Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 28th August 2008 Change Date

RBS Ambassador, Luke Donald

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Minority rule no problem for SNP



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 24 January 2008
THE SNP may be a minority government, but the majority of the time it manages to get its own way. Last night's vote on the first stage of the budget was closer than most, but the Nationalists still came out ahead and can now expect their £30 billion spending plans for next year to get the final green light within weeks.
The SNP won 64-62, thanks to the support of the Tories, the abstention of the Greens and after securing Margo MacDonald's vote by promising extra cash for Edinburgh.

Afterwards, Finance Secretary John Swinney hailed the result as evidence of the G
overnment's success in building consensus. But a lot of the time, the Government's victories are just as much to do with the failure of the opposition parties to get their act together and mount any kind of united front.

When the SNP Government was formed without a majority, the talk was of almost every vote being on a knife edge as ministers haggled daily with different opposition parties in a bid to gather the necessary support for their proposals.

The closeness of the numbers – 47 SNP, 46 Labour, 16 Tories, 16 Lib Dems, two Greens and one independent – seemed to promise a permanent state of precariousness for Alex Salmond and his colleagues.

Labour and Lib Dem politicians trying to come to terms with being evicted from government consoled themselves with the prospect of making life difficult for their successors. Even if they could no longer rule the roost they would at least be able to inflict regular defeats on the SNP or squeeze concessions from them with the threat of it.

The tight arithmetic was also going to give the Greens unprecedented influence in the affairs of state. Despite their number being reduced from seven to two, they would be wooed for their vital votes with all kinds of eco-promises.

But very little of that has come true. There have been close votes – but far fewer than many expected. And the only serious defeat for the Government was on its bid to scrap Edinburgh's trams – and that took three attempts before Labour, the Lib Dems and the Tories could agree on a clear motion to save the project from the axe. Even a motion asserting the importance of a single British Olympic team failed to pass despite the parliament's pro-union majority.

Government insiders admit they had expected far more trouble from the opposition.

One source says: "Everyone said minority government would be difficult – and it is. But majority opposition is difficult too. Not only have you got to get people to agree across party lines, but you have to think about the consequences of what you are putting forward. You can't just oppose for the sake of it."

The budget was long held up as the crucial test for the SNP. It was all very well coming up with populist policies like scrapping bridge tolls, abolishing the graduate endowment fee and scrapping prescription charges, said the opposition. But just wait till they tried to come up with a budget to pay for it.

There are still plenty pitfalls ahead on a whole range of the Government's policies, but it looks as if they have managed to get past what their opponents said was going to be their biggest hurdle.

Labour and the Lib Dems are bitter about the Tory support for the Government and say it prevented any genuine cross-party negotiation over the spending proposals.

One senior Lib Dem says: "We have all known for a long time the SNP and the Tories were doing a deal on the budget, so the SNP has not had to come out and talk to anyone else.

"The Tories have been totally irrelevant for the last eight years. Now someone occasionally thinks they might have a use after all and for them that's progress."

When the budget was going through the committees before yesterday's vote, the Lib Dems argued there was not enough detailed information to come up with alternative proposals. And their MSPs chose to abstain rather than moving their own amendments or supporting anyone else's, though they voted along with Labour when it came to the crunch last night.

In the committees, Labour took what could be seen as the responsible approach for the main opposition party – tabling a series of amendments which proposed more funding in certain areas but also identified other areas where it could come from.

But they failed to win support from any of the other parties and ended up being accused of wanting to make cuts all over the place.

The Greens were unhappy about the big road-building projects in the SNP budget – including the new Forth Road Bridge because they suspect it will end up as an additional bridge rather than a replacement.

But in the end they could not bring themselves to vote against a spending plan which also included major investment in renewable energy.

Perhaps it should not be a surprise that politicians from different parties find it difficult to agree. But if they feel they have a common enemy and politics is the art of compromise, it has to be asked why the opposition is not a bit more successful.



