Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Lord McCluskey on Haymarket: In my judgement it's a tasteless, vulgar, ugly cliff



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 June 2008
A FORMER judge and solicitor general for Scotland today launched an outspoken attack on the £200 million Haymarket development, branding it "vulgar and tasteless".
West End resident Lord Mc-Cluskey, one of the country's most senior legal figures, said the scheme "would grace a declining industrial town in the more depressed parts of Lancashire, but has no place whatsoever in Edinburgh".

The city council has also received letters of objection from the John Lewis firm, which warned that city centre shopping could suffer, and the Hilton Grosvenor Hotel, which said the flagship 17-storey hotel would "dwarf" its Victorian architecture.

The controversial plans for the former Morrison Street goods yard, which include a neighbouring three-star Travelodge, offices, shops and restaurants, are due to come before councillors on the planning committee next week. 39 objections to the plans were today made public, and mainly come from local residents concerned about the height of the hotel.

But council planning chief Alan Henderson has recommended that councillors give the go-ahead at next Wednesday's meeting.

Although now retired, Lord John Herbert McCluskey, 79, is Scotland's longest serving judge.

An Edinburgh University graduate and a life peer since 1976, he hit the headlines in 1973 after convincing judges in Campbeltown, Kintyre, to let Sir Paul McCartney off with a £30 fine for growing cannabis on his farm, claiming the former Beatle had a genuine interest in horticulture.

In his letter to the council, Lord McCluskey wrote: "My wife and I, resident (in the area) for 25 years, object in the strongest terms to this proposed development.

"(It] is wholly out of character. It is a vulgar, massive and tasteless piece of architecture. This cheapskate hotel, designed to look like an ugly cliff, will seriously inhibit views of the beautiful spires of (St Mary's] Cathedral.

"The Edinburgh Council in its various manifestations has, since the war of 1939/45, allowed the vandalising of much of Edinburgh. For once, let us ask the council and its members to stop and think about our heritage."

Andrew Woodrow, senior planning consultant with CB Richard Ellis, writing on behalf of John Lewis, added: "Our client's concern is that this proposal will have a detrimental impact on the city's retail around Princes Street."

Henderson Global Investors, owners of the St James Centre, also said the Haymarket development should be considered as "outwith the city centre retail core".

In his complaint about the size of the main hotel, Hilton Grosvenor general manager Stephen Hall wrote: "The design of the building is totally unsympathetic to the Italianate style of the surrounding area."

Haymarket development firm's John Nesbitt said: "The design team, led by Richard Murphy, has designed a landmark innovative and exciting building."


The full article contains 465 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Les insolences du Frère Untel,

20/06/2008 15:46:35
"the Italianate style of the surrounding area" ?

I dont think so really. And Wiggy Mcluskey is only protecting his own "turf".

The good thing about glass and steel homegenous structures is that they can easily be replaced and are unlikely to be listed.
2

alex paterson,

edinburgh 20/06/2008 15:57:33
Well said Lord McCluskey,and never a more truthful word spoken.
3

Foo,

ejinbara 20/06/2008 16:40:53
You think that you're too cool for school, but I have a newsflash for you Lord McCluskey... you aren't.
4

Buttress,

20/06/2008 16:51:23
He's right - it's ghastly. Thank heavens that Alan Henderson is retiring, although too late... he has also said this will enhance the adjacent World Heritage Site I believe - yet the council sponsored Edinburgh World Heritage Trust has stated clearly it won't. Is there anyone employed by the council in planning who has a clue?

Tall buildings policy? What tall buildings policy?

Still, the developer will be laughing - the taller the building the more the profit. And of course the council will be gaining over four million for the trams scheme, I think?

Landmark, innovative and exciting my arras! They'll tell you anything and this council will believe it!



5

Concerned Citizen,

Edinburgh 20/06/2008 16:56:54
How can the council make a truly objective decision on this project when they have what amounts to conflict of interest where their need to raise cash for the tram project is paramount ?

"But the project, which will now go to city councillors for a decision next week, will only get the go-ahead if backers pay £4.14m towards the tram network."

It could also be construed as a form of bribe to city to ensure that the planning went through regardless of suitability for the area and over-ride the views of the local people. Where is local democracy when developers can buy their permissions for such hideous developments.

This practice should cease.
6

,

20/06/2008 17:36:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Buttress,

20/06/2008 17:41:58
Alan Henderson is retiring - not before time.

