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

City poised to ban 'clean' graffiti as complaints roll in



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 October 2008
CONTROVERSIAL advertising using "clean graffiti" faces being outlawed in Edinburgh as complaints continue to roll in about a Government campaign.
The city's environment leader, Robert Aldridge, has said they are unlikely to allow the technique to be used on pavements again.

The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) jet-washed messages on to grimy pavements on 30 streets as part of a crackdo
wn on benefit fraud, but several people complained as they were confronted with the messages outside their houses.

The city council has now arranged to clean the offending graffiti from three streets, and said it only agreed to the campaign on condition that it was not placed outside people's homes.

Councillor Aldridge said they would think twice before giving permission for a similar advertising campaign again.

He said: "I personally think it's not a very effective way of dealing with benefit fraud. I do have some concerns it sends out a mixed message. We're quite clear graffiti is unacceptable. We would be quite happy to talk with the DWP about other ways we can assist in dealing with benefit fraud."

Carrie Duffy, 28, a make-up artist from Inverleith Row, said she was "upset" by two messages outside her front door.

She said: "I didn't feel I was being targeted, but I did have some comments as I took my pram out the front door. I just don't think it's appropriate in a residential area."

Peter Brook, manager of the Maltings Alehouse, also complained about messages outside his pub on Montague Street.

He said: "They didn't just put one – there were three in a row. It looked awful. A lot of customers were asking us about it. I felt I was being victimised."

Andrea McHugh, head of environment at the city council, said they would be reporting people's concerns to the DWP.

She said: "We support this campaign because it sends out an important message about benefit fraud.

"Our agreement to it taking place in Edinburgh was subject to a number of conditions and we received assurances from the DWP that adverts would not be placed outside residential property."

A spokeswoman for the DWP said: "No adverts should be placed directly outside private residences and we are sorry for any offence and inconvenience caused.

"This is the latest version of our ongoing campaign to target benefit thieves. We hope people will use the opportunity to use the hotline number to report suspicions of fraud for us to investigate."





The full article contains 420 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 October 2008 10:31 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Mr. Richard C. Normuss,

14/10/2008 12:03:36
The people who created the 'Graffiti' should be dealt with using the full force of the law.
2

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 14/10/2008 12:32:06
Graffiti is blatant vandalism NOT art.

When these idiots are apprehended they should be heavily fined and made to remove the garbage they and their associates have created.

3

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 14/10/2008 12:34:10
Should the idiotic Kooncillor Aldridge not be ashamed that Embra footways are so filthy that this 'graffiti' can be created by cleaning off the message? Is that not much the same as writing 'Wash Me','Also available in white' and similar on the side of a manky Transit? Howzabout about putting benefit claimants to work scrubbing pavements, and solve both problems??
4

Decent,

14/10/2008 12:51:06
Tam the tank - that's the most sensible thing I've read in ages - why should they not work for their money?
5

Rap,

14/10/2008 13:08:50
Peter, do you understand what you are commenting on? This is a message blasted into the dirt on the pavement. What garbage has been created, apart from your message?
6

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 14/10/2008 14:24:52
#5 Rap

Good point, I hadn't even read the article, only the first comment and just made the assumption it was about the 'normal' grafitti louts who muck up our towns and cities.

Looks like the DWP have joined their ranks.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.