Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Parents gear up for fight to save schools facing the axe

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 10 June 2009
CAMPAIGNERS are gearing up to take on the council over its plans to close a further four city primary schools.
Opposition is already mounting against the proposals, which could see the closure of Drumbrae, Royston, Fort and Burdiehouse primaries next summer.

Parents and children had the news broken to them yesterday that their schools have been earmarked
for closure, but they have already warned they are not going to take it lying down.

The move to close the schools follows the council's controversial plan in August 2007 to shut 13 primaries, three secondaries and six nurseries, which was aborted following mass protests from parents and communities.

Eric Jackson, parent council chair of Drumbrae Primary, which was on the original 2007 hit list, said the fight to save the school will start once again.

He said: "The school has fought long and hard since the original closures were announced. Although we have got a low occupancy rate, that's due to the fact we were on the original list because it has made parents decide not to put their children into the school.

"This is not down to anything that the school has done wrong.

"We will fight it again. We will fight it as far as we can take it."

"Because we were on the original list it was obviously always at the back of our minds,

but it's still a great shock and a great disappointment to be told this."

At Fort Primary in Leith, even though it was decided earlier this year that the nearby Fort House estate was to be bulldozed, parents say they still want to send their children to the school and will fight all the way.

Mother-of-three Nichole Edwards, 32, has two children at the primary and believes the council won't win the battle to close the school.

She said: "I don't believe it's going to happen because there's no reason to shut a good, clean, safe school.

"Because the classes are small, the kids get more help and more one-to-one time with the teacher.

"I just don't understand where the council is coming from trying to close a perfectly good school."

The council is proposing that pupils from Burdiehouse would be given places at Gracemount or Gilmerton if it were to close.

Pupils from Fort would go to Trinity, while pupils from Royston in Granton would go to either Granton or Forthview. Children from Drumbrae would go to Clermiston or East Craigs.

Closing the schools would save the council more than £1 million a year in costs and bring in a further £2.4m in land sales.

Council bosses say there are 8,600 empty places in city primaries and closing these four would remove 1,270 excess places.

The occupancy rates at the under-threat schools range from just 33 per cent to 41 per cent.

The council also plans to close a secondary school, to be named later, by 2011 to save a further £1m.

Alison Johnstone, the Greens' council education spokeswoman, said the primary closures were just the "tip of the iceberg". She said: "With this 'drip drip' approach to school closures I remain unconvinced that the council is not intent on closing schools on a wider scale and it is important that those schools affected make their feelings known.

"Many other parents will be left wondering which school is next on the list."



The full article contains 578 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 10 June 2009 9:35 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Schools in Edinburgh
 
1

simonp,

10/06/2009 11:58:42
why doesn't the council withdraw funding and let the parents pay all the costs?
2

d smith,

edinburgh 10/06/2009 12:08:38
kids of royston school will have a choice of Granton or Fothview
you should check the HMIE report for Granton shocking i would like to check roystons and maybe it should look at picking the other school to close
3

PG,

Edinburgh 10/06/2009 12:09:04
Given the current climate, the council won't get what they want for the land. Developers already have lots of land they can't afford to build on. Still, they're likely to go ahead and get stiffed on the sale by some developer who'll rip them off, wait out the economic downturn and make a killing when prices rise again.

If Fort House is being bulldozed resulting in the school being up for closure, does this mean the council have no intention of building affordable family housing on the land?
4

Loving Mother,

10/06/2009 12:11:11
What a very stupid silly comment to make. A large number of the Parents pay Council Tax they don't sit at home all day and get it paid for them.No.1 with comments like your's they are very unnecessary.
5

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 10/06/2009 12:13:58
We need these schools but badly do we need a non thinking council.
6

simonp,

10/06/2009 12:29:13
#4 my comments are not silly if these scholls are to be closed then why don't the parents actually take over the running of them. The council tax they pay is only a small proportion of running these schools so how are my comments silly or do you just not understand them?
7

simonp,

10/06/2009 12:30:12
#4 when you learn to write comments that actually make sense then I will take note of your views
8

Loving Mother,

10/06/2009 12:45:31
4 Where do you suggest the money to run the school comes from. Teachers Salaries purchase of books keeping the school up to standard etc.
9

simonp,

10/06/2009 12:49:00
#8 are you asking yourself? This is my point and is I believe how it works in Sweden
10

Big bob 79,

10/06/2009 13:07:58
The tram project is floundering for cash, funds must be found to pay the councillors and contractors bonuses and it seems our schools will be one of the areas that will have to meet the shortfall
11

simonp,

10/06/2009 13:10:25
could they not have lessons on the trams ?
12

Madjock99,

edinburgh 10/06/2009 13:43:33
Again the Outraged Parent brigade want to save all schools regardless of the economic sense in closing them and their little darlings having to Travel a little bit further.It is about time the whole of the Councils services were looked at to save money in areas where demand is falling. As school funding is based on the number of school age children and this number is falling in edinburgh it makes sense to close the schools with the lowest occupancy rates. we need good local services and in this period of economic uncertainty we need to use the limited resource on services that will benefit the majority of residents in Edinburgh and where there is greatest demand.With the current economic climite likely to increase demand on Council services whilst their funding is being cut it is incumbent on them to use these resources as best they can and to target these at areas of need and necessity not at funding less than half full schools.
13

simonp,

10/06/2009 15:45:35
#12 well done the Outragesd parent brigade are as #4

Recently I was up in the Highlands and it seems every village, however small, has its own primary school. This can't be economic
14

me150,

10/06/2009 18:50:12
Give up the fight, you won't win!!

