Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Simpson's goes from the cradle to grave



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
09 August 2006
IT is a scene which will trigger mixed emotions for thousands of people across Edinburgh. The Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavilion sits surrounded by piles of rubble, its windows knocked out, as the demolition teams move in.
Four years after the doctors and nurses moved to modern facilities at Little France, the building where they and their predecessors worked for almost 70 years is about to be demolished.

Around a third of a million babies have been born at the Sim
pson's since it first opened its doors in 1939.

The building echoes with some of the most cherished memories of countless families across the city and far beyond.

But workmen have now begun ripping out the interior of the building in Lauriston Place in preparation for its demise.

Some of the work is painstaking as it involves the removal of asbestos.

Within a few years, it will be replaced by a complex of one, two and three-bedroom flats, many with views across the Meadows.

Among those whose emotions have been stirred by the sight of the famous old building in its final days is Sinead McNally.

The clinical risk co-ordinator at the ERI's new maternity unit trained as a midwife in the Simpson's in 1977 and worked there until its closure.

Ms McNally, 54, who lives in Bruntsfield, still walks past the building daily and has taken a series of photographs to remember it by.

"I've taken photos of the flapping curtains. It looks such a mess now, but still stands as a reminder to everyone."

The beauty of the grand old building, particularly its two Art Deco staircases and its many balconies, loom large in her memory.

"I will never forget those big circular staircases," she said.

"You could stand at the top and look all the way down five floors to the rosette design on the marble floor of the basement.

"And I don't think anyone will forget the balconies, built so women could get sunshine and look out on the Meadows."

One task Ms McNally remembers is working in the unit's milk kitchen.

"The old milk kitchen was where we used to make up the baby's milk. That's all changed now as nowadays we don't make up milk. The majority of women breastfeed."

The Simpson's closed in March 2002 when the facility was moved to the new ERI site in Little France.

Though the new hospital has been welcomed for its hi-tech equipment, the old building still holds a great deal of sentiment for many former staff and patients.

Yvonne Clark, 52, clinical manager of the labour suite at the ERI, worked as a midwife at the Simpson's for more than 20 years.

Mrs Clark, from Queensferry Road, trained as a midwife at the Simpson's in the 1970s and was one of the last to leave the old building after staying behind to clear it out.

She said: "It was very sad to move into the new building. We just left a shell of a building and I shed a tear when I left. It's hard to see it when I pass by but our memories are with us."

Mrs Clark added that she wished the building had been torn down much sooner after it closed as it was painful to see its condition deteriorate.

"When you leave somewhere like that you expect things to be done much quicker," she said.

Grace Benfield, from Stockbridge, gave birth to her son Louis, now four, in a special birthing pool at the Simpson's in 2001.

The 27-year-old bank worker said she would be sorry to see the building go, but what she most remembered was the kindness of the nurses.

She said: "When I was giving birth I got quite a good room - the only one they had with a birthing pool. The nurses were really nice and helpful and made me as comfortable as possible for the 12 hours I was giving birth.

"It'll be a shame for them to see the building demolished. Of course, people now have to go all the way out to Little France."

Alice Davidson, 88, from Stockbridge, who gave birth to her two sons William, 68, and George, 66, at the Simpson's - one in the building about to be torn down and the other in its predecessor - remembered the lack of space in the hospital's early days.

She said: "I was so glad to get out. I remember all the beds were up against each other with just a screen in between.

"I had just come up from another room where I was waiting and the person in the next bed suddenly pulled back the screen and said 'have you had your baby yet?'. You could hear all the screams."

The Simpson's is the latest part of the ERI complex to be knocked down as part of the £350 million Quartermile development. The project is expected to boast at least 1000 new homes, more than 350,00 sq ft of office space, a boutique-style hotel and cafes, bars, restaurants and shops.

Among the architects working on the development are Norman Foster, who designed London's famous "gherkin"-shaped Swiss Re Building, Comprehensive Design Architects, who designed the Harvey Nichols department store on St Andrew Square, and Richard Murphy, architect of the city's Fruitmarket Gallery.

Work overhauling the entire site is expected to last until around 2012. The first apartments are due to go on sale in the spring of next year. It will be later next year before building work starts on the Simpson's site.

The category B-listed building at Lauriston Place today was built in 1939. It replaced the original Simpson's which opened in 1879 as a purpose-built maternity hospital.

The hospital was named after the Edinburgh doctor Sir James Young Simpson, who was the first to use chloroform as an anaesthetic during childbirth.

Around 6000 babies on average were born each year at Simpson's, which was one of the busiest maternity hospitals in Britain.

Dr Miles Oglethorpe of The Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland said as well as the many memories it contained the Simpson's had also been important for its architecture. He said: "The Simpson Memorial Maternity Pavilion is a very distinctive Art Deco part of the old Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, dating from the late 1930s.

