Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Councillors are 'burying bad news' ahead of by-election

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 October 2008
SENIOR councillors have been accused of "burying bad news" about massive funding cuts in north Edinburgh ahead of next month's by-election.
An announcement on the future of community groups reliant on the much-criticised Fairer Scotland Fund was due to be made this week. But a meeting of the funding panel was suddenly cancelled and postponed until after the November 6 by-election.

Cha
rities and organisations will now have to wait even longer before finding out if they can survive, or how many staff they will need to make redundant.

Critics estimate north Edinburgh will lose £800,000 this year as a result of the Government's Fairer Scotland Fund, which has replaced seven previous grants.

The chairwoman of the Forth ward funding panel, Lib Dem councillor Elaine Morris, said a decision was postponed because SNP by-election candidate George Gordon, a Royston/Wardieburn community councillor, sits on the board. But political opponents said he could have been replaced.

Independent candidate and winner of Big Brother: Celebrity Hijack, John Loughton, accused Councillor Morris of delaying "bad news".

"This cancellation is entirely party-politically motivated and the best interests of the people of Forth have been blatantly ignored," he said.

Former Lord Provost Lesley Hinds said it was an "appalling way to deal with local groups", and Labour group leader Andrew Burns added: "Local organisations should not be suffering like this because of an impending by-election – it's not acceptable."

Community leaders are also known to be furious with the decision, but are afraid to speak.

One long-standing local activist said: "Organisations want to know which workers they will be shedding, or whether their service will continue."

Around 17 projects are thought to be at risk in north Edinburgh, which could include Pilton Equalities Project, the North Edinburgh Childcare Centre and the Granton Information Centre.

All organisations received funding for nine months from April during the transition process, meaning any redundancy notices to staff need to be issued shortly. However, because of the delay, groups in the Forth ward will receive cash until February.

Cllr Morris said it would be wrong to allow a by-election candidate to make funding choices.

"All local organisations have been given an opportunity (to put their case], and it has been an even playing field."

The council's north neighbourhood manager, Peter Strong, added: "I have decided that in order to avoid any accusations of possible conflict of interests it would be best to postpone the funding panel meeting until after the by-election."





The full article contains 428 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 October 2008 10:50 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Matt there,

Somewhere 16/10/2008 12:15:52
Oh. Another none story, then?

With someone 'hyjacking' the election for more slef-promotion and publicity?
2

Crania Nelsen,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 12:19:44
I can imagine that the delay is inconvenient for many of the community groups involved; on the other hand, it gives them more time to make provisions should their funding be cut.

Also - imagine the headlines if the decision had not been delayed: "by-election candidate decides on funding for Forth" or something like that. But then, whatever you do the EEN will criticise.
3

Skip McClendon,

16/10/2008 12:30:34
Jo Moore lives.
4

capy,

emba 16/10/2008 12:58:44
Im shocked at the likes of cllr Burns reaction to the SNP burying bad news. He should be delighted that at long last they are learning from the masters of spin and manipulation, Nu Labour.
5

Chris.J,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 13:13:19
Don't be too quick to swallow Labour spin... For an alternative view read http://snptacticalvoting.blogspot.com/2008/10/labours-trouble-and-strife.html

OK its SNP spin, but nevertheless enlightening and for sure, Hinds is up to something....
6

Ghengis McCann,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 13:36:38
#7 - Don't be fooled by Labour spin, here's some enlightening Gnat spin instead.

You are really quite funny, in a peculiar sort of way.
7

Chris.J,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 14:13:41
#7 Yeah yeah yeah, I could see that poke in the ribs coming as soon as i posted that last one... ;-)

Read it and maybe you'll see what I mean... Hell, in between the two of them we might even have a clue on what's going on...

Like I say, its curious that the quotes above are attributable to Hinds: Some background info (granted, with a slant on it) on her parliamentary ambitions for the area certainly explains why she's sticking her oar in with this particular piece of spin....
8

Ghengis McCann,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 15:54:50
#9 - Right, I've read it. It is exactly the kind of waspish tittle-tattle in which rival Party activists habitually indulge themselves regarding their political rivals - in this case Gnats having a pop at Labour, and almost certainly not letting all of the facts get in the way of a good malicious story.

