Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The oldest profession needs a new approach



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 April 2008
I'VE never paid anyone to lie underneath me but I have paid someone to lie under my sink. The geographical difference is important when it comes to differentiating between prostitutes and plumbers.
No doubt there are some who like to pay prostitutes to lie under their sink but – Formula One supremos notwithstanding – most try not to mix their professions when it comes to hiring.

Much as I enjoy the benefits of plumbing, I'd rather pay some
one who knows what they are doing to do it for me. And much as I enjoy the company of all fellow members of the human race, my interest in plumber welfare tends to disappear once they've unblocked my pipes. They provide a service, I pay, they depart. Whether they provide that service is up to them. All of this is broadly the same for those providing some form of sexual service in exchange for money.

What people choose to do with their body to make money is up to them. They can join the armed forces and put their body in the line of fire; they can sit in a office cubicle and live for the excess of the weekend; they can lie under sinks and tell people it's worse than they thought. Or they can offer sexual services.

It's probably not too much of generalisation to say that women standing on rainy street corners in unpleasant areas of town waiting to sell their body to whoever opens the car door are not living the life of their dreams. Indeed, they are in a position where they have not much left to lose in terms of dignity and quality of life.

That said, undertaking that work is ultimately their choice. Yes, they may be at the nether regions of the social order, yes they may have substance dependency issues. But ultimately it is their body and they should decide where it goes and what it does, otherwise the whole issue of individual rights means nothing.

So why is prostitution illegal? Some will argue that prostitution – unlike plumbing – is an activity that brings with it a whole set of social problems including child welfare and white slavery. To them I would say two things – you never met the plumbers who came round to fix my shower last week, and legality can help solve most of the problems associated with prostitution.

An issue of over-riding importance is that the social issues raised by prostitution are woefully under-funded. Sexual prostitutes would, of course, be subject to the same taxation as the rest of us who only engage in white-collar administrative prostitution of our bodies. Turning prostitutes from drainers of public resources to contributors will change not only how they feel about themselves, but – and it might take a bit of time – how society feels about them. And it will help provide resources to tackle those problems associated with the sex trade.

I wouldn't pretend legalisation will solve all problems. But unless I am mistaken, we have tried everything else, from total illegality to arresting car drivers, and none of it has worked. The rise of attacks on prostitutes is a predictable result of forcing the trade underground and off-camera. And if you think legalisation has nothing to offer, imagine what would happen if being a plumber was illegal.

Gnawing problem
Last week came the thrilling launch of my Moles of Peace campaign; to send thousands of tiny velvety warriors over to hitherto mole-less Ireland in celebration of that island's new found peace. Now comes the fantastic news that beavers are being (illegally) introduced to Scotland. I am sure that these hearty Beavers of Freedom are part of a wildlife-based campaign to promote independence by example; as they gnaw their way across the land they will leave a trail of tooth-shaped inspiration in our flora but hopefully not the fauna.

If you should come across a Beaver of Freedom, bear in mind that Scottish Natural Heritage has warned that the haphazard, unprofessional campaign means that many of them will be lonely – so keep your teeth hidden and don't chew any sticks in front of them.

Just a fly perk
What's all the fuss about Prince William taking his RAF helicopter to visit the girlfriend? Everyone takes advantage of things at their place of work – let he or she who has not made a personal photocopy cast the first stone.

Apart from anything else, given how much the country has given the royal family over the centuries, getting worked up over a wee jaunt in the company chopper is missing the point somewhat.





The full article contains 778 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 10:02:17
> What people choose to do with their body to make money is up to them.

Totally agree. Legalise prostitution now.
2

GmL,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 10:10:09
As I have said on other threads on this issue. Prostitution, that is to say the exchange of sex for money, is NOT illegal. Misunderstandings like this have to be nailed before we can have a proper debate. The article may be well-meaning, but its poor attention to facts does it no favours.
3

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 22/04/2008 13:20:14
Hennigan is absolutely right that legalisation would help solve prostitution's problems. If we could make their largest problems filling in their tax forms and dealing with HR, it'd be a big step forward.
4

James (1),

22/04/2008 13:45:03
#2 you keep spouting this as if you are some legal expert. Can you please clarify then why would supporters of this want it legalised if in your opinion is already is?

With regard to legalisation being a better solution, what are you basing this on?
Amsterdam have legalised it and still have problems with pimps and drugs.
So stop putting this forward as the panacea because it will not work.

All that will happen is these women will become more of a nuisance to residents and their seedy punters will be more blatant about kerb crawling. They will not pay taxes (more airy fairy wishful thinking) but will continue to claim benefits AND earn money.

Does Hennigan think his "insight" into the problem has never been tried?
He is very magnanimous with his "But ultimately it is their body and they should decide where it goes and what it does" etc

So if they want to be self employed lets stop their benefit money. That's what should happen to them or should we, using his Plumber analogy, be telling Plumbers "You dont need to pay tax even though you are self employed. Just you keep it as you work so hard."

If caught more than once they should be reported as "working" to the benefits agency.

To repeat, Amsterdam still has a big problem in this area even though it has legalised it but for reason unknown to me people think making it legal will cure the problem.
More ostrich thinking from the liberal do gooders.
5

R Corbett,

Embra 22/04/2008 15:23:30
Right, I've got to file my copy in about half an hour. What will I write about? I know, I'll just start talking a load of p ish about a subject i know nothing about in a tone that cant quite manage either serious discussion of topic or lighthearted radio 2 fluff.

