Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 4th July 2009 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Smoking displays ban: Out of sight out of mind?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 December 2008
IT is an issue that has divided opinion almost as dramatically as the subject of a tram network in the Capital. The contentious decision taken this week to ban tobacco displays in shops across England and Wales has sparked fear among small independent businesses, who say they cannot afford to lose trade or make the required changes to their shops, particularly during the current economic crisis.
There are also fears that similar legislation in Scotland, due to go before parliament next year as part of the Government's Smoking Prevention Action Plan, will force many smaller retailers out of business.

Health groups in favour of the move po
int to evidence that banning point-of-sale displays at shops abroad has led to a reduction in the number of youths taking up smoking.

In Westminster last week, Health Secretary Alan Johnson announced a ban on tobacco displays at shops in the hope that teenage smoking rates would fall here too.

But Tuesday's announcement has provoked storms of protest from shopkeepers, who argue it will cost them much-needed business during the economic crisis.

Leaders of their umbrella group, the Scottish Grocers' Federation, fear that at least 250 newsagents across Scotland could be forced to the wall over the next few years if a change in law is made north of the Border.

Chief executive of the SGF, John Drummond, said the decision was "a step too far" and would result in a significant and damaging cost to the convenience store sector.

He said: "Compliance with a tobacco display ban will place a significant financial burden on small retailers.

"SGF estimates that convenience store retailers in Scotland can expect to pay a minimum of £5000 to modify their shop, which does not take into consideration the loss of trade during a changeover.

"Creeping costs and additional regulations during a recession will place many small shops at risk of closure."

Chris Ogden, chief executive of the Tobacco Manufacturers Association, is naturally opposed to the move. He said "Tobacco display bans are not supported by robust evidence, will not achieve the stated public health benefit and will have serious unintended consequences.

"A ban on the display of products will also blur the distinction between the legal and illegal market by virtue of it all being 'out of sight' and will play into the hands of criminals trying to infiltrate the retail network. Smuggling continues to account for up to 17 per cent of cigarette and 59 per cent of handrolling tobacco consumption, resulting in a loss of up to £3.1 billion to HM Treasury."

However, Mr Johnson disputes the potential cost to traders, citing evidence from Canada suggesting that the cost of refitting stores could be as low as £550 per shop.

And the Department of Health said evidence from abroad where similar bans had been introduced showed that under-age smoking rates had been cut by as much as ten per cent, with no retailers forced to close as a result of the change.

More than 96,000 responses were received to the Department of Health's consultation on the future of tobacco control – the largest response ever to a consultation of its kind. Eighty-four per cent supported removing tobacco displays in shops.

Sheila Duffy, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) Scotland, said: "Point-of-sale displays have been removed in a number of countries including Canada, where they saw a fall in smoking prevalence rates amongst 15 to 19-year-olds, from 29 per cent in 2002 to 19 per cent in 2007."

Ms Duffy stressed people were being bombarded by tobacco branding on entering shops, particularly youngsters. "It's one of the last loopholes in the tobacco advertising ban," she said. "There is strong evidence that young people notice such advertising more and are more influenced by it than adults.

There is no evidence from Iceland or Canada of stores closing as a result of removing cigarette displays."

However, Mr Drummond argues that in Iceland, where tobacco displays were banned from shops in 2001, youth smoking remained at the same levels and in parts of Canada, it even increased following display bans.

Public Health Minister Shona Robison said: "We are committed to doing all we can to reduce smoking rates in Scotland – both by encouraging more smokers to quit and discouraging young people from starting.

"In our Smoking Prevention Action Plan, published in May, we signalled our intention to remove cigarettes from open display in shops.

"We are currently taking this forward in consultation with the industry. Next year, we will introduce the Health Bill, which will detail our proposals to continue our drive to make Scotland smoke-free.

"While England is about to consult on proposed legislation, we have already concluded our consultation and are currently developing the legislation that will be introduced next year."

In England and Wales the regulations are expected to come into force from October 2011 for larger shops, and 2013 for smaller businesses.

Tobacco is responsible for a quarter of adult deaths in Scotland every year.





