Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Friday, 6th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Government drafting laws to nationalise Northern Rock

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 January 2008
THE Government was today said to be planning emergency legislation to take troubled bank Northern Rock into public ownership as Gordon Brown gave the clearest signal yet that nationalisation was likely.
A Bill, transferring the ownership of Northern Rock from its shareholders to the Government, is seen as preferable to either buying the bank or allowing it to go into administration and acquiring its assets. A decision is expected in the next few day
s, but the Prime Minister last night confirmed the Government was now actively considering the option of taking it into public ownership.

Although "a number" of private companies had expressed an interest, the move may be necessary to protect the British economy, Mr Brown said.

"Because stability is the issue we will look at every option and that includes taking the company into public ownership and then moving it later back into the private sector. So that is, yes, one of the options that has got to be considered."

The Newcastle-based lender has been in crisis since soaring borrowing costs in the summer credit crunch forced it to seek a Bank of England bail-out in September, prompting the first run on a UK bank in nearly 150 years. It now owes an estimated £24 billion. Rebel shareholders yesterday failed in an attempt to gain a greater say in the future of the bank. Investors rejected three out of four resolutions put forward by its two biggest shareholders.

Hedge funds SRM Global and RAB Capital had wanted to restrict the board's ability to issue shares and sell assets at knockdown prices.

However, the board had warned that the proposals could hinder a rescue of the ailing firm, and make nationalisation even more likely.

Northern Rock now has a stock market value of less than £300 million – compared with a peak of almost £5.3 billion a year ago.

The two hedge funds have called for 400p a share in compensation if the lender is nationalised, but the company's shares are currently trading at less than a fifth of that level.

Shadow chancellor George Osborne claimed nationalisation would represent a "major failure" for Government policy. However, he did not entirely rule out the Tories supporting such a move in Parliament if it was considered necessary. He said: "The Labour Government's dithering for months over Northern Rock has been deeply irresponsible and has now exposed the taxpayer to a £55 billion liability, more than the schools budget. We may be fast approaching the defining moment when the economic incompetence of Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling is brought home to the whole country, with the first nationalisation of a high street bank.

"Nationalisation would be a major failure of policy. We have yet to see the detail of this desperate option, but it is difficult to see how we could support it."

Chancellor Alistair Darling said yesterday ministers' "preferred" course was to find a private buyer. But he added in a speech in London: "Our objectives are to protect the interests of taxpayers and depositors, to maintain financial stability, to champion growth and enterprise. And I'll take whatever action is necessary, however difficult, to take the right decisions for the long-term interests of the country."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 January 2008 10:05 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

fiferjohn,

16/01/2008 10:58:32
what ever happens the taxpayers are going to get stuck with the bill .
all because some of cadninet have vested intrests in the bank
2

ddmc,

16/01/2008 11:56:56
the shareholders are complaining about loosing out, they should have let market forces (i.e run on the bank) have it's way, maybe it would have sent a real message to the rest of the finance companies about how they have badly managed with regards to securitisation. But it seems that if they all stick together & make the same mistakes the poor old taxpayers will bail them out.
3

Cauchy Riemann,

Wales 16/01/2008 12:20:06
A disaster - yet more tax burden.

Although I can't see this article in the Scotsman, Britain has slipped out of the ranks of this year's Heritage Index of Economic Freedom - 'reflecting the sharp rise in the tax burden and ballooning state sector'.

Brown has transformed the UK from one of leanest (fiscally) in Europe to one of the most bloated.

A few months ago there was a report published:

"In a damning new report "More Mirage than Miracle" published by the free-market think tank Policy Exchange, the analysts said Britain was relapsing into high-tax and high-regulation sclerosis just as the rest of Europe begins to shake itself out of statist lethargy.....Judging by the fiscal deficit trend, the UK is now in worse fiscal shape than almost any other major Western country. In the event of an economic downturn, the UK now has little leeway for stimulus"

Brown's economic prudence has always been a mirage. High debt has given a false boost, bailing out the economy by debt.