Next week - what if UFOs existed and the Scottish Parliament was full of moles from space
6

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

22/04/2008 15:30:21
If i met Brian Hennigan I would have no time for him and I would tell him to get out of town. He's just a silly man with a silly haircut that cant get a proper job.
7

GmL,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 17:08:37
#4, I have answered this before. I am no "legal expert" as you put it. However, I am aware of the facts. There are offences surrounding sex work, such as soliciting and kerb-crawling. However, the actual act, as I say the purchase and sale of sex, is NOT against the law. You are wrong when you say "supporters... want it legalised". Those who "support" it know the facts.
8

John Blackley,

Florida 22/04/2008 20:34:52
One result of being a flippant columnist (with 'Moles for Freedom' and smirking opinions on Royals' use of RAF helicopters) is that, when you do attempt to make a serious point, no-one will take you seriously.

I don't know (pace, GmL) whether the act of prostitution is illegal in Scotland or not. When those who have the power to make laws attempt to solve a 'problem' (originally seen as a moral one in the UK), they can do so by specifically banning the activity seen to be the problem or (and this is delicious if the lawmakers want others to leave off using the service while the lawmakers contibue to enjoy it) they make laws to choke off the demand for the activity.

Even with all its attendant ills (and the characters that surround the world of prostitution will bring with them a host of ills), legalised prostitution makes slightly more sense than a legal system that drives prostitution underground.

Is making prostitution, soliciting and all the other attendant activities legal a perfect answer to all the ills that surround prostitution at the moment? I don't say it is. I only say it's a better answer than the current one and, to date, the best answer we have.
9

Moscow,

22/04/2008 22:45:57

Selling sex is already legal. What people are asking for is a free pass for pimps and assorted creeps to become members of the chamber of commerce

and of course, for teachers to run brothels with schoolgirl theme nights. Teachers virtually direct the porn trade in Scotland as it is.

The girls in the Amsterdam windows from 2002 are moatly dead, there is that slight down-side to it. It is also a direct subsidy to drug dealers and crime.

and kerb-crawlers are of course child molesters. having said that, with nobody living more than a few yards from an active pedophile in Edinburgh,

maybe we should legalize everything with the objectors simply leaving.
10

Moscow,

22/04/2008 22:50:29
"Hennigan is absolutely right that legalisation would help solve prostitution's problems. If we could make their largest problems filling in their tax forms and dealing with HR, it'd be a big step forward."

If he is right let him sell himself on TV to give us all a laugh, without condoms I feel. Just for a week.

Prostitution does not pay tax anywhere. That is one red herring that has been counted, or not counte as the case would have it.

In NZ the HR part is a bucket for syringes in the corner of the room and human breast milk on special offer on altenate Tuesdays.
11

R Corbett,

Edinburgh 22/04/2008 23:45:59

Which MSP looks most like a mole?

Which Councillor has the most moles?

If the provost was a mole, would he/ she be worth the money compared to a human provost?

Is guacamole made of mexican moles?

Brian Moleygan's article for next week: "Is Inane Chatter A Good Thing Or A Bad Thing?"

- 'We all love a bit of inane chatter don't we. It's the oldest hobby. I like moles, in much the same way as Harry Hill goes on about badgers. But no one baits moles like I do, I'm a bit of a master baiter in that respect. By the way have you ever noticed how there isn't a sofa full of pensioners at the top of the escalator at Marks'n'Spenser's these days? maybe like the moles they've went underground and sit there spraffing abbot the auld days, ken, inane chatter, canny beat it likesey'
12

James (1),

23/04/2008 07:19:02
#7 I know you are not a legal expert just as I know you are you very good at getting you point across!

According to you I am wrong when I said supporters want it legalised and Hennigan (who is a SUPPORTER or did you miss this as well?) says "and legality can help solve most of the problems associated with prostitution." Can you tell me where exactly I am wrong? Is it that you did not actually read what was said?
What you also missed or have chosen to ignore is nobody cares about your view on the legality as you see it. They care more for the grief it brings.
Prostitution is not some person setting up a business, paying taxes and providing top of the range standards.
It is about women making money from seedy punters who creep about and both parties to this act cause grief to decent tax paying residents.
13

GmL,

Edinburgh 23/04/2008 11:24:56
Careful, James, you're becoming abusive again ;0)..."nobody cares about your view on the legality as you see it."

My point, again, is that the writer is wrong in his underlying assumption that the sale of sex is illegal. THAT was my issue with the article, and not a discussion of my morality versus yours. We both know that we will never agree on that, but a grown-up debate on the issues HAS to start with a basic grasp of the facts. It also needs an acceptance of, and respect for, the concept of others having different opinions.

14

James (1),

23/04/2008 15:21:19
#13 No, you are splitting hairs here!
The writer was talking about prostitution in general and we all know that in general we think of prostitutes being paid to have sex and their "customers" approaching them for "business".
If they all went to an island to carry out this seedy practice then I dont think anyone would really care but they don't.
I am also guessing they do not hang around outside your house either? So a magnanimous attitude on your part would be easy to give. (By the way the do not hang around my area either just incase you thought this was the reason for my point of view)
They ply their "trade"(notice how we use terms as if it were a real job?)in areas that law abiding people live.
That is why they should be dealt with severely. As I said I would report them as self employed and stop their benefit. Seize the "clients" car would also be on the agenda.
Legalising would make matters worse but it is so easy to put it forward as a "give it a try" solution.
Amsterdam is your answer and we do not want to go there.
15

Ron Thomson,

calonge 10/06/2008 17:07:25
This is a wholesale business they are only Entrepreneurs trying to scratch a living by giving a service and yes it should be legal after all the government has been screwing us for years and taking money for it and they call that legal.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.