The council gave way last time so you can be sure that this time they know exactly what they are doing.
15

Sceptic Edin,

10/06/2009 18:54:17
#13 - You might be surprised about costs. Highland and Edinburgh spend similar amounts per primary pupil: Edinburgh about £3300/yr, Highland about £3400/yr compared with the variation across Scotland of £2500 to £4500.

The cost of teachers, other staff and central admin massively outweigh premises costs. An empty classroom or two in a school doesn't actually cost anything significant extra especially compared with the cost of building a new single school to accommodate two existing ones. You can of course get some money from selling sites, but once its gone its gone – then how do you deal with rising birth rates as we now have. Births in Edinburgh (and in most of Scotland) have been rising rapidly since the low point of 2002-2003 and if we carry on cutting places we will soon have the problem they have in large parts of England – "Number of pupils is set to soar"– BBC 13-05-2009
16

well done,

edinburgh 10/06/2009 22:17:28
I don't think it is fair on any of the kids as all these kids come from challenged back grounds the teachers at these schools become there support and help the children come out there selfs.
why is it the council wants every class over crowded so the kids hardly get 1 on 1 time with the teacher smaller classes means more 1 on 1 and the kids start to understand better.

as a parent it is hard enough helping my child settle into a new school but to do it again it upsetting to see my children hurt cause they will have to leave a school that they really like and is really friendly.

the council want to save money tell them to stop spending the money on state of the art furniture for there offices to look nice how about you invest in the schools as the children are our future not just kids.

they need education which the kids are getting in these smaller classes.
17

Pilton D,

North Edinburgh 10/06/2009 23:24:26
There's a lot more to the closure of Royston than meets the eye.

£5m was allocated in the Capital Programme for 4 YEARS to upgrade the school and integrate a new Royston Wardieburn Community Centre as part of it. Suddenly the Lib\SNP cowboys come along and it was off the table, until two weeks ago, oh RWCC will be rebulit on it's present site, at a fraction of the cost.

Now the school, which has stood since 1937 is to be axed, after years of failure by the Council to properly support it with funds and above all a decent management team to turn around results. Exactly the same as Ainslie Park suffered up to it's closure in 1991.

Once again the people of Royston will be made to suffer for extreme budget cuts due to mismanagement in a dept overburdened with management posts upwards of £35k per annum.

Get those hiding in offices off the wage bill, alongside ending the profits made by private companies supplying services to the dept such as BT, Amey and those lucky enough to be on the procurement list that can swindle away away week by week with prices at least 3 times over the odds.

Another disaster awaits due to this decision. Forthview Primary has been told on the hush that 60 Royston pupils will be there in August, what does that say about consultation with parents Councillors before any decision? Another SHAM!

Forthview is an example of a well run North Edinburgh school that has shown marked improvement due to a great headteacher, Sheila Laing, who's up for head of the year Scotland next week, great stuff. However, she is leaving after this term for East Lothian.

Why? Well the impending disaster that awaits by forcing overcrowding with the Royston arrivals, alongside the cuts to supplies of books and other services to the budget of each school, has all become to much, enough is enough for a valuable asset.

Senior teachers at Forthview, with decades of service in the dept, have also cut their week to part time from the end of this ter
18

Pilton D,

North Edinburgh 10/06/2009 23:29:15
Senior teachers at Forthview, with decades of service in the dept, have also cut their week to part time from the end of this term, with inexperienced youngsters covering the other days, a terrible situation. Job share teaching all round for kids already suffering so much in life, it's simply not good enough.

Once again, the poor will suffer the hardest, with Royston, Granton and Pilton kids all affected by this decision.

Of course, it's all lead by a woman who sends her kids to private school anyway! Stan up Marilyn, take a bow, another blow to the schemie scum eh!
19

simonp,

11/06/2009 07:30:07
#16 I am not saying all the schools should be closed but that the costs of keeping open these under-utilised schools (buildings and staff) should be used more efficiently with an eye to future growth.

20

mumsays,

Edinburgh 12/06/2009 12:00:53
#17 Can I just say that ALL these kids don't come from challenged backgrounds! My son goes to Royston and the biggest challenge he faces daily is choosing what cereal he wants for breakfast! Don't get me wrong there are kids who's families have drug/acohol/abuse issues but don't tar every kid with the same brush.

#12 #13 you clearly don't have school age children! Either that or you are just heartless. My son is devastated at the thought of going to Granton, I stay in Granton's catchment and went there myself but I chose not to send my son there, now this choice will be taken away from me.
21

Taxed To Death,

Edinburgh 18/07/2009 11:35:29
As usual the facts underpinning this whole debate have been poorly researched and misrepresented by our supposedly professional journalists. The Scotsman is such a rag these days.

Lets examine Drum Brae primary school. Forget about all the sentimental hogwash and lets only consider practicalities. There are lots of new houses and flats being built in the local area on what was farm land by Cala homes. Somerfield and its car park is to be a housing development. The BP garage and probably the rainbow will be developed into further housing. This will bring lots more kids into the catchment area, no new schools are being built. East Craigs primary was built with a tiny dining room which can't accommodate the existing pupils let alone kids from new developments. If you sell Drum brae for further housing development, where will the kids go to school?


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.