In a sense Northern Rock is somehow symbolic of Britain under Brown.
4

D Fiasco,

Walkerburn 16/01/2008 12:42:08
Why are we (the taxpayers) buying a bank, precisely?
5

lielayer,

16/01/2008 14:02:18
The US investment bank JP Morgan has signed up Tony Blair as a part-time senior adviser, on a salary said to exceed $1m (£500,000) a year. The former prime minister would provide "strategic advice and insight on global political issues and emerging trends", the company said last night.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jan/10/blairjpmorgan?gusrc=rss&feed=networkfront

Northern Rock yesterday reduced its £26bn outstanding loan to the government after it sold more than £2bn of mortgages to US investment bank JP Morgan. Some analysts argued the bank was bargaining with some of its best assets to secure the deal and was, in effect, selling the family silver to stay afloat.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/jan/12/northernrock.jpmorgan

6

Allan (Glasgow),

16/01/2008 14:08:49
I wonder what our friends in the south would have been saying about all of this had this been RBS or HBOS?
7

Fairfax,

16/01/2008 14:46:10
Allan (6): "I wonder what our friends in the south would have been saying about all of this had this been RBS or HBOS?"

The vast majority of the depositors of RBS and HBOS are in England, so I suspect the Treasury would have acted to protect depositors' liabilities. On the other hand, these institutions are so much larger than NR that nationalization would probably have been necessary from the very beginning: NR is sufficiently small to have been allowed to fail. In fact, had NR been in the South, it might well have been allowed to do so -- unfortunately its location in a Labour heartland has provoked unwise decisions.

To raise another hypothesis, suppose RBS failed after Scottish independence. The perturbation to the smaller Scottish economy would be enormous unless Scotland were already within the Euro zone.
8

hibbyspurs,

16/01/2008 16:10:03
#6, Another dig for independence there by claiming that the Westminister government would not act in the same way for a Scottish Bank. Don't be so silly...

However whilst finance is not my "bag" (unless we're talking about the 3:30 at Kempton!). I have followed the "Rock's" demise with interest mainly because they are of course my mortgae provider.

So if this happened I'd be owing the government that money then? In fact I'd owe myself that money then as a taxpayer?

Could someone with a bit of knowledge briefly explain to me how this bizzare situation would work?
9

Fairfax,

16/01/2008 16:28:52
hibbyspurs (8): "So if this happened I'd be owing the government that money then? In fact I'd owe myself that money then as a taxpayer?"

I suppose that could be argued, although your share of your particular mortgage would be minuscule! The same argument would, of course, apply to any debt to the state (e.g. taxes).

More seriously, it is difficult to imagine that the British government would wish to become a mortgage provider for very long. Imagine the publicity if a state-owned mortgage provider needed to reposess lots of properties during a property market crash . . .

10

Allan (Glasgow),

16/01/2008 16:32:30
Hibbyspurs,

No, what I am saying is that we would be subjected to vitriol in tabloid newpapers had this been a Scottish bank. It would have fed the "subsidy junkie" proponents a great story.

11

hibbyspurs,

16/01/2008 16:45:53
#9, The point of mass repossessions had crossed my mind. As the local authorities have a mass problem with collecting rent on council houses & are practically unable to evict the offenders, then surely my state provided mortgage would allow me to join the payment dodging brigade and just stick two fingers up the lender. Now try that with a "proper" bank and they'd have ye out on yer erse faster than they could say "unauthorised overdraft charges are legal"..... What a farce!!

#10, fair point then, apologise if my reply was a little misjudged.
12

Publius,

London 16/01/2008 17:01:32
#6 Allan (Glasgow); #8 Hibbyspurs
For what it's worth my workmates in London think that the Northern Rock should be left to go bust. Unlike the big high street banks it is not central to the economy, depositors will get their money back, people who have mortgages will find that other banks or building societies will 'buy' their mortgages from the receivers. So life will go on as usual except for the shareholders (who will get nothing),the taxpayers who will get have forked out several billion for no useful purpose, and the bank's employees who will lose their jobs.
13

Fairfax,

16/01/2008 17:05:16
hibbyspurs (13): "then surely my state provided mortgage would allow me to join the payment dodging brigade and just stick two fingers up the lender."

