Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Masons aim to dislodge tram works from their doorstep



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 August 2008
A GROUP of Edinburgh Masons have threatened to obtain a court order against the city council to prevent tram works blocking access to their lodge.
James MacLean, secretary and treasurer of the Edinburgh Masonic Club, has written to council leader Jenny Dawe to formally complain of contractors "completely obstructing access" to the premises on Shrub Place Lane.

He claims the obstruction has a
lready resulted in a number of near-misses from cars mounting the pavement to avoid the roadworks, and has obstructed the path of beer delivery trucks and council refuse collectors.

Mr MacLean said: "Vehicles had to manoeuvre at right angles across the pavement.

"During the day, the operative in charge of the roadworks was instructing people to mount the pavement, but as night fell and with the failing light there was a number of angry exchanges, with pedestrians shouting at motorists following a number of near misses."

Mr MacLean has also complained about council refuse collection vehicles being unable to access the lane.

He added: "There's a railway line nearby (and] a family of foxes breeding there. There's been a lot of food waste from our recent functions spilling out into the road and the foxes are having a rare old time."

The club has now has threatened to apply for an interim interdict at Edinburgh Sheriff Court to restrain the city council and tram firm TIE from continuing to obstruct access to it premises.

He added: "This would involve our solicitor going into court (to argue] that the council is acting illegally by preventing access to the premises. This is obviously going to cost a couple of thousand pounds but we will certainly go down that road if we have to.

"TIE previously gave us assurance that we would be able to gain access to our premises 24/7."

A city council spokeswoman said that the matter would be dealt with "as a matter of urgency" once it had had time to examine the Masons' complaints.

However, TIE insisted vehicles could access the premises throughout and at no point was access "impossible".

A spokeswoman added: "We strive to accommodate the access needs of local residents and businesses wherever possible.

"The excavation in question has now been filled and is currently being fully reinstated. We are confident that all necessary health and safety measures were taken during this phase of the work."





The full article contains 403 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 22 August 2008 10:14 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Mikey,

22/08/2008 12:38:10
They'll all be ott with their trooser legs rolled up, asking aboot the age of yer granny and if ye can tie a bow!

Will the Poles who are doing the diggin understand?
2

alex paterson,

edinburgh 22/08/2008 12:38:36
#1
Not under the circumstances,no.
3

Mallory,

Edinburgh 22/08/2008 12:42:24
Boaz to TIE
4

,

22/08/2008 12:48:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 22/08/2008 12:57:25
It's a pity that a lot more people didn't do this... Then this crazy scheme would have HAD to be scrapped.
6

Hmm?,

22/08/2008 13:03:08
#1 "Is it not somewhat ironic that an organisation with a reputation for secrecy, resticted practices and resticted access to membership..."

The Mason's may well have that reputation but sadly it isn't true. In fact it's so difficult to become a member of the Masons that you actually have to fill in a form, be in 'good standing' and pay a fee and your in :)
7

Bill MacD,

22/08/2008 13:43:01
Hey, the Evening news stirring up more anti-tram diatribes from the cars-should-be-allowed-to-race-around-everywhere-including-kiddies-playgrounds-if-they-want lobby! What makes this news? We all know that a few diehards care not a whit for anything but smelling their own exhaust fumes, and don't care that everyone else has to too. The rest of us are looking forward to the arrival of the trams making this a more civilised city. Pity the News wants to align itself with the polluting minority.
8

Epicuras,

22/08/2008 13:56:06
not a fan of the masons but good idea - everyone in edinburgh should bring inderdicts to stop this bloody tram farce getting any further
9

Ronster,

edinburgh 22/08/2008 13:58:34
Spot on Bill MacD !!!!
10

,

22/08/2008 14:02:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

D2,

22/08/2008 14:08:00
Driving on the pavement is an offence. Surely it must be illegal for a civilian (whether or not in charge of the works is irrelevant) to encourage or instruct others to break the law
12

Boy Wonder,

22/08/2008 14:09:04
#12. I'd still like to see a headcount on that assumption, Foo!
13

,

22/08/2008 14:21:33
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

Howard Moon,

22/08/2008 14:25:46
You're taking the micky Foo. Even the minority of folks I know who were in favour of the scheme have major doubts now.

But I'm more interested in the Road to Damascus-style conversion of the EEN over the trams. They refused to publish a single story against them while it was still up for discussion, and even went to the extent of doctoring and even removing reader polls on the subject. Remember 'Save Our Trams'? Then the day it's passed, they start calling the 'network' a 'line' and start almost daily stories predicting doom and gloom.

Anyone at the EEN fancy explaining that? Thought not.
15

,

22/08/2008 14:36:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

tomias,

Edinburgh 22/08/2008 14:52:26
That Lodge will not be able to"pay" a legal fee as they owe thousands for their electricity bills- unless a member does it for free.
As for restricted membership- it is- I am barred, strictly barred for entry- these masons demand a belief in some sort of invisible deity; atheists not admitted.
17

Gorgie_Tony,

Edinburgh 22/08/2008 15:07:24
Maclean should put his own house in order before complaining about others. This is a man who refuses to pay his electric bill.
18

alex paterson,

edinburgh 22/08/2008 17:03:59
#4
Well said brother.
19

Casey Beer,

22/08/2008 17:11:56
#17 "The vast majority of people I know are in favour of the trams. Perhaps the people you know have a bias."
If the people that you know are in favour, then they also have a bias.
20

Axl,

Edinburgh 22/08/2008 17:25:00
Good on them for threatening TIE with a court order.

The construction of this tram line is causing untold chaos for many thousands of Edinburgh residents, and TIE seemingly do not care one bit about that fact.

I say scrap the whole thing and cut our losses.
21

Ian Ross,

Edinburgh 22/08/2008 17:56:16
'It's a fact that the majority of people in Edinburgh are completely in favour of the tram network that is being built in Edinburgh.'

Who and where are they ? Trams will be the biggest pink elephant Edinburgh has ever seen, and a complete waste of our money. Something the council know all about - wasting our money.
22

sydglen,

22/08/2008 19:16:38
im against the trams, but anything that stops the masons getting their beer has to be applauded.
23

,

22/08/2008 21:16:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

jimb4abobor2,

Edinburgh 22/08/2008 22:21:45
The trams again? well the masons i dinuh no aboot them but we must be the only high booming country that has the worst record of public transport. what with high prices,late arrivals large queues and a system that does not work for the public in other words the person who pays the fare to keep people in there job and keep there profits up the whole thing is that the uk is over taxed under payed and discontented. yes im for anything thats new and friendly but at what cost to us the public? no system will work properly until the goverment realises that for it to be so you have too spend a little now and enjoy the benefits later not the way they are trying it too get rich overnight or get rich quick schemes, the thing is you see keep your cstomers happy and they will stick by you upset them and ure left to defend for yourself.and you can watch your profits disappear over night
25

James (1),

23/08/2008 16:32:48
#17 just because two of the three people you know are for the trams does not mean the majority are for them.
The powers that be knew that if this went to a vote the trams would not have taken place.
26

James (1),

23/08/2008 16:35:22
#15 mind and remove your head first!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.