Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

I never backed home rule says McLetchie as report surfaces

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 January 2007
FORMER Scottish Tory leader David McLetchie today denied he had ever advocated devolution, despite the re-emergence of a pamphlet he wrote 30 years ago which appears to back home rule.
The pamphlet, written jointly with former Scottish Secretary Michael Forsyth in 1975, "regrets" the hostility in the Tory party towards the Scottish Assembly which was proposed at the time.

But today Mr McLetchie, MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, sai
d they had simply been arguing the party ought to accept what seemed inevitable and work with it.

The pamphlet was written when Mr McLetchie was a 22-year-old law graduate and "Mike" Forsyth was a third-year student at St Andrews. The then Labour government was drawing up plans for a Scottish Assembly and the pamphlet dealt with how the Conservatives should respond.

It is highlighted in a recently-published book by former Edinburgh Evening News journalist David Torrance on Scottish Secretaries of State.

But Mr McLetchie said he had never been pro-devolution. He said: "It has to be seen in context, which was we mistakenly believed there was going to be an assembly or parliament. A lot of people wanted nothing to do with it, but we were saying you cannot do that because it's going to be an established feature of the constitution whether you like it or not."



The full article contains 232 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

I'm no really here,

Ladysmith 08/01/2007 12:35:19

Would you buy a used car from this man?

2

Voice of reason,

08/01/2007 12:42:47

Yes I would . Those who opposed devolution have been shown to be spot on with this mickey mouse burger and chips parliament of orrz .

3

Thomas the Tank,

Embra 08/01/2007 13:02:53

Is a minor pamphlet written more than 30 years ago really the best piece of 'evidence' against McLetchie that the 'News' can come up with? What about the political affiliations of some members of the present Government and Scottish Executive at the same time, like card-carrying membership of the Communist Party?

4

Messalina,

08/01/2007 13:25:11

He's a Tory. 'Nuff said.

5

Alberto.,

08/01/2007 14:24:46

Regardless of 'who' gets in at the May elections, it seems we are faced with another bunch of very costly amateurs, possibly a few nincompoops to boot, as well!

No doubt, they are all eager to jump on the 'Gravy Train' - it probably being to the forefront of their minds, especially seeing how generous it has recently become, and will probably get much better!

It seems the politicians in Scotland have well and truly got the electorate well and truly tied up very tight!

Perhaps the main thing in politics that needs very determined attention, by the electorate, before ‘it all goes to pot’ is not only the way it is operating - but more importantly, the way it is actually being allowed to operate in such a manner within the current ‘arrangements’ (Rules?), so tis’ said!

The present situation, whereby those elected to run the show – hopefully for the benefit of the whole of the electorate - but seemingly not doing so, but can and are, so it seems, running the show more for their own tiny minded Political Party and personal beliefs (and comforts!) in preference to all else.

It also seems that no matter what errors they make, or taxpayers funds they squander ( or gain illegally!) in their adventures, financially or otherwise - there is virtually no meaningful penalty to pay, from the electorates point of view, in all probability for at least four years when they may get voted out at best! What a disgusting and expensive way to operate a 'business' and even more so that they can and do so in such a manner - almost without question!

There must surely be something more serious due for change than the current Party ‘modus operandi’ of the politics game – because it just ain’t working for the best!

6

bikerider1,

08/01/2007 14:37:02

mc who??


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

What should be done to cut down on food waste at the Scottish Parliament?
They should give it out to homeless charities
Open the MSPs’ restaurant up to the public
They should reduce the number of items on the menu

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.