Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

You have been assessed for a street repair fine – of just £120



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 September 2008
UTILITY firms that carry out late or shoddy repairs on Edinburgh's roads are to face fines from the city council – of just £120.
Council chiefs are also to hire two new roadworks inspectors to help lead a crackdown when local authorities get the power to fine companies from next week.

While action to tackle the ongoing problem has been welcomed, doubts have been raised abou
t the effectiveness of huge companies being hit with small penalties.

The city council today insisted the fines were part of a range of new measures being introduced and said the most serious offenders could end up being referred to the Scottish roadworks commissioner, who can impose penalties of up to £50,000.

But opposition politicians and motoring groups say more needs to be done to force companies to improve the standard of work.

It comes as latest council figures show nearly a third of all reinstatement works by Scottish Water fail the council's quality pass rates.

Neil Greig, head of policy in Scotland for the Institute of Advanced Motorists, said: "I can't really see that these fines will be much of a deterrent – for a major utility like Scottish Water it is more of an administrative nuisance.

"Where it might make a difference is if smaller firms are subcontracted the work. Then they might think twice before incurring these fines.

"I am happy though to see we are moving to a more enforcement-led approach but I think there is still some way to go."

As part of the new drive, the city council is also planning to put up signs before and during roadworks to explain what is going on and how long it will last, improve coordination of major projects and investigate the creation of a 24-hour control room to deal with traffic issues.

The £120 fixed penalty notices will be for each contravention of the legislation, such as a utility not properly informing the council what it is doing, but the fines will not be cumulative.

The Cowgate
BOB SMITH, manager of Siglo on the Cowgate, which sits opposite a massive square hole in the road that's proving to be a menace for pedestrians and motorists alike, was more positive.

He said: "If it was my company I would fill the hole rather than pay £120. This hole is across the road and up the street a little, and it's right outside Faith nightclub so they'd probably feel a little stronger than I do about it. However, there was a hole outside our club a while back and Scottish Water were out to fix it within 24 hours."

However, the council will continue to issue fines for different offences at the same site and "excessive" failures would see the firm refereed to the new roadworks commissioner.

Mark McInnes, the city's Tory transport spokesman, said: "This is an issue which the council really has to take seriously.

"We are dealing with very large utility companies here and unless there is a significant deterrent they are unlikely to be interested."

Private companies such as Scotland Gas Networks, BT and ScottishPower are responsible for 85 per cent of the roadworks carried out in Edinburgh. These companies dig up the city's roads and pavements on average 31 times a day, resulting in about 27,000 holes in our roads each year.

Councillor Robert Aldridge, the city's environment leader, said: "The tightening of legislation and the council's new power to imposed fixed penalties will undoubtedly aid us in holding utility companies who are underperforming to account."

The council spends around £300,000 a year monitoring works by utility firms, with 14 inspectors checking works or working with the utility firms on a daily basis.


Brandon Terrace
JOHNNY BACIGALUPO, who runs Napier Interiors in Brandon Terrace, has had to endure "never ending" roadworks after Scotland Gas Networks dug up the road twice, and is now facing a visit from Scottish Water. He called the £120 fine "laughable".

He said: "All that's going to happen is these companies are going to start charging the council more money for the work it carries out on the council's behalf, because they know that they're never going to be able to get work done on time in the city.

"I'm appalled. I don't think £120 is going to make much of a difference to companies like Scottish Water or Scotland Gas Networks."

Dalkeith RoadGASWORKS on Dalkeith Road are causing misery for traders and residents, and road closures are expected to continue for at least another two weeks.

Mohammed Dean, owner of Deans Grocers, called the threat of £120 fine "a joke" and said it was unlikely to speed up work.

He added: "The roadworks are very bad for business. I've had elderly residents complaining they have to walk to Cameron Toll to get a bus.

"The gasworks seem to be progressing well but if they fall behind I don't think £120 will move them along. The only people it will benefit will be the council, who'll pocket the money."






