Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Mortgage woes coming home to roost for 3000 city borrowers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 October 2008
MORE than 3000 people in the Lothians are at risk of defaulting on their mortgages because of the credit crunch, according to official figures.
Furthermore, thousands who are not covered by the statistics could be in the same boat.

The news comes at the same time as separate figures show a surge in the number of people going bankrupt.

Today a firm which specialises in buying homes on
the brink of repossession so they can be leased back to their former owners said the number of inquiries it is receiving had quadrupled.

Since April 2005, 630,334 mortgages were sold in Scotland – 21,130 of them to people with a poor credit history.

Sub-prime mortgages – which triggered the US credit crunch – are defined as those targeted at consumers with impaired credit history or low credit ratings who might find it difficult to obtain finance from traditional sources.

No data is available for people with low credit ratings but figures from the Scottish Government show 1840 mortgages in Edinburgh were sold to people with impaired credit history, 2.7 per cent of all city mortgages sold.

The figures for East Lothian, Midlothian and West Lothian were at a similar level, adding up to 3030 mortgages in the Lothians.

In the current economic climate, these are the people seen as most likely to run into problems meeting their payments.

Ken McEwan, managing director of Edinburgh-based property firm McEwan Fraser, which specialises in sale-and-leaseback, said: "We are seeing about 20 inquiries a day, where it used to be about five. It's pretty serious out there. I think we have got at least four years of this and it's going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

"It's quite sad – a lot of people are finding things very difficult."

Edinburgh Pentlands Conservative MSP David McLetchie said the figures reflected the "age of irresponsibility" in terms of lending.

He said: "Some banks and building societies were so desperate to move mortgages off the shelves they were not too fussy about the ability of borrowers to repay and they gave loans to some people who had a previous history of defaulting. It's a classic case of chickens coming home to roost."

Edinburgh mortgage broker Craig Esplin of Fair Deal Mortgages said specialist lenders had given mortgages at higher rates to people who had bad credit ratings.

He said: "High street lenders maybe lent too much in relation to salary and affordability, but they were not usually keen to lend to people with low credit ratings.

"But there were plenty specialist lenders out there last year willing to lend to people with poor credit ratings who may have missed a mortgage payment or two in the past. The main thing is for clients not to bury their heads in the sand. If they are having difficulties, they should get in touch with their lender and see if there is some compromise they can come to."


EVERY CASE IS A PERSONAL TRAGEDY
THE number of people going bankrupt in Lothian and Borders rose from 866 in 2006-07 to 920 in 2007-08, but reached 452 in the first quarter of this financial year. Part of the increase is caused by a change in the law, making it easier for poorer people to go bankrupt.

But Martyn Evans, director of the watchdog Consumer Focus Scotland, said every case represented a personal tragedy.

He said: "Bankruptcy is not an easy option to allow people who've overstretched themselves to escape their debts – it completely changes your ability to live a normal life as a consumer. And bankruptcy doesn't just affect individuals but whole families. The level of unmanageable debt in Scotland is alarming."






The full article contains 629 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 October 2008 12:10 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Mortgage and property news
 
1

Scotish Exile,

07/10/2008 11:44:14
"credit crunch" is just an excuse, they probably could never afford the mortgage in the first place. Its their own ignorance and the lenders greed that is to blame.
2

allknowing,

07/10/2008 11:57:30
#2 exactly, trying to life the high life, without actully building up to it. Start somewhere small, and work you way up the housing ladder.
3

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 12:14:23
Edinburgh is immune to global economic problems.
4

Voice of reason,

EDINBURGH 07/10/2008 12:19:06
How right David MacLetchie is about irresponsible lending . Blair and Brown knew about this but conveniently turned a blind eye .
5

Hector the Red,

07/10/2008 12:32:55
Ha! Ha!
6

JayDeeTee,

07/10/2008 12:40:23
Meanwhile taxpayers' money is baling out irresponsible banks and the boards of these irresponsible outfits are still getting mega bucks in severance payments.

Ah, that's ok I suppose.

7

Tolle1,

07/10/2008 12:44:17
`Edinburgh Pentlands Conservative MSP David McLetchie said the figures reflected the "age of irresponsibility" in terms of lending'.

How stupid do these politicians think we are, his Conservative Party are as bad as New Labour, we may even have reached this crisis earlier had the Conservatives remained in power.

It was Margaret Thatcher that got the ball rolling by embracing Milton Friedman's Free Market Capitalist ideology, then Tony Blair speeded this process up, and Gordon Brown who was The Chancellor of the Exchequer when Blair was PM built his false reputation for prudence on the so called `Economic growth, which had produced untold wealth (debt), and promised no more no `boom and bust` using the same ideology.

