Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 16th May 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Five years to save Tattoo



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 January 2008
TATTOO chiefs are facing a race against time to protect the future of the flagship event by finding cash for a new £15 million grandstand on the Castle Esplanade.
A report published today reveals that council chiefs are considering putting up £3m for the project, which involves new grandstands that can be erected and dismantled much quicker than at present.

The current ageing structures, which have been used for every Tattoo since 1975, take up to 12 weeks to install every summer.

City development chief Andrew Holmes warned that "failure to replace the grandstands now will jeopardise the future sustainability of this event within the next five years".

The warning originated from a feasability study by Tattoo chiefs, which began last year.

To ensure the new facilities are in place for summer 2010, funding must be secured by this May. On top of the council's possible contribution, tattoo chiefs have pledged £5m from their own money and hope to attract private investment of up to £5m, with the Scottish Government supplying the remainder.

If the scheme gets the go-ahead, the modern seating will have around one-third more leg room, as well as better facilities for disabled people and VIP guests.

By taking just three to four weeks to install, the new 8600-seater grandstand would also free up the Castle Esplanade over the summer months, and create the opportunity to use the seating for other events all-year round.

Mr Holmes said: "Edinburgh Military Tattoo is one of Edinburgh's and Scotland's iconic events, drawing in international audiences, providing global media coverage, profiling Scottish culture and heritage, and bringing significant economic benefit to Edinburgh and Scotland.

"The existing grandstands are now nearing the end of their life and, to avoid wasteful expenditure in extending their operation, now is the time to commit to their replacement. The investment of £15m in the infrastructure will create grandstands of a higher quality, creating a world-class customer experience and less disruption and a greater flexibility."

Tattoo chiefs have drawn up a business plan for the project, which sets out the case for Scottish Government support, through Scottish Enterprise. The Tattoo, which is run with the backing of the city council and Historic Scotland, spends most of its takings on the event, but there is usually surplus cash left over for charity.

The council's contribution could involve it taking ownership of part of the grandstand.

The report will be discussed next week, and city leader Jenny Dawe said any decision to put up the cash will be debated within the Lib Dem/SNP coalition ahead of next month's budget.

But she said the Government's decision to add previously ring-fenced money to the council's overall financial deal means cash is available for this kind of capital project. "The grandstand does need replaced and the administration understands the needs for investing in it," she said.

"And if the Tattoo does well, then so does the local economy."

The Tattoo is now in its 58th year and generates around £31m annually for the Scottish economy.

Tattoo chief executive and producer, Major General Euan Loudon, said: "For the past year we've been working closely with the city council and Scottish Enterprise on the feasibility and delivery of the Castle Esplanade grandstand project for 2010.

"We now await the outcome of the council's deliberations."


WEB LINKS

www.edintattoo.co.uk
www.edinburgh.gov.uk


The full article contains 574 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 January 2008 11:59 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Edinburgh Military Tattoo
 
1

hassan i sabbah,

edinburgh 16/01/2008 13:01:25
Let it die.Shameful display of military fetishism,grasping at the tattered remnants of a half remembered concept if Empire.Let it go.
2

Darren :-),

on way to ibrox 16/01/2008 13:10:12
if they stopped the stupid tram idea they could have more than enough money for the tattoo and everything else we need in the city
3

Bob 2,

16/01/2008 13:10:43
what happened to all the PROFIT from the sale of Tickets, surely they've been putting money away to replace the Seating !!
4

Dante's world looked rosier,

16/01/2008 13:19:24
#1 at some point the penny will drop and you will realise that people that come to these events are supporting our local economy. Tourism and well constructed events bring millions in to this city and should continue to do so, however, people who do not see the big picture tend to have a limited view on these things.

Clue; that would be you!!
5

Jambo Number 1,

16/01/2008 13:26:35
#3

Spot on, or have I been dreaming about these "Record ticket sales" or "Tickets sell out in record time" headlines!!
6

PaulB,

Edinburgh 16/01/2008 13:30:29
I love the phrase "supporting our local economy"! What it actually means is that all the businesses in Edinburgh benefit - not the council tax payers. Tourists jam up our city every year, using resources and transport systems. Perhaps some of the so-called "benefits" might be put to use reducing council tax. And why not add a levy to the cost of tattoo tickets and put that towards the new seating - the shows always sell out every year, so the demand is there - let the tourists pay for this, not under-seige Edinburgh residents!
7

Duncan McD,

Edinburgh 16/01/2008 13:32:22
#3
You are are right but

You must remember this is not regular commerce where we know we must budget for replacement and other capital costs - this is a quasi public business where the profits are pocketed and then an emergency plead made for the money in an attempt to draw public attention.
8

JFW,

New Town 16/01/2008 13:42:07
While I have a vested interested in keeping tourists coming to our city I really don't see why these profit making companies can go cap in hand to the council and government looking for cash so that they can continue making money hand over fist (the fringe does it too). It's obviously been badly managed to date with nothing set aside to replace aging equipment. If the council put money in then they should be doing it as investors in the company and getting an actual monetory return out, as opposed to settling for the not so tangible tourism revenue return that they'll no doubt only be offered.
9