Agreed. A state-owned mortgage provider would be in an extremely difficult position. I suspect that they will nationalize it though, followed by selling the better quality mortgages (presumably most of their mortgage book), forbidding new business, and allowing the business to run down -- i.e. keeping the minimal company in being whilst customers pay their mortgages off. It would even be possible to encourage customers to remortgage, for example by charging a higher rate of interest than competitors.
14

Fairfax,

16/01/2008 17:12:51
Publius (14): "For what it's worth my workmates in London think that the Northern Rock should be left to go bust. "

I took this view back in September -- it would have been a much cleaner solution. However, after several months of doing very little, the government is now in a much more difficult position, for the following reason: If NR were to be sent bust now (e.g. by withdrawing Bank of England credit), then the months of indecision and the tens of billions of pounds of loans implies that the government has been absolutely moronic -- nationalization only implies stupidity and indecision.

Allan (10): "It would have fed the "subsidy junkie" proponents a great story. "

But if a Scottish bank failed on this scale, then it really would be a subsidy: £50 billion is roughly half of Scotland's GDP (including North Sea revenues)! And NR doesn't even have oil . . .
15

Publius,

London 16/01/2008 17:26:45
#16 Fairfax
I agree with most of your post. There is no way that the government could allow RBS or HBOS to go bust.

The problem with nationalising the Rock, though, is that the government still may not get all of its - our! - money back. Also it will have to pay the shareholders - in other words compensate them for their stupidity or cupidity. And it might not dare to make 5 or 6000 employees redundant.
With the benefit of hindsight we can see that what the government should have done was to support the proposed LloydsTSB takeover last August/September. Prior to the division of banking supervision between the Bank of England, the FSA and the Chancellor, the Bank of England used to encourage takeovers of this kind when a small bank or building society got into this difficulty. The Governor saw it as part of his job. This was often done so quietly that no-one was aware until afterwards.
16

Fairfax,

16/01/2008 17:29:32
Publius (17): "The problem with nationalising the Rock, though, is that the government still may not get all of its - our! - money back."

I completely agree with your post. I too fear our NR billions will be going to Money Heaven, together with all the cash we spent on British Leyland.
17

Andrew Allan,

16/01/2008 17:47:25
Northern Rock -Darling- Gordon Brown, a sure indication the chancellor is caught between a rock and a hard face.
18

Andrew Allan,

16/01/2008 17:55:29
#17.,Publius.
'I agree with most of your post. There is no way that the government could allow RBS or HBOS to go bust.'

Considering the mess with this Northern Rock issue it is more likely the government would have no choice but to let any further bank go to the wall rather than bailing it out to the same extent.
19

An English Voice™,

16/01/2008 18:42:31
19. Ba-Dum-TISH!

He's here all week, ladies and germs!

Try the veal!
20

Highland Mighty,

17/01/2008 11:14:32
"The two hedge funds have called for 400p a share in compensation if the lender is nationalised, but the company's shares are currently trading at less than a fifth of that level."

Er....isn't the warning, 'The value of shares can go down as well as up'?

Their shares are worth 68p but they actually demanded that us taxpayers give them £4 for each one?!

Unlucky.
21

Fairfax,

17/01/2008 16:09:21
Highland Mighty (22): "Their shares are worth 68p but they actually demanded that us taxpayers give them £4 for each one?!"

The shares are, of course, really worthless, since NR would be bankrupt without the Bank of England/Treasury credit. However, the shareholders could still cause great embarassment to the government. If, for example, the hedge funds persuaded the majority of shareholders to vote to send NR bankrupt, then we would immediately return to the run-on-NR conditions of the last September. I would say that the hedge funds are betting that the government will be willing to provide some money for a quiet life.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.