Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Pupils face losing out on free fruit

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
23 February 2007
FEARS are growing for the future of free fruit for thousands of Edinburgh's primary children after the charity which delivers it plunged into a funding crisis.
Edinburgh Community Food Initiative (ECFI) has been running healthy eating programmes in nurseries, primary schools and communities for ten years.

But now the charity's Snack Attack programme, which provides fruit to primary children, is under th
reat because the council has not confirmed funding beyond April 1.

Bosses at the charity are writing to the 102 primary schools and special needs schools it supports to advise them that the service for P3-P7 pupils may have to fold.

There are also fears that the healthy eating charity will have to lay off more than half of its 20 staff by March 1 - in order to give workers a month's notice.

ECFI is the biggest community food project in the UK and gets funding from the council's children and families department to run its range of specialist programmes.

The Snack Attack programme has been providing free fruit three times a week for P1-P7 pupils in Edinburgh's primary schools for the last seven years.

It cost £315,000 to run last year, delivering up to 23 different kinds of fruit.

Project workers also do workshops on healthy eating and run activities such as planting apple trees in school gardens.

The Scottish Executive has guaranteed free fruit for children in P1 and P2 for the last three years and this service has been put out to tender. However, free fruit for the older children in P3-P7 in Edinburgh's primaries will cease on March 31 if council funding is not confirmed.

Workers at the ECFI said they had been trying to confirm continued funding with the council since last September, but had received no response.

Nuala Roger, Snack Attack development worker, said it flew in the face of common sense that a project shown to do such effective work should find itself in such unnecessary difficulties.

She said: "The Scottish Executive provide fruit for P1 and P2 children and will continue to do so. It is all very well to encourage children to have good habits but if the service isn't continued there is no reason for them to keep up their healthy eating.

"It's the kids in the priority areas who will lose out most. They value the service and are most likely not to get it at home."

Ms Roger, whose tasks include educating children on why they should eat five pieces of fruit and vegetables a day and showing them how to make smoothies, added that she was very worried for her job, and those of others in the charity.

"I'm very worried that our jobs could end. It's the not knowing that's the worst."

Lib Dem education spokeswoman, Councillor Liz O'Malley, said she was concerned for children's health if the project ended and for the jobs of Snack Attack workers.

She said: "We are so committed to giving our children a healthy start that anything to stop that happening would be a real concern to me.

"I'm also concerned that people have been left worrying about their futures because the decision has been deferred for so long."

City education leader Cllr Andrew Burns said no decision had been made as yet.

He said: "We are currently reviewing the Snack Attack initiative and the Fruit in Schools Scottish Executive programme is out to tender."



The full article contains 577 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 23 February 2007 12:07 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Children's Diet
 
1

john 1,

23/02/2007 12:06:00

In this day and age it seems ridiculous that a charity was giving free fruit to schools. The kids who already eat fruit probably enjoyed it and possibly those whose parents have never bought them fruit threw it away. I remember my mother with delight introducing me to my first banana in 1945 and I spat it out. Not now.

2

Paul Voltaire,

www.paulvoltaire.spaces.live.com 23/02/2007 12:59:48

I've never seen a straight one.

3

elayne,

fife 23/02/2007 13:35:04

sometimes free fruit is the only fruit that kids will see,some folk feed there kids on total convenience junk,that is a shame if the free fruit is withdrawn

4

MoragtheToerag,

Embra 23/02/2007 14:23:48

Well, hey, the parents want to send them to school with KitKats and other crap in their lunch as it is.

5

Comerscroft,

23/02/2007 15:45:42

Make the parents pay.

I'd rather see the old folk getting some free food, than the likes of those fat little porkers shown stuffing their oversized gobs with kitkats yesterday.

6

supersh,

Queensferry 23/02/2007 15:58:34

Of course some parent may want to give their kids more fruit, but can't afford much, especially in winter when out-of-season stuff is more expensive.

7

elayne,

fife 23/02/2007 17:12:54

i was told about some fat lazy bitch who gave her kid chocolate for BREAKFAST,dumb or dumber?

8

Comerscroft,

23/02/2007 17:15:14

##6##

strange how the parents who 'can't afford much' can always find money to buy their offspring mobile phones, the latest trainers, TVs etc, etc.

Strange, too, how the kids are fat and unfit.

Could it possibly be that too much time spent stuffing their moon-faces with cakes, pastries, sweets and cola, combined with sitting in front of the latest computer game etc, might be related?

Let the parents pay. Why should charity/taxpayer subsidse moronic parenting?

9

elayne,

fife 23/02/2007 17:40:48

agreed!fruit is cheaper than all those items you mentioned,that and excersise would sort the wee bloaters out,aye these parents are dumb in the extreme,whats wrong with wee johnny getting no chocolate for a while and having to walk to school ,people have it too easy nowadays,im saying that and im not even that "old"


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Would a ban on advertising junk foods make our children healthier?
Yes, it will make them less likely to eat unhealthy foods
No, ultimately it’s down to what their parents feed them
No, kids like the taste of junk food too much

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.