Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Naked Rambler locked up - again

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 January 2008
THE Naked Rambler today passed up a chance of freedom by emerging naked from Edinburgh Sheriff Court and immediately being arrested.
Stephen Gough, 48, was given the opportunity to bring "the vicious circle" of imprisonment to an end by Sheriff Kenneth Maciver.

Gough, of Eastleigh in Hampshire, has been in Saughton Prison, almost without a break of more than a few minutes, sin
ce May 2006.

In November of last year, Sheriff Maciver found Gough guilty of committing a breach of the peace by walking in St Leondard's Hill without clothes on, after his release from a police station. Sentence had been deferred for a psychiatric assessment and to give Gough the opportunity to reconsider his position.

When the case was called today, the sheriff was told that Gough was still refusing to dress. He was brought to the bottom of stairs leading from the courtroom to the cells so that he could hear what was happening.

Sheriff Maciver said the view of court, including the High Court, was that members of the public should not have to tolerate completely naked persons in full view on public streets.

The sheriff said: "Mr Gough's position is that he is entitled and has the legal and moral right to be naked in public and the public have no reason to be concerned about his nakedness. He takes the view that the courts are wrong."

He said Gough was kept in solitary confinement in prison because he did not wear clothes. This was not good for the prison authorities in terms of management and not good for him in terms of his general health.

"I am trying to bring this vicious circle to an end " said the sheriff. "The only person who can bring this to an end is Mr Gough himself.

"He can end this by simply making his own free choice to put on his clothes like the rest of the population and to go home, or to go back to prison."

Sheriff Maciver deferred sentenced on Gough until April 16 to be of good behaviour and ordained him to appear.

He said: "He will be completely clear of the justice system and free to make the choice about his future."

If Gough had been in no further trouble at the end of the three-month period, Sheriff Maciver said he would deal with the matter without Gough having to come to court, but if he carried on with his conduct of not wearing clothes he would have to accept the consequences.

Less than two hours later, Gough emerged from the rear of the court building, still naked, to be met by police officers.

He was arrested and before being placed in a police van, was asked if he had any comment to make, said: "Where is the freedom?"




The full article contains 472 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 January 2008 4:02 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Naked Rambler
 
1

alex paterson,

embra 18/01/2008 16:10:48
Why give this guy so many chances,drive him back to where he belongs,naked if needed and deliver him to the local polis he is costing us a fortune.
2

Draco Was a Wimp,

Edinburgh 18/01/2008 16:28:23
#1 Alex

Exactly. It's a long walk from Hampshire. Lothian and Borders the courts are making erses of themselves by keeping dealing with this sad attention seeker. Like you say, it would be much, much cheaper to drive him home, hopefully not stopping the car too much at the other end. A nice gravel rash on his sensitive bits might delay any thought of return.
3

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 18/01/2008 16:37:21
Silly. What harm does the man do? Why bother arresting him? Let him get on with it. Who cares?
4

,

18/01/2008 16:46:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 18/01/2008 17:07:21
#3:

Agreed.

#4:

If you did that, he'd be very annoyed indeed. He's an ex Royal Marine!
6

Gothic Rose,

18/01/2008 17:13:50
Why not belong to a Naturist Colony? He would be amongst friends,or, at least of a similar mindset
7

The Naked Gambler,

18/01/2008 17:26:22
I bet this guys got a mental problem, you can clearly see he's nuts.
8

James (1),

18/01/2008 17:49:40
He obviously has a mental health problem. Carstairs should be the next stop for him.
9

alex paterson,

embra 18/01/2008 18:50:09
#3

Would it not worry you if you 10-12 year old daughter bumped into him while he was rambling naked,it would bother me.
10

Darren :-),

on ma way to ibrox 18/01/2008 19:24:33
lock him up in a psych hospital. he wants to expose himself in public, where little kids walk, add him to the sex offenders list!
11

Nellie,

Liverpool 18/01/2008 21:09:24
#7. Was that a typo,and did you really mean to say, "I bet this guys got a mental problem, you can clearly see HIS nuts."?

But seriously, folks. It is not beyond the bounds of possibility that this guy might be suffering from a mental illness. For example, if he is Bipolar, he might do such a thing when he's in a manic phase. If this were the case, he'd be perfectly harmless ... and, as it happens, just as God intended! (Remember Adam and Eve?) If he were Bipolar, he'd come out of hat phase and probably be acutely embarrassed at what he had done! So, I would hope the Court would refer him for psychiatric reports before bunging him into a Hell hole prison as he'll do no good in there if he's really unwell. If he's ill he needs treatment, not prison.
12

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 18/01/2008 22:30:04
Is he really walking about scudders in this weather? He'd die of hypothermia without a doubt if the polis just left him for 24 hours.
13

beinn the hoose,

18/01/2008 23:11:07
#7 jinty travers is not nuts, merely misguided.
14

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 18/01/2008 23:14:19
send.him.over.to.live.with.the.eskimos.they.go.hunting
15

Pete Knight,

Not Scotland 18/01/2008 23:17:32
"I am trying to bring this vicious circle to an end " said the sheriff. "The only person who can bring this to an end is Mr Gough himself".
Surely if they just let him go the problem will go away, they are perpetuating the problem too!

