Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

This Big Issue action plan beggars belief

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 January 2008
I WRITE regarding the setting up of an Edinburgh initiative called BEST, which proposes to promote the selling of the Big Issue and the public buying vouchers to give to street beggars rather than cash donation, with a view to ending street begging (News, December 27).
I am the addictions team leader of the Homeless Outreach Project (HOP), a long-established organisation; with the most experienced and professional full-time street outreach specialists in central Edinburgh.

We are now dealing with the initial re
actions to this article, with clients (street beggars) coming to our office making some astute but mostly unprintable statements about this "initiative".

HOP staff work seven days a week with street beggars helping with the complexity of issues (not only drugs) they endure. Had HOP been consulted perhaps this ill-informed initiative could have been fully thought through.

The main thrust of clients' feedback, if this "initiative" goes ahead, is that they would have to revert to other forms of begging, for example "hand tapping" – begging on the move; stopping people with general requests for money or saying they need bus fares, pressured begging with the targeting of tourists and shoppers from out of town. Addicted street beggars also fear that because of this initiative they may have to revert to more aggressive means of obtaining money through various forms of theft and robbery and realise that they would inevitably be having "more jail time".

Let's not get confused here – drug and alcohol-addicted clients need money and will continue to get it, one way or another, until they either receive effective interventions, treatment and support or die.

If this initiative is the BEST that Edinburgh can do, pity help us to achieve anywhere near the 2012 goal of ending homelessness.

Government and councils need to act on the fact that the way to combat drug and alcohol addiction and the subsequent by-products, like homelessness and begging, is to stopping wasting time and money on a tiresome charade of petty schemes and tackle the big issue, ie a huge investment of time and dedicated organisation to effective early intervention drug and alcohol treatment facilities along with specialist interventions and support for addicts, their families and to tackle society's prevailing attitude that alcohol misuse is part of our cultural heritage and somewhat acceptable.

Addiction (and poverty in the case of Eastern Europeans) is the true root of the problem and needs treatment, not to be hidden by brushing the beggar off the street to find the needed money by alternative means.

Steve Amos, HOP Addictions Team Leader, Homeless Outreach Project, Grindlay Street Court, Edinburgh


Here's your ticket to ID cards for OAPs

I NOTE that in your piece about the new ticket machines to be installed on the Lothian Buses fleet you refer to the new free national pensioner' cards as "concessionary travel cards" (News, January 4).

This is quite untrue. The cards are also not "bus passes", as commonly referred to by pensioners. In reality they are multi-purpose entitlement cards, which in other countries would be referred to as "identity cards".

The truth is that Scottish pensioners have been issued with identity cards, but remain totally unaware of it.

Dr John Welford, NO2ID Edinburgh, Boat Green, Canonmills


Empty promises in New Year message

I NOTE in her New Year message that Jenny Dawe (Mouthpiece, January 3) states the Lib Dem/SNP coalition will continue the "existing programme of school building" which was set in motion by the previous administration.

That, of course, will not include the new schools planned for Boroughmuir, James Gillespie's and Portobello by the previous Labour administration.

Though these replacements are desperately needed, they will not go ahead because the SNP Government has withdrawn support for PPP funding without putting anything else in its place.

How many more New Year messages will pass before those in power get their act together and arrange funding for these schools? How much longer will pupils, parents and teachers have to wait for the SNP Government and the Lib Dem/SNP council to deliver on their promises?

Henry Philip, Grange Loan, Edinburgh


Thinking big isn't always for the best

GRAHAM BIRSE, Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce's deputy chief executive, has recently raised the requirement for the growth of Edinburgh, and once again I shudder at the idea that our city must continually grow in order to survive. Is there no end to this concept?

We now face the prospect of thousands of new homes in the docks area along with a major development at Haymarket and to cap it all the likely construction of some huge building at Leith Walk/Picardy Place to help finance our tram system.

What benefit does all this development confer on the citizens of Edinburgh? Little if any, I would venture to say.

However, if Mr Birse means growth by way of offering better and more effective use of existing facilities and the raising of the standard of living of all our citizens then I will go along with that. Much can be done to attract visitors either from near or far and to make the life of Edinburghers more pleasant but without increasing the population of the city. An ever increasing population means the loss of the facets that make Edinburgh a great place to live.

Edinburgh's uniqueness is already here – embrace it. Do not be greedy and try to make it bigger because that will be irreversible and fatal for our town.

Ian Ross, Eden Lane, Edinburgh



The full article contains 924 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 January 2008 9:53 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 07/01/2008 12:07:26
RE: 'Empty promises in New Year message', what a pity that the Monumental Embra TramCar Folly hadn't been set up as a PPP. But then, the Private Sector recognise a White Elephant when it crashes into the room and won't touch such a beast with a bargepole. Step forward, gullible-idiot toytown politicians with a bottomless sack of public money . . . !
2

abcd1234,

Edinburgh 07/01/2008 13:22:53
What sense Ian Ross speaks. How many houses / offices must we allow property devlopers to build and how many public amenities must we continue to lose (especially in central Edinburgh e.g let's demolish Meadowbank and build an new resource on the outskirts)?
3

Unimpressed one,

07/01/2008 13:45:52
Steve Amos puts the issue of begging firmly in perspective as someone who is at the front line of the problems involved. Compare his informative letter with the cr*p peddled about by ENN and ill-informed members of the public, who would prefer to sweep the problem under the carpet.
4

Dragonlord,

07/01/2008 14:02:55
3# I personally have winessed " beggers" boarding buses( with dog in tow) at the Huntersfeild tavern Gorebridge. Setting out for a day of begging and spending it in the pub. They are not homeless and very few beggers are. There is also the case of the young girl outside blockbuster video ( newington) who lives in a top flat near-by.Time to rid the city of these " poor unfortuneates" They are better off than most OAP's
5

The Judge,

07/01/2008 14:34:29
Steve Amos know that without "beggars" and junkies on our streets he'd be out of a job. He is nothing more than a professional yogurt knitter who has probably never had a real job in his life. Anybody who refers to junkie scum as "clients" needs their head examined.
6

CRAGman,

Capital city Edinburgh 07/01/2008 14:43:36
It's a shame that they ever got rid of the tenements at Picardy Place - where Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was born. And a further shame that they knocked down most of Leith Street for a road scheme that thankfully never happened. Nowadays we wouldn't put cars before houses.
7

Speedy Gonzales,

Edinburgh 07/01/2008 14:46:55
Even if these 'vouchers' for the beggars do come about, there will still be people who give money, either through personal preference or by virtue of the fact they don't have ready access to these vouchers.
At the end of the day, it is up to the passing public to not give cash to these people, whether in need or not. Ultimately people will always beg, and it is a personal choice whether the public give up their hard earned cash!
8

Linda,

Edinburgh 07/01/2008 15:02:38
Henry Phillip repeats Labour nonsense "That, of course, will not include the new schools planned for Boroughmuir, James Gillespie's and Portobello by the previous Labour administration."

Labour did not apply for government funding for these schools and mislead parents before last election on this issue
9

James (1),

07/01/2008 15:49:42
Well said Mr Amos. Just let your "clients" have their say on how they get their money from the public. The same "clients" who do not want your help because if they did they would not be begging would they?
They choose their way of life. Good luck to them, however when their choice of life style impacts on mine (and I don't think I am alone in this) then unlike them I want something done about it.
Like the mugs who give them money, there are more than enough organisations out there being paid to help them, if they really wanted help.
Begging is not an occupation but it is well paid for doing very little.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.