Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Battle begins to keep new Sick Kids parking fees down



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
02 January 2007
A CAMPAIGN is under way to keep parking charges low when Edinburgh's Royal Hospital for Sick Children moves to Little France.
The hospital is expected to leave its existing Victorian base in Sciennes Road for a purpose-built home beside the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary within six years.

But campaigners are already demanding there is no repeat of the controversial decision
to charge patients and visitors £10 a day to park at the ERI.

Lib Dem politicians in the south of the city are spearheading the protest. They have launched a petition and will deliver 36,000 leaflets to residents in January.

They are demanding a promise from NHS Lothian that there will be no attempt to collect more revenue than the council already brings in from pay-and-display charges on roads near Sciennes.

They also insist that families should be able to park for free at evenings and during the night.

Health chiefs today said the new site will offer "huge improvements" for motorists, and discussions are still to take place on how much it will cost to park there.

While welcoming the decision to build a new hospital, South Edinburgh MSP Mike Pringle said: "It would be wrong to charge parents sitting by the bedside of sick children to park overnight and at weekends and the NHS must accept that principle for the new hospital."

The £10 parking fee proved controversial when the new ERI opened in 2002, with charges set as part of the private finance deal under which the hospital was built. Patients and their families complained of racking up massive parking fees.

Last month it was announced that the charge is to be cut to £7 as part of a wide-ranging deal struck between hospital bosses and Consort, the private firm which built the infirmary.

Charges for shorter stays, which start at £1.20 an hour and operate 24 hours a day, will remain unchanged - much higher than the 70p-per-hour cost of parking on Hatton Place, near the existing Sick Kids Hospital, payable between 8.30am and 5.30pm.

Newington Lib Dem councillor Fred Mackintosh said: "Locally, Labour blames the last Tory government for the high parking charges at the Royal Infirmary, but Tony Blair's Labour government approved the deal to build the hospital and the price for parking in 1998. We don't want NHS Lothian to make the same mistakes about parking charges."

A recent public consultation on NHS Lothian's proposals to move the hospital to Little France attracted 100 responses, with only two disagreeing. The Scottish Executive has to approve the plans before building work can begin, but that is expected to be a formality given the strong support.

John Jack, director of facilities for NHS Lothian, said: "The relocation of the Royal Hospital for Sick Children to Little France will offer huge improvements in terms of car parking availability, which has been a key priority for NHS Lothian. However, at this early stage there are many other issues still to discuss and this includes charging for car parking."



The full article contains 519 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 January 2007 9:40 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh Royal Infirmary
 
1

NorT,

Edinburgh 02/01/2007 12:43:08

It was the Labour Council who set the level of parking fees at the new Royal Infirmary. Through the planing permission they limited the number of places to force people to use the non existant public transport. Thert was originally to be 2 or 3 times the number of parking places before the Council cut them back.
They also did not wish it to become a park and ride so that was why they imposed the high charges for parking- to discourage people. It was the ant-car Begg controlled Council not Consort who set them altough Consort get all the benefit.

2

Agent 99,

02/01/2007 16:55:54

>>John Jack, director of facilities for NHS Lothian, said: "The relocation of the Royal Hospital for Sick Children to Little France will offer huge improvements in terms of car parking availability...

Mr. Jack's concern for the motorist is touching. I was under the impression that the NHS was about health care, not whether someone can park nearby or not.

The move of the Sick Kids should not be about whether or not there are one or two more parking spaces, it should be about the facilities and level of care that can be provided to the patients.

It would be hard to imagine that a modern purpose-built facility could not improve on the current victorian edifice that's been extended and extended again.

Health care professionals would do well to keep out of decisions about infrastructure items like car parks. By the same token the politicians should quit trying to make their grubby little profit out of infrastructure that's dedicated to public sector endeavours like the NHS.

3

Jakey Rowling,

02/01/2007 18:29:43

"A CAMPAIGN is under way to keep parking charges low..."

Is that so the wee souls can reach the meters?

4

Damian,

Edinburgh 02/01/2007 18:38:58

NorT - the Council did not set the parking charges at the RIE. That was a matter left entirely up to the operators to decide.

The Council did require the number of parking spaces to be restricted, in order to avoid congestion problems on the surrounding roads.

It had wanted a much larger contribution towards public transport measures, but was told to get stuffed by Central Government, who did not want this flagship PFI scheme hindered by additional finance requirements, that had not been allowed for when the site was selected. The Council was forced to approve this development.

5

NorT,

Edinburgh 02/01/2007 22:02:48

Damian - The Council maybe did not set the charges but they made their feelings know to the operatots that the charges had to be high to deter all day parking. If not then the charges would have been more reasonable.

6

Damian,

Edinburgh 03/01/2007 12:00:20

NorT - There are some 5,000 - 6,000 staff and students at the site.

If parking was cheap, there would be no spaces left for visitors and patients, as they would all be taken up by staff.

Visitors and patients can find spaces ( even if they are expensive). In addition, frequent visitors and patients can qualify for discounts.

The main problem is the edge of town site, without major public transport provision, because Central Government and the NHS refused to consider transport off-site as their problem, initially.

7

weeone,

NIDDRIE 03/01/2007 16:21:23

poor parents, family having to pay to see there sick relative in hospital its not a dico they want to go to.

8

weeone,

NIDDRIE 03/01/2007 16:22:17

that was disco not dico


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.