Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

MPs to launch new probe into MI5 over 7/7 suicide bombers



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 May 2007
A GROUP of senior MPs is to re-examine how MI5 handled intelligence about two of the July 7 suicide bombers after it emerged the security services had known about them long before the atrocity.
The fresh probe by the House of Commons Intelligence and Security Committee comes in the wake of the conviction of five men yesterday over a plot to explode a huge fertilliser bomb in the UK.

It emerged that MI5 tracked two of the July 7 bombers
during the investigation into that case, but took no action.

They dismissed ringleader Mohammed Sidique Khan and Shehzad Tanweer as peripheral figures and failed even to tell the Special Branch in West Yorkshire where Khan lived of their findings.

Around 15 months later, Khan, Tanweer and two other men would go on to kill 52 people in the London attacks.

MI5 today claimed it had done all it could and Home Secretary John Reid dismissed claims for a full public inquiry. But today the chairman of the ISC - former Northern Ireland Secretary Paul Murphy - said the investigation would be re-opened to look again at why the 7/7 bombers were not picked up.

It will also look at why the Special Branch in West Yorkshire were not kept up to date with the MI5 surveillance operation on the fertiliser bombers despite the fact that Khan lived in Dewsbury in their area.

Mr Murphy said that the committee - made up of senior MPs picked by Downing Street - would look at why it was told Khan was not "named and listed" but he said that the information at the time was that he was not fully identified "until after he died" in the Tube suicide attack. MI5 is under heavy questioning over the fact that it said at the time that the London Tube terrorists were "clean skins" whose attack came "out of the blue". But in fact they had tracked, bugged and photographed Khan and Tanweer during four meetings with Omar Khyam, the leader of the fertiliser bombers in the final stages of the plot.

Khyam was then one of Britain's top terror targets but his close association with Khan was ignored.

The Dewsbury man was tracked to his mother-in-law's home in Dewsbury and it was established that Khyam occasionally travelled in his car. Both had attended a terror training camp together in Pakistan two years before.

One of the survivors of the 7/7 attacks, Rachel North, said she was shocked and appalled to learn that two of the killers were known to MI5. She said: "Now that we have discovered these men were very much on the radar of the security service and could have been stopped, that is going to be difficult to come to terms with.

"This has fuelled my desire for an independent inquiry because it appears we have not been told the truth about what happened."

But Dr Reid dismissed the calls for a public inquiry saying it would not be "the correct response" adding: "It would divert the energies and efforts of so many in the security service and police who are already stretched greatly in countering that present threat.

"Our responsibility as a government is to try and minimise the chances of any other group of families ever having to suffer as the families of 7/7 did suffer."

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Menzies Campbell said the trial would spark "widespread public concern" about the capability of MI5 and the reliability of government information after 7/7.

And Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said: "Whether deliberately or not, the government have not told the British public the whole truth about the circumstances and mistakes leading up to the July 7 attacks."



The full article contains 634 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

McPundit,

Lothian 01/05/2007 12:47:57

Sorry to be a pedant, but the ISC is NOT a 'House of Commons Committee' - clue: some of its past/present members are peers. It's not even a parliamentary committee in the normal sense of that term. Don't worry - BBC Scotland made the same mistake this morning.

See description on Cabinet office website: http://www.cabinet-office.gov.uk/intelligence/

"Parliamentary oversight of SIS, GCHQ and the Security Service is provided by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), established by the Intelligence Services Act 1994. The Committee examines the expenditure, administration and policy of the three Agencies. It operates within the ‘ring of secrecy’ and has wide access to the range of Agency activities and to highly classified information. Its cross–party membership of nine from both Houses is appointed by the Prime Minister after consultation with the Leader of the Opposition. The Committee is required to report annually to the Prime Minister on its work. These reports, after any deletions of sensitive material, are placed before Parliament by the Prime Minister. The Committee also provides ad hoc reports to the Prime Minister from time to time. The Chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee is the Right Honourable Paul Murphy. The Committee is supported by a Clerk and secretariat in the Cabinet Office and can employ an investigator to pursue specific matters in greater detail."

2

Immutable Name,

of Toll-X 01/05/2007 13:14:55

It is however the same committee that had the oversight job the first time round. A half decent investigation would also look into this committee’s handling of that first appraisal with impartiality, which the self same folks clearly can't do.

3

petrol head,

Edinburgh 01/05/2007 13:37:39

Who put the bombs UNDER the trains then?

4

Calum10,

01/05/2007 15:04:26

The chairman of this committee has already said that he would expect the findings on the initial report to remain unchanged despite new and further evidence of a failure of intelligence. So there is no point in the ISC re-examining this new evidence if their minds are already

5

jayceebee,

02/05/2007 22:55:58

no matter the 'probe', the real truth will be deflected. It is the truth which is the danger to the 'national security' --- where 'national security' has become a euphemism burying the truth.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.