Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009 Change Date

London from only £11.50 with National Express

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Horns lock as trams stampede over hidden bull sculptures



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 November 2008
AS if building Edinburgh's tram line was not hard enough, it seems transport bosses now have a bull fight on their hands.
Three stone sculptures have been uncovered during work to fell trees in Haymarket Terrace.

And despite locals being unaware of their existence, the bulls' plight has proved to be a red rag for local campaigners.

They are now fighting to protect them from the all-conquering stampede of the trams.

The sculptures are part of Roseberry House, an office block which is a base for Amnesty International, Cosla and others, but their origin is a mystery at present.

Even tram company TIE, whose own offices are just yards away at nearby City Point, is at a loss to explain where they came from.

Jim Cooney, a member of the West End Community Council who lives in nearby Dewar Place, said contractors had not known of the bulls when they arrived to cut down trees at the weekend.

The 76-year-old former research engineer said: "The guys that cut the trees down did not have a clue what they were. I don't think they knew they were there until they started the work.

"They're cutting trees down all over the city and it needs a few councillors to put their heads above the parapet and start asking questions. The bull heads will end up getting moved away or put in storage and they're part of the fabric and history of the area."

The sculptures sit just a few hundred yards from where a viaduct is currently being constructed for the tram project.

Last orders were called at the nearby Caledonian Ale House in June when it was demolished to make way for the viaduct across Haymarket Station's car park.

The pub, which was built in 1862, had long been a popular haunt with rugby and football fans before it was compulsory purchased by TIE two years ago.

Earlier this year, protests were mounted over plans to permanently move the Hearts war memorial from Haymarket junction. The historic clock, which was built by the Gorgie club in 1922 to remember the footballers who had signed up to fight in the First World War, will be put into storage and return in 2011.

A spokeswoman for TIE today said a decision had yet to be made about the future of the bull heads. She said: "They are part of the street furniture belonging to Roseberry House and it is likely they will have to be moved, but a decision is still to be made."

Do you know why the bull heads are there? Contact the Evening News on 0131-620 8733




The full article contains 450 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 November 2008 10:35 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Skip McClendon,

04/11/2008 11:48:29
This entire tram project is Bull.
2

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 12:01:45
#1:

Too right! Scrap it now.
3

David Harrington,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 12:10:53
Who cares? This is another non-story designed to do nothing but inflame the usual anti-tram suspects...looks like it didn't take very long to do that, either...
4

Amenemhat,

04/11/2008 12:14:42
Make sure they dont move them until they know why they are their, I work next to them and they were obvious until the tram started and ivy was allowed to grow ever them as the trees were coming down
5

Skip McClendon,

04/11/2008 12:24:01
#3

Yes, let's just obliterate the entire city. It's just getting in the way of the great Edinburgh White Elephant Theme Park, with its spiffing £1Billion tramline rollercoaster ride. Whatever is left after construction, we can give away to Donald Trump so he can build a golf course and some obscenely expensive houses on it.
6

Trams shams,

04/11/2008 12:29:53
The the idiots working at TIE had used their eyes they would have seen them as they made their way, half dazed into their office every morning. They are right at the entrance at the front of the Haymarket Station carpark!

Mind you.. Nothing surprises me about the wholesale dis-regard for Edinburgh's history these numpties have.
7

aurorablue,

04/11/2008 12:30:12
What a load of bullocks!
8

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 04/11/2008 12:34:41
correct #3. The anti trammies are looking for any excuse to moan as usual.
They always fall for the EN wind ups, every time !
9

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 04/11/2008 12:36:40
#5 one minute the anti trammies are saying it is only ONE line being built that won't serve anyone, then they say the whole city is getting ripped up to get it built.
Make your tiny minds up !
10

Skip McClendon,

04/11/2008 12:38:21
#8

It doesn't exactly inspire much confidence in TIE's planning though, does it?

If they can't notice some ruddy great sculptures right outside their own office, what other little things have they failed to take account of in their grand plan?

Next they'll be telling us the bill is set to increase because they didn't realise that trams need electricity to go.

Does anyone still believe this project will come in "on time and in budget"?
11

Diana,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 12:44:57
"...and they're part of the fabric and history of the area." Huh?? No one even knew of their existence!

Not that I care - the council and their trams can go to blazes!
12

Ryan Kelly,

bullivia 04/11/2008 12:46:12
It is just another excuse to cover up a delay that will make the project over run and over spend
didnt they find roman remains at the new depot at gogerburn
and i can see them finding the remains of bus passengers in princes st as the bus company will be no more thanks to the mess that our city is in
13

Dr DoGood,

edinburgh 04/11/2008 12:51:17
only bull in this story is some of the comments being made,I do not fully support the trams but fully recognise the need for something to be done about the state of transport within the city and as the trams was the best anyone could come up with lets stop the whinging everytime the EEN come up with some nonsense about them
14

Dorian,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 13:00:12
I for one am looking forward to the trams.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe_tossing
15

fresian,

edinburgh 04/11/2008 13:26:20
Well I for one, am coming very close to losing my head!! Mooo!
16

J G W,

04/11/2008 13:37:09
Someone shoot the headline writer. Not only does it not make sense, it's not even remotely witty.
17

lynbrown,

edinburgh 04/11/2008 13:41:29
Surely you mean Rosebery House? (only one R)
18

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 04/11/2008 14:20:49
its simple, they are there to remind everyone , that hearts play just along the road and they are bullsh1t
19

Jenny MacArthur,

04/11/2008 14:30:28
the "all-conquering stampede of the trams"... typically unbiased reporting from the fair and balanced Evening News then? Not just some cheap rag shoddily deliberately stirring up yet more sad argument from anti-tram losers by using stupidly one-sided and melodramatic language? No, the Evening News would NEVER fall to such depths.
20

Leila,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 14:30:47
#13 "I do not fully support the trams but fully recognise the need for something to be done about the state of transport within the city and as the trams was the best anyone could come up with ..."

