Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Call for pay debate as fat cats 'now obese'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 December 2006
THE TUC today demanded a national debate on pay after new figures revealed boardroom pay was rising on average at 17 times the employees' rate.
According to the trades union body, a company director now earns £205 for every £100 they received in 2000. But for rank and file employees, the £100 earned in 2000 has risen to just £106.

In his new year message, TUC general secretary Brendan Ba
rber said reward for performance and responsibility may be justified. But he insisted: "There is still an important debate to be had about how big and how justified these extra rewards should be.

The gap between top pay and that enjoyed by the rest of us is getting bigger each year. Plump felines became fat cats some years ago, now they are dangerously obese."

Mr Barber said levels of top pay affected the whole country because they often fed inflation in the property market which affected decisions about interest rates.

He also hit out at soaring levels of executives' perks and bonuses, adding that FTSE-100 directors had "amassed" pensions worth nearly £1 billion between them.

On average, directors can retire at 60 on a final salary pension worth nearly £3 million, rising to almost £5m for some top bosses.

"This is at a time when many have been happy to cut the pensions of their own staff, and been ready to condemn the Government for not cutting the pension built up by public servants," said Mr Barber.



The full article contains 275 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 December 2006 12:34 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Executive fat cats
 
1

The Busman,

28/12/2006 15:12:22

Would Mr Barber describe the wages of top-flight professional footballers as "dangerously obese"? No?

2

Paul Voltaire,

www.paulvoltaire.spaces.live.com 28/12/2006 17:20:08

My neighbour's cat is dangerously obese.
I hate it .
It is lazy AND smelly.

3

Angry,

Edinburgh 28/12/2006 21:10:42

Get your own house in order first Mr Barber. Being part of a 'dangerously obese' public sector is doing more harm than the few fat cats. Perks and renumeration in the public sector now far outweigh the majority of those employed in the private sector - who are paying to employ all those in the bloated public sector. Back in your box Brendan - if you can fit.

4

Isabel Ronan,

Edinburgh 28/12/2006 21:20:03

I have no issue with executives in Private flourishing companies having their rewards.I object to those in failing companies taking anything when they have obviously not had the ability to make the profit.Staff in those companies would have no benefits. In the Public Sector companies it is ridiculous when the services are so poor.
As for Pharmaceutical and Oil companies I could not print what I think but in polite terms, In the first instance I would say Drugs in third World countries and in the second the enviroment.If I seen commitment to those then those executives might have a right to their bonuses!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.