Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008 Change Date

Claim a Free Glayva Miniature

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Convoy of truckers to protest over fuel costs



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
15 December 2007
HAULIERS will protest against increasing fuel prices today, with a 30-strong lorry convoy set to travel across major roads in central Scotland.
Members of the Road Haulage Association protest at Grangemouth in 2005 Picture: Donald MacLeod
Members of the Road Haulage Association protest at Grangemouth in 2005 Picture: Donald MacLeod
The vehicles, travelling in single file at 40mph, will head from Glasgow to Edinburgh, and return via Stirling.

However, there were signs last night that a threatened demonstration outside the Grangemouth oil refinery may not go ahead.

Motoring groups warned the truckers they risked alienating drivers by organising the convoy on a busy pre-Christmas Saturday.

The protest is being organised by the Road Haulage Association (RHA), following pressure for action from some of its 9,000 members in Scotland.

Phil Flanders, the RHA's Scotland director, said the action would "highlight the problems faced by the haulage industry due to the current high price of diesel, made worse by the continuing imposition of higher fuel taxes and their effect on the UK economy".

He went on: "Many hauliers are facing a bleak future and the public face higher prices for their shopping. This affects everyone, and we continue to urge the government to introduce a fuel-price regulator and to freeze fuel duty while the price of oil is so volatile."

It is estimated that the protest will cost £3,000 in diesel alone – or £100 per lorry.

The RHA said the protest had been timed to avoid disrupting other traffic, such as Christmas shoppers and fans travelling to football matches.

The convoy will travel north on the M74 from the Hamilton services at 10am, then east on the M8 as far as Newbridge, west of Edinburgh. The lorries will then follow the M9 to Stirling, before returning to Glasgow via the M876 and A80, with the journey due to be completed by 1pm.

Neil Greig, the director of the Institute of Advanced Motorists' Motoring Trust in Scotland, criticised the RHA's tactics.

He said: "There is sympathy for their cause because everyone is suffering from high fuel prices, even if they don't own a car. However, the road haulage industry risks losing public support by staging a protest on such a busy shopping day. Causing chaos at this time of year will not be popular."

Police said they did not anticipate delays as the lorries would remain in one lane of the roads.

Officers also said they did not expect any protest at the Grangemouth complex.

Transaction 2007, an alliance of hauliers and farmers, had planned to include it in demonstrations at refineries across Britain. However, Grangemouth was not included yesterday in a list on the group's website of six sites to be targeted – Stanlow, Cheshire; Fawley, Hampshire; Jarrow, South Tyneside; Purfleet, Essex; Cardiff and the North Lincolnshire port of Immingham.

The group has threatened to step up its action if fuel taxes are not cut.

WINDFALL AT THE PUMPS

RISING fuel prices have generated an extra £300 million a month windfall for the government which could be used to cut fuel duty by 7p a litre, financial advisers Grant Thornton said yesterday. But the Campaign for Better Transport said fuel duty had not increased in line with inflation since 2000 and the cost of motoring had fallen 10 per cent in real terms over the last decade.



The full article contains 539 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 December 2007 9:55 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Fuel prices
 
1

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 15/12/2007 01:03:54
Come on you brother truckers.
2

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 15/12/2007 08:34:56
The higher the prices the better as we'll use less.
3

Nubar Gulbenkian,

15/12/2007 08:38:37
I am an ordinary motorist. I hope these guys have a successful day, and will escalate their action if need be. Perhaps they could learn a valuable lesson from our French brothers and sisters!!
4

M.T.,

15/12/2007 08:46:56
#2 The higher the prices, the higher the cost of living to all who eat, wear clothes and buys anything from shops.
Hauliers transport animal feed to farms, Hauliers transport milk to dairies, hauliers transport the milk from the dairy to the distribution centre and hauliers transport milk and everything else from the distribution centre to the supermarket. Public go to the supermarket and find price increases due to the amount of tax on the fuel which the hauliers use in their business which is passed to them. Over £100.00 + VAT per truck per working day for fuel tax alone
Foreign hauliers come into our country and allowed to work contributing NOTHING to our economy while our food prices go up and up due the fuel tax.
5

urban poacher,

Edinburgh 15/12/2007 09:50:01
why not all go and park outside brown and darling's large houses to stop their government provided cars getting there
6

mr chips,

15/12/2007 09:58:14
Motoring groups warned the truckers they risked alienating drivers by organising the convoy on a busy pre-Christmas Saturday.Bull The mototist is 100% all for the truckers,why dont we all park our cars on the m8 and grind the country to a halt. Broon HAS TO BE TOLD ,we have had enough.
7

