Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 7th July 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Caltongate king heads for victory



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 April 2008
After three years of wrangling over plans for the Old Town, the developer is hoping the fighting is over.
WITH his smart suit, pink shirt, silk tie and friendly demeanour, Manish Chande doesn't look like public enemy number one.

Yet sitting at the conference table in his Old Town office, just the gentle swing of a wrecking ball away from the Capital's most controversial hole in the ground – the former New Street bus depot – he is in enemy territory.

Only a few yards away are the tenement flats from where a determined band of protesters have mounted a vociferous campaign against Mr Chande's firm Mountgrange's £300 million modernisation – he prefers the term "regeneration" – of a huge chunk of World Heritage Site land.

After three years of battle though, he seems to be on the brink of victory. All that's left is to fight past Scottish Government ministers and the possibility of a planning inquiry before the real work can begin – building new housing, offices, shops, a five-star hotel and new civic square.

The cries of protest from campaigning residents and many in the city's heritage lobby must still be ringing in Mr Chande's ears – for anyone hoping to tinker with the fabric of Edinburgh's historic heart – pulling down two listed buildings in the process – was never going to get an easy ride.

If there's anyone who can vouch for that, it's Manish Chande. "Of course we are pleased to have got to the position we have (where the city council has backed the plans), but there's still more to do," he says. "You are never going to please every single person. You just have to try to do what you think is the best thing and get the majority on side.

"Unfortunately, there were some very strong voices in the community which spoke quite loudly and that seemed to overshadow, I believe, what the reality was."

A chartered accountant by profession – Mr Chande gave up the opportunity to study business and commerce at Edinburgh University on his family's advice.

He speaks with a polite middle England accent, despite a background that spans continents and is steeped in turmoil.

His family's roots are in India, yet he was born in Uganda where his mother's family ran a portfolio of large businesses.

As dictator Idi Amin's reign of terror descended, the Chandes were caught in his sights. "They were a key target for the anti-Asian thing Amin did," Mr Chande nods. "They literally had to leave the country overnight. It was the mid-1970s."

They fled to Tanzania where his father's family were based. "My father had a similar problem," he says. "He had flour mills in Tanzania and his was the first business to be nationalised.

"The army came in one day to his office with guns. They literally put a gun to his head and said 'This is our business now'.

"To his credit, my father came back the next day and said to them, 'Look, you don't know how to run this business but I do. I'll run it for you as an employee'."

Mr Chande's personal involvement in what happened may have been limited – he was only six when his parents sent him to school in Norfolk– yet it couldn't fail to leave its mark.

With a background like that, it's perhaps not surprising that he wasn't about to be cowed by any protest campaign.

"Of course we anticipated difficulties, no-one likes change," he says. "We spent a lot of time and effort listening and consulting; we did exhibitions, held public meetings, sent out newsletters and we listened to what they had to say."

The consultation process was so thorough, he adds, it is now embodied in Scotland's planning act. The bottom line is, he shrugs: "You simply can't please all of the people all of the time."

The development has been plagued by accusations that Mountgrange had grown too close to the old Labour regime at the city council. It was an image which fuelled suspicions about the project.

The fact that the go-ahead for demolition work had been agreed before plans were in place for what would replace them did not help.

Nor did former council leader Donald Anderson taking up a key role with Mountgrange's lobbyists – the PR company PPS. The council's own financial interest in selling the land also added to the impression.

Then there was the infamous Mountgrange Christmas party, where the then planning convener, Trevor Davies, gave a one-fingered salute to protesters outside the champagne reception.

"The party was a moral boosting effort. We invited staff, other businesses and members of all political parties and council officers," says the sympathetic host. "The convener was coming in when someone hurled some abuse at his wife, and like any husband, he reacted. Maybe he shouldn't have but he's a human being and that's human nature."

He dismisses recent news that his firm pumped £4000 into a Labour Party champagne soiree in Glasgow, adding that Mountgrange was among a number of companies involved in sponsoring what amounted to a business networking meeting.

