Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Waging war against plastic bags

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 March 2008
EVEN the Prime Minister has a view on a tax or ban on plastic shopping bags. As even more stores begin charging for them, Hazel Mollison discovers we go through a mountain of them and that concerns are growing for the effect this is having on the environment.
THE average family gets through hundreds a year without a thought, but now the plastic bags handed out freely by supermarkets and high street shops could become as much a thing of the past as smoking in pubs.

Politicians, retailers and environme
ntal groups have declared war on the billion carriers given away each year in Scotland. Marks and Spencer is the latest chain to introduce a charge for them, while Gordon Brown says he would like to see them banned completely by the year's end.

Supporters see them as the ultimate symbol of our throwaway society, with many ending up littering our streets and parks as they are discarded after use. They say a similar ban in the Republic of Ireland has reduced bag use by 90 per cent.

But some opponents say these claims are exaggerated, and that banning bags will only have a minimum effect on waste while consumers and small business owners will suffer if a levy is introduced.

Marks and Spencer announced last week it would charge customers five pence per bag from May, joining Lidl, Ikea and B&Q, who already charge for bags.

Chief executive Sir Stuart Rose said a trial in 50 stores resulted in consumers taking away 70 per cent fewer bags. They also raised more than £80,000 for the environmental charity Groundwork.

He said: "We want to make it easy for our customers to do their bit to help the environment and our trials have shown us that they want to take action. Just imagine if M&S customers right across the UK cut the number of food bags they use by 70 per cent – that's over 280 million bags they'd be saving every year."

The Scottish Government has already set a target of reducing bag use by 25 per cent by the end of this year but many people think this does not go far enough, and they cannot rely on retailers to take action themselves.

Edinburgh South MSP Mike Pringle is leading calls for a compulsory levy on plastic bags. Although his bill was shelved last year, he hopes to persuade the Scottish Government to reconsider it.

He said: "If we really want to get rid of plastic bags, the only way is a charge. To be honest, voluntary agreements never work. Australia managed to get a 34 per cent reduction (although this figure crept up again) but Ireland has managed to achieve a 93 per cent reduction through a compulsory levy. And the great thing is small shopkeepers will actually save money."

One shopkeeper who supports a levy is Aslam Aziz, who owns a fruit and veg shop in Argyll Place.

He said: "I'm totally in favour of it. It would save me £4500 a year. People will come into my shop and ask for a bag for two onions. We can't really refuse as everyone gives them away."

But Graham Russell of the Federation of Small Businesses says a compulsory charge would be hard on smaller shops.

He said: "Legislation is not the answer. A tax on bags would be an administrative nightmare for shopkeepers.

"Small businesses are extremely careful about how many bags they hand out, as they're extremely expensive. They don't put them on the checkouts. Ninety-three per cent of bags are handed out by the top four supermarkets."

Carrier bag producers say they are being unfairly demonised, as bags make up only a small proportion of plastic sent to landfill sites. They say most consumers already reuse or recycle their plastic bags, while alternatives such as paper bags or heavier grade plastic bin bags could be more damaging to the environment.

Peter Woodall of the Carrier Bag Consortium: "When people are deprived of free plastic bags they just have to buy them, although the latest research shows than in excess of 70 per cent of people do reuse their plastic carrier bags.

"In Ireland, people had to buy more bin bags after the levy was introduced, and the amount of plastic was actually greater than before. Bin bags and refuse sacks are a heavier grade of plastic.

"We recycle about 3000 tons of plastic bags in the UK. We turn them into park benches, litter bins on the streets.

"Very often the first thing a politician wants to do is tax it or ban it. We'd rather be educating people than having a tax slapped on it."

But there are signs that Scottish shoppers are becoming more aware of the environment, even if they are slower to embrace the reusable bag than other European countries.

Campaigners in North Berwick aim to make it the first plastic bag-free town in Scotland. They have persuaded stores, including Tesco, to stop issuing free ones.

