Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Tuesday, 8th December 2009 Change Date

City leaders prepare £70m bailout for property firms

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 23 May 2009
THE council-owned companies behind regeneration efforts in Craigmillar and the Waterfront are on the verge of going bust – with city leaders forced to draw up a drastic rescue plan.
The council is lining up a £70 million bailout of its struggling arms-length companies which will see them buy up the property assets of Waterfront Edinburgh Limited (WEL) and Parc Craigmillar, along with development firm EDI.

All of the flagship companies have struggled to cover their debts with commercial banks in the face of falling land values and it is hoped millions can be saved by the council taking out the £70m loan at the cheaper interest rates available to local authorities.

Repayments on the loan will be met from the rents on the properties the council is buying.

It is understood that WEL and EDI will effectively disappear, as all of the council's arms-length companies are to be brought under one group, CEC Holdings.

Meanwhile, it has also emerged that city taxpayers are to be hit with a £1.6m bill to repay loans to Miller Developments after the property giant recently pulled out of a joint venture with the council to build a new town at Shawfair, the site of the former Monktonhall Colliery.

Opposition politicians today accused council chiefs of carrying out a "smash and grab" on some of the city's best arms-length firms.

But the city's finance leader, Councillor Gordon Mackenzie, said the restructuring would save taxpayers money in the long run.

Cllr Mackenzie said: "It is important to make clear that the council is not taking a hit here, the loan is to buy properties which have tenants who are paying rent and this will cover the loan repayments.

"I would confidently say that in three to five years this will prove to be a very good deal for the city with the companies back on track and land values rising."

The city's Labour finance spokesman Ian Murray said: "There are questions to be asked of this move. The council seems to be doing a smash and grab on EDI's assets.

"Greg Ward (the council's head of economic development] said himself that EDI was suffering short-term problems, which is tied up with the money it is owed by PARC, but I don't think these were insurmountable."

Uncertain future facing council's cash cows

AT THE height of the property boom they were the darlings – and often cash cows – of the city council's regeneration efforts. So what has gone wrong with EDI, Waterfront Edinburgh Ltd and Parc Craigmillar?

• EDI: The slashing of land values has hit the council's main development firm hard. In recent months, EDI broke its banking covenants with a loan-to-value ratio on its £48 million borrowings of 94 per cent. Penalty charges have EDI facing interest and banking costs of £4.1m per annum.

• WEL: With its land values cut by 50 per cent over the last year, WEL has been left with a net asset value of less than £900,000. The sale of its remaining property portfolio to the council for £7.5m will mean the firm's bank, the taxpayer-owned Bank of Scotland, will only get around two-thirds of the £11.7m it is owed by WEL.

• PARC: Falling land values and dozens of unsold houses have left Parc fighting for its future. Parc owes EDI £3.45m in 'soft' loans but must start shifting some of its new homes in Craigmillar. Council chiefs are set to give Parc a £600,000 loan just to help it through the year. Delays to a deal to bring a major supermarket to Craigmillar have severely hampered Parc's cash flow.




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 May 2009 12:06 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Mortgage and property news
 
1

Dragonlord,

23/05/2009 10:38:26
There is already a black hole in council finances, the tram LINE is over budget and now this! Where are the city leader going to find the spending cuts to cover this massive overspend?
2

madrab,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 10:41:41
These companies are hardly arms length if they are not allowed to go bust.

Why should my council tax be wasted on poor quality flats in Niddrie and Leith?

How can the council justify this waste of money when they are withdrawing other services and closing schools due to lack of funds?
3

Robert12,

23/05/2009 11:16:02
The trams have sweet FA to do with the council. The funding came from the Government with a small amount from Edinburgh Council (majority of which came from developers on the tram route).

This is a complete joke though. Let the companies go bust. The council is talking about lay offs and reducing key services yet can find the money to bail out companies going down the toilet? I'll have some of what they're smoking!!!
4

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 23/05/2009 12:02:35
City leaders are forced to draw up drastic plans,how much will that cost us.
5

Mallory,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 12:03:15
And who will pay if the firms go t**s up liks Mountgange? Has the council not learned anything about finance.
6

TankEngine,

Uphall 23/05/2009 12:51:51
Broke and facing major cuts in services one day, the the next they can find £70M down the back of a sofa!
7

Statsman,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 13:55:02
We're getting suckered for hundreds of millions of pounds by this lot. I am not looking forward to future council tax bills.
8

Dragonlord,

23/05/2009 14:32:26
3# The council are committed to paying 10% of the trams cost. Over £52 million and counting.
9

Statsman,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 14:41:00
9 Joe

I have the impression that the unelected officials wield more power than the elected politicians. It doesn't seem to matter who is in power politically. It's always the same policies and cynical wasting of money.
10

Hmm ...,

23/05/2009 15:25:39
... it's good to see immediate action now that the City Council has a professional banker in charge of its finances!! LOL!!!

If only I could be convinced that Wheeler is not just an incompetent who couldn't cut it, even in RBS!

CEC would have done better to let the companies go bust then buy the assets from the administrator, dropping the liabilities as a result. Then they wouldn't need this huge loan, however "advantageous" its terms are because the banks are lending to a local authority, which as we all know can't go bust - just as the UK isn't really on the brink of bankruptcy!