Mr McLetchie should be honest, and tell the nation that he does not believe that `Free Market Capitalism' has anything to do with the misery the credit crunch has imposed on people who do not have money like him in the first place to make this crisis feel like only a blip.

When the taxpayer has bailed out the banks, and been landed with all the dud mortgages etc, then Mr McLetchie and the capitalist robbers who have caused this can relax, as their shares will have risen in value while thousands, maybe even millions of people will lose their jobs, and their houses.

Ordinary people do not need your insincere comments about `irresponsible lending' Mr McLetchie, as that's what the politicians at Holyrood, and Westminster get paid for, to ensure that does not happen.
8

Victorian-Ian . oap Edinburgh district .,

07/10/2008 12:47:10
#8 Karma
9

Jim W,

07/10/2008 12:48:58
#1 I guess it's all about providing a service. Ultimately it helps people stay in their homes rather than having them sold from under them. Parasite possibly but better to turn to a parasite than a shark?
10

Liz,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 12:52:45
#10
Whilst I agree with many of your points about the Conservatives effectivly kick starting this, the fact remains that Mr (prudent) Brown did nothing to rein it in.
For years he was revelling and taking the credit for all this so called economic growth. Sadly all our recent economic growth has been down to an ever increasing pile of debt which if anything he encouraged. How they did not see this current mess coming I do not know, there were plenty out there sending the warnings but they were classed as doommongers and were largely ignored.

I am afraid that history is not going to look kindly on the man at the helm during all this.
11

Liz,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 12:52:48
#10
Whilst I agree with many of your points about the Conservatives effectivly kick starting this, the fact remains that Mr (prudent) Brown did nothing to rein it in.
For years he was revelling and taking the credit for all this so called economic growth. Sadly all our recent economic growth has been down to an ever increasing pile of debt which if anything he encouraged. How they did not see this current mess coming I do not know, there were plenty out there sending the warnings but they were classed as doommongers and were largely ignored.

I am afraid that history is not going to look kindly on the man at the helm during all this.
12

Mallory,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 13:00:51
And what about all these buy-to-let merchants? How will they fare as all these new-build student flats come onto the market?
13

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 13:09:27
So here we have more speculation based upon assumption.

It's quite simple. If you can keep up your mortgage repayments, you will not default and you will keep your property.

14

Epicuras,

07/10/2008 13:36:53
do we have to import the dreaful ameican phrases as well as their debt problems - these people are not sub-prime - they're just skint
15

Tynieweeguy,

07/10/2008 13:50:42
This would have happened to a greater or lesser degree on a global basis some time ago but for the western world living off credit. Look at the amount of credit the average person in the west has, this is money not yet earned. I have memories of finding it hard to get credit in shops let alone a mortgage because you had to have a sizable deposit for anything you wanted to buy, today I can walk into a high street shop and walk out with £2000 worth of goods without handing over a penny.

It was always going to come home to roost and we can't go blaming Brown for the ills of the world and our own greed he didn't make people buy things they couldn't afford. He is also not responsible for stock markets around the world crashing.

In my opinion this greedy society started with the policies of the Thatcher Government.
16

Truthman,

DC 07/10/2008 14:18:20
This article puts the cart before the horse. The deadbeats not paying their mortgages, including the 3000 noted, are causing the credit crunch by their actions, they are not victims of it.
17

reader,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 14:40:43
#21 exactly. And let's not forget that there is another kind of tragedy: that of the people who could not afford to buy and instead had to rent from unscrupulous private landlords, handing over the best part of their salary every month. As said many times before, the problem is not the credit crunch but the absurd house prices, and these were caused by people taking out absurd mortgages. So those who are facing repossessions now are not only guilty of their own misery, but also of that of the private renters who were put at the mercy of greedy buy-to-letters due to their actions.

I pity them, but I have no sympathy for them.
18

Marian,

07/10/2008 15:26:34
Economists were predicting at least three years ago that the UK was heading for bust because of the quicksand of debt that had accumulated under Gordon Brown of New Labour's hands off approach to managing the excesses of UK financial institutions, but Gordon Brown took no notice and did nothing.

Gordon Brown and Alastair Darling obviously don't have a clue on what to do as every day they have nothing to say in response except sound-bites such as "I'm just getting on with my job" and "we'll do whatever it takes" every time they are challenged to take actions to restore confidence in the UK economy.

