Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

City to force new affordable homes quota on developers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 October 2008
DEVELOPERS in rural west Edinburgh are to be forced to build more affordable homes by the city council.
The council was the first local authority in Scotland to stipulate how many properties must be low-cost or socially rented houses, but the rules have always been less stringent in places such as Newbridge, Kirkliston, Ratho and Ratho Station.

With
plans for hundreds of new homes in the area, the affordable housing quota is now set to rise from 15 per cent to 25 per cent – in line with that in the rest of the Capital.

Council leaders today said the measure is necessary to tackle Edinburgh's massive housing crisis, especially in the current economic climate.

But property experts warned that developers, who are already resentful about the policy, will be put off by the rising "tax" on land.

Affordable housing is defined as housing that is available for rent or sale to meet the needs of people who cannot afford to buy or rent on the open market.

Councillor Norman Work, the city's deputy housing leader and ward member for Almond, said: "This increase from 15 per cent to 25 per cent for the affordable housing quota in rural west Edinburgh is something which I have campaigned for for some time.

"I'm determined that this change should now be set in stone, as it will bring this area in line with the rest of Edinburgh.

"There is an ongoing acute shortage of affordable housing right across the city, so anything we can do to help deliver more badly needed homes is extremely welcome."

Senior councillors believe there is enough land in the city to solve Edinburgh's housing crisis.

They want the Scottish Government to provide enough money for registered social landlords and public bodies to provide the necessary 6677 homes. The affordable housing quota applies to all developments of more than 12 units.

There are several developments in the pipeline for rural west Edinburgh, including Sir David Murray's plan to nearly double the size of Ratho Station by building 200 new homes. The council is set to remove this land from the green belt to allow the scheme to go ahead.

Developer CALA Homes has drawn up a £50 million project for the nearby village of Ratho, including 118 family homes, a new 60-bed private care home and a canal basin.

There are also proposals to build 650 new homes at West Craigs.

The site of the former Continental Tyres factory in Newbridge is also being earmarked for housing-led regeneration in the village.

But Roy Durie, senior partner with Ryden property consultants, said the changes to the affordable housing quota could delay developments.

"This is a barrier to development," he said.

"It's absolutely the wrong time to be increasing the quota. They should be reversing it, down to around ten per cent.

"It's effectively increasing the tax by 67 per cent on landowners."



The full article contains 494 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 October 2008 10:30 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Mortgage and property news
 
1

bluehead,

edinburgh 25/10/2008 11:09:17
affordable!!!!what's that?the way things are going going,people will soon be living in caves,,there is nothing affordable now,the only ones who will be alright jack are politicians ,they will be in no pain.
2

spud the enforcer,

25/10/2008 11:45:46
another pointless soundbite from chief liar of the council jenny dawefull,

she really is a walking miracle a woman with no backbone who can actually stand, i don't agree what so ever with developers being forced to build affordable homes,
3

Morry,

Scotland 25/10/2008 12:06:33
affordable-ish home are being built everywhere but the cities.
affordable only to millionaires and idiots who want to pay extortionate overthetop rents to rogues who see themselves as doing the world a favour.
4

Boy Wonder,

25/10/2008 12:07:45
Councillor Work? A mistake in this name surely??
5

Mallory,

Edinburgh 25/10/2008 12:41:56
Which current developments are going to meet the 25% affordable housing targets?
6

Unimpressed one,

25/10/2008 13:03:21
With the current economic slowdown, surely this is an opportunity for Darling to put in place a massive expansion of 'affordable' housing. By spending large chunks of public money, this would not only boost the flagging construction industry during the coming recession, but help redress the shortfall of suitable property. A win-win situation surely.
7

Jams,

Edinburgh 25/10/2008 13:07:34
Developers do what they do to generate profit. If you remove the profit from 25% of what they build then the cost of the other 75% increases. So in order to make 25% more affordable the council makes 75% less affordable??

