Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009 Change Date

London from only £11.50 with National Express

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Latest news: Tourist wins damages after breaking ankle



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 April 2008
A TOURIST who broke her ankle during a sight-seeing trip to Switzerland and Italy has succeeded in suing a coach company – with a little help from her safety expert husband.
A judge at the Court of Session in Edinburgh today awarded dental practice administrator Diana Cheeseman, 64, damages of £7400 and praised the "clarity and cogency" of husband Peter's evidence.

Horror attack drug dealer sent to psychiatric hospital

Prince Philip in hospital with chest infection
Two held over discovery of severed head
Tourist wins damages after breaking ankle
Man charged after suspicious death
Personal details stolen from old folk's home
Young man trapped in machinery at Lothians sawmill

Mr Cheeseman, 61, is a senior lecturer in construction management at Heriot Watt University and a health and safety consultant.

He has been helping with damages claims – particularly when people have fallen down stairs or slipped on floors – for 30 years, the court heard.

Mr Cheeseman told the court that after his wife's fall, he found the carpet on a step at the back of the "luxury coach" had come unstuck.

Mrs Cheeseman described how she was sitting on the back seat, about 9in higher than the rest. When the coach was driving very slowly, she moved forward to get a better view of something the guide pointed out.

As she went to step down she tripped and fell forward, fracturing a bone in her left ankle.

Judge Lady Smith heard that Mrs Cheeseman hobbled around on crutches for several days and suffered significant discomfort in her right foot for another couple of months and was unable to drive during that time.

The Cheesemans, who live in Murrayfield, took the "Swiss and Italian Lakelands" holiday in September 2001 and were on an optional trip over the Simplon Pass to Zermatt when the accident happened.

They raised a civil action against London-based International Travel Service Limited who also have a business address in Colinton, Edinburgh.

The travel company contested the action, claiming that the Zermatt trip was the responsibility of an Italian coach operator.

In her written ruling issued today, Lady Smith said Mr Cheeseman's work over many years involved him looking at why people fall and whether the falls had anything to do with defects in flooring.

"I am readily satisfied that his qualifications add considerable weight to his evidence. Further, he being an experienced expert witness, it makes it less likely that his evidence was swayed by a desire to favour Mrs Cheeseman's interests," she said.

He also helped with the washing up and other housework while his wife recovered.




The full article contains 446 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 April 2008 4:31 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

gordon aka smoker and proud,

edinburgh 04/04/2008 15:27:38
that is got to the silliest claim i have ever heard! lady smith has obviously been well and truely hoodwinked. i have been a coach driver/guide for over 30 years and up until 1998 i did a tour called the italian lakes and switzerland which was very popular. when a driver takes over the coach at the start of a tour the "first" thing he/she does is go through the safety procedure with the passengers. part of that is telling the passengers not to block the isles,to keep seated at all times until the vehicle comes to a halt, if there is a toilet on board then passengers are advised that they use it at their own risks and they must be vigilant if the coach is moving, ie holding on and taking plenty time. this is pretty self explanitory, driving along and an emergency occurs outwith the drivers control or fault and the coach veers or brakes suddenly. seat belts are fitted and should be used. the difference between a coach and a bus, as explained in the highway code, is there are no standing passengers allowed at any time on a coach.
argument over! there are windows that are virtually panoramic so why was this woman on her feet? to get a better view? no, past experience tells me that she has been standing up and doing something else, where are the names etc of other witnesses? (back seat holds 5 people)i think the company should appeal the mis-judgement and then pursue a claim from her.
2

Cynicaltalk,

E Lothian 04/04/2008 15:28:13

So some daft bint from Murrayfield who probably doesn't need the money, gets her smart a@se husband to win her compensation for not paying attention?

And we make our ex servicemen live in poverty?
3

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

EH1 04/04/2008 15:42:48
A shame that 'accident' has been replaced by 'culpability' and the inevitable rush to consult m'learned friends.
I bet that, until now, nobody knew it was possibe to work as an 'expert' in knowing why people fall. And doesn't the knowledge that he "helped with the washing up and other housework" tug at the heart-strings? Or possibly inform us he is a lazy git around the house the rest of the time, possibly for fear of falling!
4

AD in sunny Livingston,

04/04/2008 15:52:32
".. helped with the washing up and other housework .."

(he rang the bell for the butler to come instead of her - resulting in a nasty blister on his finger after a few days)
5

Brian M,

Edinburgh 04/04/2008 16:45:31
Was there any photographic evidence that the carpet was unstuck?

Looks to me like the judge took the word of someone based on their 'standing'
6

Loki - The Scourge of the Schemies,

EH1 04/04/2008 17:05:55
Mrs Cheeseman (64) and her toy boy husband (61) still need to work? I have always suspected that conditions in Murrayfield must be grim but I did not realise until now just how bad things must be there.
7

Brian Ferrari,

04/04/2008 17:27:53
Let me see: an experienced expert witness who is the husband of the claimant.

Anyone else see something slightly odd there? Apart from the name. Cheeseman. That's a bit odd.
8

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 04/04/2008 17:53:24
#2, my sentiments entirely.
9

Brian M,

Edinburgh 04/04/2008 19:04:07
Maybe 'expert' husband coached his wife on diving techniques.

Where was he in the coach anyway? probably chatting up a youthful 59-year old with own teeth.
10

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 04/04/2008 23:57:32

It must have been so nice for Judge Lady Smith to have had decent sorts in court rather than the usual trash.

The Cheesemans! Fragrant! Absolutely Fragrant!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.