Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Friday, 20th November 2009 Change Date

Heritage chiefs clock up £58,000 in expenses

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 July 2009
BOSSES at Historic Scotland have claimed almost £58,000 in expenses, including entry to castles, Christmas cards and a tourism "masterclass", it has been revealed.
More than half of the claims – £34,211 – were for travel expenses for senior managers and board members.

The Edinburgh-based organisation's chief executive, John Graham, put in the most claims over the past three years, totalling £18,800.

He cl
aimed just over £10,000 in travel alone, while also racking up expenses of £4,600 in accommodation and food.

Mr Graham also claimed £24.90 for admission to castles not managed by Historic Scotland as well as £17.50 for Christmas cards and almost £100 for what is described as a "tourism masterclass".

Historic Scotland's director of properties, Peter Bromley, has the second highest expenses claim at £16,640, the majority of which was for travel.

The third highest claimant is the organisation's chief inspector, Malcolm Cooper, who claimed a total of £9,200 for everything from travel, accommodation and hospitality to attending an exhibition, training and a printer cartridge.

The only member of Historic Scotland's 14-strong board not to make any claims in the past three years was director of media and communications Patrick Connor.

The information was released to the Evening News under freedom of information legislation.

It follows the outcry over the millions of pounds claimed by MPs every year from the public purse.

The expenses scandal caused unprecedented anger from voters, inquiries by Westminster's sleaze watchdog and criminal investigations.

Since then, other public bodies have come under pressure to disclose their expenses.

Last month the BBC revealed the expenses of its top managers in response to freedom of information requests, which included leaving celebrations, business dinners and gifts for BBC stars.

But while many MPs and top BBC executives may struggle to defend their spending from the public purse, Historic Scotland says extensive travel – which accounts for the majority of its expenses – is essential for its senior management and board members.

The expenses include travel to Historic Scotland buildings across the country as well as travel to the six annual board meetings for non-executive members.

A spokeswoman said:

"We manage over 365 of Scotland's most important historic sites from Shetland to Dumfries and Galloway, and deal with nearly 3000 consent applications for Scotland's 57,000 listed buildings and scheduled monuments.

"We grant aid numerous projects across the country and provide advice to all of Scotland's local authorities.

"We also work closely with other groups such as the National Trust for Scotland and the Historic Houses Association Scotland, particularly this year as part of the Homecoming celebrations, on joint marketing and sharing expertise.

"To do this effectively it is essential that our board members are able to see the work that is being done and how it compares to other similar attractions and organisations working in the heritage sector."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 July 2009 10:30 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

ih8hibs,

15/07/2009 12:08:37
I believe they even get their passports on expenses.
2

Ecto,

15/07/2009 12:43:09
Unbelievable, the ONS has also published today that the Labour Government has increased jobs in the public sector by 15,000 to April 2009. Gordon is a moron and he is leading the rest of us to the knackers yard with him.
3

shacks,

kooringal australia 15/07/2009 13:02:54
if they are entitled to these expenses then shut up. If they were not then name and shame them
4

Blind Pew,

15/07/2009 13:14:23
Why £17.50 for Christmas cards when the Agency provides its own bespoke edition for staff to send to business contacts (having recieved one myself)????
Everything else here is standard civil service business need expenditure, properties and businneses from Shetland to the Borders need to be visited. As a direct arm of government, their travel claims are at the standard rates for all Civil Servants. Why is the EN picking on a small governement agency when there are no end of unelected bodies out their operating outwith CS rules and claiming exorbitant sums for all manner of expenses? These are the people to target!
5

Mcewans 80/-,

(Formerly Abbeyhill) Now Warsaw 15/07/2009 14:25:33
What!!!! No "Tram" talk today?
6

Logie Almond,

15/07/2009 14:30:07
Once again, the Evening News will only be in a position to criticise others when they publish the salary, expenses and pension pots of their own editor, senior staff and senior management of Johnston Press.
7

Kate,

Zurich 15/07/2009 15:17:36
Considering the size of the country and the difficulty in getting around in value for money public transport, this is actually not bad! As put at #3, if they are entitled to these expenses, so be it!
8

Think Tank,

15/07/2009 16:52:15
#6

Have you considered that the expenses claims of a private company are irrelevant?

The only (weak) aspect of this story is that the expenses are paid out of taxpayers' money.

Historic Scotland are an absolute joke of a quango that should not exist. It is remarkable that after being branded "inept and incompetent" by the Scottish Public Service Ombudsman, Historic Scotland continues with the same management team, power and principles.

The expenses are a non-story- they are entitled to such spending within their brief.

The point is they shouldn't have a brief because the organisation should not exist.

9

eDUCATIon,

15/07/2009 17:30:38
8

So who looks after all the castles and abbeys etc?

George Wimpey?
10

Blind Pew,

15/07/2009 19:23:28
#8 Your are the miss-informed joke, who is as good at half story telling as the hootsmon! HS is NOT a quango! It is an Agency of the Scottish Government and part of the Education department. They only have Agency status because of the peculiarities of the business in running the properties in their care.(castles etc) The reference to "inept and incompetent" by the SPSO was in ONE particular listing case and probably the fault of one person, not a comment on the working of the Agency as a whole, so come clean!

HS could quite easily be re-absorbed into the main Scottish Government, but would be implementing the same policies and briefs (which are approved by ministers) as at present whether you like it or not!
11

Plodjfriss, Hammer of the Numpties,

Edinburgh 15/07/2009 19:28:00
You're being a bit misleading with the "inept and incompetent" slogan there, Think Tank. It seems to have appeared as part of an investigation into a mishandled attempt to have a building listed. The context in which those words appear is in the statement

"Historic Scotland were inept and incompetent in their production of the listing description of the property."

see http://www.spso.org.uk/investigation-reports/2007/december/city-edinburgh-council-and-historic-scotland.

Taking this out of context and implying that it's a criticism of the entire organisation seems little short of deliberate dishonesty.
12

Blind Pew,

15/07/2009 19:44:38
#11 Agreed, although #8 seems to like using this comment regarding HS in an out of context manner, as he has dropped it into other posts on historic environment issues without clear explanation!

Bee in bonnet perhaps?
13

GrahamH,

Edinburgh 16/07/2009 08:32:53
Trying to stir up a storm over Senior Managers travel and sundry expenses when they have a property portfolio across mainland and on Scottish Islands is ridiculous.

We should be more concerned if they DID NOT have travel expenses, it would show they are not doing their jobs.

It's akin to complaining a footballer spent money on a pair of boots!
14

Hmm?,

16/07/2009 11:00:31
>>6 Logie Almond
"Once again, the Evening News will only be in a position to criticise others when they publish the salary, expenses and pension pots of their own editor..."

Far be it for me to defend the god awful 'News, but I'm afraid I don't agree. -

Historic Scotland is a publically funded agency and as such its not unreasonable for the public to be concerned about the expense claims of its employees.

The Evening News on the other hand is owned by a private company and can pay it's employees any expenses it likes. The only people that is any buiness of is the company shareholders.
15

KenKo,

Edinburgh 16/07/2009 11:50:43
It looks to me that the figures being reported are the total claims for the last THREE years and if this is correct, £58K is hardly scandalous.

This is basically poor journalism - put in a few FOI requests to government agencies and totally distort the results.

In some cases, the jounalists putting the FOI requests can actually cost the organisation a lot of money in time and resources to provide the information. Who's wasting the taxpayers money now???

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.