Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008 Change Date

Claim a Free Glayva Miniature

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Boyd's decision is a knee-jerk reaction that's hard to accept



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 October 2008
AS if Scotland's manager didn't have enough on his plate just now, Rangers striker Kris Boyd has declared he will not play for Scotland again while George Burley is in charge.
It seems his decision is a knee-jerk reaction to having been an unused substitute against Norway on Saturday, something of a recurring theme since Burley took over the national side.

Boyd has always been a player who divides opinion – some love h
im, others think he's lazy and doesn't contribute enough to the team.

I'm not sure what to make of Boyd, though I do think his decision to quit the Scotland team is not only pathetic, but also hypocritical in the extreme.

Here is a player who, since Walter Smith took over at Rangers, has been left out of the starting line-up just as often as he's played.

Yet, for some reason, he's never once said he would leave the club, even though there are a whole host of sides willing to take him.

Now though, when it comes to Scotland – or more specifically, Burley – it appears that after waiting five matches to get a start, he's content to chuck the towel in rather than stay and fight for his place like everyone else.

He is not so good that he can expect to play, and rather than spitting the dummy out it would have been far more productive if he'd gone back to his club and used the disappointment of being left on the bench as a reason to train harder.

As for Scotland's campaign, Burley said the target for Scotland was to get 17 points from their eight qualifying matches to have a realistic chance of finishing first or second in the group.

It has to be said that after Saturday's goalless draw with the Norwegians, that total is now looking extremely unlikely.

Scotland have picked up just four points from their opening three games which means they are going to need four wins and a draw from their remaining five fixtures to achieve what the manager was aiming for.

The good news is three of them are at home. The bad news is that the two away games happen to be against arguably the two best teams in the group, Holland and Norway. Those two nations play each other in Oslo on Wednesday night and though international games involving countries outwith the UK would not normally get much press attention over here, on this occasion it may be different as a win for the Dutch is vitally important to Scotland's chances of finishing runners-up in the group, which is surely the best anyone can hope for now.

There are, of course, nine qualifying groups, which means even finishing second does not guarantee a play-off place.

The first eight groups comprise of six countries in which the second-placed team will have its points against the bottom side deducted in order to ensure Scotland's Group 9 is not placed at a disadvantage.

It means Burley and his players are going to have to put some points on the board pretty quickly, not easy when the Scots' next game is a trip to play group favourites the Netherlands on Saturday, March 28 followed by a home game against Iceland three days later and an away trip to play Norway in Olso on Wednesday, August 19.

If they were to miss out on the runners-up spot, or even if they manage that but fall short on the points total, it will be something of a missed opportunity, because looking at the way the other groups are made up there are some nations out there who you'd think Scotland could beat over two legs.

I would exclude three groups from that: Group One featuring Denmark, Sweden and Portugal; Group Four with Germany and Russia, and Group 6 which includes England, Ukraine and Croatia.

The remaining five groups are made up of countries that would be decent opposition, but certainly not unbeatable.

All this makes the current situation even more frustrating for the nation's supporters.

It also highlights what can only be described as a disappointing performance against Norway.

All week there was talk about who would partner James McFadden in attack. Kenny Miller was the obvious choice until he ruled himself out through injury.

Boyd was the next candidate but, as I've said before, it's clear Burley doesn't really fancy him at this level.

The nearer we got to kick-off the more the rumours went around that the previously untried Chris Iwelumo might get the nod. As it turned out, George Burley surprised us all by going with a front three of Shaun Maloney, McFadden and James Morrison.

This formation worked a treat in Iceland last month – even if it was with different personnel – but let's be honest, it bombed on Saturday against a Norwegian side who were far stronger and more tactically aware than people gave them credit for.

McFadden has been a huge success for the national side in recent campaigns, but he's clearly struggling for form just now and looked a shadow of the player we're used to seeing in a Scotland jersey.

However, it should be said he's always been at his best when he's played alongside or slightly deeper than another forward, so the decision to put him in a central striking role on his own was a strange one. He likes to come short and link-up, meaning Scotland were always likely to be less threatening in the final third unless they got midfield runners going beyond – something that never happened. The lack of efforts on goal in the first half was worrying, but credit to the manager for realising this and making the change soon after the break.

Taking off McFadden was the right choice, despite the crowd's reaction, and the team looked a different proposition after the introduction of Steven Fletcher and Iwelumo.

Sadly, the latter's glaring miss will go down as one of the worst in living memory, which is a terrible shame because he showed some promise on his international debut.





The full article contains 1028 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 October 2008 11:23 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scotland's football team
 
1

Teary Ennui,

13/10/2008 15:02:50
"Yet, for some reason, he's never once said he would leave the club"

Don't think that's true. I seem to recall him saying he would leave at one point.