To anyone who knows anything about local politics, that a local political Party contains factions who are sometimes at odds with each other is the non-story of the decade.

It is no great secret either that Labour turncoat/Gnat big cheese Cardonkey and the Gnat candidate in Forth George Gordon have previous as well - but that is equally a non-story.

"Local political parties all sweetness and light and united in perfect harmony as by-election approaches" - now, there's a Man Bites Dog story for you. But it's like Santa Claus, that one - doesn't actually exist.
9

Jorel,

Edinburgh 16/10/2008 16:33:29
Whether you admit it or not, Loughton is talking sense.

£800,000 worth of cuts to one of our most empoverished communinties forced by the Fib Dems and Scottish Numpty party- FACT.

Local orgs are being treatef like rubbish surely that area is better than that.

Maye an independent getting elected would do both people down their and the wider edinburgh political scene some good!

ELAINE MORRISS OUT!
GEORGE GORDON OUT!
10

Marian,

16/10/2008 16:48:10
New Labour's record in Edinburgh:-

They left the council reserves at practically zero (£370,000) - leaving the council on the verge of bankruptcy.
£500million Tram line - the worst idea ever, now way over budget , bringing gridlock to existing city transport, and causing businesses to go bankrupt as a result.
They sold off council capital assets to fund their spending merry-go-round that saw councillors taking foreign trips.
They squandered £thousands on the building of a pile of old tyres in Leith and calling it art.
They squandered £millions on a Central Traffic Management Scheme that was so badly thought out it caused gridlock and had to be aborted after a few days in operation.
They squandered £millions on an abortive campaign to persuade housing tenants to agree to the transfer of the whole of the housing stock to a Housing Department Mark II.
They never challenged the Treasury to give Edinburgh the money for housing it would have had if houses had transferred.
They squandered £millions on propping up loss-making DLO's and DSO's.
They squandered £millions on a vanity project to acquire and run a little used climbing centre which is located in an area of the city with poor transport links.
They failed to properly maintain schools and public leisure facilities with the result that many are now having to be demolished and replaced.
They sold off playing fields for housing
They failed to invest in Wave 3 schools or apply for central funding, leaving the current administration to sort out the mess.
Council tax went up 85% in the last ten years of Labour administration.
They spent little money on roads & pavements – new administration is doing it.
They have serious questions to answer about the way they mismanaged public money on the Granton Waterfront.
They did nothing to address the single status pay claim in spite of years of notice that it was coming.
They did nothing to address inequalities in pay between the sexes in spite of almost 40 year
11

Marian,

16/10/2008 16:48:36
continued.......
They did nothing to address inequalities in pay between the sexes in spite of almost 40 years of legislation compelling them to do it.
12

Calum Crubag,

Alba 16/10/2008 18:16:19
Labour would never do something like this. They're a model or moral government... no spin, no lies, no cash for honours, no cash to change laws.
13

fairmikerush,

16/10/2008 19:56:56
Marian (#12) for PM......sense en masse. Guid on yah!!
14

Scotish Exile,

16/10/2008 21:58:39
par for the course with politicians
15

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 10:13:47
It is worth remembering Labour's record when they were last in power. They tried to force through an extremely unpopular council house stock transfer wasting millions in the process. When it was rejected they refused to release any money to improve the housing stock based on Brown's 'golden rules' about borrowing.

These rules have been torn up when it suits Labour now, so why did they try to bully local residents into joining a private housing association?

Hardly the actions of defenders of the working class. Their love for Trident, ID cards and their use of the financial crisis to attack Scotland show them up for what they are, cynical betrayers of their ain folk.

As for the funding 'crisis' I very much doubt it is going to turn out as badly as Labour are pretending. I live in Wardieburn and there is no evidence whatsoever that anything is being done with the money at the moment so revisiting and re-examining it sounds like a smart idea to me.
16

JoeMiddleton,

Edinburgh 30/10/2008 10:15:52
The guy from big brother is a unionist reject who wasn't good enough for Labour or Lib dems so why should anyone vote for him?

He was also involved in the Calman 'let's see what powers we can keep from Scotland' commission. Great!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.