Let's hope his replacement has more idea.
8

Andrew,

20/06/2008 17:42:49
If Scotland ever joins the space race, we'll have a ready-built rocket-launcher right in the middle of Edinburgh!!
9

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

20/06/2008 18:09:13
I relaly dont see the problem . Conservative isnt the word for you lot. currently its one of the dodguest parts of town with dodgy ameneties like the toilets and the Jakey benches and early morning bars.

I really think it will help to rejuvenate the area and by the time the new haymarket comes along it shoudl be decent.

17 storeys is nothing and i cant think of any views it can block from its placement.
10

Buttress,

20/06/2008 18:41:40
But it's rather nasty and will be seen from all over...
11

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 20/06/2008 20:07:22
4, 5 & 6 - absolutely spot on. This 'application' is attached to £4.14million stuffed in a Broon Envelope. How can the idiot Kooncillors be objective. Henderson leaving that other buffoon, Andrew 'Mr Bean' Holmes in retirement? - good b****y riddance to both.
12

Statsman,

Edinburgh 21/06/2008 00:15:49
There is no way the council can be objective about this when the proposition. This application, that they are meant to be 'independently' adjudicating, could help bail them out of the tram fiasco to the tune of £ millions.

It's just as well the council's planning department has such scrupulous people such as Alan Henderson. We can surely all trust him to make sure they are given appropriate guidance.

Aye right!!!
13

celtic4,

USA 21/06/2008 03:04:11
I think it is lovely....and I have a better hairdresser than he does. lol
14

Buttress,

21/06/2008 09:21:37
I read Alan Henderson's reports with total incredulity - they take no note of anything except what a developer has to say, it seems.
15

Concerned Citizen,

Edinburgh 21/06/2008 10:19:21
Just consider, if you were asking the council for planning permission to build a hideous garage to house your car and you have paid the statutory fee for this consideration. The council could then say 'Hey, we will only give you permission if you pay us a contribution to the trams project'.

Surely ,there is something sadly wrong with that idea. I wonder what Lord McCluskey has to say on these matters ?
16

Buttress,

21/06/2008 18:25:49
'Mr Henderson said today: "The mix of uses represents a positive contribution to the area-wide aspirations for Haymarket.

"The quality of the urban design solution will enhance the area and the setting of the Edinburgh World Heritage Site, adjacent listed buildings and conservation area.

"The five-star hotel will create a landmark building which adds positively to the city skyline and marks this important interchange location."

Mr Henderson said the £8.75m boost to the city's economy would also include another £4.7m for Scotland as a whole.

Contributions to the tram scheme are now normal for any new development, but the £4.14m condition is thought to be one of the highest ever.'

How on earth will this enhance the WHS, the setting of listed buildings etc?

Where do they find these people?

17

Ted & Janet Levecque,

Belwood, Ontario Canada 21/06/2008 20:32:43
For one thing, we dont think the Haymarket area is down and out either, we have relatives there and my wife grew up there, but do agree that new Hotel will block many views! Lets face it, most Developers dont care about the common folk, all they want to do is make money, known as "greed"
18

Concerned Citizen,

Edinburgh 21/06/2008 23:23:11
#16 quote 'Contributions to the tram scheme are now normal for any new development'

Just because something is 'normal' does not mean the practice of obtaining funds in this way should not mean that it is an acceptable practice within any planning application proceedure. It corrupts what should be a system of fair and neutral consideration.

Haymarket just needs a modest development not an ugly carbuncle. The proposed development appears clinical and sterile with no real features. It does not really add any character to the area.
19

Buttress,

22/06/2008 11:18:31
As with Caltongate - when the council is to make money anything, it seems, goes, no matter how lousy:

http://independentrepublicofthecanongate.blogspot.com/



20

Sod off labour!,

edinburgh 01/07/2008 15:23:40
There is a fabulous building in Dubai Creek, I'm not suggesting anything like it for Haymarket, but all I'm saying is that they might change developers and ask other architects to put forward their ideas low - rise substantial.. elegant? The one in Dubai is curved also but the frontage on the Creek mirrored in some way. You architects on this message board will know the one I am referring to...... I don't think the one already on the drawing board should just go ahead.... remember all the fuss re.. the Scottish Parliament? Did not lots of people get a chance to design something fantastic? Back to the flippin drawing board please!!!!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.