Historically every time there has been a Labour Government their term of office has ended due to an economic crisis created by their own genetic instinct to over-tax and spend as if there is going to be no tomorrow.

How much more does it take for voters to wake up to the fact that New Labour is a busted flush?
19

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 16:56:11
#20:

In the days of Thatcher we had growth. Blair and Brown simply presided over borrowing.

They COULD have done something to change it. They COULD have regulated the housing market when they saw it was going crazy. They COULD have introduced regulations to limit by law the amount anyone could borrow.

They COULD have done a lot of things to stop the situation getting into this state, but instead, they chose to sit back and do nothing. Therefore they must share a large part of the blame.
20

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 07/10/2008 16:59:28
#23:

"Historically every time there has been a Labour Government their term of office has ended due to an economic crisis created by their own genetic instinct to over-tax and spend as if there is going to be no tomorrow."

Correct. And historically, the Tories have then had to come in and sort out the mess---which usually gets worse before it gets better and therefore they get the blame.

When are the people of this country going to learn the lesson not to vote for stupid labour ever again?
21

JG,

Fife 07/10/2008 18:30:26
#26 Fuel Head
Aye, and then the people get sick of the Tories who go too far, vote them out and so it begins again!
22

rs,

in ma house 07/10/2008 19:44:04
Sub-prime mortgages – which triggered the US credit crunch – are defined as those targeted at consumers with impaired credit history or low credit ratings who might find it difficult to obtain finance from traditional sources

i.e. People who should never have been lent money in the 1st place
23

rs,

in ma house 07/10/2008 20:08:19
comment 25 Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,
Edinburgh 07/10/2008 16:56:11


comment #20: is correct, credit is too easy, you can borrow £10,000 on 4 or 5 credit cards, without little problems, but you couldn't get a loan for the same amount to easily.

We have been living in the Land of Make Believe for far too long, borrowing and spending money that we never had.

Egged on by Must Have
a big fancy house, with all the mod cons
weekly trips to the Fort
by TV programs with the house is only £350,000

and the bubble has finally burst, the banks are too blame for lending us the money, but we are part of the problem


But I have to agree with comment 25

They COULD have done something to change it. They COULD have regulated the housing market when they saw it was going crazy. They COULD have introduced regulations to limit by law the amount anyone could borrow.

They COULD have done a lot of things to stop the situation getting into this state, but instead, they chose to sit back and do nothing. Therefore they must share a large part of the blame
24

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 08/10/2008 00:31:06
#28 totally wrong to write off all those people. You can lend to them knowing that they are in higher risk of default, so you build in higher margins. They don't all default - most actually want to keep up payments. Danger comes when those mortgages are sold on to other financial institutions and bundled as some sort of asset. Aye. Ok, I read that.
25

John Knox furr First Meenister,

Embra 08/10/2008 00:37:21
#29 They COULD have done ...They COULD have ...
They COULD have done... but instead, they chose to sit back and do nothing. Therefore they must share a large part of the blame.

Sorry.. no.. doesn't follow. If I kill you, its not the polis's fault for not stopping me!
26

Voldemort,

Edinburgh 08/10/2008 01:45:43
10 - It is no use trying to blame the conservatives for starting this whole thing. The very reason you, probably, didn't vote for them is that you wanted change?

At what stage did Labour even murmur about repealing this state of affairs - the fact that they continued and even accelerated the process mean that they have let you down even more !! But I guess you don't see it that way - I mean after 12 years in power how could they possibly make a difference !?

You have to get over the stuck record mantra of 'it was them who started it!' and get on and elect someone who will stop it if that is what you believe in.

What really disappointments me is that successive governments tend to build on existing legislation rather than getting rid of legislation that they see as wrong or is just plain wrong!
27

Tolle1,

08/10/2008 07:53:28
#32 I will not vote New Labour, or Conservative at the next election, in fact I will not vote because I do not trust any of the political parties.

When will people realise that your vote is a waste of time, unless you are in the fortunate position of being wealthy, as whoever you vote for it always ends up the same in the end.

Remember the 3 million unemployed, all the house repossessions under Margaret Thatcher, the high interest rates etc.

Now we have the same kind of people in power now in the guise of New Labour, and look at the pain many people in the Uk are about to suffer for a very long time to come, and remember the misery has not even begun yet.

People persist in maintaining dogmatic party allgiances, and conveniently forget that Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and the other politicians only look after themselves, and people who are able to make huge sums of money by what ever means they wish, and the collateral damage caused by this is accepted.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.