I agree with #6 - if they want truly affordable homes then they should build them and by doing so keep some people in jobs.
8

Eliz,

Edinburgh 25/10/2008 13:30:37
Properties are only "affordable" the first time round. After that, the owners will sell them for whatever they can get so it's all just political soundbites. And you're correct #7, development companies aren't charities, they just bury the costs of "affordable" in all the other properties they build - and so it goes on....
9

Statsman,

Edinburgh 25/10/2008 14:41:53
The council never bother enforcing this anyway. Alan 'Useless' Henderson gives anything the nod.
10

noswod,

Honestas 25/10/2008 14:57:55
Why not build coouncil hooses ? Getting your social housing off the back of the private sector never really works with the rich (private sector)directly subsidising the poor. No new private sector hooses are going to be build for maybe 4-5 years the public sector shouls take over and build hooses like they did in the old days Westerhailes needs to be rebuilt in Leith.
11

Mykel Mzoritz,

25/10/2008 17:03:08
Why doesn't Councillor Work then go to the Council Owned company rebuilding Craigmillar and force them to put 25% of the houses affordable housing instead of the current 20%.

The council themselves are breaking their own rules.
12

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 25/10/2008 18:20:52
Like the rest of her cast of FibDum Idiots, Jenny Dawg needs to get real. Who in their right mind is going to pay over the odds for a 'nice' house in a 'nice' area, with the prospect of 'social' tenants (newspeak for disfunctionate scumbags) being dumped next door to suit the ideology of some third-rate politician.
13

Cabbie,

Toon Cooncul 25/10/2008 18:55:56
Most are missing the point. First, The Scottish Government are going to stop the sale of new build coucil and housing Association housing. Secondly, affordable housing in this context is for social rent and either built by housing associations or built by the developers for HA's to manage and are not for sale. Finaly, the council have announced that they are going to build council houses for the first time in twenty years and the council could build even more houses if Darling wrote of the inherited £300m housing debt.
14

JT,

26/10/2008 08:13:13
Dont the council know its all about location, location, location! No offence to those who live out at Newbridge or Ratho Stn, but its not exactly handy for town is it without a car? Its either out in the sticks or in dodge city aka Craigmiller Instead of letting the developers get prime land in the city for pennies and they charge mega bucks for shoeboxes time that the council got the land in town for "social" housing.
15

Julian.,

edinburgh 27/10/2008 02:10:52
#13, Cabbie

"Affordable housing is defined as housing that is available for rent or sale to meet the needs of people who cannot afford to buy or rent on the open market"

For all those who are against this idea and advocating the building of council houses, a quick look at some of the estates that were built in the 60's and 70's will tell you that's a bad idea.

This is a good idea in my opinion. It gives people on modest incomes a house which has a good chance of being a pleasant place to stay. Because private developers have, in general, a better track record at building places people want to stay than the council has.
16

duelay no more,

perth 27/10/2008 11:07:37
I am sorry to say that it is not the fact that the private sector builds houses better than councils etc..What makes a house more desireable is location within the city, proximity to amenities and transport, safety, and the ability to sell it after "x " years of ownership.

If any one of those circumstances is deemed to be affected, the value will similarly be affected, and projects will thrive or stall.

For the single person / female etc..safety is a major factor, this in turn affects the way married persons and families perceive their risk to reward ratio.

In a nutshell I agree with No.12, as difficult neighbours can make a lovely home, a hell, which cannot be sold or rented effectively, so why would one take the risk? Also if the transport system is dangerous, who wants to live 30 minutes away on a train.?

I am not concerned about sharing my living environment with proiductive members of society like teachers and police officers, but I do take exception to having mouthy unemployed layabouts, hanging about on the kerb to scratch my car, or in the stairway to terrorise my children, with zero chance of the authorities doing anything about it. So safety goes up very high on my priorities, and I suspect would be so for most people who are putting their OWN MONEY into the deal.

If one is getting accomodation in such an area for virtually zero personal effort, the value of this is not understood or appreciated in the same way is is with those who actually earned their place there.

Sorry to sound a bit one sided, but I have experienced the ugly side of "social deprivation" and "wasted education" too many times to take such personal risks on or near a reservation. Let councillors and their staff buy these houses first, and if they actually live there with their families, then they may have some mandate to further such social engineering.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.