Meanwhile, Portobello traders are trying to rid the area of plastic bags by selling a range of canvas alternatives under the Porty Shopper brand. A similar scheme in Leith in 2006 saw thousands of cotton shopping bags distributed in the area.

One thing everyone agrees on is that we need to reduce the number of plastic bags we use, through taxation or education.

They may be convenient, but in terms of environmental impact, they are certainly not free.







The full article contains 921 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 March 2008 11:13 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Environment
 
1

Seabhag,

Edinburgh 04/03/2008 12:06:43
I suppose it was inevitable that Hazel, as the daughter of a Lib Dem activist would mention Mike Pringle's bill but made no mention of Green councillors' motion to City Of Edinburgh Council on plastic bags - a motion backed by officials but suffocated by staff.

2

Nellie,

Liverpool 04/03/2008 12:57:25
#1 ... and I'll bet you washed those nappies by hand!

It's the same old story of modern society though, isn't it? REverything has to be done un a rush, so there is too little time and "convenience" has become our God. These days folk have less time to prepare food from scratch (ready made from Tesco is so much easier ... or buy a take-away), paint awnings (cover 'em with white plasic), mow the lawn (lay Tarmac or concrete over the space), grow your own veggies (buy it from Tesco), walk or cycle (use the car), handwrite letters (send an email), write ANY kind of letter (forward a joke received via email), look after and home teach pre-school children to read(send them to pre-school), plan and plan a holiday (buy a package), play with the children (sit 'em in front of the TV or let them play computer games/Nintendo/Play Station/etc) , read a book (see the movie - it's quicker) ... and so it goes on.
3

Unimpressed one,

04/03/2008 13:03:57
Hew we go - the usual serving of green tripe masquerading as 'saving the planet'. The carrier bags are made from a constituent of crude oil, naptha, which would otherwise be burnt off (producing more nasty CO2). The supermarkets will have to find a free alternative if these bags are banned or taxed, so what the hell's the point? More sucking up to the eco-bams and their dim-witted political lackies.
4

alex patersons English teacher,

04/03/2008 13:16:26
1. Forget plastic bags for a moment: think disposable nappies.

Their great when the milk leaks,but you cant get much home in one of them.
5

Jams,

Edinburgh 04/03/2008 13:27:28
#5 Thank you - first time I've smiled today.
6

Jm Forlum,

Glasgow 04/03/2008 13:28:48
My concern is to do what is right for the environment and humanity, not just for Scotland and the World, and to produce the facts of the issue from which a reasoned conclusion can be made. This is what the Scottish Parliament did over 2 years and they concluded that this complex issue was best addressed by continuing with plastic carrier bags whilst encouraging the "reuse, reduce and recycle" educational promotion now being advertised by many Scottish cities including Edinburgh and Glasgow. This intelligent Holyrood decision saved Scotland from a minimum of 13,500 tonnes of extra waste occupying an estimated 300,000 cubic meters of landfill space EVERY year!
This additional waste would have produced extra carbon dioxide and methane which is exactly what Kyoto, Bali, the EU and the world wants us all to reduce!
I visited a variety of the "factories" representative of Indian cotton and jute manufacturing. The lack of cleanliness, the appalling work conditions, the product lying on the filthy unprotected floor, the age of some of the workers, and the number of workers in one location is clearly disgraceful. Condoning the use of this type of production is simply socially unacceptable and irresponsible.
However well intentioned Ms Mollison might be, may I suggest that she reads, listens to, and understands the facts which result in the unintended consequences of her misplaced desires for, without any shadow of doubt, they will produce an environmental disaster for Scotland and the World.
Because all plastic bags are reusable, recyclable, inert, waterproof, non absorbent, lightweight, hygienic, material efficient, made ethically, relatively thin, and inexpensive they tick all the environmental boxes. No other product can do all of that, and to top it all, they don't cost the poor, the elderly or the disadvantaged one penny.