"Why not belong to a Naturist Colony? He would be amongst friends,or, at least of a similar mindset"
Nud1st colony? What planet are you on, anyway Steve isn't a naturist, he just wants the freedom to be himself.
Better idea would be to establish prudist colonies so that the rest of use can be natural.
So No.12 believes that just being naked is a sex offence, what sad person you are!
16

henrymanchester,

UK 18/01/2008 23:27:32
Someone needs to sit the guy down and have a long, long talk to him about whatever his problem really is.

Then if that doesn't work just put him in the snake pit for a few months!
17

Darren :-),

18/01/2008 23:31:21
#18, im not the sad one here, i just think, if a man is exposing himself, in public, then it is a sex offence. Would you like to walk out, with your kids (if you have any) and have a man walking towards you and your kids with his penis hanging out on show? Sorry, but that, as far as i know in the law, is indecent exposure, which, if you show any child, a penis, is an illegal offence, and therfor IS a sex offence.
18

I'mallymax,

Orwellian nightmare; Godless scottish courts. 19/01/2008 02:39:28
Lord Justice Clerk, Lord Gill, said: "The appearance of anyone in court naked, whatever crimes that may constitute, is unquestionably a contempt."

So if he's 'constituting crimes' why don't they charge him again with all the charges they can throw at him? That's what they do with all of us now; 'ZERO-TOLERANCE!

Tha fact is, this guy is making a stand against the totalitarianism Scotland has become. And the way the elites are controlling us now is through ideals of morality. It was the exact same in the 18th and 19th cneturies; the lauded, lorded, and aristocrats belched insidious luridness when they partied, but the minnions were kept tied to the mill-stone as far as 'good' morals were concerned.

I find there's too much moralising from the bulpit in Scotland now. From an ethical standpoint, morality is only the value credence deserves. So if I'm not bothered if the rambler is naked, why should he have 12 scottish charges, and 2 years in prison for something we as a nation of tolerants are not bothered about?

Mr Gough, aka, 'the naked rambler', has stated he needs no justification to wear clothes while he worships God; but our scottish judges say he does have to wear clothes?

For judges to sit in honour while crown prosecution lawyers try to eroniously prosecute mr Gough with 'breach of the peace/indecency' is a travesty of the term being used by said lawyers. Moreover, every court of the land requires the plaintiff, witnesses and defendents to 'swear to tell the truth' on the bible, (King Jmes 1611), so why is it not legally moral to praise God by telling the truth with clothes off, but legally moral to praise God by by telling lies with clothes on? (Bliar in HM court of westminster palace/house of commons). I don't see any judges/elites rushing to force Bliar into court.

I find the scottish system of law here is indulging too much with people's everyday rights in the name of morality. Ethically, the court system in scotland is purely the old-time
19

,

19/01/2008 02:42:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

Faye,

19/01/2008 02:48:26
This is discrimination. The guy wants to freeze himself. Let him do what he wants. Folks are far too PC with this case.
21

ddmc,

19/01/2008 10:50:03
your birthday suit is the most natural thing we've got, waterproof, comes with optional fur etc etc. The solution is perhaps for him to wear pants made from leaves. Else drop him of at a noodie beach somewhere. it would have saved us a small fortune in court time & money, but i forgot PF's like him as he makes the conviction rates look good.

When i tried to post this with the word nud1st a message stoppped the post

'We have detected some potentially unsuitable words in your post:
xxxxxx
Your comment has not been processed.'

big bruvver or what
22

Ganjass,

19/01/2008 11:32:55
What gets me, is they spend all this time and money on mr naturist, when all the wee idiots of the day are getting away with attacking OAPs and the like.

Something very wrong with the priorities of the police and judicial system!

Why don't they spray clothes onto the guy with, would that not be a happy medium?
23

earnabob,

19/01/2008 12:22:55
He has the right to behave the way he wants - in any area there are no other people who could be offended under our laws.
If he really wants to be this way send him off to one of the now uninhabited islands where he can roam to his hearts content and pose for the tourists who would boat out just to see it.
As for the double rant #21,22 if you think the laws here are so bad concerning this issue then have him move into your house and walk around it all day naked.

While it is his choice to be naked, it is also his choice knowing he will be arrested every time he comes near a town with people to complain.

The best they could manage would be to transport him to the middle of nowhere every time he upsets someone.
24

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 19/01/2008 15:50:40
Get him some medical assistance, he is clearly unbalanced. He cannot get the fact that others just don't want to see his naked body. He considers only himself, not the public and not children who he thrusts his beliefs upon. Even primitive tribes had loin cloths, what does he not get??
25

Gina Gibson,

Wales 19/01/2008 18:38:43
Why don't they leave the guy alone to continue his walk? He'd be back in England soon enough!
26

I'mallymax,

Orwellian nightmare; totlaitarian scottish elites. 23/01/2008 01:28:34
#28, Gina, this is what I don't understand.

The cops keep nicking this guy, and the courts keep putting him in prison for daring to snub his nose at these elites.

Why don't thery just let him get on with his walk?

And the fact he's kept in solitary confinement is a breach of ECHR. Maybe Scotland's elites think they are morally and ethically above the law; or even the law?
We should remind them they actually work for us, the citizens.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.