And Gordon is telling us that nowadays, there is not the same shame in going to the International Monetary Fund (as there was when the previous Labour governments failed)! It's as though he knows that the UK COULD go bust - and soon!
11

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 15:40:56
#3 - The council is responsible for ALL costs in excess of £500m. This is an open-ended commitment, so if the vanity tram costs £700m, CEC will need to find £200m.

They had hoped they would be able to get developers to make some contributions but these were mostly expected for Line 1B. The bulk was to come from selling council owned assets e.g. Meadowbank. In the current climate the value of these assets has fallen significantly and developer contributions have stopped.

My understanding is that the council has raised around £4m at present, leaving Edinburgh's council tax payers facing a bill of several hundred pounds per household at present.
12

tomias,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 16:20:08
demockcracy!
Market forces
13

Concerned Citizen,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 17:13:55
The council are prepare to bail out this group of arms-length companies to the tune of £70,000,000 but refused the Council owned arms-length Lothian Buses a bail out to the tune of only about £4 million a few months ago. Lothian Buses had been giving the council a good dividend. These development companies have not made a penny in profit yet.

Where is the justice in this when eldery people have the lost their local bus services (eg , No 20 - which passed a number of sheltered housing developments) ?

The council should think very carefully before bailing these companies out.
14

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 17:18:54
Freeze all activity of these 'arms length' quango, 'jobs for the boys' so-called companies immediately, and bring in the Auditors - not the political yes-men in Audit Scotland, but a proper, hard-nosed, forensic commercial outfit, and let their report be made public. Then watch all the cronies of the previous administration, Nolanites, Roy Jobson, Andrew Holmes, et al, run for the first flight to South America.
15

animmo,

23/05/2009 17:59:28
Hooray. Now who's going to pay for me to have my job back please?
16

Goat Boy,

23/05/2009 18:47:58
"THE COUNCIL-OWNED companies behind regeneration efforts in Craigmillar and the Waterfront"

That'll be why the Waterfront project sailed through the planning stage. It's not just the MPs that need to be investigated.
17

cathym,

23/05/2009 19:18:55
4years ago i lobbied edc and edinburgh evening news about the problem with dunedin/canmore houseing assoc and the waterfront, parcs etc. simply because the said houseing assoc got their tax payers money upfront 75k for every house they built. and even a blind man could see that the money was going to run out, take a look at whats finished in niddrie/craigmillar ect ,dunedin/canmore have finished their bit lined their pockets now jumped ship, leaving US the taxpayer with nowt
18

Voter and Council Tax payer,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 23:18:47
Now is the time for all those who were supposed to be supervising these companies to be held to account for their failure. We need to know how much was claimed by the managers and the Councillor Directors who supported such unrealistic business plans.
19

observator,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 23:32:23
What are the "arms length" companies for? If the work they do was carried out by public servants they would only earn their current pay. By setting up these companies, those and such as those can be paid handsome "private sector" salaries and the companies can award contracts to those and such as those and their friends, families and business partners.
All this endeavour should be in-house as there is obviously no advantage to the Council if it assumes the risks and pays the debts. If the council walked away from the debts and let the companies fold, who would lose? Who are the creditors? What relationships do they have to the Council?
20

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 23/05/2009 23:54:02
"all of the council's arms-length companies are to be brought under one group, CEC Holdings' - Does that include the bunch of sharp-suited, lying charlatans in TIE? Still, at least the £70 million the cooncil are going to pull out of a wizard's sleeve to bail out EDI, WEL and PARC will be £70 million it WON'T be able to use to bail out Andrew Burns' TramCar project when the kitty runs out later this year.
21

BIGEYE,

Bonnyrigg 24/05/2009 08:15:28
The constituents voted them in, so can also vote them out.
What I'd like to see is an investigation and publication of councillors expenses, just as we are getting with MP's.
22

daveserviceman,

edinburgh 25/05/2009 11:20:37
all the council retirement homes are being sold to private enterprise to raise extra cash for these projects, next to go will most probabally be more childrens homes. how this council is destrying the city I do not know how they are getting away with it.
probabally be better off migrating to North Korea than stay here in a failed city
23

Concerned Citizen,

Edinburgh 25/05/2009 12:37:26
The whole purpose of council owned arms-length companies is to reduce the risks of financial liability from the council tax payers. Yet we are now bailing out these companies who have made a lose. Before the council bails out these companies they should check to see what the target for the long term break even point was and when that target was due to happen. A balance has to be sought on whether the costs/income targets would have be expected to be met at this stage or whether the whole project has become unsustainable due to to current economic crisis. Is this £70 Millions to be used to prop the companies up indefinitely. Maybe these companies timeline would have normally shown a loss at the time considering the long terms scales of these projects. Very often these days managers and accountants think short term.
24

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 28/05/2009 13:33:49
cash for the boys eh,that money could be better spent,if a tenant feels the pinch ,just like these buisneses,will the council chop some off the rent please?
and pigs will fly first,oh hang they do,as lord ,the man of many wage packets foulkes does to get to the house of (ill repute)lords and take £560 a day
25

McAffee,

Edinburgh 01/06/2009 09:35:54
Before the downturn began residential and commercial developers were keeping well clear of WEL because of the shocking ineptitude of the management and their complete lack of commercial ability.
As for rental incomes on the WEL property portfolio, the concensus opinion amongst a significant number of tenants is that the management of WEL are not to be trusted and almost anywhere would be preferable to the Waterfront under its present management.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.