Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 21st November 2009 Change Date

Health chiefs say sorry for Marlene Wightman 'failings'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 November 2009
HEALTH chiefs today apologised "unreservedly"for the "major failings" in its care which left a woman to bleed to death following breast cancer surgery.
The death of Marlene Wightman, 49, was "entirely preventable", Sheriff Isabella McColl ruled following a fatal accident inquiry yesterday.

Staff at the Western General Hospital are now facing the threat of disciplinary action while an internal investigation is carried out by the health board.

Today Charles Swainson, medical director of NHS

Lothian, said: "Our concern is that there were major failings in organisation. It's not about blaming individual members of staff.

"We have several times apologised unreservedly to her family. I think it's clear there have been major failings in looking after Mrs Wightman."

The mother-of-two, from Dalkeith, bled to death in the early hours of 23 March 2006, the day after a mastectomy operation.

Her death has led to damning criticism of the procedures in Ward 6 of the hospital in the sheriff's written determination of the case.

Staff with little experience in breast surgery aftercare failed to identify she was haemorrhaging or transfer her to a high dependency unit until it was too late to save her life.

The hospital failed to provide enough training to nursing staff and junior out-of-hours doctors.

Sheriff McColl also criticised records which were "incomplete and contained inconsistencies, inaccuracies, alterations and errors".

She also hit out at the "fairly appalling treatment" of Mrs Wightman's husband Tom, and two children, by the hospital. He was given little information when he was called to the hospital late on the night she died, with no-one offering a reasonable explanation of why he needed to be there until after his wife's death.

The family were left in a room on the ward, where they could see staff fighting to save Mrs Wightman's life. The sheriff said the hospital had also been reluctant to provide information and records following her death.

During the inquiry, surgeon Michael Dixon, who carried out the mastectomy, said he could have saved Mrs Wightman's life if he had been told about her worrying blood loss. When he spoke to the family the day after her death, he appeared extremely upset and said the operation had been fine, but the aftercare was at fault. He told them he could see someone bleeding to death outside a hospital, but not inside.

Evidence from Professor Alistair Thompson of Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, an expert witness, was that if Mrs Wightmam had not died she could have looked forward to at least an 82 per cent chance of surviving for ten years after her surgery.

Today, Mr Swainson added: "We've already put into place the majority of the recommendations, in particular the proper education and induction of nursing staff and junior doctors covering the unit, so they understand what to look out for. I think everybody has learned from the incident."

The health board has now introduced audits to ensure accurate records are kept. From next year, the ward will also become a dedicated breast treatment ward.

Elaine Motion, of Balfour & Mason LLP, the solicitor advocate for the Wightman family, acknowledged that the hospital had taken some steps to remedy the failures, but said there was still much to be done.

She said: "The family have sat through a trial for almost a year listening to evidence which was awful, and they did it with such dignity. To hear that her death was "entirely preventable" was expected, but still devastating.

"They desperately hope that the hospital will make the changes required to ensure this never happens again."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 November 2009 11:35 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 07/11/2009 12:02:26
This was an error large scale,and there is no excuse for this poor womans death,the team that carried out the operation should be struck of from medical practice.
2

luby,

07/11/2009 12:41:17
The surgical staff were NOT at fault. Read the article alfonsa you dimwit. Mike Dixon was the surgeon and is a wonderful caring fantastic highly skilled individual. He saved my life ten years ago and there are probably thousands of women reading this article and thanking him in their heads for giving them the chance to be alive and enjoying life.
3

Alice Cooper,

07/11/2009 13:47:25
#2 totaly agree prof dixon has more brains in his finger tips than some posters on here
he was made a prof,and even then he said they gave it to the wrong man,a man who has saved so many women,and if you read it when the story first broke,he had never lost a patient through surgery in all the time he has been one
4

Mrs Alex Pinkfoot,

07/11/2009 13:55:17
#2 & #3

Ignore the prat "Alfonsa" he/she and his alter ego Alex Paterson have symbiotic relationship,one can read and the other can write,albeit only to primary 2 level.
5

Goody2Shoes,

EDINBURGH 07/11/2009 14:33:17
The surgical staff must have been at fault - otherwise she wouldnt have bled to death. One of her blood vessels couldnt have been cauterized properly during the operation / or re-attached as the case may be. Even consultants make mistakes.
6

luby,

07/11/2009 14:36:48
Goody2shoes is an idiot and I bet there are a few thousand supporters of Mike Dixon that would happily volunteer to remove his fingers without anisthetic. Stop him posting nonsense here.
7