Burley clearly doesn't fancy Boyd so it's up to the manager to qualify us with the players he does rate. So far, he's struggling....
2

donald macdonald of macdonald,

13/10/2008 15:50:52
So Burley decides to bring on a player who has had thirty minutes or thereabouts of international football, in a game where winning is the only option if qualification is to be realised.

Does he seriously think if Boyd played for Wolves that Iwelumo would be keeping him out of the team? Given the fact that on Saturday the Wolves player looked like a guy who couldn't hit a coo's backside with a banjo from two yards, one does wonder about Burley's thought processes.

Once again he has proved himself to be an automatic first pick for the hard of thinking first eleven. Not only does he throw our slim chances of qualification away by refusing to bring on Boyd but he then repeats past indiscretions by slagging the player off on national radio.

It's not too difficult to predict that on this evidence Mr Burley will only be remembered for undoing all the good work of Walter Smith and Alex McLeish and pretty soon we'll be languishing somewhere above the sixty mark in the FIFA rankings.

He should expect the clown's shoes and the squirty flower in the post soon, along with his P45.
3

kenny mcg,

13/10/2008 16:34:56
Hi Lads, totally agree. I have read in another article where i Burley is quoted as saying "Boyd doesnt care about Scotland" personally its clearly obvious that Burley is in that category. The Norway game was crying our for Boyd. Everybody could see that. Except Mr Burley. Our George has threw a nice wee grenade in amongst all the hard work and pride that was restored last year.
4

Scotland Uber Unionists,

13/10/2008 17:30:28
Boyd, fvck off man. Boyd couldn't handle the English first division (to the guy on about Wolves). The defenders down there are a cut above the SPL's rubbish.

Boyd only scores against rubbish defenders up here in Scotland and how embarrassing must it be for him that Kenny Miller has scored more goals against celtc in one match than Boyd has managed in 19 attempts?

Fact is Boyds static nature would have seen the Norwegian defenders have an easy time of it had he played. These defenders play for some of the biggest teams in one of the strongest leagues in world football and not Kilmarnock.
5

Woody47,

13/10/2008 17:41:52
Who does Boyd think he is? Dummy out the pram. Just don't come back. No player is bigger than the team although he seems to think he is the dog's bo££ocks.
However, I wish he could take burley with him. Those 2 deserve each other.
6

Novafone,

13/10/2008 18:35:33
I've never been so disgusted or angry at a footballer in all my life.

An all time low point in Scotland's football history.
7

Toast,

13/10/2008 19:36:33
If I'd scored 7 goals in 14 games and my manager played a total nobody in preference to me I'd tell him to shove it to,and as a result of the managers decision Scotland are looking for a miracle to qualify.
8

geo67,

13/10/2008 20:05:55
I think Boyd is justified in being angry,but don`t like the fact that he`s made this decision.
I hope he reconsiders and announces he will allways play for Scotland ,whether he is ever chosen again or not,would be another matter.

He would have sunk that sitter,as would my nine year old son.

Despite his appearances,Boyd has a goal ratio that many are jealous of and just because Walter uses him sparingly,it doesn`t mean he doesn`t recognise him as one of the top strikers in Scotland.

Burley was quick to point out today that Boyd wasn`t a regular,for Rangers ,so why should he get a game for Scotland?

So why select him?

There must be Scottish players ,who are getting a game in the SPL asking themselves if it`s worth it.
Chris Iwelumo is probably still reliving it,like strikers do,hopefully he`ll become a better man for it.
Burley??? Get tae!!!
9

edinburgh teddy,

13/10/2008 20:10:15
4# and 5# fuds
10

edinburgh teddy,

13/10/2008 20:10:58
6# shut the fvck up
11

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 13/10/2008 20:56:16
Good to see the Edinburgh intelligentsia taking part in these postings.
12

edinburgh teddy,

13/10/2008 21:05:20
#11 dont like it ....simple ....flight off sonny
13

WJR,

Leith 13/10/2008 21:49:22
I'm a Hibs fan but have been a fan of Boyd for years. I didn't like the way he retired but that is up to him.

Do we not have to select Scotland strikers for Scotland? Who would have been the Rangers Scottish striker ahead of Boyd? And was he fit?

I love Fletch as a player but I would have had Boyd in ahead of anyone.

For Scotland manager I would rather have Mark McGhee but too late now for the World Cup

14

mark23,

14/10/2008 10:57:47
Boyd is a disgrace of a scotsman.
Good riddance to bad rubbish, easy to jump ship when the going is tough, at least it gives others who actually want to represent their country a better chance. If he came out and made a public apology to the Scotland fans for being so arrogant i wouldn't mind him getting back in the squad otherwise
he should not play for Scotland under any circumstance ever again.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.