The full article contains 852 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 December 2008 9:25 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

english charlie,

16/12/2008 11:50:31
'More than 96,000 responses were received to the Department of Health's consultation on the future of tobacco control – the largest response ever to a consultation of its kind. Eighty-four per cent supported removing tobacco displays in shops'.
The vast majority of the consultations were sent from anti-smoking organisations. Nearly half from an anti-smoking group in the North West of England.
When there are polls in newspapers, the majority vote against such bans.
2

english charlie,

16/12/2008 11:52:00
The Government said that such a ban reduced smoking in Canada and Iceland, but this is not true.
3

Chuckles,

London 16/12/2008 14:36:35
Exactly Charlie1 I dont know where they seem to pluck these figures from. Same with the consultations on the smoking ban-like this one the majority of the ones recorded by HMG(probably that they chose to report) came from groups like ASH, CRUK, BHF or groups like this North-West based group. These consultations were a farce- NEVER were the businesses who were going to suffer the most(pubs and small shops) included.
4

Belinda-2,

Edinburgh 16/12/2008 15:00:07
'While England is about to consult on proposed legislation, we have already concluded our consultation ...'

Thanks to the posters from down south for pointing out that the consultation in England has not only taken place, but also report on it has already been published, and the results widely attacked as a 'public sector' consultation rather than a public consultation.

From http://www.medilexicon.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=132994

'There is no evidence that the removal of tobacco displays from retail stores in Saskatchewan has had any impact on the sale of tobacco. Tobacco sales volumes have remained consistent in the four years since the ban was introduced. Teen smoking rates are reportedly on the rise -- the result of rampant illegal contraband tobacco sales. In fact the only measurable outcomes of the retail display ban in Saskatchewan appear to be negative impacts on the convenience store industry itself...

Retailers in Canada subject to tobacco display bans have seen:

- Increased safety concerns for retail employees from theft
- Increases to capital costs as retailers must now install and maintain covered shelving units
- Operating cost increases as employee training requirements grow
- Increased regulatory burden to be born by retailers who must now ensure that their products are never in sight'

I present this by way of redressing the imbalance in the report on the consultation. which has apparently excluded 2,500 responses from independent retailers under the banner of the Tobacco Retailers' Alliance.
5

Belinda-2,

16/12/2008 15:24:27
I meant 25,000!

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/132901.php
6

Captain Flint,

Edinburgh 17/12/2008 10:58:33
Youth smoking rates have fallen significantly in Saskatchewan since their tobacco was put out of sight.
When the law came into force, rates were 29%. The most recent figure is 22%. But english charlie and Chuckles, bless them, are adamant that this is not a reduction ...

And despite what Belinda says, the DoH's consultation was indeed open to the public. Anyone who responded would have had their views taken into consideration. If you couldn't be bothered to take part, then all your complaints now sound just a little bit hollow.
7

TheTerminator,

17/12/2008 19:42:23

This will blow the whole reason for smoking bans

wide open.


THE 1ST WORLD CONFERENCE AGAINST PROHIBITION

"SMOKING BANS AND LIES"

IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT BUILDING 27/28 JAN 2009

http://www.antiprohibition.org/ticap_pages.php?q=6

8

helend498,

17/12/2008 23:36:47
Are you sure about that Captain Flint?
Andrew Lansley tabled this question today:
Well, I asked the House of Commons Library to look at the statistics from Canada and it says that the tobacco display ban was not introduced in all provinces; that it was introduced only in Manitoba and Saskatchewan; and that since the tobacco display ban was introduced, there were no statistically significant results for any reduction in the number of young people smoking in either of those provinces. Will the Secretary of State simply apologise for giving the House an inaccurate presentation of the data on Canada and will he put a note in the Library explaining his basis for the proposition that there is a proven reduction in young people smoking?

I think the official data as well shows this. I don't know where your figures have come from - perhaps from someone like Prof Pell? Say no more.

I believe also that a large complaint has been made about the consultation as several thousand responses were totally ignored. It's in the papers in England anyway

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.