Goody2Shoes,

EDINBURGH 07/11/2009 14:45:39
If patient was haemorrhaging - that means bleeding internally and that must have been caused during the operation. Failure to pick up the signs of haemorrhaging by nursing/junior medical staff is another issue.
8

OLDGRUMPY,

edinburgh 07/11/2009 17:58:36
The point of this tragic accident has been missed,The health service has a vastamount of managers who are accepting big salaries,for doing?Last I heard there was one for every patient!In the mean time short staffed front line people are being cut back,Even my nursing students find there is no jobs to be had,this is what is causing these big time errors in the NHS,cut backs are beiing taken from the people we need,and replaced by tiers of paper pushers,when is anyone going to realize it,s a gravy train for those who convince themselfs they are worthwhile.the ,just a political excercise to keep themselves in lucritive jobs,rant yes I work in NHS and we are all getting tired of this.
9

OLDGRUMPY,

edinburgh 07/11/2009 18:00:26
do you give report unsuitable,because you are in with the NHS media team?Yes!
10

OLDGRUMPY,

edinburgh 07/11/2009 18:00:52
Thats fine
11

Kitti Kat,

Newtown Square 07/11/2009 18:42:05
the staff (probably nurses?) taking care of this woman should have noticed that something was terribly wrong. I am not saying that the surgeon is to blame. AFter he's finished operating, in most cases the floor nurses are the ones taking care of the patient and should have seen that she was in trouble and notified the doctor. It's the staff, not the surgeon who is mostly to blame. Hopefully, the family can sue. I am not in favor of suing but when a medical procedure goes wrong because of post op care (or lack of it) someone should pay!!! I worked for surgeons for a long time so to sue is not usually something I approve. No, it won't bring the patient back but perhaps it will teach the post op carers , etc. to be a heck of a lot mre vigilent.
12

The real dracula,

07/11/2009 21:25:58
People there are some other factors in heamorrhaging. If the drains are filling up rapidly then obviously this is an easily spotted outward sign and should have been noted and corrected with fluids or blood transfusion.

However people can bleed internally , not as noticable.

Both types of bleed can be noticed by a drop in blood pressure and raise in pulse , sadly tho sometimes the body compensates for this for a certain amount of time and then suddenly plummets ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,it all depends what happened , none of s can fully comment or point the finger of blame without the full picture.

It is very rare for someone in hospital dies of blood loss like this.

Of course this will not comfort the family or change the awful event but may reassure others who are frightened it could happen to them.
13

quickassembly,

08/11/2009 09:19:52
Alfonsa Pedrosa, you really are a numbskull. Why don't you read the full inquiry report and then comment. Hopefully lessons have been learned and procedures put in place which will prevent such a tragedy happening again.
http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/wightman.html
14

fickrick,

Edinburgh 08/11/2009 11:29:15
I had a mastectomy in ward 6 about 2 months before Mrs Wightmans death. I was extremely well looked after, though I felt at night time the staff were not really well expereinced. It was a bit of a conveyor belt of people having the same op. The day staff were very professional, and I saw my surgeon and breast care nurse on a daily basis as well as the ward nurses throughout my 5 day stay. I would like to point out that the breast unit is incredibly busy and possibly spending the first 24hrs after the op in high dependancy would make a difference, but unfortunately there are too many women having this op there would not be enough specialised nurses for 1 on 1 care.
15

the smoking gun,

08/11/2009 12:39:08
One thing that comes out from this story and from my own experiances at the Western where I underwent
treatment for cancer is,the care from the staff is fantastic, the problem being is, there are too few of them and the amount of work they have to do is far to much. The solution has to be, more spent on frontline service and less on management and corporate affairs.
16

Julian.,

edinburgh 08/11/2009 22:04:16
#15,

I'm sorry but the care being fantastic certainly does not come out of this article. Go and read the bit which starts:-

"Her death has led to damning criticism of the procedures in Ward 6 of the hospital in the sheriff's written determination of the case...."

On saying that I'm sure a lot of the care in this hospital is fine but to say that the one thing which comes out of this article is that the care in this hospital is fantastic is a bit flippant.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.