"Personally, I think that the council have handled all this well," he concludes. "The planning officers have been superb, they have challenged us and questioned us. It has taken three years," he says, with an air of exasperation. There has never been any impropriety at all."

Instead, Mr Chande wonders what the development's opponents' real motivation may have been. "At times I have felt I was involved in some kind of political game," he adds. "There were members of the community who I felt, at times, had a political agenda.

"But at the end of the day, if you are a responsible developer you have to listen to everyone. You can't ignore it because politically it doesn't suit you to do so."

Caltongate's future is now in the hands of the Scottish Government, sent for consideration not because of its location in the heart of a World Heritage Site, but simply because of the council's financial interest in its outcome. If approval is finally given, work will begin with a view to completing the first phase of work by 2012.

Whatever happens, there's a fair chance we've not heard the last of Manish Chande and his Mountgrange partner, Martin Myers.

"We want to do more in Edinburgh," he admits. "I love the city, I love everything about it."

EXQUISITE OR AN EYESORE?
IT is one of the most dramatic developments in Edinburgh's historic heart since the 12th century – billed by the developers as a vital regeneration of a neglected area, but damned by its opponents as a potential eyesore and smeared by allegations of sleaze.

Spanning an area from Market Street and the Jeffrey Street arches, encompassing the former New Street bus depot site, it will eventually provide a modern quarter in the centre of the World Heritage Site.

The plans include 163 private homes and 42 affordable homes, retail outlets and office space. At its heart is planned a new public square surrounding artists' units, restaurants, possibly a jazz venue and, as its centrepiece, a five-star hotel and conference centre.

www.caltongate.com
Opponents of the proposals - www.eh8.org.uk




The full article contains 1212 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 April 2008 2:17 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Caltongate development
 
1

Mallory,

Edinburgh 29/04/2008 11:35:29
Chande must be getting desperate now to see something for all that money borrowed from various entities - including at least one off-shore fund.

Pity that the hotel trade is likely to remain affected by a weak dollar and credit-crunch and that the demands for office space is likely to contracty further as the economic down=turn continues.

Never mind though Edinburgh doesn't really need to rely any longer on World Heritage Status and in any event the Trams disruptions seem to be putting off shoppers.
2

Buttress,

29/04/2008 12:29:47
See

www.eh8.org.uk

and read the blog.

World Heritage Site?

Who needs it? Clearly not developers like this man, aided and abetted by Ron Hewitt and his Chamber of Commerce, or its rentagob PR person Graham Bell.

The WHS status of Edinburgh is at risk - but developers will love that. Means they can make even more money once it's gone.

So - listed buildings are to be demolished, a conservation area spoilt, and a really, really bad development (Masterminded by Allan Murray) with some of the most ugly architecture to be designed anyhwere, and thst's OK is it Scotsman?





3

Buttress,

29/04/2008 12:34:07
Of course - this is a reaction to this:

Developers warned against destroying capital's heritage



Published Date: 19 April 2008
By BRIAN FERGUSON
EDINBURGH's economic prosperity will be damaged unless steps are taken to protect its historic heritage and world-famous landscape, the city's council leader claimed yesterday.

Jenny Dawe, who issued the stark warning almost a year after taking the reins of power in the capital, said she was determined not to see the city's World Heritage Status "compromised" by new developments.

As debate over the future direction of thecapital intensified yesterday, she admitted to a preference for "more modest and people-friendly" architecture and city centre environments.

Speaking at a major conference in the city to mark World Heritage Day, Ms Dawe said Edinburgh had to be careful in what it created in future years, warning: "grandeur can become merely gross."

She echoed many of the concerns voiced by the new head of Edinburgh's most powerful heritage group, Adam Wilkinson, who said the city was in danger of "killing the goose that lays the golden eggs" if it placed too much emphasis on large new hotels, conference centres and office blocks.

Business leaders yesterday warned Mr Wilkinson that he was "heading for a bloody nose" after an outspoken interview in The Scotsman and a series of attacks on the priorities of developers and investors at yesterday's conference.

