Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Teenagers jailed for kicking dad-of-3 to death

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 February 2008
THREE teenagers were jailed for life today for the murder of father-of-three Garry Newlove.
Mr Newlove was kicked "like a football" by the youths after he confronted them about vandalism outside his home in Warrington, Cheshire, in August.

Adam Swellings, 19, received a minimum 17-year term; Stephen Sorton, 17, received a minimum 15 year
s; and Jordan Cunliffe, 16, was locked up for a minimum of 12 years.

They were convicted of murder at Chester Crown Court last month.

Jailing the teenagers, Judge Andrew Smith said: "You were three of a gang who attacked Garry Newlove only because he had the courage to remonstrate with you.

"For you all drunken aggression was part of the night's entertainment.

"It was a gang attack, each of you continued to behave aggressively after you had finished with Garry Newlove."

Mr Newlove, the father of Zoe, 18, Danielle, 16, and 13-year-old Amy, suffered massive head injuries in the attack which took place shortly after the gang had kicked the door of his wife's car, parked outside their home.

His widow, Helen, 44, spoke out after the guilty verdict and pledged to campaign to make Britain safer.

She said: "I am determined to carry on for the sake of my wonderful husband Garry. He will not have died in vain.

"The light has gone out of our lives. It's like a piece of our jigsaw has been lost for ever.

"Garry and myself have brought up three girls together to respect other people and to be home, not walking the streets causing damage and intimidating other people."

It emerged, after the trio were found guilty on January 16 of Mr Newlove's murder, that Swellings had been released from custody for an assault just hours before the August 10 attack.

He was freed on bail on condition he stayed away from Warrington but he never left the town. Instead he met up with Sorton and Cunliffe and began a drink and drugs binge.

The teenager had consumed four litres of cider and smoked five cannabis cigarettes that night, paid for with his dole money.

As the oldest in the group, he took it upon himself to lead the confrontation with sales manager Mr Newlove, arrogantly telling him to "get back inside".

He threw the first punch, having approached the defenceless and barefoot victim from behind.

Egged on by the other gang members shouting "Get him" and "Do him, Swellhead", the youth knocked Mr Newlove to the ground.

Sorton, who had consumed nine or ten bottles of Stella Artois and one three-litre bottle of Frosty Jacks cider in the hours before the attack, then kicked Mr Newlove with a force so ferocious that he left his training shoe under the victim's body.

Cunliffe, who was aged 15 on the night of the attack, also joined in, bragging to other gang members afterwards: "We've just banged a man and he's not moving."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 February 2008 1:22 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Alberto.,

11/02/2008 15:05:43
Why differing sentences for these yobbos who obviously took part in a concerted attack on Mr Newlove?

It must have been very difficult to arrive at differing periods of penalty - but why was it done, after all they all had the 'opportunity' to walk away from their 'bit of fun' - but chose not to, so there would seem to be no worthwhile or serious reason to penalise any of them less than the greatest penalty arrived at for this malicious crime!

However, it would appear the Justice system is to be applauded, at last, for seeing the light in this kind of yobbish behaviour and their decision of such a lengthy period of imprisonment (if it is fully held!) may go some way to deter others!

However, I canot help feeling that the awarding of equal penalties (the longest terms applied) would help moreso, meanwhile, at least we know the streets will be clear of any trouble, for quite some time, certainly by the three now imprisoned - so long as we don't see the Justice system being interfered with by some crazy EC or PC ruling against fighting crime in this way that we are now seeing!
2

Diana,

Edinburgh 11/02/2008 16:13:41
How is that a "life sentence"? They'll get out while they're still in their 30s, most likely to continue a life of crime.
3

SPG,

edinburgh 11/02/2008 16:29:09
The youngest of the scum deserves the highest sentance. No doubt they thought they'd get away with it.I laugh at them and their families.
4

The Daleks,

Longmen 11/02/2008 18:51:01
"Having been found guilty of murder there is only one sentence available to me. That you be taken from this place to another, and there hung by the neck until you are dead."

It's about time we had those time honoured words re-introduced to the courts.
5

Douglas,

Bathgate 11/02/2008 20:23:23
#4: Aye
6

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 11/02/2008 21:44:58
add on another 20yrs each pure cowardly killers
7

Evia,

11/02/2008 22:48:31
#4

I am sure we would find that most people agree. The folk in this country are fed up with do-gooders making excuses for the scum and lawyers defending the ones who are definitely guilty. We are also fed up with seeing piddling little sentences handed out and it's high time we had a government that kept it's promise to get tough on crime.
8

Julian,

EDINBURGH 12/02/2008 03:08:28
#7 Evia,

Go and emigrate to Iran. You'll probably feel more at home there. How can you call minimum seventeen years a piddling sentence?

#2 Diana

It's called a life sentence because even when they do eventually get released they're on probation and under scrutiny for the rest of their lives.

I do agree though. To say they were "jailed for life" is plainly wrong. Unfortunately you can't e-mail the writer of this article for some reason. Hopefully he might read these comments.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.