The full article contains 850 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

alex paterson,

edinburgh 26/09/2008 12:13:43
We all know the roads are a disgrace but,the laughable sum of £120 is crazy,it will take lots of £120 fines to repair our roads.
2

rover,

Edinburgh 26/09/2008 12:16:25
Does the council fine tself for the shoddy repairs.
3

Mallory,

Edinburgh 26/09/2008 12:16:49
How about £120 per day per square foot of un-repaired surface. Does anyone from the council ever inspect these roadworks immediately after they are completed? If not why not?
4

Incandescent,

26/09/2008 12:20:30
In light of the vast profits being made by the utilities and their reluctance to work after dark, £120 per square metre per HOUR might be more likely to grab their attention.
5

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 26/09/2008 12:40:26
#2 did you not read the article ?

85% of roadworks are carried out BY PRIVATE COMPANIES.

But no, lets blame the Council for everything.
6

JT,

26/09/2008 12:52:18
It took 3 calls to scottish water to get the leak at the top of our road fixed a couple of months ago and now its leaking again, so once again a call to them on tuesday and today they started ripping up the road at 845am - was more surprised to see anyone there especially before 930. However if they had repaired it properly in the first place they wouldnt need to be back.
7

abcd1234,

Edinburgh 26/09/2008 12:57:43
Not sure about the sums here. Salaries for 2 inspectors to collect £120 per fine?

I thought the council had it's own 'black hole'
8

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 26/09/2008 13:09:28
#5 Road Raga.
It may well be the case that 85% of the work is done by private companies, but as the council is the customer it is surely up to them to ensure that the work is carried out to specification. Few people would pay a tradesman for unsatisfactory work done to their property so why should any council pay out money paid by council tax payers for shoddy work?
9

Duncan in Edinburgh,

26/09/2008 13:28:30
I wonder if they could levy the same fines on van and lorry drivers who crack paving slabs when mounting the kerb to park illegally? We need to do something about this.
10

11+failed,

the pans 26/09/2008 13:43:44
Seems the council are wanting to charge the utilities for their traffic calming measures.
11

Incandescent,

26/09/2008 13:48:40
#9 Completely off-topic there Dunc-E. Drivers (or, less likely, their insurers) are indeed liable for costs of damage caused to council property in just the same way as anyone else is liable for damage caused to another's property. Besides, the £120 *fines* will be a contractual clause and therefore not applicable in the cases you mention.
12

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 26/09/2008 13:53:25
£120 is far too little. it should be the full cost of doing the repair properly.

Anyway they should not even be paid until inspected as it seems no one who does council work can be trusted to WORK!
13

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 26/09/2008 14:52:46
wrong again #9. The council is not the customer. In fact the work carried out by the likes of Scottish Water, gas etc in nothing whatsoever to do with the Council. Understand now ?
14

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 26/09/2008 14:53:17
sorry that whould be #8
15

Snails dont like curry and chips,

26/09/2008 15:08:07
Passed by Murrayfield Road today - cones over the main road yet again - Murrayfield Road shut as is Riversdale Crescent - not a workman in sight. This part of the road has been continually been dug up for the past 2 years causing inconvenience to all who use it. A fine of quarter of a million would be warranted rather than a laughable £120 for this stretch of road alone. Also, how come those developing private land - such as the house on Corstorphine Road at the junction of Station Raod can get awau with digging up the kerbside and sticking a few cones round it forcing all traffic to swerve towards oncoming traffic. How is it that the wonderous Roadworks Tsar isn't coming along and giving them 2 hours to fix this out and then placing a substantial fine on them if they don't - just one of example of many such annoyances.
16

First Minister,

Gibraltar 26/09/2008 16:04:30
I had to drive from HBOS at the Mound to tollcross, a journey which should take 5 mins, i tried to go down Johnston Terrace, closed, i tried to go via Lauriston Place, but roadworks there too, so i had to drive via The Meadows to get to Tollcross, Climate Change?
17

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

26/09/2008 16:12:38
These firms just pass the costs onto the consumer. They should be jailed instead.
18

thibor,

musselburgh 26/09/2008 16:57:16
Just another non-sensical measure from the confederacy of dunces that sit in there wee offices dreaming about what they will do next to harrass and complicate the lives of Edinburgh's citizens. Did these jacka**es attend special classes to learn how to bring a city to its knees. A terrorist group couldnt do a better job.
I agree with #3 #12 & #8 , Lets have some accountability from contractors .

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.