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 15/12/2007 10:04:46
#4MT A gross exaggeration! A 10% rise in fuel costs does not add even 1% to prices. Fuel is one of the smaller costs of transport, and it has hardly risen in real terms for twenty years. Higher prices lead to higher efficiency engines, vehicles, methods and systems, all of which are a good thing. Just look at how gas guzzlers are fast disappearing off US roads. High fuel prics are a short term pain for a long term gain.
8

Jay Kay,

Burntisland 15/12/2007 10:06:41
I give these guys my full support its time we stood up for ourselves and give a strong argument to that bl**dy shower in London that we will not be robbed to the tune of billions each year which is not reinvested in the infrastructure, the roads the railways the Bridges, there are so many potholes in Dunfermline I cant risk taking the Lotus out anymore, it's suspension would be wrecked before I got to the office.

We need to see a dramatic reduction in the amount of tax levied on fuel and we need it now so no matter what action is required I would certainly be prepared to break the law in order to get the message across that we the people have had enough of this government and the fat cats who are running Britian into the ground.
9

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 15/12/2007 10:16:08
#7 - You are missing the point. Virtually all hauliers cannot pass on the increase in fuel costs so their margins are ever squeezed, whilst foreign lorries run oversized tanks so they can fill up on the continent and then take jobs in the UK without paying any tax.

Brown and Darling are addicted to taxation and don't give a damn about the consequences.
10

Rollo Tommasi,

15/12/2007 10:37:02
No.9: No - you are missing the point. Foreign hauliers do not compete with most of the truckers on Scotland's roads. Removing the last duty rise would save a lorry driver only £2 on a £100 daily fuel cost. If hauliers cannot pass on the increase in fuel costs, then that is their problem - they need to organise themselves to improve their negotiating position - it's not the Government's or taxpayer's problem.

And just as importantly, what the hauliers want simply won't work. They say Govt must cut taxes if fuel costs go up more. What would that achieve? Only encourage the fuel companies to raise their prices. So drivers would pay no less but we'd see less in taxes as more was creamed off to add to the fuel companies' already excess profits.
11

Inagaddadavida,

Highlands 15/12/2007 10:55:53
#2

As I live in the highlands I'd appreciate your advice on how to use less fuel to travel.

Would that be train, tram or donkey that you're recommending?
12

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 15/12/2007 11:02:03
10, Rollo, according to a friend of mine who still does a weekly drive to Amsterdam (2 night turnaround on the ferry from newcastle) he is not allowed to refuel over there and can have his tanks dipped by customs officials on his return.

The continental registered vehicles, however, fill up at Amsterdam and don't buy fuel here, depending on distance travelled.

I wonder which hauliers are able to give the more competitive quotes.
13

Inagaddadavida,

15/12/2007 11:07:01
#2

As I live in the highlands I'd appreciate your advice on how I'm to use less fuel for day to day travel.

Is it train, tram or donkey that you'd recommend?
14

JoeMcT,

BlairsFantasyIsland 15/12/2007 11:49:38
Could someone from New Labour (old Lies) please explain WHY Britain has the highest Fuel taxes in Europe?
15

Rickie,

Reality 15/12/2007 11:52:56
Fuel is a life blood to get everything and everyone everywhere.

Brown taxes anything he doesn't have to pay for himself. I'm with the folks same as last time.

In a part of my business we took a hit on costs due to diesel costs getting 40 cared for people out for the once a year xmas lunch, which we provided cheaper than Fife council and thier cuts in services could or would.

But we made less as a business than we should have - in fact it covered material costs only, well not quite, no wages for those involved, so those with kind hearts still pay the Brown boys decisions.

Go figure on your in depth examinations of global economy, bring back common sense. Start off by taking Browns & co's cars off them and make the buggers walk so adding to the green policy in actions rather than diversifying from other 'dodgy' issues with the government currently being quietly buried too.

Sorry to be so blunt but till the see the pointed (not the word I wanted to use) end of the stick they have no clue about what is real and what is in their lovely fluffy world.