"Its design by architect Thomas W Turnbull reflects the period, making it stand out amongst the older buildings of the hospital.

"This was a great help to the many anxious husbands and other relatives who have navigated their way through the complex."

Gladedale Capital, the developer behind the project, said the building's deteriorating condition meant there was finally no option but to demolish it.

A company spokeswoman said: "Dating from the 1930s, the building had a significant asbestos content and had experienced a series of structural difficulties.

"Due to these problems during the 1970s the building was overclad with low-cost fibre glass panels backed with polystyrene to resemble sandstone.

"Subsequently there has been significant further deterioration and it is now necessary to demolish the building in order to regenerate this important part of the city centre."



The full article contains 1226 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 August 2006 10:23 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Health of the NHS
 
1

SarahT,

09/08/2006 11:50:00

What a crime that such a beautiful building has been treated so badly through the years only now to be destroyed. How can a listed building just been torn down?. Developers always claim structural damage when they want to knock something down but the fact of the matter is had they converted it into flats, more people would have bought those than the modern ones that they are putting up.

Now it will be replaced with ghastly looking modern flats that in a few years will look out-dated and decrepit. Was it not possible to salvage parts of the house at least (e.g. the staircase, the floors, etc.)?

The city has shown very little imagination in salvaging its old buildings, opting instead for bland looking, poorly built flats that, while expensive, are cheap boxes. That whole area will look like a housing estate in years to come. Its already filling up with graffitti and garbage. Imagine how much more there will be when these shops set up and you have so many people living so close together?

2

steeeeeeeve,

09/08/2006 12:30:01

You cant keep them all I'm afraid

3

Three From Leith podcast,

09/08/2006 15:54:34

It's the 60s and 70s tower block mistake being made all over again.

Just look at the state of some of the recent wood-clad, white and yellow-painted monstrosities that they're throwing up everywhere. The wood has almost rotted away, the paint is stained and grubby and the buildings are looking miserable, cracked and weary.

'Modern' isn't always the answer, but the council gets massive payments from the property developers for the land so it's little surprise they're only too willing to let them demolish everything in sight these days.

4

SarahT,

09/08/2006 16:31:25

Number 3: I agree! These buildings look awful Like the Scottish parliament, they will like heck in only a couple of years. Grubby and shabby. I can't believe the same mistakes are being made again and again.

2: Why not keep them all? What do we get instead? Awful modern apartment blocks that cost a fortune to buy but not to make? For environmental reasons alone we should try to restore them (not just for their amenity value on the landscape, but because forests, quarries, etc. were all drawn upon once to make them). We should be conserving resources and cutting down on energy required to build and transport materials to build new buildings when perfectly good ones are standing there just crying out to be restored.

5

steeeeeeeve,

09/08/2006 16:53:40

I don't agree - cities should be allowed to evolve and develop a mix of architectural styles from different generations.

Certain buildings are difficult to find a new purpose for and won't easily convert to flats. Just look at how many old properties have been vacant for years during debates on what they should be used for in future.

I don't subscribe to the theory that everything should be kept just because it's old and neither did our 19th century ancestors

6

Andy,

09/08/2006 17:43:13

The new blocks are already 3 or 4 stories over the old hospital and will dwarf them on completion. Who approved these planning monstrosities, like the one built at Lochrin? It puts the entire basin in shadow just when people want to be drinking outside.

7

Strathmore,

Glamis Angus 09/08/2006 18:46:51

My late mother's cousin was Sister Catherine S Anderson from Comely Bank Road and was Labour Ward Sister at the then new Simpson Memorial Hospital. She was there for 27 years.
Sister Anderson trained at the old ERIand the Simpson she delivered between 60,000 and 70,000 babies in her career. She was well known to Edinburgh mothers in the 1920's and 30's giving advice to doctors and pupil midwives who held maternity posts worldwide.

8

Elka,

New Orleans 09/08/2006 21:16:03

Someone who has been taking pictures please post a link to see them! I'm in New Orleans so I can't walk by myself! It sounds like the photos would be amazing.Obviously I'm surrounded by empty and damaged buildings here and I am always impressed how their lingering beauty really manifests itself in photographs.

9

Jayess,

Edinburgh 10/08/2006 00:20:30

Our planners approve the demolition of old buildings, and the developers replace them with kit built Euro designs. Simply because they want more space per pound spent, but they don't have the skills to build similar quality, and if they did they could not afford it. (see Holyrood).

In the case of The Royal Infirmary, the developers paid too much for it, and to the wrong people. The original buildings were built on common land for the common good, but it certainly will not be common people who will benefit from it now.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.