The full article contains 880 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 24 January 2008 10:08 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Ian Swanson
 
1

AJ Fife,

24/01/2008 11:04:15
Yep...Alex is making the unionist suckers jump through hoops!

Mr Salmond is a truly an inspiring Statesman. He can even get our natural enemy to give the govt precious votes, but does he have enough dug biscuits in his pocket to keep big Annabelle sweet?
2

malkster,

Scotland 24/01/2008 11:04:33
Politics at work the way it was meant to, compromise and agreement rather than simply do what you want with a majority.
3

connaughtboy,

stonehaven 24/01/2008 11:53:37
Libdem quote:

"The Tories have been totally irrelevant for the last eight years. Now someone occasionally thinks they might have a use after all and for them that's progress."

Unlike the Libdems who did have some ill-deserved power for 8 years but are now relegated to a completely irrelevant party.
4

artemisclyde,

24/01/2008 12:39:58
Swansong sounds gutted: "it has to be asked why the opposition is not a bit more successful" he moans.

The LibDem "source" should probably try to be a bit more cautious.

I am sure the final result of the Scottish Parliamentary elections showed that the Tories garnered more votes than the LibDems in both the Seat and List votes. So here's a question for the LibDem "source": if the Tories are irrelevant, what does that make his party?
5

Calum10,

24/01/2008 13:22:30
The reality is that Labour and LibDem MSPs are too dumb to engage in any form of smart politics.

The LibDems did not offer up one single amendment to the proposed SNP budget, how stupid that now looks. The Labour amendments were crass in that they failed to address properly the cuts that would have to made elsewhere in the budget.

Labour and the LibDems have simply been reduced to the opposition of name calling and by saying it is all unfair. Lamentable politicking that is unlikely to change without a clear-out of the dead wood on the Labour and LibDem benches.
6

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 24/01/2008 14:57:55
"One senior Lib Dem says: "We have all known for a long time the SNP and the Tories were doing a deal on the budget, so the SNP has not had to come out and talk to anyone else."
LibDems will have to realise that they are irrelevant and the SNP did not have any need to consult them.
How sad it is when with so much in common in the two parties manifestos the LibDems threw away the chance of really making things change for the better in Scotland. Something that eight years of support for Labour had failed to do.
7

James Andrews,

Edinburgh 24/01/2008 15:06:21
A debt from 1979 was paid to the SNP yesterday by the Tories for the help and support given to Thatcher in order to bring down Callaghan at that time. It is not for nothing the SNP are called 'Tartan Tories'. Beware of the future - it will be a blue tartan.
8

Auld Twa,

Edinburgh 24/01/2008 15:09:12
"One senior Lib Dem says: "We have all known for a long time the SNP and the Tories were doing a deal on the budget, so the SNP has not had to come out and talk to anyone else."
LibDems will have to realise that they are irrelevant and the SNP did not have any need to consult them.
How sad it is when with so much in common in the two parties manifestos the LibDems threw away the chance of really making things change for the better in Scotland. Something that eight years of support for Labour had failed to do.
9

James (1),

24/01/2008 16:26:59
Why should politics not reflect real life?
10

Edward,

24/01/2008 17:49:21
#7 James Andrews,Edinburgh
Grow up!
In case you forgot Gordon Brown, Labour Parties dear leader was in full praise of the said Margaret Thatcher and had her round to Downing street for tea.
The SNP Government and party are no more Tory than the Labour Party is, well was!
At least the SNP Government are trying to make a go of it despite the inane efforts of the Labour party, whose main goal is to undermine Scotland and the Scottish government at every turn. Labour and there lapdogs the not so democratic Libdems had every opportunity to work for a consensus budget, but they point blank refused, puting up instead there own agenda
11

Miss Jean Brodie,

24/01/2008 22:09:55
For a party that are having their FIRST time in lead governence of Scotland - they are doing a sterling job - it shows the disgrace of how Scotland and it’s inhabitants HAVE been governed by the other parties.

‘Moan the Nats !
12

,

24/01/2008 23:12:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.