Seeing 40 cared people having the time of ther life for a few hours on a day out having a xmas lunch and a band playing for them waited on hand and foot for the only time in a year was priceless. We will pay the price for the fuel required but vicously defend the position of those that need to pay for the 'privalage' of it at a well paid idiots whim.
16

Rickie,

15/12/2007 11:55:22
PS anyone else hate the "New Look & Feel"

The old version was much better, and cleaner - more wasted time and money, no doubt a new upcomming (read old and tired) consultants suggestions.
17

Rollo Tommasi,

15/12/2007 12:18:40
11 - Most competitive quotes? Would come down to overall price (not just the cost of fuel). Plus if I were hiring a haulier, I'd want to ensure their delivery was reliable and fast, that they could provide a driver and lorry at short notice if required, that they could deliver my products before the drivers hit their working hours limits and that they could promise delivery in good condition. Seems those issues must also be important to your friend's customers, if he's got a weekly run to Amsterdam.
18

Rollo Tommasi,

15/12/2007 12:29:56
13 - Rickie. I sympathise. I do voluntary work which involves me driving to visit people (at my own cost).

But fuel is going to keep going up in price. Get used to it and organise your business around it. The reason has nothing to do with the Government and what Transaction 2007 want the Government to do won't stop prices from rising. Demand for fuel (especially in India and China) is shooting up fast and supply isn't keeping up. Fuel companies will keep raising their prices and will be happy to absorb any cuts in fuel duty from the Government without passing on the full reduction to punters like you and me.

Agree with you about the new design of these pages. The pages are far less distinctive than before and it's often impossible to know from the front page what the articles listed are about. The only purpose I can see is to provide for fancier animated ads. Whoop de do.

PS Why are there 2 fewer comments on this page than the top of the page says there are?
19

Gogzy,

Fife 15/12/2007 14:28:00
Rulesbutnotrulers the costs will be passed onto the consumer,its just not happened yet but when it does everyone will be complaining, you dont seem to see the point that if hauliers go out of business or go on strike that they can litterally bring this country to a standstill, no food, no fuel nothing. the haulage industry is understaffed as it is and in years to come when drivers have to retire at 65 theres going to be a problem.

im a newly qualified driver (im 21) but i work for a small company and worry about finding work as i was lucky to get this job without experience in driving a hgv.

these guys get my support in whatever they do im sick of paying over the odds for my fuel, i have no choice but to take my car as i start work before public transport even starts in the morning here in fife.
and im lucky if i get 70 miles out of £10, i used to get 100-120 miles form a tenner but due to the crap prices of fuel i have to fill up more which means everyone has to do the same which means more is being used.
20

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 15/12/2007 18:23:21
15. He used to go more often.
21

Jock Tamson,

Scotland, Caledonia, Alba 15/12/2007 18:26:23
Now that I come to think of it, did Eddie Stobart not register his fleet in the Netherlands?

Road tax comes into it as well I think.
22

Paula,

15/12/2007 20:12:00
Thank you to the truckers.

The amount of duty the government gets is obscene and all this guff about saving the environment when they are the biggest polluters and never sorted out the public transport as promised back when Labour took office.

(Why a politician not keeping their promises! Never!)
23

,

15/12/2007 22:59:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
24

truthsleuth,

South of the Border 16/12/2007 11:13:55
I am an ordinary motorist and a taxpayer lets hope the cost of diesel rises even further with a bit of luck it will mean fewer juggernauts on the roads and far far less congestion. In addition if they pay more of their costs in tax it will mean less tax for other taxpayers!!!!! now thats a view not often put forward.
It was interesting to note that one haulier when interviewed on tv said he had REDUCED his costs by operating smaller lorries, perhaps there is a message for other hauliers.Taking this argument further some of the hauliers should put their long distance loads on rail bringing more benefits all around.
These Juggernauts do not pay their full road costs and never have and its about time they did.
25

Gogzy,

Fife 16/12/2007 19:04:15
#24 if you have less lorries on the road their will be more people unemployed due to the fact there will be no jobs for truckers its in the governmenst best interest to cut fuel dutyor they will lose out in the long run. less lorries on the road means less folk working in warehouse etc which means even more unemployment.

alot of companies cant run smaller lorries and not alot of them have the privelige of being able to use the railways to move goods. the only place that i know in scotland that you can unload containers by at is in grangemouth so hows everything meant to get from grangemouth to its destination yep youve guessed it lorries. tesco bring their containers up from davnerty to grangemouth butu they still have to get to livingston to the RDC somehow. you take lorries off the road and you could easily run this country into the ground, only the big companies will be able to afford to run their vehicles.

and if your an ordinary motorist then you would obviously be annoyed at the price of fuel unless you have a company car and your work pays for your fuel and if thats the case you have no right to say your an ordinary motorist, i dont have the choice to use public transport because A) no public transport goes anywhere near my work and B) their is no public transport at 6am in fife.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.