Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Pressure mounts on SNP to accept £1bn Forth Road Bridge 'lifeline'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 March 2009
THE SNP was today under growing pressure to accept the UK Government's £1 billion "lifeline" to help fund the new Forth Road Bridge.
Treasury Minister Yvette Cooper yesterday outlined a funding package to cover half the cost of the £2 billion project, which she claimed could avoid an "unacceptable squeeze" on other spending.

At an hour-long meeting with Scottish Finance Ministe
r John Swinney in London, she repeated her rejection of the Scottish Government's preferred method of paying for the new bridge by bringing forward money from its capital budgets over the next 20 years.

But she said Scotland could expect around £500 million from Westminster linked to spending on London's Crossrail scheme.

She said the rest of the £1bn could come from Scottish ministers being allowed to keep unspent cash and the proceeds from the sale of land and buildings.

Both sides described yesterday's talks as useful and constructive.

But the SNP insisted the Treasury proposal involved "no new money" and said it had already expected to receive Crossrail cash through the Barnett formula.

However, Scottish Secretary Jim Murphy said it was "the type of deal it's almost impossible the Scottish Government would say no to".

He said: "The UK Government put a £1bn offer on the table which was taken seriously by John Swinney.

"It's clear our offer will form an important part of the funding jigsaw required to build Scotland's most important infrastructure project in a generation."

Labour's Holyrood finance spokesman Andy Kerr described the package as a "great offer".

And he claimed it "dug the SNP out of a hole of their own making".

Mr Kerr continued: "It's also making a nonsense of the SNP claim that the UK Government doesn't deal constructively with the Scottish Government."

Edinburgh West Liberal Democrat MSP Margaret Smith said: "This seems to represent a much better position than we have had so far and if there is an acceptance by the UK Government that this is a crucial national project for the whole of the UK, not just something of interest to people in Scotland, that is something I welcome.

"The governments need to be working together on this. It should not be used by anyone as another way to have a go at each other."

A spokesman for Mr Swinney repeated the SNP's commitment that the bridge – due for completion in 2016 – would be built on time and on budget.

He said: "In terms of the various suggestions that were made, we're not actually talking about any new money.

"And we obviously still would wish progress to be made in relation to the key issue, which is being able to spread the costs over a longer period of time."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 March 2009 10:20 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Forth Bridges
 
1

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 05/03/2009 10:56:06
If the SNP were really smart they'd just say yes to everything that comes out of the mouths of Jim Murphy and Iain Gray and implement all their policies. Then when the pack of cards falls they can say, we just did what Labour and the Scotsman told us. Should Labour manage to get back into power (which at the moment looks far from likely), I wonder how much debt they'll feel free to burden us all with. We've bailed out the bankers and will be paying for it for years; we'll be paying for the hospitals and schools and bridges for years under PPP/PFI. Soon they'll want us to fund their election costs. Surely not!
2

alanh,

ek 05/03/2009 11:02:59
Of course our government will "accept" this money...........Its OURS so why should they not?

They had already been told in November about the £500m from the barnett consequentials,the rest is from end of year underspends FROM OUR GOVT and then from selling OUR govt's assetts.
So basically its a usual nu liebore smoke and mirrors trick "giving " us money that was already accounted for.

Now can nu liebore, north britain dept, tell us which CUTS from the other services we have to do to be able to earmark this ALREADY accounted for money to the bridge??????
3

Fred Leeson,

alicante 05/03/2009 11:17:01
If Puffdaddy's glove puppet Spud Murphy is backing the funding plan then forget it. It'll be a fiasco like the Skye Bridge deal and hospital car park charges deal etc. It'll be left to the SNP to sort out the expensive mess that is PFI.
Private finance initiative paid for by the public purse but the private companies can still make a profit. GTF.
4

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 05/03/2009 12:13:14
Take the money,build a crossing,and dont be so silly.
5

TheDisplacedGlaswegian,

alfonsa pedrosa 05/03/2009 13:30:20
RTead the 'story'. THe headline is a disgrace. THE Scottish GOvernment have already budgeted for this money as it is rightfully ours. It is coming to Scotland regardless of a new bridge or not. The story is just anti SNP propaganda - can you not see that?
6

John south of Soutra,

05/03/2009 13:58:57
Is this a case of if we say something often enough then people will believe it is true.This is exactly the same story as the Scotsman ran this morning.
They are not offering any extra money but telling the snp to use the money that they are getting anyway to build the bridge.
7

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 05/03/2009 14:22:30
#7

Because the job must get done,we are going to pay for it anyway,in one way or another.
8

,

05/03/2009 14:55:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

ochone,

Sauchie, Clack's 05/03/2009 17:32:17
The headline talks of mounting pressure, yet apart perhaps from the Lib/Dem mentioned the other statments were all made yesterday, so where is the mounting pressure.

Poor headline to a poor story in a paper that's getting poorer in standard by the day.
10

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 05/03/2009 22:33:21
should.have.kept.the.pay.tolls.money.thrown.away

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Would you support the return of tolls to fund a new Forth Road Bridge?
No, it should be paid for in the same way as other roads.
Yes, it’s fairer for users to bear the brunt of the cost.
Yes, as long as it was only for a fixed amount of time.

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.