However Ms Dawe said it was "quite justified" to regard Edinburgh's historic architecture, World Heritage Site status and parks as economic assets in their own right.


An extract from an article published last week.

Is this the 'bloody nose' then threatened by the evil ones out to destroy the city?

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/Developers-warned-against-destroying-capital39s.3999601.jp

4

zorki,

edinburgh 29/04/2008 14:38:48
I'm really sorry that this very rich developer had such a hard time in Uganda but fail to see the relevance. Just one look at the building plans proposed shows how incredibly ugly the proposals will make sites like Jeffrey st look. Check out: http://www.eh8.org.uk/jeffrey_st_the_future.

This is rash, insensitve, profiteering development at its worst (ok, perhaps Trump is pretty close). The buildings Mountgrange propose are even more unimaginative and ugly than the glass cubes and towers that now sit on the pretentiously named "Quartermile" - or old infirmary site. If this man had the slightest idea of how to match the beauty of the city he is knocking down that would be fine - but he is way out of his league. He should amend his plans and come back with new ones and the Scottish Parliament should have the backbone to tell him just that.

He needs to employ people who can design well or else he simply does not deserve to build here. The Old Town deserves more than this - and so do all of us who call this beautiful city 'home'.


5

Buttress,

29/04/2008 14:52:57
Wonder if this will affect Caltongate:

Land Securities' Stratford plan dealt blow by EU ruling
Ben Cook, Regen.net, 28 April 2008

Developer Land Securities' hopes of signing an agreement with Newham Council to extend a shopping centre in the borough have been dealt a blow by a European Union ruling.

The property company has, over the last four years, been developing plans for a mixed-use extension to its 350,000 square foot Stratford Centre in east London. The extension would have involved the development of land owned by Newham Council.

But an EU ruling on a case in France means Newham Council has been forced to put the contract out to full tender.The ruling - which related to a case involving Roanne town council - has established the principle that public development agreements are bound by EU procurement rules. Previously, such development agreements were not considered to be work contracts falling under EU procurement legislation.

Land Securities says it was close to signing a deal with Newham Council and the London Thames Gateway Development Corporation to work on the project, but now the contract has been put out to tender via the Official Journal of the European Union.

The Stratford Island Regeneration Project will consist of an extension to the shopping centre as well as educational facilities for the University of London.

A spokesman for Land Securities, which owns the shopping centre, said the company was "disappointed" with the ruling.

He added: "The Stratford centre has development potential and we will take a view on what is the best way forward."





6

Callum MacPherson,

Edinburgh 29/04/2008 19:44:05

This whole project stinks of bribes and cronyism and money talking where common sense and intelligence should be heeded.

One thousand years of history in this, one of the oldest areas of Edinburgh, and because the Council are strapped for cash (largely because of the former, labour ruling party), they are going to allow these developers in.

These developers who are, of course, only interested in making their money and leaving. They will not be worried in ten and twenty years time when all those guilty cretins at the Council can no longer look at themselves and we are all asking ourselves how could we let them get away with it.

Their design simply is not nearly good enough.

Councillors hang your head in shame on this one. It is up to the national government now.

7

Buttress,

29/04/2008 21:50:02
I wonder if the deal has not yet been finalised re the sale of Common Good land and the Canongate Venture from the council, if the EU ruling will apply?
8

Tom Sutherland,

29/04/2008 22:06:17
What's happening to this country when people like Chande are able to flash the cash. It's outragous that our politicians refuse to listen to the PEOPLE.

What we need is real democracy. only by mobilising and demonstrating can we defeat those people who are more interested in money than buildings.

We need to build solidarity between the freedom loving people of the Canongate and the masses of oppressed people who are simalarly under the yoke of tyranny.

Only be developing transitional demands and forging links with other anti-labourist forces can we show the hypocracy of wishy washy liberal bourgous tendancies.

All hail the Canongate Republic

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.