Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

SNP annual conference: 'There's nothing to show we would be better off separate'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 October 2008
FIRST Minister Alex Salmond rallied the faithful at the end of the SNP's annual conference yesterday with repeated attacks on Gordon Brown, blaming him for the financial crisis in general and the collapse of HBoS in particular.
He hit out at "London's boom and bust", branded Mr Brown the "Sub Prime Minister" and accused him of presiding over "the biggest economic reverse for a generation". He toughened significantly his line on HBoS and the proposed merger with Lloyds TSB,
saying said no deal should go ahead until there were reassurances about jobs and decision-making being kept in Scotland.

He also boasted of the Scottish Government's achievements, announced new investment in shared equity schemes to help first-time buyers.

But Mr Salmond failed to answer the question which many people have been asking and spell out how an independent Scotland would have fared in the current crisis.

He did point out that the latest growth forecasts from the International Monetary Fund suggest small, independent Ireland is and will remain 40 per cent per head more prosperous than the UK; and other small countries like Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland are expected to escape recession.

But the social and economic situations in these countries are different from each other and different from Scotland. There is no automatic read-over that relative economic strength in self-governing Scandinavian countries means an independent Scotland would end up defeating recession.

Even if his attacks on the UK government were justified, there is nothing to show Scotland would be better off if we were a separate state. With such huge sums of money being ploughed into bail-outs and rescue packages, common sense suggests an independent country with a smaller budget would find it harder to do what was needed.

Mr Salmond won his most enthusiastic applause from the delegates in Perth when he extended his attack on Gordon Brown's "Age of Irresponsibility" to cover political as well as economic matters, specifically renewing Trident, signing PFI contracts and keeping troops in Iraq.

But the economy was rightly the main thrust of his speech. And he called for three specific measures – further and deep cuts in interest rates; lower tax on energy bills this winter; and investment in expanded public works. These were the sort of actions a Scottish Government with full economic powers would take, he argued, and it's what he wants the UK government to do.

• Do you disagree with our views or have anything to say on the issues of today? To contact us visit www.edinburghnews.com, call 0131-620 8692 or e-mail letters_en@edinburghnews.com.





The full article contains 450 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 October 2008 9:22 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Linda,

Edinburgh 20/10/2008 13:29:17
Confused thinking by editor. Too much Rugby like Gerald Ford.

The latest growth forecasts from the International Monetary Fund suggest small, independent Ireland is and will remain 40 per cent per head more prosperous than the UK; and other small countries like Norway, Denmark, Sweden and Finland are expected to escape recession.

Is it only Scotland that is incapable of running its own affairs?


2

First Minister,

Markinch 20/10/2008 16:11:25
Ask the 10's of thousnd's of HBOS Scottish Employees/Shareholders if they know think Scotland would be better off as an Independent Scotland, ( It is the Unionists who are seperatists, keeping Scotland Seperate from the Top Tables, EU, and so on. ), i know for sure that this wouldn't have happened in an an Independent Scotland, no one in their right mind would have allowed Halifax to take 63% and Bank Of Scotland 37%.
3

Marian,

20/10/2008 19:07:41
UK unionist politicians claim that Scotland had a budget deficit of £2.7 billion and that is an argument against Scottish independence. This figure, which equates to 2.1 per cent of GDP, shows Scotland in a substantially stronger position than the UK as a whole, which has budget deficit of 2.3 per cent of GDP.

Scotland's deficit equates to the OECD average and, paradoxically according to the argument used by unionist politicians, it is the UK that is not viable as an independent state. Scotland also enjoyed a budget surplus of more than £800 million last year – in the context of a UK deficit of more than £4 billion and a flow of resources from Scotland to the rest of the UK of £1.2 billion. This snapshot was taken at a time when oil prices were low and with the dramatic rise that took place earlier this year Scotland's surplus would now be even larger.

Scotland is on a firm financial footing. Independence holds the prospect of a flourishing and economically successful nation.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.