People cause litter, and the laws are in place to fine them for doing so, plastic bags don't cause litter.

7

,

04/03/2008 14:01:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Edinburgh 100,

Musselburgh 04/03/2008 15:22:22
Saving the planet, green issues, has become a new bloody religion. I am sick and tired of having the new buzz words "carbon foot print" thrown in my face at every oppertunity by the now fashionable earth saving groups of all distinction. Its like going to confession now, forgive me father for I have sined, I used a non degradable plastic bag etc etc etc. this whole approach of force it down your throats and if you are not one of us you are a planet killer is the real reason why most people ignore what is going on.
9

,

04/03/2008 15:59:14
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

geriatric swampi,

Aberdeen 04/03/2008 17:12:23
Plastic bags are a menace both to the environment and wildlife.My wife and I bought 3 canvas type bags and we are able to fit in the same amount of shopping as
filled 6 plastic ones. Total cost to our purse was around £7. They last a considerable time.
11

sceptic,

04/03/2008 17:19:32
Nice that Gordon can take time to ponder on plastic bags.
An all time record trade deficit, inflation at its highest for fifteen years, our soldiers dying every week in Iraq and Afghanistan, 4 million living in fuel poverty, house repossessions at a 16 year peak and rising.
Go for it Gordon, charge 5p for a plastic bag next year and Britain will be transformed!
12

11+failed,

the pans 04/03/2008 17:34:34
#7 Jm Forlum
"from a minimum of 13,500 tonnes of extra waste occupying an estimated 300,000 cubic meters"
That gives a density of of 0.045gm/ml, the waste must be all polystyrene? Perhaps we should be spending more on educating the eco-fascists!
13

Groucho,

04/03/2008 17:34:38
With the population of the world doubling every 50 years, and every one of these people wanting a better life than there parents, is the war on plastic bags the only possible worry? The reality is that we are on a sinking ship. Unless we are prepared to practice extreme birth control, with many families never having children and everybody working until death, then the level of greenhouse gasses will soar. Smaller cars are not the answer. The answer is a much smaller population. If we don't limit the population voluntarely then the wars over the worlds shrinking resources will do it for us.
14

joppa jock,

Huntingdon 04/03/2008 18:09:52
Do none of the small shops use paper bags any more? The guy who complained that he has to hand out a plastic bag for 2 onions could have used a much smaller paper bag that could be recycled.
15

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 05/03/2008 04:06:08
do what your mother and granny did have we ever become such a useless bunch off sheep ban all plastic bags and leave the car at home and the cell phone and the credit card
16

tomi,

05/03/2008 05:59:29
So, the humble plastic bag is "Public Enemy number 1"!

What a relief!!

I thought it might have been something like crime: murder, rape, robbery, fraud, burglary, vandalism, etc; or unemployment; or drug addiction; or price inflation; or youth suicide; or any one of the ills aflicting society.

No! Its plastic bags!!!

Oh!! How I wish that all these other problems could be solved as easily as the problem of plastic bags!1

What's the solution? Recycle them!!

It is easily done, if the facilities exist.

So, stop blaming the bags or the people who supply them, but blame those who accept them, but are too lazy to dispose of them properly!

Perhaps it is them who should be blamed for anti-social behaviour.




17

E300,

tomich 08/03/2008 14:32:47
Scientists and environmentalists have attacked a global campaign to ban plastic bags which they say is based on flawed science and exaggerated claims.
The widely stated accusation that the bags kill 100,000 animals and a million seabirds every year are false. They pose only a minimal threat to most marine species, including seals, whales, dolphins and seabirds.
Gordon Brown announced last month that he would force supermarkets to charge for the bags, saying that they were “one of the most visible symbols of environmental waste”. Retailers and some pressure groups, including the Campaign to Protect Rural England, threw their support behind him.
But scientists, politicians and marine experts attacked the Government for joining a “bandwagon” based on poor science.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.