If lies are repeated often enough and in a sufficiently authoritative manner, people tend to believe them. That's what I think happened with trams: the reality of Edinburgh's excellent bus service and some congested roads at peak times was transformed, purely for the sake of the argument for trams, into poor public transport and nearly gridlocked roads.
21

PaulB,

04/11/2008 14:38:20
Don't you just hate all the pop up ads on this site? makes it a pain to read the stories! Let's get them banned!
22

The Judge,

04/11/2008 14:59:20
If they didn't see the bulls heads, they are in for one all mighty shock when they start digging up Princes St.

Any more news from Phil Wheeler and the report his department commissioned into the moving of the Haymarket Memorial? He swore blind he didn't see it even though TIE and his department paid 10 grand for it.

What date did he become aware of the report and what date did he actually read it?

While I'm here, any news on the laying of the wrong pipe in Shandwick Place? Will it have to be dug up again or will they try to get away with it?
23

fresian,

edinburgh 04/11/2008 16:22:57
I believe Osiris security will be providing protecti...sorry security for quite a lot of the tramworks sites. Phew, I nearly said "Protection" there.
24

Pumpkin,

04/11/2008 18:41:33
#23 Turn on your internet browser's pop-up blocker. I find that works.
25

Dragonlord,

04/11/2008 19:47:32
Should the enevitable happen and they move the Bulls, who will pay? Tram funds are running short fast and already Edinburgh residents are coughing up to move statues and pay compensation. Why are we paying, when Tie should have checked their costing before fooling all those MSP's
26

Waspy100,

04/11/2008 19:59:46
Move then to the Tron Kirk might brighten it up a bit.
27

Dr DoGood,

edinburgh 04/11/2008 21:25:55
Leila just so you understand me better
1 I drive for Lothian Buses so I do take an interest in what traffic plans are put forward.
2 The idea of the trams is to relive the city centre of congestion from both buses and cars
3 Trams were decided to be best solution after the people of Edinburgh rejected congestion charges which would have worked and brought income into the city
4 If motorists would obey the laws on parking and the use of bus lanes the public transport that we have would serve everyone better
5 We all had an opportunity to say what we thought before the Trams project was given the go ahead but no one came up with a real alternative so we are stuck with it is what I was trying to say.
28

tumshie heid,

04/11/2008 22:50:53
#32 When was there a referendum on the transport strategy for Edinburgh?
I must have missed that.
The reason we have such bad congestion is that over the last few years various councillors have artificially created it by crazy road closures,one way systems, bizarre traffic light sequences and unneccessary bus lanes which cut the available lanes in half.
Now that their mission of creating havoc has been achieved..Hey Presto we can spend an inordinate amount of money on a new fangled transport system called trams.
29

Gina Gibson,

Wales 04/11/2008 23:08:47
Who cares?? Edinburgh was a dump before the tram works started and now it is a dump with a tram line.
30

Sarah B,

Edinburgh 04/11/2008 23:42:08
Dr DoGood (32) - Your point No. 2 is not quite correct. The idea of trams arose from a report, commissioned by Waterfront (Edinburgh) Ltd and the Council, in relation to ways in which to connect the proposed North Edinburgh developments with the city centre. The report was one of the most astonishingly biased and limited I have ever read and basically concluded that only trams would do because only trams were likely to stop residents in the N. Edinburgh developments using their cars. Even TIE have been quite clear that the trams were designed to address whatever congestion may arise from those developments in the future. That is why TIE's papers predict virtually no reduction in congestion or improvement in air quality once the trams start running, ie, because those developments will not yet be built. The concerns are that (a) it may now be a very long time until they are built and that, in the meantime, Lothian Buses will have to deal with the operating losses; and (b) we are spending upwards of £512m on a project which may deliver no benefit at all and certainly never enough to justify the capital and operating costs.

Your Points 3 and 4 are not correct. The tram scheme was already well underway before the congestion charging referendum. The only connection was that it was proposed to use any revenue raised from congestion charging for local transport projects, including Tram Line 3. The decision to proceed with (the then) Tram Lines 1 and 2 was taken by local councillors and the government, ie, the public did not have a chance to state our views. The only exceptions were those who lived/had a business directly adjacent to the proposed tram routes who were able to object to the Parliamentary Bills. Objections from anyone else were not allowed.
31

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 05/11/2008 02:39:00
THE.WHOLE.CITY.MUST.BE.BLOODY.SHAMBLES.
32

Rap,

05/11/2008 11:36:27
The bull heads are not just a few hundred yards from where the viaduct is being built, they are in the way of the tram line itself. That's why it's an issue, not just because they are near the viaduct.
33

daveserviceman,

edinburgh 31/12/2008 01:41:06
Could always send these to afganastan for the troops to melt down to make bullets to defend themselves and fight the taliban. its the only way they will get ammunition from this government

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.