Scallywag,

Edinburgh 16/01/2008 14:01:03
JFW. Point well made but I'm not sure the tattoo is a profit making enterprise from the report. However, I have had involvement in two major events in Edinburgh where ex- military were involved in running what would normally be considered civilian fare and it was a total shambles. While I am sure their hearts are in the right place they really should concentrate on fighting wars and organising the square bashing and let someone else look after other aspects of the event.
10

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 16/01/2008 14:02:11
use the vast profit the make every year to pay for it not the edinburgh tax payer who cant get to see it
11

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 16/01/2008 14:05:26
your right jfw its the same with the fringe students/ next cleaner wants the tax payer to fund their jamboree mass joint smoking event if you cant pay for it yourself dont have look at the street party started charging a fee now a total disgrace
12

hassan i sabbah,

edinburgh 16/01/2008 14:10:23
#4 and your point is.....?
13

The Judge,

16/01/2008 14:11:31
Simple solution, approach a bank ask to borrow the money for new seating, add a few quid to the ticket price and repay the loan. No public money needed.
14

'Chopper',

Norwich, "a fine city" ..... full of inbreds! 16/01/2008 14:28:29
Could they not use part of the Main Stand at Tynecastle?
15

Mensa George,

Washington, DC 16/01/2008 15:07:35
So, the main problem is that the stands are a big job to assemble and, "failure to replace the grandstands now will jeopardise the future sustainability of this event within the next five years". Sounds to me like the only folks left who are clever enough to assemble it are due to retire within the next 5 years.
16

AndrewS,

Edinburgh 16/01/2008 15:25:21
#2 is correct, if the cretins behind the trams, including Holmes and other nutters were locked away in the City Hospital, far away from being allowed to make crazy decisions which everyone disaggress with, we'd have a better run city.
Where is todays tram story in the EEN ?
17

TattooFreak,

Edinburgh 16/01/2008 15:41:32
Have said for years, why don't they introduce a tourist tax, it works in many other countries in the world. The money raised can be ploughed into the events for the tourists and they can leave with the knowledge that they have help safeguard something for future visitors. the tax can be added to hotel/b&b prices. I'm not talking a fortune hear a £ or ££. Who is going to say "not going to Edinburgh they are charging me an extra £7 per week as i am a tourist". This way the residents of Edinburgh are not being asked to subsidise the tourism industry. We all know that it is the hotels and bars that make all the money not the local.
18

The Genuine Mario Antoinette,

16/01/2008 15:46:12
Ive got a funny feeling that the Tattoo will still be there in 5 years.

Havent you ?
19

Dante's world looked rosier,

16/01/2008 16:19:07
#1 what does this mean: "Shameful display of military fetishism,grasping at the tattered remnants of a half remembered concept if Empire"
Also spaces tend to follow punctuation.

You ask me my point, it is clear that these events bring in money. As such they should not be allowed to fall by the wayside or die as your over dramatics suggest.
Years of history and its celebration are an extremely valuable part of our make-up. This after all is an international world event.

I totally agree with #17 and think a tourist tax would help to alleviate some of the bugetary constraints that we see at present.
20

,

16/01/2008 16:30:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

Gothic Rose,

16/01/2008 16:58:34
18#Yes Mario.
22

Finbarr Saunders,

16/01/2008 17:34:16
Going by the time it takes to sell-out and the price the tickets fetch on eBay, the face value of the tickets is clearly far too low.

Solution: Increase the ticket prices substantially and run it from June to September.
23

Bob 2,

16/01/2008 21:31:55
no5...good point.

So with SOLD OUT months in advance, they msut be sitting with millions in the bank getting interest.
24

,

16/01/2008 22:07:03
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

,

16/01/2008 22:28:02
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Roger Irrelevant,

17/01/2008 00:33:22
The nights are getting longer. Again.
27

Disgrunted Ebardonian,

17/01/2008 05:32:39
Totally agree with #2 we had an open cheque with the Scottish Parliment, I expect the tramlines will be the same so I dont suppose a spare 15 million donation from their budget wouldn't go amiss.

As for the Tattoo its self it would be nice if the Edinburgh folk could have a couple of nights for to see the spectacular night without the tourists I have lived in Edinburgh all my days you would think it would be easy to get tickets for the event but that is not the case I tell my kids that it is a wonderful experience but the chance of them getting a ticket is very slim I think this should be seriously looked into.

And I feel that we should get the tickets at a reduced price as long as we can prove that we are residents of Edinburgh or Scotland. Having to pay tourist prices to get into your own places of history is out of reach for most scots due to high unemployment or disability.
28

LUVMACITY,

in thelobby 17/01/2008 08:53:50
You idiots harp on about the profits. If you knew how much money the" profits" generate for servicemen,s charities tou would maybe shut your gobs.
29

Bob 2,

17/01/2008 12:13:08
no28, you'll find that many of the commentors are not against the tatoo or profits.
What is wrong about putting "some" of the profits away for maintenance and replacement of the stands.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.